margaret why not campbell. find out what's really happening to the global economy is cause a report on our. week's news in the very latest developments russians go to the polls to choose their next president to govern the country for six years he's the latest pictures as people have just started coasting their ballots and. for most of the most transparent to date with observers and read comes from entering the polling station. and other news this weekend you stateside not to tough budget rules to stop overspending for britain and the czech republic on the idea too much to take writers took place in several european countries against cuts imposed a simple single cuts. one hundred suspected nurseries including many french

fleeing water on homes schools or foreign interference in syria escalates the senior rebel leader also claims this woman should return and supply the french american weapons and anti aircraft missile. because reports is next. i imagine eyes are welcome to the kaiser report i remember a couple weeks ago we were talking about the richest towns in america being within an hour's drive of washington d.c. and then most of those towns specialized and essentially spying on americans there was more space max yes this is the data industrial complex otherwise known as dick and these dicks are in the news this week we have the hackers on one side and the hackers on the other side really strapped for is

a joke and so is wiki leaks for taking it seriously so we know we have this big data dump from wiki leaks which was data from strat for five million e-mails hacked by anonymous well the atlantic says the corporate research firm has branded itself as a cia like global intelligence firm but only julian a song and some over paying clients are fooled a friend who works in intelligence once joked that stratfor is just the economist a week later and several hundred times more expensive as of two thousand and one a strat for subscription could cost up to forty thousand dollars per year dick's industrial complex. yes thank charge a lot for the rehashing the economist magazine and who is the primary buyer of this rehashed information of course wall street you know wall street spends billions of dollars a year buying research which is another huge wall street's stress anyone can

pushing all up and say they do research and somebody in washington will buy it if they think that they're getting some. that's why i think this headline is wrong max stratfor is a joke and wiki leaks is a joke for taking it seriously yes strive for is the bimbo of the dick community. but the fact that our publicly subsidized them backed banks like goldman sachs and j.p. morgan take these guys seriously you know obviously the cia you can see in the e-mails treat these guys as a joke that you know these guys who think they're like super high tech spies for googling perhaps are drinking a martini shaken not stirred while googling and that's what they think is like our spy is what remember of the in the case of wall street who buys the research these are the these are the wall street banks to get bailed out by the taxpayer exactly so the taxpayer get bailed out of goldman sachs or without without the largest of

warren buffett of the taxpayer an insider corney information dollar sized have been bankrupt already but because of all the money that's thrown at them they can use those money the money to buy worthless research the fact that it doesn't mean anything as worthless as a motorist not their money the first finding their spending our money as you see in this next headline massive insider secret dealings scheme with strat four in g. sachs maybe so the e-mails show that in two thousand and nine then goldman sachs managing director shame moran's and stratford c.e.o. george friedman hatched an idea to utilize the intelligence it was pulling in from its insider network to start up a captive strategic investment fun what struck cap will do is use our stratford's intelligence and analysis to trade in a range of geo political instruments particularly government bonds currencies and the like they said geo political instruments countries are treated like options like derivatives and they use this bogus information from croissant i see

a wanna be to put on algorithmic trades and high frequency trades and if it doesn't go right to outcomes one they get the sucker taxpayer bill be they just blown the country they just destroy the country so just go into iraq and goldman sachs will have a head and agenda. sockeye million again you think they care because it's all priced into the stock price and the other reason why i give for why we should take this bimbo company stratfor seriously is look what happened with m.f. global was drawn corps lines intelligence had it worse not sure that to bet on portuguese and greek and european debt was that from this big go company. oh yes this is they go to these retreats whereas the head of these banks they take off all their clothes they go into a sweat laws they smoke cigars and they blow smoke up each other strange thing and they pretend to be masters of the universe and change inside information the martial law the start of the iraq war based on inside information but you can do

a leveraged buyout of iraq you probably got that from strive for and some don't turn around goldman sachs proprietary desk and it was the result a million dead innocent people because of these frickin sadist and insider traders on wall street so the fact that goldman sachs is using stratfor we know stratford's source of information is google so we know therefore that j.p. morgan if j.p. morgan were real competitor to goldman sachs could just create an algorithm to trade against the publicly available information on google to trade against goldman sachs exactly and this is where algorithmic trading and i frequency trading is that big bourse wants to curtail algorithmic trading high frequency trading what they call capacity restraint trading where you've got these computers that are programmed not to make a market because lloyd blankfein argues but to break the market so the program the computer to attack the market like a stick attacking opinion they just attack it with hundreds of millions of trades

