moseley braun do you want a video for your media project screen radio gondar t.v. dot com. good afternoon and welcome to capital account i'm more in leicester here in washington d.c. these your headlines for wednesday may thirtieth two thousand and twelve right now at the world bank here in washington there is reportedly a global housing finance conference going on this theme is the importance of it now it's focused on emerging markets but how about a lesson ed how housing finance can go terribly awry as we've seen in the united states when i have this story you probably have not heard behind robo signing and mortgage backed securities from a u.s. government whistleblower that you haven't seen on t.v. and that was a blower was fired from the us congressional budget office which is purported to be

nonpartisan and objective remember now she believes it may have been because she gave an honest assessment of the issues facing the u.s. economy that was it odds with with this cvo and perhaps it's a panel of economic advisors including morgan stanley and goldman sachs wanted to put out to the public so who is this c b o and congress really serving she's here to tell us why we should all be asking that question and remember that twenty five billion dollar mortgage settlement that was still proposed to help struggling homeowners or victims of foreclosure abuse well homeowners are suing in one state so the money doesn't go to filling state coffers instead of going to homeowners we'll talk about it let's get to today's capital account.

today we have a story you probably haven't heard that's behind the mortgage mess and foreclosure fraud in the united states let me give you some background before we get to our guest in the past century real estate law in transactions in the u.s. have been subject to state regulations with mortgage documents recorded at the county level now this works relatively well in a traditional mortgage market like we had for most of american history the bank that issues the mortgage keeps a loan on its books until maturity however this makes difficult if not impossible the type of financial engineering of mortgages we've seen in past years i'm referring to of course the slicing and dicing the repackaging and selling of homes in mortgage backed securities and collateralized debt obligations for example that

we saw during the refinancing credit boom of the two thousands now one glaring reason for this is that every time a financial product containing mortgages is sold various state laws would require that the sale of the mortgage be recorded in the local county office so this results in additional costs of course paperwork and perhaps most importantly chain of title trails now eager to work around these barriers of course the financial industry with all of its innovation created an alternative system for recording the issuance the sale and the redistribution of mortgages now that system is known as mers you probably never heard of it at least i hadn't it's the mortgage electronic registration systems and it was founded in the mid ninety's with the help of the big banks you see here these are shareholders along with fannie mae and freddie mac. now mers was created as straight from their website by the mortgage banking industry

to streamline the mortgage process by using electronic commerce to eliminate paper now according to mers this would also help. reduce fraud and less fraud means lower costs for all borrowers now it may actually have accomplished the exact opposite of the stated objective so let's back up because what this did was effectively replaced the recording and the tracking of mortgage ownership and the paperwork at the county level with a privately controlled system for tens of millions of mortgages once more as winces to tooted this is what happened a lenders were still required to file initial paperwork at the county but with two key distinctions from how things were done in the past first the paperwork did not need to be filed with the name of the lender instead of bank of america our j.p. morgan or whatever it said mers that was substituted in place of the mortgage issuers now second and perhaps more importantly annie's subsequent modification in

terms or in change and ownership of that mortgage so what used to be paper at the county everything was filed through the county. instead would only be recorded now through mers through this database making it effectively a black box for the securitisation industry and for the truly ns of dollars in mortgages that would subsequently be rolled up cut up sold in complex financial products to pension funds and other investors trillions of dollars in credit protection let me remind you was written on these very mortgages to adding another layer of exposure to a financial system run amok so fast forward mid ninety's mirza's founded by two thousand and seven it registered some two thirds of all the home loans in the u.s. that's according to harper's and it was around this time that the financial system

began to experience the credit convulsions that of course went on to become known as the. financial crisis now this led not only to a bailout of firms holding these toxic products but it also led to a one hundred eighty billion plus dollar bailout of the largest insurer of insurance protecting against the very products that were being pumped out like sausages on an assembly line and of course the federal takeover of fannie mae and freddie mac. which is still being footed by the taxpayer in the us now these are issues that dr lanty pham former principal analyst and financial economist at the congressional budget office was beginning to explore in her work there that was back in two thousand and ten but as soon as she started writing about things that this c b other like she was fired that's according to her now she's here to tell us her story and what these issues are that are still so important to housing to the

