difference and take a look at the prospects of greater supervision for the big banks that m.f. global and j.p. morgan teach us a lesson and who make sure it won't be just more of the fox guarding the hen house then the occupy wall street movement may be one that's leaderless but one of the more involved prominent participants is running for congress we'll speak to him on our show about his campaign and about where the occupy movement is now we'll have all of that and more for you tonight including a dose of happy hour but first let's take a look at what the mainstream media decided to miss. all right everyone's of the historic recall election in wisconsin has come and gone and there's about everywhere you looked you found someone talking about the role money played in this election the first big one really in this post citizens united era. governor walker will keep his governorship after the most expensive

campaign in wisconsin says three about two thirds of governor scott walker's donations are from out of state in special interests it's seven to one it's unbelievable if i want to go anywhere voters are casting ballots in the most expensive race in that state history third doing it with insurmountable amounts of money this is what the money and that's looking like in this recall election in wisconsin this is to scale walker is outspent his opponent seven to one the republican governors association chipped in about nine million dollars we believe in scott walker more than sixty million dollars has been spent on this recall effort nearly forty six million on the republican side almost twenty million on the democratic side pro walker outside organizations have spent a total of sixteen million dollars including six million dollars from the koch brothers super pac americans for prosperity is coming from the right it's not from the u.n. it isn't on the left that's the overall amount of money that went to scott walker

the red part is the proportion that is the money that he raised from out of state people power versus the money only by citizens united. all right now i actually just got back from wisconsin late last night i was there like many other national media covering the recall election and so many people i spoke to said their biggest fear of scott walker survived the recall effort had to do with the environment frankly i was shocked i hadn't heard of any connection between scott walker in the environment but over and over people said governor walker was throwing out the state to the highest bidder and they have a major concerns. and things like allowing more phosphorus in our lakes which will damage the lakes and i think all the out of state money mainly to cope brothers was just unconscionable my biggest fear is that he will destroy the environment of this state he will sell off our public lands to the koch brothers to private interest. all right so i looked

a little more into this and i found there are actually multiple direct connections to the koch brothers and wisconsin other than all that money they gave to help governor walker keep his job koch industries actually has an energy firm with about three thousand workers in wisconsin last year scott walker's budget contained within it a little known provision that would allow the sale of state owned power plants without bid. why on earth would governor walker who talks nonstop about wanting to save money want to not sell power plants to the highest better and then there's the mining bill that was the cause for a big statewide fight go give a tech tectonic is a mining company that wanted to do business in wisconsin but only if the major changes took place changes that would make it easier to do their job so the mining bill was introduced to essentially loosen regulations in a major way i won't bore you with the details but basically it's far fewer rules on mining itself having to do with the environment and transparency even the permit in

process itself one example within the bill the once required public hearing you know when they discuss all the environmental impacts gone contract leases the record keeping which before had to be made public and transparent would no longer have to be now insiders say that the bill was basically ghost written by alec the koch brothers funded american legislative exchange council it failed in march that bill but many believe that with the walker win it will now give it a green light to welcome back to the state some of those koch funded entities particularly some of those environmental ones you know it's really interesting ray bradbury died this week. in the martian chronicles granbury imagines a future in a series of short stories in which humans depart earth and travel to mars and those great american conquerors colonize the red planet bringing with it and he problems they sought to leave behind bradbury wrote in the one nine hundred fifty s. of a world where the government used to fire departments to burn books to make sure the citizens remained ignorant bradbury himself said the novel fahrenheit four fifty

one was not about censorship but on how television could control and limit knowledge composed of factoids partial information and devoid of context his words not mine it's appropriate i think to connect a future now a present bradbury imagined and which large corporations and the government even have the power and the will to promote ignorance and the fear of those who do keep their eyes open including some of those people in wisconsin still mourning the loss of that recall election and what they worry will eventually be months of their pristine land wisconsin in more ways than one could symbolize a few different versions of the future in this country but we might not be aware of it until it's already happened because those potential paybacks and favored owed to those who helped fund one of the most expensive statewide elections ever well those are all things the mainstream media chose to miss.