per second to try to shake the candy out free money that they did not work for whatsoever is beyond even rent seeking it's just it's computerized extortion max another hacker is in the news we had anonymous hacking strap for here we have. james murdoch quits as executive chairman of news international so just like stratfor of the bimbos that were hacked by anonymous here james murdoch has been hacking e-mails and in order to get the stories of bimbos around the world and now finally all of this information has come doubt that in fact the trail leads right up to james murdoch he did in fact know about the hacking the eight thousand people on jerry mulcair is no plug and he was apparently handing over transcripts every single day of all these phones he was hacking they were gerrie nel care worked for a company called southern investigators kind of like a strat four and it was that x.

policeman who is allegedly also an axe murderer and james murdoch is sitting there because he knows that he has data to sell he's basically pushing advertising what's incredible is that of julius own ran a hedge fund and he used all this data to trade with insider information and algorithmic trading he'd be a billionaire today and people would accuse him of training on inside information but he would buy his way out of any legal problems and he would claim like lloyd blankfein of goldman sachs that he's making a market he's any liquidity and they would say oh you just do so if you're a troll and g.v. is we won a stupid. thing because your record god but of course because he shows the information to the public like share of the press he's vilified because he's telling the truth and sharing information with the public he's of enemy for the first murdoch who truly is an enemy walks around what is false the breasts of

flashing them to a sun sunday audience hoping you can score with some transvestite somewhere in some dark alley that is if you look like this right here if you're anonymous if you choose to remain anonymous. most likely you're the most valuable of the advertised to audience advertisers want that eighteen to thirty four year old male market best the price primo thing that's why we're doc is a failed enterprise ok he failed at my space where people willingly give you information and data about themselves and yet he failed at that company so he can't compete in the market where people the participants willingly give them the data so he has a strong arm or leg break and send the axe murderers to go hack the phones of little murdered children he can't make money even if it's given to him these are the the

my space or causes should be made for hundreds of millions then of course as we know from the facebook i.p.o. people giving information is worth one hundred billion dollars or more my space was before facebook people were giving him information impose a way to promote his stupid movies at fox he didn't know what exactly what business he was even in the justin timberlake you know a pop singer what my space suit for like five bucks in the garden it's already out you know it's already bigger than than than the wall street journal in terms of a business but the point is max ok your data as facebook is true thing as google is proving its worth something your information is works worth something and here's rupert murdoch his weasley little son james murdoch and their acts murdering hackers that were stealing your information they didn't want to pay you a fair market price for your information bullets or he's not even telling a fair market price he what people were giving him the information he could lose

with it sort of going bankrupt like it is now but he's like who i want to prove. well let's look at how the comparison here is rupert murdoch he's clearly breaking the law but there's no we can't find any information the f.b.i. hasn't arrested him there's clear. your evidence that right now today james murdoch right now today should be in the custody of the f.b.i. who is in charge of arresting people for foreign corrupt practices act the man has obviously brought foreign officials police officers and politicians in the u.k. but he's not arrested was interested because he's connected he's an oligarch listen to how somebody who is not one of these oligarchs is treated suspect and celebrity hacker case sorry for all of this christopher chaney thirty five a nobody from jacksonville florida is accused of hacking into the accounts of more than fifty celebrities including movie stars scarlett johansson a meal

a coonass and singer christina aguilera a grand jury indicted chaney and nine counts of computer hacking for again eight counts of aggravated identity theft and nine counts of illegal wire tapping if convicted of all twenty six counts cheney would face a maximum of one hundred twenty one years in federal prison here's rupert murdoch who has been hacking celebrity accounts for over a decade quite clearly and what does he face nothing absolutely nothing is rewarded his line is considered a pillar of society exactly so and it's all because as long as he's part of the data industrial complex he's a dick he's one of these data industrial complex scum and he's allowed to get away with it because as long as you're selling this data to the advertisers and you you know are part of the game now finally speaking of advertising max i have this

graffiti art here from the invader famous prison because c.d.r. it is a closer look at her oh you know it's really much. and i have a headline again from another. anonymous. i don't know what it is but i'm like a bank see an advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours people are taking that out of you every day they butt into your life take a cheap shot at you and then disappear they leer at you from tall buildings that make you feel small they make flippant comments from passes that imply you're not sexy enough and that all of the fun is happening somewhere else they are on t.v. making your girlfriend feel inadequate they have access to them with sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it they are the advertisers and they are laughing at you banksy he understood this is ahead of the curve yonder stance they value being anonymous and telling the truth but