mortgage market to taxpayers homeowners and pretty much anybody that's watching this show so first of all welcome to the show dr pham we're very happy to have you on. so first let's back up for those of our viewers in our audience who are not familiar with your story let's first start out with who you are and how you came to work for the congressional budget office in the first place. well prior to coming to the congressional budget office i and was an actual professor at a university for a brief time teaching a graduate student in a graduate program the use of economics to examine policy but i was still very interested in working on real world issues as a father a dozen years ago i had worked in a firm where i was exposed to different aspects of housing finance issues from the regulatory side from the policy side. of banking all these issues which

evolved to be at the center of the financial crisis in two thousand and eight as a follow in my teaching. at the congressional budget office at the congressional budget office i would be what they would call it senior staff or over principle analysts off a national economist in the seals the national analysis to the ok and as a congressional senior staffer and financial economist there your initial responsibilities as i understand them were to write a brief to congress on this day the foreclosure crisis and the alternative policy options in that crisis as well as cover banking and housing now when you presented this opinion to your supervisors specifically the c.b.o.t. chief economist and assistant director dr deborah look at what was her response. well i i at the time that i was writing the foreclosure grid to congress and also internal memos on the banking and mortgage sectors that would help to provide input

into the macro economic forecast for the country at that time the robles lining up for closure of fraud issues emerged and i wrote about that and dr lucas the chief economist at told me that it was an issue of media sensationalism and discouraged me from writing about it. in response to what i wrote in the the memo she said that foreclosure fraud or robo signing was an issue that we should take the lead on that we should not be adding of that we should be adding skepticism to the issue rather than add to the media hype and that was the response from my writing up our proposal fraud and also a reason that was cited in my termination where the civil felt that i had poor judgment in writing up issues related to rebel signing and what it meant for chain

of title issues in mortgage securitization now if you said this wasn't just a dispute with your boss you didn't just disagree on the core issues here you were fired why do you believe you were fired. that was fired because it was not only an issue of the robles landing but i also covered and wrote about the banking sector and the mortgage markets and all of these issues are inextricably linked and at the heart of the financial crisis in two thousand and eight and there were other concerns raised about the banking sector were there were issues about to potential acquisitive problems and the solvency issues that came out of the financial crisis in two thousand and eight where she dismissed those concerns and reversed and actually she went through and then changed my my memory to reflect the views of the

c.p.o. that the banking sector was by the ruble signing of was just the look that would go away and that we should not be concerned about it and now that blip that they believe will go away has resulted now a few years later at a twenty five billion dollar mortgage settlement about those very practices related to robo signing do you see that settlement as a testament to the fact that what you were raising was the right issue to be raising. well it's not just that i was raising these issues that the supreme court's and being confronted with. currently actually just recently the washington state supreme court the oregon state supreme court heard arguments on the validity murders to foreclose and also it was an issue that required an act of congress when the issue emerged where congress quickly passed the nature of the bill that would have made it difficult for homeowners to

challenge the well for closures that were improperly done with poor documents defective documents that were presented to the courts and so. the the settlement i'm not quite sure what it settled i think. what they did not say well. the issue rather than what was presented to the public with the settlement and i want to get more into that settlement as far as forward looking but first i want to back up because essentially you're saying that you were fired because this cabo didn't like your pessimistic point of view i also should mention that and your personal story that you've written you said you were told to include research include analysis from morgan stanley from goldman sachs so big wall street banks that were advising the c b o and at the heart of your criticism was something you just

mentioned something that i won over in my introduction called mers which stands for the mortgage electronic registry system now we gave a brief overview of this at the beginning of the show but could you just expand upon why it is so important in your view to this subsequent crisis we saw in the mortgage market and the larger financial crisis and i'm talking about mergers. well emerge is another word for that is its title database that purports to have legal standing on over sixty five million i think it's over seventy million mortgages and as the roble signing issues emerged in the fall of two thousand and ten there were also increasing legal challenges in the use of mirrors in the banks and then in their freddie mac's use of merge to foreclose because until then or over the time that they found it mars all of these mortgages are recorded with mers his name