all right it's time for our weekly financial checkup and there's a lot to discuss today the presidential campaign is in full swing and therefore the economy center stage dominates headlines in newspapers and pundit discussions on the big networks and therefore is on people's minds constantly that's not even touching upon all those people who are unemployed or underemployed and have no choice but to think about the economy the financial crisis in europe of course remains of major factor and contributes to quite a bit of an uncertainty about the recession depression and well full implosion of the global economy all this plus the fed chairman ben bernanke you spend most of his days testifying on capitol hill in front of the congress joint economic committee and what he says is being watched very closely by whole bunch of had heavy hitters but what does it all mean well let's get started on our financial checkup.

all right and here it is gus this is lauren what sort of hope host of the capital account on our t. lauren let's talk about this testifying on capitol hill today by ben bernanke a lot of people watching this pretty closely a lot of people watching this closely christine because what investors are speculators traders politicians savers want to know is is the fed going to do more are they going to stimulate more is more q e three coming so that's what everybody is looking towards the fed has a meeting later this month where they may or may not act but everybody's trying to read the tea leaves ben bernanke on the hill today saying that they do have tools and they can't rule anything out but he's not giving any hints about what they're going to do but recently we've seen some regional fed presidents and i said governor janet yellen hinting that they would be on board for more easing which should raise concerns for people that think that this is a solution because what we've seen with this is a lot of. unintended consequences without the benefit to the real economy that this was supposed to produce and that advocates of it are looking for it to produce it

just has not produced the results that people are looking for and so people should have a real note of caution when they look to what the fed's doing but you say those magic words that everybody needed to hear today. it depends on what you want to hear of a guys if you're maybe you know want to trade on it and you're a traitor and a speculator then you were you know maybe looking for indication of what's going to happen that you didn't get but it depends on what you're looking for and the reality is you know he didn't give any game changing news today absolutely not but a lot of people would say that the fed probably will act they probably will do more it is likely at some point in some way to stimulate it's their central bankers they can't help it but but the problem is that it's not what the economy needs it's not the solution and i know in the testimony today a lot of people questioning chairman bernanke he kept referring to the c.e.o. the congressional budget office they recently released a report and it sort of was

a little scary basically we're nearing the edge of the cliff because that we are lowering taxes because the government is spending too much things are getting dangerous. talk about you know the c.e.o.'s role in all of this and why it has been brought up time and time again well this is something that i think is a really important to look at because there's this whole conversation that's going on in these hearings where they're throwing out numbers from the c b o reports or the findings of the stress test but what you have to think about is the very assumptions that they're making not you know on its face value but what this cvo assumptions are what the stress tests assumptions are that the fed conducts and that those on its own raise a lot of questions that c.b.l. for example so they have a report out a fiscal outlook that has you know bleak bleak look at the budget a bleak look at the debt but you have to question ok the cvo supposed to be objective the cvo supposed to be nonpartisan that's if people take it into space. well you they be looking those reports going ok this is what we need to do ok look we need physical tests fixes or here's what i know policy if. they say it's not

politics the thing is i just interviewed a whistleblower who says she was fired from the c b o because she refused to paint a rosy picture of the housing market the housing market the mortgage market and the banking sector because she refused to incorporate the research of wall street advisors from banks like morgan stanley and goldman sachs so you really have to question the objectivity of these so called objective sources that then become just that kind of like the baseline facts and figures that congress is looking at and what the stress test same thing ben bernanke he says ok stress test for the banks are the assumption that he uses to justify all of these things that he says in his economic outlook or forecast but the stress tests were problematic lots of people said that you can't have the fed with its projections of what a collapse would look like then saying ok banks would be able to withstand this collapse that we concocted i mean that's just not realistic and there are a number of things that people said were problematic of those realestate being just

one that the fed did not factor in properly so the very assumptions need to be question and i think people should look at these with a skeptical eye when they are watching them it's so hard to because when they when they talk about painting these realistic pictures a lot of times those people who defend their position say you know what we don't want to cause worry because that will make things worse but guess what it doesn't seem to me that it's up to the c.e.o. to determine whether worry will be cause or what the reactions will be it seems to me they should just be the ones sort of painting the realistic picture and that's really to be now it's really sad to hear the people have been fired for wanting to tell the truth i want to talk a little bit about bank oversight something i know that you talk about a lot we've been hearing it in the news a lot because of the m.f. global problem that you talk about a lot of the j.p. morgan chase issues. did we learn a lesson i mean do you think there will in fact to be more supervision over these big banks because of what we saw happen i think what's really difficult to know is if an. the thing can reign in the banking sector because what we saw ok regulators were on the hill j.p. morgan's main regulator one of them the o.c.c.