that's why i think anonymous is under attack because they are anonymous they are remove themselves from the advertising grid they are not advertised to though they are the prime audience for advertisers the young male i love it i stated over thanks so much for being on the guys report thank you all right i say right there what's more coming your way. we all make choices sometimes it's tough. but it can be an easy. choice can be left to fate. or it can be. limiting. germs and. it's always personal. except. when

choice matters to everyone. time now to go to new york city and speak with andy barack obama's former executive doubt jellicoe is on the u.s. chamber of commerce. only as part of the yes man of course you can find his work at the yes man and his latest film the yes man fix the world is available on d.v.d. and the pickle bomb welcome to the kaiser report i think all right any good or bad for those who don't know for the international audience who are the yes man and what do they do in a word what the yes men try to do is make hoaxes make funny stories to give

journalists an excuse to cover important issues that aren't getting covered enough . so we come up with whatever scheme we can that we think is funny that we think other people think is funny and we do it with the audience being journalists who will then take the information and make a story out of it getting more coverage for the issue and in two thousand and four when we posed as dow chemical thanks to b.b.c. error we gave a lot of journalists an excuse to talk about the twentieth anniversary of the bhopal concise defeat the biggest industrial disaster in history that has never been cleaned up chemical never took responsibility for the spill even though it brought the company responsible for the spill and the victims in india meanwhile have gotten practically nothing in compensation for a lot of thousands of people and they've gotten practically nothing and the site has never been cleaned up right so that both paul disaster

a famous incidents you're on the b.b.c. they mistakenly went to the web site and this brought enormous attention to this catastrophe in a way that cut through the media chatter it's everyone widely seen sees this as a really remarkable example of i guess what some would call culture jamming as well as unique form journalism but now the yes men have come up recently because according to the latest wiki leaks dump the yes men were monitored by strat for a key. company that's you could say it's an impersonating a global intelligence company they seem to be like a shadow cia so tell us about the fines why you were mentioned in strat for stratfor seems to be a really creepy. there's a lot of really shadowy stuff that came out in the wiki leaks dump you know e-mails with the c o n structure and operatives to control their subjects sexually

psychologically and financially in order to extract information i don't know if that's what journalists usually do they claim to be a journalist and a media company but they they have these incredibly shy that we practices there's also what seems to be a really flagrant nasty example of insider insider trading where staff or creates the thing called stratfor kept in collaboration with goldman sachs to capitalize on information that they obtained presumably through psychological sexual and financial control of their subjects. but with us it wasn't nearly so glamorous they were just monitoring public reports that we were putting go to the journalists were writing or the you know some some students were writing it at colleges where we would appear and speak twitter feeds they they just monitored very carefully everything we were doing for years but yet it didn't surprise us we don't have much

of a security culture we don't really care who reads our stuff we would prefer people not to read our private email although that seems to be a given that they're doing that as well but certainly reading public reports about us and trying to figure out exactly what we're up to is just the height of flattery really and we're we're very. well and even obama on the same day as these wiki leaks revelations we learned from the leveson inquiry in the u.k. that rupert murdoch's news corporation adding gauged in systemic widescale. bribery of corrupt police officers corrupt government officials in the u.k. so here you have rupert murdoch doing all the bad things that everyone is up in arms about in terms of what is being revealed through wiki leaks but somehow through word rupert murdoch's organization there's not that level of outrage your thoughts on the role of the media in maintaining this this dual standard system

where murdoch is given so far a slap on the wrist for doing things for doing is spying illegal spying corruption where is wiki leaks which is doing actually a public good service is seen as somehow in bed with the terrorists well it's certain certain very big forces are attacking wiki leaks it would seem. the u.s. government for example there are you know people who really don't want we keep leaks doing what they're doing they're a major threat to something and that's why you see blockading any payments they can't you can't pay you can't donate money so we can leak through pay pal master card anything like that. all of those companies have mysteriously decided that we must absolutely not receive any money they were getting hundreds of thousands of dollars a day and donations that went down to zero immediately because of this very effective blockade so somebody is very afraid of them and that might have something to do