is so they relied on the system in order to initiate foreclosures and at least half a dozen states have invalidated the use of the legal standing to foreclose. and so we're looking at a little system that is very. that is not that relatively unknown that holds the title to a decision to buy sudden the million mortgages and the ramifications of the lack of legal standing for mers has a serious consequences for investors for. fannie mae and freddie mac. which announced back stopped by taxpayers the exposures that the banks exposed to in the mortgage backed securities that they issued and especially for investors as well because if there is a break in the chain of title because mers now has lacked legal standing in several states. that what they may end up with in the six and

a half or seven trillion dollars in mortgage backed securities that are out there is suggest that perhaps these mortgage backed securities may be on securitized or unsecured and dr pham a lot of implications here is basically opened the door to this a characterization to these trillions of dollars of mortgage backed securities that break that had. rick and the economy into the financial system so when we get back we're going to talk more about that we'll have more with dr lanty pham former principal analyst and financial economist at the c.b. i will be back in just one minute stay right there also still ahead we'll have more with our whistleblower dr pham about how the mainstream media responded to her firing and her story about her job at the c b o but first her closing market numbers.

what drives the world the fear mongering used by politicians who makes decisions to break through it's already been made can you trust no one who is you who with the global machinery see where are we heading state controlled capitalism is called sessions when nobody dares to ask we do our t.v. question more. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else and you sure see some other part of it and realize that everything you. don't i'm sorry is a big issue. here is what you consider a. bump in the aloneness so you'll get a real headline with none of the most of the problem with the mainstream media

today is that they're completely disconnected from the viewers and what actually matters to those viewers and so that's why young people just don't watch t.v. anymore if they want news they go online and read it but we're trying to take those stories that people actually care about and transfer them back to t.v. . welcome back today we have a very special guest we're talking to dr lanty pham she's a former principal analyst and financial economist at the congressional budget office supposed to be objective supposed to be nonpartisan dr pham she was fired when they didn't like her analysis because it wasn't as rosy as they would have liked it to be they didn't want to talk about problems in the mortgage market the

housing market problems with robo signing with the banking sector and of course robo signing we don't how that turned out there was just a settlement the problems in the mortgage market continue to plague us and she has actually said she was fired she's telling us about the issues she was finding the did play out which still very much play a role today one of them is something you maybe have never heard of mers it is this database that basically made all of this information that used to be filed with the county about mortgages private and this opened the door to mortgage backed securities is huge trillion dollar market in them so let's bring dr fan back in to talk about how mers played a role in all of this so that everybody does know the work she was doing so dr pham we were talking about mergers and how this brings up issues in the title of these mortgages and the chain of title and it appears almost after reading what you've written that robo signing wasn't just advantageous for banks but it was necessary

in order to foreclose because they're required documents were nonexistent or missing do i have that right and can you explain. in the fall of two thousand and ten as. i knew from problems emerged. and it isn't it was not just an unsolicited incident there were legal challenges to. but. as far as the missing documents with that result as a birth and did that lead banks to forge them to foreclose on people well yes because legal moves can no longer be used to initiate foreclosures in these banks and in these. in the banks names and so they had to emerge to foreclosure under their own name and if they had the proper documents they would have presented that to the court and we would not have an issue but i believe that because of the

break in the chain of title and the missing documents especially the mortgage how can this not promissory notes that were not available that the banks in the services had to resort to creating or fabricating are using defective or forged documents to foreclose and it was actually and how did mers create potentially over seven trillion dollars and then backed so-called mortgage backed securities. the securitization of mortgages relying on the investors ability to liquidate the collateral or access the collateral which is the homes that back these mortgage backed securities and the mortgages were registered inside mergers which has whose legal standing has been eroded by the courts and so if they're not able to access the collateral then what is it

that backs these mortgage backed securities and it's not just an issue of mercy as well because it's the issues in the way that miers was set up that raises the possibility is that what what isn't that backs these m.b.'s is that some court cases have shown that these banks i cannot even show which m.b.a.'s pulls the mortgages that they were trying to foreclose on so not only does it raise questions about whether these investors are holding secured assets as we've seen in the case recently where a large pension fund is suing the trustee of the bank of new york mellon overseeing thirty billion dollars in this mortgage backed securities that has suffered about nine billion dollars in losses and delinquencies and one of the charges in that case is that the promissory notes and the mortgage documents were not delivered to