the office of comptroller of the currency was on the hill the head of that this week it's the first time we've heard from him and you know he said ok well j.p. morgan didn't have adequate risk supervision gadd does whose job is it to believe that the regulators there are sixty five full time in house from those d.c.i. j.p. morgan chase ok well really you couldn't have been going on now to looking at it and i mean the problem is not that we don't have regulations we have regulations on the book lots of them the problem is they are not being enforced regulators are not catching this stuff they are not doing their jobs if they are catching this stuff and that is a theme we see again and again and again whether we're looking at the j.p. morgan two billion dollars whale trading loss that's likely to be a lot more or whether we're looking at a now defunct firm like m.f. global that stole customer money that used accounting shenanigans regulatory arbitrage you could argue it came out in the trustee report really looks like that and yet they got away with it under the noses of regulators under the noses of

auditors and it just continues and just real quickly and we have just about thirty seconds i feel like we've got to get europe in here a lot of people saying spain on one hand is too big to fail on the other hand it seems like we're really close to them asking for a bailout what does this mean yes banks are in trouble it's just the next domino they're all in trouble the problem in europe if you want me to sum it up in a few seconds is that there is too much debt and it has not been dealt with all of these solutions are either piecemeal or they're based on some kind of political consolidation but with no dealing with the debt overhang it's going to need to be written down forgiven or something if the root of the problem is ever going to be addressed to the capital account lauren lyster always good to have you on break this down for for those of us who don't quite get it all thanks so much thank you for having me. well it's time for our first break of the evening when we come back we'll tell you about an effort to crack down on an alleged marketing scam and lines at the glue. more of hope then kevin zeese will be joining us to talk about the latest and bradley manning the trial here.

sure is that so much to me is going to make you a lot of people if you're in a burger lunchtime with the euro with the greek economy in tatters and spain on the financial break the future of the monetary union looks anything but bright.

the scuttle all. the lights will come down. so must you choirs will be singing. well tonight plimer of hope has to do with the frequent hot topic on this show for profit colleges they're known for routinely ripping off students particularly veterans who want an education this is wrong on so many levels first our vets volunteered for a pretty tough. job and they deserve to be treated with a little respect and they deserve a quality education and when they can help them get good jobs that lead to

successful careers now it also cheats the taxpayer out of large sums of cash last september the senate education committee found a just under a quarter of g.i. bill spending over a billion dollars went towards eight for profit colleges between two thousand and ten and two thousand and eleven these schools are also among the top ten recipients of g.i. bill funds a sum of money that has vastly increased in the last decade now this trend wouldn't be bad would be a bad thing if the schools provided a great education but more often than not they don't five of the eight schools mentioned in the report some more than half fifty percent of their students drop out and oftentimes students find that their degrees from those for profit colleges aren't respected or accepted by employers and many of defaulting on these government backed loans so why do students particularly veterans keep attending these institutions adam weinstein was on the show last september and he explained it has a lot to do with lax oversight and slick marketing executives. in addition to which

you saw these web sites that are kind of picking up. in general curious the service members looking for information online you've got recruiters that are having access to a campus. we have one report that was before open by bloomberg businessweek a couple of months ago about a recruiter from one of these for profits that walked right into a wounded warriors unit in a marine based in north carolina i mean also sure advertisements on the american forces network which is generally not supposed to show advertisements. well today it came out that attorneys general from fifteen states are actually trying to hold one marketing firm accountable and they're investigating quinn street a company with many for profit college clients and this is according to the company's quarterly f.e.c. filings from last month you see quinn street has been operating websites such as g.i. bill dot com and army study guide dot com to connect veterans with for profit colleges

