seven thirty pm in moscow he's here r.t. headlines nato condemned syria for shooting down a turkish jet but stopped short of naming it an attack against its members statements came during an emergency closed door meeting someone that congress requests. on the last leg of his middle east tour where he's meeting jordan's king russian president urged restraint between israel and the palestinians as he met separately with their leaders lead to dead domino rolls across the euro zone cyprus becoming the fifth state to admit needing a bailout citing heavy exposure to greece this as spain awaits its own hundred billion euro lifeline. surprise arab surge for freedom and institutional crisis in

western countries and new hope coming from latin america that's the topics of debate in the modern world in the eyes of noam chomsky and terry levy two prominent thinkers and guests on julia songes show airing next. well to the. point is the magic of transforming airplanes into jet trains dirty diesels into green rail dreams double down on profits by building up instead of out in a german swoon place east for the summer knowledge up here on r.g.p. you've got the central. time julian assange. it is fear of wiki leaks web expose the old secrets these documents belong the

united states government being attacked by the powerful united states strongly condemn the black people all illegally should. be tamed without charge but that doesn't stop. the day. that can change the world tomorrow. during the last few years. today i speak to two giants of the intellectual if noam chomsky read noun linguist rebel think tara kelley street fighting novelist the military historian i want to find out what these two act towards think where is the world going. to go. terry. two thousand and eleven two thousand focus being storage here for liberation movements in many places across the world did you see it coming i didn't see it

coming i don't think most people saw it coming but what's interesting is that you have these arab uprisings in a part of the world which commentators was saying people aren't interested in democracy the muslims are genetically all started to go crazy and you have these ups ages and then they spread because it's the occupation of buried square in cairo that inspired activists all of the united states even in russia who would have expected these movements suddenly to come up in russia and challenge authority so the the arab spring has been very infectious and it's still going on in different ways and i'm trying to keep no i can't say i predicted it i assume that sooner or later there would have to be a popular reaction to the. better class war that been fought for the past generation very conscious class war which has.

of the always quite class conscious business classes really felt they were on a roll so in the united states for example. well we all know the facts over the past generation there's been. wealth created but it's gone into very few pockets the extreme inequality in the united states is weighted very heavily by a literally a tenth of a percent of the population mostly the hedge fund managers c.e.o.'s of major corporations and so on but talking about the united states but the phenomena are basically worldwide takes a egypt one of the most exciting places you know the the movement that that started off the top or square demonstrations a year ago it's called the april sixth movement and there's

a reason april sixth two thousand and eight was the day of large scale a labor protests at the major industrial installations in egypt supporting demonstrations and so on the there was a small group of my tech savvy professionals who tried to who wanted to participate and help help them out with social media and so on. the it was crushed by the dictatorship but that group of professionals is the april sixth movement they skep the name that's one indication of how deeply rooted these protests are yes the. there were people ready a lot of people for many it was just a moment of. an opening which we can somehow do something but they were there

was plenty of preparation for it and something similar in tunisia you asked if i predicted it no i didn't but. it's now happening worldwide in one form or another. i think gnome is right and i think essentially. what we've been witnessing together with the near liberal economy is a can crack of politics in the sense that i've been arguing now for some time that what we have in western politics is neither the extreme left nor the extreme right but an extreme center and this extreme center in compas is both center right and center left we agree on fundamentals waging wars abroad occupying countries and punishing the poor pushing through austerity measures it doesn't matter which party's in bar either in the united states or in the western world. things

carry on like before does continue to from one regime to the next which affects the functioning of the media which is become more and more narrow so there's very little diversity very few debates constructed within the mainstream media and that is a big characteristic now it's a form i it's a dictatorship of capital which is exercise through this extreme center the arab countries had dictators backed by the west for some time and the speed in scale of those uprisings certainly took everyone by surprise none of us could have predicted it do you think that the lack of predictability in fact is part of why they were successful. if that if they could have been predicted mechanisms would have been put in place to stop it happening yeah and pretty extreme mechanisms they would have tried to arrest people crush people torture people lockout but it went

out of control very rapidly and the united states and the french in tunis here in egypt for instance couldn't control it earlier they were taken by surprise to mean they only got their act together to try and subvert the process. when they had a six month bombing of libya by nato things so they could exercise some control on the entire arab world again but it's still incredibly well that and you know sometimes people say. but nothing much has changed this is true but one thing is change which is the people the masses have realized that in order to bring about change they have to move and become active and that is a big lesson from these uprisings. i want to consider how much choice there really is is a choice illusionary or do the regimes have to deal with the situation that is

