broadcasting live direct from our studios here in central moscow this is our teeth i'm sean thomas and these are helping. the presidential election is underway in russia in fact you're looking at live pictures right now from voters in the eastern part of the country who have already started casting their ballots a record number of observers are also at the polling stations with almost two hundred thousand web cameras set up to monitor the voting process online in fact that's why we're getting a look at that right now you can see the process in action. seven

people are killed in the garage southern syria when a suicide bomber targeted government supporters this as at the opposition syrian national council powerless to escalate the fighting reports have emerged from homes over a hundred suspects mercenaries excuse me have been caught fleeing the city after government forces regain control of the rebel stronghold. plus tension over a possible military strike on iran amounts in washington ahead of president obama's that meeting with the pro israel lobby and a visit by israeli prime minister benjamin netanyahu so far the u.s. has warned against a preacher strike on iran. because a report is next here on our team this time max and stacey a look at the differing a treatment by u.s. authorities of internet freedom activists and wall street bankers.

i am x. times are welcome to the kaiser report remember a couple of weeks ago we were talking about the richest towns in america being within an hour's drive of washington d.c. and that most of those towns specialized in essentially spying on americans there's more there's max yes this is the data industrial complex otherwise known as dick and these dicks are in the news this week we have the hackers on one side and the hackers on the other side really strapped for is a joke and so is wiki leaks for taking it seriously so we know we have this big data don't from wiki leaks which was data from strat for five million e-mails hacked by anonymous well the atlantic says the corporate research firm has branded itself as a cia like global intelligence firm but only julian

a song and some over paying clients are fooled a friend who works in intelligence once joked that stratfor is just the economist a week later and several hundred times more expensive as of two thousand and one a stratfor subscription could cost up to forty thousand dollars per year dick's data industrial complex. yes they charge a lot for the rehashing the economist magazine and who is the primary buyer of this rehashed information of course wall street you know and wall street spends billions of dollars a year buying research which is another huge wall street scam straight anyone can pushing all up and say they do research and somebody in washington will buy it if they think that they're getting some edge that's why i think this headline is wrong max staffers a joke and wiki leaks is a joke for taking it seriously yes stratfor is the bimbo of the dick community. but the fact that our publicly subsidized them backed that thinks like goldman

sachs and j.p. morgan take these guys seriously you know obviously the cia you could see in the e-mails treat these guys as a joke that you know these guys and think they're like super high tech spies for googling perhaps or drinking a martini shaken not stirred while googling and that's what they think is like how a spy is a member of the in the case of wall street who buys the research these are the views of the wall street banks get bailed out by the taxpayer exactly so the taxpayer get bailed out of goldman sachs or without without the largest of of warren buffett of the taxpayer and insider crony information both sides have been bankrupt already but because of all the money that's thrown at them they can use those money the money to buy worthless research but the fact of it doesn't mean anything as worthless as a motorist their money that they're spending their spending our money as you see in this next headline massive insider secret dealings scheme with strat four in g.

sachs maybe so the e-mails show that in two thousand and nine then goldman sachs managing director shame moran's and stratford c.e.o. george friedman hatched an idea to utilize the intelligence it was pulling in from its insider network to start up a captive strategic investment fund what struck cap will do is use our stratford's intelligence and analysis to trade in a range of geo political instruments particularly government bonds currencies and the like they said geo political instruments countries are treated like actions like derivatives and they use bogus information from clauses a wannabe to put on algorithm trades and high frequency trades and if it doesn't go right to outcomes one they get the sucker touch her bell and b. they just blow their country they just destroy the country go to go into iraq and goldman sachs loggerhead an agenda. i million good care good song priced into the

stock price and the other reason why i give for why we should take this bimbo company stratfor seriously is look what happened with m.f. global was john corps lines intelligence had it worse not sure that bet on portuguese and greek and european debt was that from this bimbo company. well yes this is they go to these retreats whereas the head of these banks they take off all their clothes they go into a sweat logs they smoke cigars and they blow smoke up each other strange thing and they pretend to be masters of the universe and exchange inside information or chalabi start of the iraq war based on inside information that you can do a leveraged buyout of iraq you probably got them from stroud for it some don't turn around goldman sachs proprietary desk and it was the result a million innocent people because of these frickin sadist and insider traders on wall street so the fact that goldman sachs is using stratfor we know stratfor source of information is google so we know therefore that j.p. morgan if j.p.

