president but on the whole in general this is wrong so i think that the chairman of the party should definitely be a member of the party. we're having quite a political sensations right now. and you are going to be a party member and a prime minister. you fall depression dition so they're like i said i have to receive the offer and accept it and the party has to support me. but it. was not. possible are always difficult. what happens if we should wrap up this political system discussion but one of the issues discussed but also about the political reforms he would. use presidential topics and you said that your. statement of. the presidential election do you in the press. or. don't you think it's contradictory to the idea of the direct elections

with y. mechanisms with words on how to explain it to you. mechanise which just. as effective fixing the most concrete of the political structures are never the maps or democracy is not an old specific number but i am strongly believe that a democracy and has to be very specific with a nation specific but it should be based on this certainty of the political culture not on what the our political culture is not higher than in the ninety's when it used to be minorities but it's still. the worst and then in some other countries now about filters. there are no filters in this sort of mia beatles in the in the sense of mere ears there are just some qualifications but actually just one still can do the. candid should we look subordinate by new

simple deputies this is not something we invented. in france at the day have a presidential election right now and we're just using this french model of the president to. do that with the presidential election candidate has to prove that there is a group of people with a little support here that he supported by the deputies municipal leader he is not just an accidental figure a couple is going to live in the us they will be in a number we all remember what kind of elections we had in russia in the ninety's we just put out some credible is so if you can get my attention or send them to support i think it is good it's a good idea frankly speaking i don't see any problem for serious of the parties to achieve this threshold in different ways and no for their common to put it into the group about new presidential guilt is a coup yes there is no presidential filter in this new will all this says that the

president can but by then he is normal in the southeast and required to have consultation this is whether the future president of the us. this right and you have consultation is quite possible that there will be no consultations if you. outcome of these consultations that the president may have deserted. still does not consult the. lining of our thoughts in these are just consultations with. mr medvedev but this is first. since you did mention that progress is not discussed in all the things the good example is when you want to because it's ok to talk about politics i just thought our viewers may be more interested in other things that we can speak about something else. you signed a deal to create a public television recently this is and that's interesting for the public and which implies that the scene than you probably exists in channels not really cope

with the task of keeping our citizens informed and they are funding like that. the state gives a channel seems to be a way she said so maybe our taxpayers should not have their monies are wasted on the creating of this. television and. channels on that you work for a private channel joins us so you feel free to talk like there she was off to the. point of the well they'll take spears and there but you're paying them money for that ok let's talk about public television's not everybody to do said my position which is not an irony i'm like look i see something and this is my position for the rest of my life and my position on the public television. also at some point i thought. basically we just have one.

channel this is that i see a. channel one is with. the russian government is a major strategic look at the way the materials are in the people which it was so there is just one company. that receives. it is the financing from the budget you directly. so initially i was against public television but later i started to consider that the government is a known or just like a private owner for example the owner of your channel the owner of your channel but and your channel but you also have with some of the truth and known or so the government is the biggest owner and an owner has always use but it will it will only support it i think you will agree with you that want to believe in the old order always imposes is so will you live in russia an american france and sometimes he doesn't fly once in a tough manner and this may be

a wrong with the media sometimes he does it so quietly this is the way it happens around the world and this is usually done with also public television does not belong to any one specific political arena and this is the only resource that doesn't belong to anybody because it is independent from the government deal with i sources that this was. and we want to give the jumpstart to this one channel and then we'll have. the litter shipped off and this problem television channel will not have to go to the government to discriminate and beg for money as they grow finances because they'll just live on their own money. there but i think this gives you the whole different level of independence and that even more than at a private channels. this is director is appointed by the president. but i'm not in the know because i assume you're the president if you wish if you run the world is

a consolidating clear whether you're a lucky man not because he is the guarantor of constitutional rights in france. the public television channel is appointed by the president in the us by the prime minister and nobody minds. because. missionaries are then you the head of state is just a figure that has recently added in. with the solution of said i will not be respected by the entire society but the money comes from a different source and this is impossible in the. private interest of the channel so this is why we need public television now let's talk about speed on the channels get already should stop i think. that because the not so far would now after we introduce the digital broadcasting which will happen very soon nothing who don't move in with the country. has to make

a decision about its short disinhibition in the media i think the government owns too many media channels and we need to reorganize and stayed on the broadcaster some of those channels need to view the full sold off. and but it was all of them all should be. paraded into structures i mention something like that when you're talking to regional channels and they didn't like it because every governor wants to have channel. i really want to see someone else here thanks. to you clear it up there are different forms of proprietary and over the cornish and there is they get there because the level of resistance participation and once there is something called federal. and some involvement of the state or is it obvious they are actually about the policy is and

i mean my next i would like to see them through our attention to the fact that we have here we could. arrange t.v. and this is a small channel compared to the state. but it's quite logical that we have a meal here because rain is a popular and people go there and you also look at where guests are. going to bring to the studio. why did it why does it happen that ask anyone. because they don't have censorship mission in anybody's mind is waves really it's just up to the journalists act which is to invite and what to talk about if you see me so i'd like to ask a question that i'm personally interested in. as federal channels journalists have . limitations on a daily basis in my work and there's not really a long way to fulfill my professional duties and she was goma's these limitations