the trust and that was made possible by this black box where mortgages are slice and dice really hypothecated you said with even the case possibly now all of this you have been investigating but when you were at the c b o you were fired and after that you wrote a letter to us senator grassley about your story because he's known as an advocate of whistleblowers what happened with the letter and the reporting inquiry that followed because we contacted his office he said that it's at a standstill yet we have this letter that he sent to the c.b. you know asking for some information on your personnel records e-mails c.b.l. tells us they have no comment so what's the status of all this. well the the story was not made public until a few months ago. through an article that was put out by the wall street journal in the third who were that there has been an ongoing inquiry for the past year now with the way that the wall street journal wrote the article they found it with what came out it seemed they had great difficulty in talking about mergers or

mortgage fraud for closure for mortgage securitization none of that came out in the article despite the fact that they had extensive access to the congressional inquiry the day after the wall street journal article came out it happened that the new york attorney general announced a lawsuit against mergers now that would have a validated all of the issues that i had written to senator grassley a year before. but the congressional inquiry declined to release the letter saying that it was a year all despite this announcement by the new york attorney general followed within a few days the department of justice and forty nine attorneys generals announcement of a national a settlement on the foreclosure issue now i think you let me ask you this dr van

because you mentioned that wall street journal article i want to i want to show our audience some of the things that have been written about your story so we had the huffington post saying your story was the most important story of the day that was from janet have a callie after she read it in zero hedge on a blog which is the only place that your story appeared in its entirety you mentioned the wall street journal did a story and a.b.c. did a story but you had some concerns about the way those stories were done how was the mainstream media's coverage of your story why do you think they didn't address some of the issues that you're talking about with mers with what you're calling foreclosure fraud and some of these other issues. my sense is that i think there is a fear of the systemic run of the cations of murders and there are over seven million mortgages that are in the process of some process of the delinquency or foreclosure and there are. cases of the poor the state supreme court that will

decide whether or not murderers will have the legal standing to foreclose these issues have not been resolved because there is even just a month ago there was an abacus be filed with the florida state supreme court expressing concerns about that than ality of closure sales because a buyer of a foreclosed property may not be the legal owner of that property as was decided in the case with the massachusetts supreme court and so these issues still exist they're still problematic but that the media has had great difficulty in speaking about murders even call your foreclosure fraud there's such a difficulty in calling presenting to the courts the forged documents deceptive documents i find that curious and also if you see news. had great difficulty or or actually as you said at the xcel in distortion

as much of what we had talked about was unrecognizable by the time that a.b.c. news put out their story and depending on the day that you read the story the version changes and i shudder damp down around that let me get in here because we're up against the close to the end of the show and i really want to get to this point you're posing here and your story that you wrote who is this the b.o.'s serving who is congress serving who gets analysis from this what do you think is the answer to that and why do you think that's an important question to be asking. well i have a sense of what the answer is but it is those are questions that i put to the public and it is for the public to. hear my story and to ask questions about the congressional budget office because the congressional budget office is a very powerful agency that determines it can determine the course of the nation's policy with the way that it does its analysis and its scoring of the bills and this

is its stance on robel signing suggesting that. in diminishing the issue of robo signing as and to not add to the media hunk so this is a question that i put to the public for them to ask the congress and see below. who it is that they so yeah i dr pham we appreciate you being on the show and talking to us we're out of time but i do want to tell our viewers i asked you earlier why now it's been two years since you worked for the cvo you said because these issues are still so important and there's so much that needs to be looked at so i really appreciate you being on this show to do just that dr pham former principal analyst and financial economist at the c b o. thank you and. now that's our show for today thank you so much for watching make sure to come back tomorrow.

and in the meantime you can follow me on twitter at lauren lester and give us feedback on the show or catch any that you missed it you tube dot com slash capital account also check out hulu thanks so much for watching and have a great night. for sure is that so much different and there's a huge music history on the mark with a series many wars in the aftermath of an alleged massacre of civilians he was military is warning we continue to try cities in syria could make. there hasn't been anything yet on t.v. . it is to get the maximum political impact. the fool source material is what helps keep journalism honest we.

we want to present. something else. that's.