morgan were a real competitor to goldman sachs could just create an algorithm to trade against the publicly available information on google to trade against goldman sachs exactly and this is where algorithmic trading and i frequency trading is the big this deutsche borse wants to curtail algorithmic trading high frequency trading what they call capacity restraints trading where you've got these computers that are programmed not to make a market as lloyd blankfein argues but to break a market so they program the computer to attack the market like a stick attacking opinion or they just attack it with hundreds of millions of trades per second to try to shake the candy out free money that they did not work for whatsoever is beyond even rent seeking it's just exclusion computerize extortion max another hacker is in the news we had anonymous hacking strat for here we have. james murdoch quits as executive chairman of news international

so just like strapped for the bimbo's that were hacked by anonymous here and james murdoch has been hacking e-mails and order to get the stories of bimbos around the world and now finally all of this information is coming out that in fact the trail leads right up to james murdoch he did in fact know about the hacking the eight thousand people on jerry moe care is no plug and he was apparently handing over transcripts every single day of all these phones he was hacking and we were gerry mulcair worked for a company called southern investigators kind of like a strat four and it was that x. policeman who is allegedly also an axe murderer and james murdoch is sitting there because he knows that he has data to sell he's basically pushing advertising but incredible sort of julius own ran a hedge fund and he used all this data to trade with inside information about a river trading he'd be a billionaire today and people would accuse him of claiming that inside information

but he would buy his way out of any legal problems and he would claim like lloyd blankfein of goldman sachs that he's making the market he's any liquidity and they would say well you just do so if you're a genius we won a stupid or fling operational train because you're growing up but then of course because issues information the public like the press he's vilified because he's telling the truth and sharing information with the public he's an enemy for those who truly is an enemy lots around well there's big full on. sunday audience hoping you can score with some transvestite somewhere it's a dark alley that could be if you look like this right here if you're anonymous if you choose to remain anonymous. most likely you're the most valuable of the

advertised to audience advertisers want that eighteen to thirty four year old male market that's the price primo thing that's why word doc is a failed enterprise ok he failed at my space where people willingly give you information and data about themselves and yet he failed at that company so he can't compete in the market where people the participants willingly give them the data so he has a strong arm or leg break and send axe murderers to go hack the phones of little murdered children. make money even move it's given to him he's a v the my space suit was initially made for hundreds of millions then of course as we know from the facebook i.p.o. people giving you information is worth one hundred billion dollars or more and my space was before facebook people were giving him information he thought was a way to promote his stupid movie to fox he didn't know what exactly what business he was even now justin timberlake a pop singer what my space out of bankruptcy for like five bucks in

a gallery it's already out you know it's already bigger than than than the wall street journal in terms of a business but the point is max. your data as facebook is proving as google is proving its worth something your information is works worth something and here's rupert murdoch his weasley little son james murdoch and their acts murdering hackers that were stealing your information and they didn't want to pay you a fair market price for your information dr evil he is something about getting a fair market price he would people were giving him the information you could lose with it sort of going bankrupt like he has now put he's like who i want to. well let's look at how the comparison here's rupert murdoch he's clearly breaking the law but there's no oh we can't find any information the f.b.i. hasn't arrested him there's could. your evidence that murdoch right now today james murdoch right now today should be in the custody of the f.b.i.

who is in charge of arresting people for foreign corrupt practices act the man has obviously brought foreign officials police officers and politicians in the u.k. but he's not arrested was interested because he's connected fuz an oligarch listen to how somebody who is not one of these all the guards is treated suspect and celebrity hacker case sorry for all of this christopher chaney thirty five a nobody from jacksonville florida is accused of hacking into the accounts of more than fifty celebrities including movie stars scarlett johansson a meal a community and singer christina aguilera a grand jury indicted chaney and nine counts of computer hacking for again eight counts of aggravated identity theft and nine counts of illegal wire tapping if convicted of all twenty six counts cheney would face a maximum of one hundred twenty one years in federal prison here's rupert

murdoch who has been hacking celebrity accounts for over a decade quite clearly and what does he face nothing but absolutely nothing he's rewarded he's lionized he's considered a pillar of society exactly so and it's all because as long as he's part of the data industrial complex he's a dick he's one of these data industrial complex scum and he's allowed to get away with it because as long as you're selling this data to the advertisers and you you know are part of the game now finally speaking of advertising max i have this for feeding our here from the invader famous prison is a closer look at her oh yeah oh it's really. and i have a headline again from another. anonymous stranger know of this but i'm i'm i'm like an it thanks see an advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours people