but the problem is they've been accused of branding themselves as an official as official government publications and presenting the for profit schools they exclusively recommend as the only one accepting veteran education subsidies before the inquiry was launched for example g.i. bill dot com didn't even contain a disclaimer stating it's a non-government privately sponsored website does now so you can forgive that's unfamiliar with higher education for getting tricked especially considering it's an ethical it's an ethical approach to search engine optimization if you do a google search for g.i. bill college g.i. bill dot com pops up right next to the official veterans' affairs website g.i. bill dot v.a. dot gov the quincy website also contains a page of military from the colleges military from the colleges unsurprisingly this list consists solely of for profit schools so it's not really shocking that the government officials are looking into the company's practices and quite frankly it's about time they invest. gaijin is being led by kentucky attorney general jack

conway his counterparts from fourteen other states have joined in too and that is impressive but you might have noticed a major absence here the federal government the one that actually issues veterans benefit it's not a surprise though for profit colleges spend a ton of money on lobbyists on campaign donations to both republicans and democrats but it is encouraging that the states prosecutors have decided to actually do something about for profit college scams that cheat a lot of people including a whole lot of veterans and taxpayers enough for us to consider it a glimmer of hope. let's take a look now at the latest in the bradley manning case today is day two of three of a three day priest trial hearing for private first class bradley manning his events team is working to get the real count specifically ten out of the twenty two against him dropped they've also asked the government to turn over damage assessment reports that resulted from the two thousand and ten leaks that were posted on the whistle blowing web site wiki leaks today two officials with the

state department testified and talked about their role in efforts to control damage after the secret documents were leaked i want to talk about the latest and also some of the bigger implications of this here to discuss is kevin zeese he serves on the steering committee of the bradley manning support network and is also the organizer occupy washington d.c. and co-director of it's our economy kevin thanks for joining us so you know i think it's important to sort of break down what's going on now and i want to start with a question a whole lot of people have been asking if nothing bradley manning leaked did any damage to the u.s. why are these documents that are being held called classified that's exactly the root of the issue because that's the main that's one document should be classified as they are going to have an adverse effect on national security if the public or other countries learn about them and so that's why the manning defenses of trying so hard to try to get access to those docs and so far we've heard nothing that indicates that any damage was done by these documents that we both the heard former defense secretary gates secretary clinton both minimizing the effect of the release

of these documents that really raise the question should these documents been classified should be prosecuted all i think what really comes down to what these teachers as truth truth is the first casualty of war we had two dozen people in court today wearing these shirts to try to get their message across we have making they're making it clear that people are following this case closely want to see the truth come out that's in this case is about should the american public know what our government is doing in our name both in the military in the state department their work with corporations in their work with who are mostly part of us empire. and we spoke about this yesterday with kevin gusto on our show and he said that the judge yesterday asked the government to actually go through item by item and sort of say it explain each item and say if there was evidence for it it seems like a little too late not too late but a little late however i think it's a good thing that it's happening what do you think is going to come down out of this but it is late i mean the trial schedule started september we're talking about

tens of thousands of the hundreds of thousands of pages of documents and so the surprise is this trial go off in september the government were dragging their feet i think. bradley manning's lawyer david kusa great job of making the case the government's been dragging their feet on this they've been fighting for discovery like this for since the beginning this is routine discovery it's called brady material reverse united states requires the government both military and civilian trials to give evidence that's relevant to the defense this material to the defense and these should be expect to be given rarely lawyer by accident got a document because the military found they had not even begun to search their files for brady material nine months after coombs started asking for and that happened to get to them in a circuitous way but he got that dogman just like florida that here we are and they are in court fighting for these documents the governor's making the claim to the so much as so voluminous is already given all in terms of the even start of the story the why do you think that is i mean do you think that the government just you know

the prosecutors in this case just thought that they were going to be so backed by the government that they were just going to sort of slide through or not have to present anything well i think this case is it looks like you can record or most of the judge is really listening carefully david coombs she's starting to really question the veracity of credibility of the prosecutors because they give multiple answers to the same question depending how their questions are asked she's learning they have to ask the question exactly the right way we're knocking at the full answer from the government lawyers and so i think there's so look so you can record except the judges are in a wake up and i think i would say because you have the commander in chief president obama saying he's. guilty on tape you have the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff saying at a press conference that was published in stars and stripes the semiofficial publication the military not to mention a suspect held in solitary confinement for as you know has been measured not to say you have the i mean straight ahead you have the solitary confinement for almost a year before resuming formally charge right and then you have the dragging their heels in discovery not in following what there is basic rules of discovery and