because it's related to a political sense so to say. a scientist can be just in fact interested in. these limitations. and for me some limit. on my duty as a journalist from the citizens of what's going on i'd like to ask your opinion on this election with my views someone different from yours because i'm not a journalist or community with the thought of course i will comment on what you mention here bill not on the list i didn't go to any arraignment it's a more than. channel i don't deliver. the owners the bosses at work here rain don't they have their own political positions they have but at the point it's just a matter of the way they present it with me any media outlet always has never political position and we want you can actually see through to subsume your theory

easily that i missed it when you were a nobody you see you troll you know that and to be really is no exception but you use make it up with go next door to where the why do you newsmakers as you call them. often go to t.v. or radio and. go to your channels that it's not because of censorship on your business alone even though political influence the system is wrong or. national channels federal channels just because you don't invite people that they invite people to see you but you don't invite people if you know five people there will come because the coverage of the federal channel service is still bigger then . i'll go to really has a very good premium audience young people they watch t.v. arraign. cable t.v. and. on satellite and on the internet on the but still federal channels

are. more influential at the moment so i think it is much easier for you. to invite politicians. who values money and i think they should move. and lastly. of course you know. the matter of political expediency it's a very interesting point and side of the matter censorship by the constitution at the end if we have a censorship machine the government should hear. now as regards expediency . this is really the matter the muscle in for this is up to. the boss of this. whether they want to be a part of mainstream and this is a matter of chemistry not their relationship between the bosses and put them in

giornale as. consumers are more you are these things should be harmonized in the way to achieve this harmony because the she was me and something you should talk to media bosses about. for the following. topic. i believe they heard speaking about censorship. about political expediency the wording. you noted recently. there is a difference in the political. and on t.v. channels it's like two different reactions to different realities for instance those who do not use the internet do not really anything about those debates going on around. the right group and the reactions. that receives and the scandals and so on. long list

can go on for a long time so do yourself do you look for the information on the internet or are going to watch t.v. when you want to know something. and frankly speaking i go on the mall. it's not because i don't like television but it's just much more convenient to use the internet we just go on the website and get all the news. your question is right. because gender is different and i am alarmed. by that. yes but the different media outlets really have different. but is it really wrong. is it that. you mention several subjects. some of them are interesting. because some of them are interesting only to a small number of pneumonia and i have also known as

a goal of the worst. headlines and the things people. in social media. do not the big things have nothing to do with what the nineteen percent of the population want to. hear people discuss this very accurately on the internet so we have just one reality and we should go on the t.v. bosses and tell them that you know this is what people talk about on twitter you should get on the news immediately i don't think that would be right but you're right that. wall between these two things. i don't think that media this is actually what is happening now let me tell you the internet is just one thing and television is talking about something different even if a small number of people is interested in the vent but it is a significant one by television should cover that as well so we can have

different realities but it gender should not be different why i would put it this way. larry and i mentioned it because if i had the group and since we all use the web to follow the process. what do you think about this case we're all interested to know as. a person who attends church do you think isis and. the girls themselves this show in detroit. when you called it a reaction to your campaign what's your. actually use the relationship between the secular and really. power. and. the orthodoxy on the east. this is a very delicate subject it's maybe some of we should be very careful when we talk about that we have a very complicated country we have

a multi-faith country and we have crimes happening in our country as there always are. religious strife sometimes people get killed aboard alleges research in our country and everybody to the same music if you think about that confuse everybody regardless of their religion with the police this is terrible but this is what is happening you will so this child. that we have. a new style. within the recent but there are a few years we should definitely preserve it otherwise consequences can be horrible for our country. we all know that there is no other country in the world. where there were not. based on what the. principles this is the situation we have in russia we are in the only country like that in the

world so this is a matter of civil peace. religious dollar records he's critical for us yeah. and i did all i could mutilate this to preserve this lease for peace and i'm confident that it was the one you future authorities will also do that he said this is an existential and existential matter now that i should support talking specifically about this subject you brought up of the head of state will not comment on the legal aspects of this case because investigation and the community is under way and i never can provide a comment. until we have a verdict yes we go out into a guilty verdict or in the. now as regards my position is a church member like you called me. a very delicately not to offend anybody that i

think can chase and keep the. will is the element of the participants of this event with regard to what they expected to get exactly. in prison this popularity. you gave some examples talking about these things you were talking about perhaps. you have got the bully facts that it goes in the office when a person who doesn't really of any danger to society. part of this culture is a serious mistake or do you think that these girls are really a threat to society and should to put them into prison for a few months. yes i was not the one who made this court decision i don't know if i started commenting on it the dismissal i did the court rulings this was i mean that i fear it was more than war to contribute is the president and this will be here in the signal to the judge that they should release this person or on the