are taking that out of you every day they bought into your life take a cheap shot at you and then disappear they leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small they make flippant comments from bosses that imply you're not sexy enough and that all of the fun is happening somewhere else they are on t.v. making your girlfriend feel inadequate they have access them with sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it they are the advertisers and they are laughing at you banksy he understood this he said of the curve yet or says they value being anonymous and telling the truth but that's why i think that anonymous is under attack because they are anonymous they are remove themselves from the advertising grid they are not advertised to though they are the prime audience for advertisers the young male on look at it and i say server thanks so much for being on the kaiser report thank you i don't know what

say right there what's more coming your way. well the. technology innovation called the list of elements from around russia we've got the future coverage. time now to go to new york city and speak with andy barack obama former executive callicles of the u.s. chamber of commerce. only as for the yes man of course you can find his work at the yes man and his latest film the yes man fix the world is available on d.v.d.

and in pickle bomb welcome to the kaiser report thanks alright any book about for those who don't know for the international audience who are the yes man and what do they do in a word what the yes men try to do is make hoaxes make funny stories to give journalists an excuse to cover important issues that aren't getting covered enough . so we come up with whatever scheme we can that we think is funny but we think other people think it's funny and we do it with the audience being journalists who will then take the information and make a story of it getting more coverage for the issue and in two thousand and four when we posed as dow chemical thanks to b.b.c. error we gave a lot of journalists an excuse to talk about the twentieth anniversary of the bhopal concerts or feed the biggest industrial disaster in history that has never been cleaned up dow chemical never took responsibility for the spill even though it

bought the company responsible for the spill and the victims in india meanwhile have gotten practically nothing in compensation for a lot of thousands of people died and they've gotten practically nothing and the site has never been cleaned up right so the bhopal disaster a famous incident you were on the b.b.c. they mistakenly went to the website and this brought enormous attention to this catastrophe in a way that cut through the media chatter it's everyone widely seen sees this as a really remarkable example of i guess what some would call culture jamming as well as unique form journalism but now the yes men have come up recently because according to the latest wiki leaks dump the yes men were monitored by strap for a key. company that you could say is a impersonating a global intelligence company they seem to be like a shadow cia so tell us about the fines why you were mentioned in strat for

stratfor seems to be a really creepy. there's a lot of really shadowy stuff that came out in the wiki leaks don't you know e-mails with the c o n structure and operatives to control their subjects sexually psychologically and financially in order to extract information i don't know if that's what your lists usually do they claim to be a journalist and a media company but they they have these incredibly shadowy practices there's also what seems to be a really flagrant nasty example of insider insider trading where strive for creates a thing called strata kept in collaboration with goldman sachs to capitalize on information that they obtain presumably through psychological sexual and financial control of their subjects. but with us it wasn't nearly so glamorous they were just monitoring public reports that we were putting go through that journalists were

writing or that you know some some students were writing at colleges where we would appear and speak twitter feeds they they just monitored very carefully everything we were doing for years but yeah it didn't surprise us we don't have much of a security culture we don't really care who reads our stuff we would prefer people not to read our private email although that seems to be a given that they're doing that as well but certainly reading public reports about us and trying to figure out exactly what we're up to is just the height of flattery really and we're very. well andy bichlbaum on the same day as these wiki leaks revelations we learn from the leveson inquiry in the u.k. that rupert murdoch's news corporation having gauged in a systemic wide scale. bribery of corrupt police officers corrupt government officials in the u.k. so here you have rupert murdoch doing all the bad things that everyone is up in

arms about in terms of what is being revealed through wiki leaks but somehow through word rupert murdoch's organization there's not that level of outrage your thoughts on the role of the media in maintaining this this dual standard system where murdoch is good given so far a slap on the wrist for doing things for doing is spying illegal spying corruption where is wiki leaks which is doing actually a public good service is seen as somehow in bed with the terrorists well it's certain certain very big forces are attacking wiki leaks it would seem. the u.s. government for example there are you know people who really don't want we keep leaks doing what they're doing they're a major threat to something and that's why you see blockading in the payments they can't you can't pay you can't donate money to wiki leaks through pay pal mastercard

anything like that all of those companies have mysteriously decided that we must absolutely not receive any money they were getting hundreds of thousands of dollars a day in donations that went down to zero immediately because of this very effective blockade so somebody is very afraid of them and that might have something to do with you know why there's. not more outrage i don't want to get conspiratorial i don't think that's really the case but there is some something going on there but speaking of systemic fears and systemic. issues you know why is we keep like such a threat it might not be just their immediate targets with us in the e-mail trove but they uncovered it seemed that. the dow. people or at least the stratfor people who were doing work for dow were really obsessed with one question and it wasn't so much were we going to mount