providing ever so it looks like a kangaroo court and i think the prosecutors are assuming that this is going to be a slam dunk and you know we hope that by being there and being present and showing the public concern and the great worry about david coombs that we can actually get a fair trial of this and if that happens this case should be dismissed for outrageous government conduct as you mentioned dissolved very the undetermined influence and the discovery lapse lapses that's outrageous government conduct you can't get a fair trial in those circumstances haven't we just had a segment called glimmer of hope what are your glimmers of hope in terms of this bradley manning case i mean there certainly on the other side so many things that are really hard to swallow when it comes to this case when it comes to the treatment of the suspect in this case is there anything that gives you hope that it that it may be dismissed or that maybe some of those charges might at least be dropped i mean i think david cruz made some great arguments today and some of his co-counsel as well arguing for dropping some of charges the judge was very tough to some hope with some of these charges were dropped or winnow down a bit and i do i do think the judge is getting sensitive to this case is about the

fact that we started off with that there may have been no national security image at all in the trial making example of this young guy i mean there are meetings twenty to twenty four he's always been two years in jail you know almost ten percent of his of his life has been spent in jail and case and he's going to trial you know and so my hope is that by the public coming out the public showing their concern their great learning from from coombes his team that will get some justice in this case and we will see this case handled with a dismissal deserves i want to talk about the state secrets aspect of this case because this is time and time again and i'm not sure to what extent the prosecute. i get to determine what state secrets are. but you know this whole classified aspect this whole seeming desire to not have this case the public talk a little bit about that you know there's been a real effort to prevent the press and thereby print the the people the public from knowing what's going on in this case it's very hard to go to these trials and understand what's happening because we don't get to really see all the filings

a lot of stuff is provided to the court where the court only sees it and she has to decide was made public in the end when you and you saw we could see as the some of the documents the few documents that the government has given to david coombs and bradley manning the pages just blacked out and blacked out the governor says they gave twelve thousand pages you look at the pages the roll you know black you can't see any harm so there's a real effort i think keep the truth out and that's what this case is about bradley manning is being essentially prosecuted for getting the truth out the truth about what our foreign policy is about how the u.s. military behaves on a daily basis and how our state department bases really would you prosecute some of the people who were exposed in these documents those ones if you prosecute bradley manning is a whistleblower who has just got the truth out in a time of war and that's a very risky thing to do and you know the other side says it's risky because he put our lives in danger he he gave secrets to the other side and i think you're right

of course we see no evidence of that actually putting lives in danger actually undermined u.s. foreign policy restore national security what it did was embarrass us by showing the good there's some good in our foreign policy the bad the ugly and the illegal in our foreign policy and that was the embarrassment it's about embarrassment it's not about undermining your success can i think you hit the nail on the had to weigh in when you said i mean it seems in so many ways they're really trying to make an example out of him make sure this never happens again appreciate you coming on the show haven't ceased with it probably want to support network keep us posted play it well thank you. also it comes and i will speak with a candidate running for office with the ideology. the occupy movement and as we mentioned alone at eleven rhode island at the net roots nation conference for high now it's on that for tomorrow's show.

come back to our new center here in moscow top stories now at home past the hour the u.n. urges both the syrian regime and the rebels to lay down arms to prevent the country from sliding into a full scale civil war this comes as you and observers are visiting the site of the latest massacre near the city of hama. a big day for european football as the euro twenty twelve tournament kicks off the third floor has been dealt a blow with boy called so human rights abuses and claims of racism was recently from the dutch national team. and eurozone experts predict spain could ask for a bailout as soon as the seeming but as powerhouses try to keep the single currency afloat one irish town is banking on the past to turn

a profit. and that's it for me and the news team here in moscow we'll be back with more. in the meantime back to washington d.c. where the eye on the show takes on america's financial woes. well with the. technology innovation all the developments around russia we've got the future covered. all right guys it's been nearly nine months since the movement that became known as the occupy wall street movement first started in new york with hundreds and then thousands of people taking over new york city zuccotti park since then it has spread nationally and.