contrary behind bars as president is the head of state i don't comment on specific situation until. he is handed down and the on the but i'm not going to really blame you for that what normally when i commented on the verdict when i went to. the department of journalists there was a look moment a woman who was convicted but this was after there was a guilty verdict and i said that i believe that the verdict was too harsh and well when you make up you know just going on that's a digital the prosecution service responded this is why the president should be very careful with what he says but still. like i said prison cannot the stooping you corrected which i personally have been at the bottom make a different person when you deal with out of the limited. certainly if you allow me i'd like to talk about something else speaking about social networks. they

contributed much to the so-called arab spring that took place in the rhetoric worlds of sort of what do you think is there an exhibit. and to come to and what's going on with the russian. the political season or here are we going to have in our country the arab spring to hold fall in russia we have spring i congratulate you all we have a spring in every sense of the word the weather forecast says it's going to be cold in today it's. going to be temporary. but speaking east and arab spring we often say that foreign policy and matter what are the business interests and. have they changed are we more looking towards china because of what to trust again or. result of that. you want to be friends with everybody we

want to trade with everybody this is perfectly normal and natural. as regards the situation in the arab world of. course the situation there is not stable. and you can a number of countries are already coming into the government usually it will be much more difficult for us to work with them it's a fact the national media knew and i was frank about that when i talk to our u.s. partners with our your. new book but when you go to some of the goal of every transformational is not a matter about you it is should never be to transfer power to extremists and this is what we've seen. still let's hope that the people on the one you know those countries will make the right choices we have our interests there over the course and we want to be friends with those. if you want to trade with them. the next go for it i do not go like i do you good so we want you to fruit in oranges but and i

want to true with what our country is famous even work but i don't. know if there is no reorientation is what it is. the horse in some cases we just continue some deliveries told with speaking about foreign interests. so we have some of the resounding. signs that. started with the us i mean. but there has been the some progress in the economically and politically relationship. but on the other hand it's not really right. all the charges on the america or for that . so you can see is that when the most of us need it in so we have achieved a lot you know our relations with america recently and our relations have never

been perfect you also during your soviet period during the soviet period of time he did things to show i've said this many times and i can repeat this again in the past few years the past two years were the best time in the history of american relations it was just the best time. second this doesn't mean that we can have with nothing to discuss like this doesn't mean that yes but that we have reached an agreement on everything that you know that we have not just an issue of missile defense on which we disagree. but if you stay put it it then you then go try to persuade them that they should not upset and look him in the balance of forces and they say yes but they continue doing what they're thinking and by the way europe is not always supporting america and we did this is a matter is not close and yet it has to be resold assure you i think we can take five or seven years to achieve a final solution was going to result the smattering nothing happens we'll have to

deploy missiles there's nothing else what you call this is life as regards washington. that soon they'll have an election election. and put it on the same place you could not have certainly sympathies for one of the candidates but it's just a personal matter i support team and i would like to continue working in washington . so moscow reaches out its hand to washington. and you say that's what you need your hands for to reach out to places. you know our country of course we should america we shouldn't say that and there we can swim abilities to the party who was that i knew. many pleadings that online a major political process is no country can three and nobody can have. any real influence in our country but they are actually trying to do something but we are also doing something to influence political process is in their country. basically

it's just a matter of. the moral assessment of these things and the tact. if you do it tactfully we're not indifferent as to what happens in america of course we don't have this many capabilities as much capabilities as the americans have but you always have to be intact. and i have never said we were. able. testing i sent there by washington. this is not so serious you can send one person. vive twenty five hundred but. nothing more than that so what i mean with the list both those who protest against the government support the government. what about the people who protest you know your notes for instance. there was like.

you were talking about this nato. well this is definitely just much the transit. was more than this. this is just something. there peacekeeping force. but i would just help. fulfill their mission in afghanistan we all want to get a student to be a peaceful country we don't want it to pull certain thread we don't want terrorists near this is our joint position to get we have oregon minutes with nato quite often regards against and we have always supported nato into it is there a peacekeeping operation in unison and we will always support it there will be no need to get the military personnel. technical ability to think about that. this has become

a political issues just there but i'm afraid you were political just people are taking advantage of this situation some people hate america and certain politicians are taking advantage of their will if you are the most certainly political forces are using this that i see in america there are people who don't like russia as well and certain politicians. sometimes make anti russian statements. mr mean that it just recently russia's relationships with practically all closely seemed to be. helping to restore them there was a war in georgia and there was a conflict of russia. with the baltic states has changed in the relationship with the neighboring. do you mean it was our relations with ukraine belarus is one of the baltic states. that's.

going to ask how it has changed the president's term ok you're right there are different now. you have to consider each case first allusion in the situation with your green started when we had a very difficult relationship with the president you should know but now the situation is that the french are few when though we have certain conflicts and arguments with our ukrainian partnership we are still partners we're still friends with then i really hope that the ukrainian establishment and president. when they make certain decisions i hope that they will be forest overcome certain. that are still very strong in their mind i said and i hope that they will be more pragmatic . interiors and those considering. with georgia the situation is much more sad we had an armenian conflict there.