a protest against dow for the bhopal issue they didn't seem to be too worried about that at least there isn't that much discussion about exactly what are they going to do oh no is something coming up it was more are they going to broaden the issue to an overall systemic critique of corporate power they didn't use those words but you know a broader issue question expanding from both paul two other both balls to a bigger question of corporate power of course for a problem they use that word there is lengthy email discussion about that and you have to wonder why why are they so interested not in their clients' thought online per se but in the question of what kind of critique is this going to. turn into and it's not just us that they asked the question about they asked the question about amnesty for example on the twenty fifth anniversary why didn't they expanded into

this big critique of corporate problems why didn't any of the big n.g.o.s they ask these questions again and again and i'm not sure exactly why or what that indicates but it would seem to indicate major that that's a threat to them but the idea that the way that the rules can be changed that could seriously impact the bottom line of a lot of their clients including joe would be if there were a real popular upswelling of anger against the corporate system such as we have it that could lead to rewriting of rules and financial impacts probably this very tightly issue based focus on on both paul and specifically doesn't have that kind of possibility to affect anyone's bottom line you know doubt. could technically. as we've said many times they could technically just pay some money and be done with the bhopal issue once and for all it's not it wouldn't be that big of an impact on

their bottom line but what it would do if they did that would be set a massive precedent that would mean that other companies couldn't do things like this and speaking about that and the big picture issues and how we really have to rewrite the rules of the game and not just go after individual companies anymore. talking about rewriting the rules of the game i think is is frightening for a lot of people who would rather the rules stay just as they are memory the way occupy wall street has been so effective and so frightening to so many people and refusing refusing to adopt a simple list of demands and you know precise targets has been probably the wisest thing that any movement could do to st know there's a serious problem here we have to rewrite the rules that allow corporations to get away with murder quite little literally and a lot of lesser crimes as well oh it's a racket so you've got others down jones or rupert murdoch they're part of the

syndicate they're part of the mafia they're part of a racket that is connected at the hip to goldman sachs and wall street because goldman sachs applies the money the financing to the racket so that's a systemic risk that anybody who is looking at any individual component of the racket is being dirty they look at the the racket of goldman murdoch citi group you know the real mafia the real terrorists they see there anyone who's challenging that is a snitch and of course if you snitch on the mafia you know that's the worst thing that can happen because then you don't rattle the entire unholy racketeering and war profiteering and basically you know what they've been able to do is operate as a as a force and to overthrow it destabilize entire countries like greece for example who is now having to suffer austerity to pay for of the the crimes the racketeering the mercenaries the financial mercenaries so just you know it's not so much you can

imagine this conspiracy angle i would as relates to murdoch i think really read them but the bigger question is why wouldn't a wise murdoch rewarded for his criminal activity he's allowed to open the sun on sunday you know his crest is a failure he just shows women's breasts that's the sum total of his journalistic ethics but he's reward. for this where is wiki leaks and julian assange was is doing the genuine work of journalism the genuine work of the floor of the state they're being penalized now if you live in the united states you live in new york is it palpable this this this feeling of a democracy being shattered by corporate interests of course don't democracy hijacked by corporate interests or are shattered definitely the way you put it the mafia it's exactly right there are very powerful people who want the system to stay the same and will do anything they can to make it stay the same it works very well

for them as figures over the last ten twenty years have shown this incredible boon for the one percent and higher than the one percent and stagnating earth dropping levels for the rest of us. and you know that is a very real conspiracy i mean there are these real conspiracies such as you've pointed out and that's why i it's a bit frustrating when when people try to go finding far fetched conspiracies and spend a lot of time inventing scenarios that can't be proved because there's this real conspiracy that is plain as day can absolutely absolutely be proved no one's denying it there's tons of evidence it's everywhere and that's what we've really got to be fighting we've got to change the rules of the game that allow this conspiracy to exist and there is a lot of. anger and

a lot of outrage at this and i think we're just going to see it increasing over the spring anybody obama time thanks so much for being on the kaiser report thank you all right that's going to do it for this edition of the kaiser report with me max kaiser and stacy herbert and i thank my guests and it become bomb of the yes man if you are seventy now please do so at kaiser report at r t t v dot ru until next time x. guys are saying. from .

it.