with you know why there's. not more outrage i don't want to get conspiratorial i don't think that's really the case but there is some something going on there but speaking of systemic fears and systemic. issues you know why is we keep like such a threat it might not be just their immediate targets but with us in the e-mail trove that they uncovered it seemed that. the dow. people or at least the stratfor people who were doing work for dell were really obsessed with one question and it wasn't so much were we going to mount a protest against for the bhopal issue they didn't seem to be too worried about that at least there isn't that much discussion about exactly what are they going to do oh no is something coming up it was more are they going to broaden the issue to

an overall systemic critique of corporate power they didn't use those words but you know a broader issue question expanding from both paul to other bowl polls to a bigger question of corporate power a corporate problem they use that word there is lengthy email discussion about that and you have to wonder why why are they so interested not in their clients' bottom line per se but in the question of what kind of critique is this going to. turn into and it's not just us that they asked the question about they asked the question about amnesty for example on the twenty fifth anniversary why didn't they expanded into this big critique of corporate problems why didn't any of the big n.g.o.s they asked these questions again and again and i'm not sure exactly why or what that indicates but it would seem to indicate maybe that that's a threat to them but the idea that the way that the rules can be changed and that

could seriously impact the bottom line of a lot of their clients including dell would be if there were a real popular up swelling of anger against the corporate system such as we have it that could lead to rewriting of rules and financial impact probably this very tightly issue based focus on on bhopal and specifically doesn't have that kind of possibility to affect anyone's bottom line you know doubt. could technically. as we've said many times they could technically just pay some money and be done with the bhopal issue once and for all. it's not it wouldn't be that big of an impact on their bottom line but what it would do if they did that would be set a massive precedent that would mean that other companies couldn't do things like this and speaking about that and the big picture issues and how we really have to rewrite the rules of the game and not just go after individual companies anymore.

talking about rewriting the rules of the game i think is is frightening for a lot of people who would rather the rules stay just as they are that may be why occupy wall street it's been so effective and so frightening to so many people and refuse that refusing to adopt to a simple list of demands and you know precise targets has been probably the wisest thing that any movement could do to sink no there's a serious problem here we have to rewrite the rules that allow corporations to get away with murder quite little literally and a lot of lesser crimes as well oh it's a racket so you've got whether it's down jones or rupert murdoch they're part of a syndicate they're part of a mafia and a part of a racket that is connected at the hip to goldman sachs and wall street because goldman sachs applies the money the financing to the racket so that's a systemic risk that anybody who is looking at any individual component of the racket is being dirty they look at the the racket of goldman murdoch citi group you

know the real mafia the real terrorists they see the anyone who's challenging that is a snitch and of course if you snitch on the mafia you know that's the worst thing that could happen because then you on ravel the entire unholy racketeering and war profiteering and basically you know what they've been able to do is to operate as a as a force and to overthrow and destabilize entire countries like greece for example who's now having to suffer austerity to pay for the the crimes the racketeering the mercenaries the financial mercenaries so it's just you know it's not so much you can imagine this conspiracy angle as relates to murdoch i think really read the bigger question is why wouldn't why is murdoch rewarded for his criminal activity he's allowed to open the sun on sunday and you know his press is a failure he just shows women's breasts that's the sum total of his journalistic

ethics but he's reward. for that's where is wiki leaks and julian assange was he was doing the genuine work of journalism the genuine work of the fourth estate they're being penalized now if you live in the united states you live in new york is it palpable this this this feeling of a democracy being shattered by corporate interests of course don't democracy hijacked by corporate interests or are shattered definitely the way you put it the mafia it's exactly right there are very powerful people who want the system to stay the same and will do anything they can to make it stay the same it works very well for them as figures over the last ten twenty years have shown this incredible boon for the one percent and higher than the one percent and stagnating or dropping levels for the rest of us. and you know that is

a very real conspiracy i mean there are these real conspiracy is such as you've pointed out and that's why i it's a bit frustrating when people try to go finding far fetched conspiracies and spend a lot of time inventing scenarios that can't be proved because there's this real conspiracy that is plain as day can absolutely absolutely be proved no one's denying it there's tons of evidence it's everywhere and that's what we've really got to be fighting we've got to change the the rules of the game that allow this conspiracy to exist and there is a lot of. anger and a lot of outrage at this and i think we're just going to see it increasing over the spring anybody bharata time thanks so much for being on the kaiser report thank you bax all right that's going to do it for this mission of the kaiser report with me max kaiser and stacy herbert and i thank my guests and of the commom of the yes men

if you want to send an email please do so at kaiser report at r t t v dot argue until next time x. guys are saying. home . from. a.

long.