around them the basic constraints in dealing with other nations would you for example knowing that cuba was ninety miles away from miami ninety one miles away from aggressive superpower that is broadcasting probably get into cuba introduce censorship would you introduce state police as a way of preventing the removing dependence from cuba because it seems to me these are the questions that are going to have to be faced by nations that are struggling not only to overthrow their rulers but to be independent as a nation from western powers afterwards. well cuba is very special case so i don't mean to some extent it has characteristics like other small countries but it is unique for fifty years you know the united states has been dedicated to strangling and crushing cuba. and the kennedy's.

let an american advisor said the problem is the castro idea of taking matters into your own and which might lead others in similar circumstances to try to follow that path and pretty soon the whole system of u.s. control would erode so for those reasons which persist the united states has carried out first of all a massive terror campaign that cuba has been the victim of more terror probably the whole world combined international. and beyond that economic strangulation i would extraordinary sort of if you are a ship that wants to be independent votes in independence states might talk about other forms of independence like that an independent state in defiance of nato or

if you need china in defiance of china or russia some of the former soviet states. they call it tolerance at a cost and in the in the case of cuba perhaps that cost is that you're in a state of war being a state of war you look around the world there are similar problems but not as dire as the one that cuba faces so go a little bit to the south south america and one of the most dramatic and important of developments of the past decade is that south america for the first time since the european conquerors came for the first time in five hundred years has made a very significant move towards independence towards integration there isn't a single u.s. military base left in south america it's pretty remarkable. what do you think terry well i think that over the last decades the most significant changes we've seen

have governments from south america i mean i visited venezuela bolivia brazil and they've moved is just different and many people say it's the first time ever we feed a really independent that whatever the weaknesses might be of these regimes and there are some they are sovereign states and they're actors so much and when travis for instance say something to the united states he's very blunt and open about it and he told me once he said you know i gave a speech in the u.n. and a lot of other countries who can say the same public come and congratulate me and said thank you you're speaking for all of us and he says i said to them but you can speak to no one can stop you but you know the goal is to be obviously think they can't take they can't and. this is now a mood in most of south america i mean with the exception of colombia mexico and partially chile elsewhere people are feeling we're independent for the first time

ever i think this is going to be a huge problem for the united states i mean they're obsessed with the arab world in china and now iran but in south america for addicted for a bit more. the united states is not in control words an enormously in fact in the national security council planning organization warn that if we cannot control latin america how are we going to impose a successful order on the rest of the world meaning rule rest of the world so if we can't control even our backyard how are we going to control everything else as a deeper point now moving over to the middle east the deep concern in the united states and the other treated. imperial powers britain france particularly concern is that now they may the middle east might get out of control and that syria's

a much more serious than south america by great that's why they invaded libya and i have no doubt about it was to reestablish control. i agree but i think it's all over so for example if you take a look at what's happened in the arab spring of the countries that are crucial to western imperial power the oil producers they have been under a very tough hand in saudi arabia kuwait the emirates the major oil producing regions it never got off the ground the intimidation of the security forces backed by the west was so enormous that people were literally afraid to go into the streets and the west mainly france and tunisia united states and britain and egypt are following a very traditional pattern there's a playbook that you pursue that you gives you a kind of a game plan when some favored dictators lose the capacity to rule what you

do is support them until the last possible minute when it's impossible any longer maybe the army turns against them you get your intellectual quest to issue a ringing declarations about democracy and then you try to restore the old system as much as possible that's what's done with some of those marcos. mobutu so hard to i mean it's routine it takes a genius not to see it but i think the real problem to it is that democracy itself is in very serious trouble because of the corporations when you have to european countries and when you have greece and italy the politicians abdicating in saying lead bank doesn't i mean where is it going to go you know so we. what we're witnessing is the democracy is becoming more and more denuded of content and slike an empty shell and this is what is angering young people who feel whatever we do

whatever we vote for nothing changes and so these protests and do do you think it's this problem is it is it the media is it structural is it is it the increased ability of the same to control the periphery as a result of more sophisticated telecommunications it is what's what's what's driving it what's writing it is a democracy that has become fide but the media has become below a central pillar of the establishment much more than it was during the cold war at that time there were proving to the russians and the chinese our system is better than yours now they don't feel the need to prove it so they operate as they would people who are using freedom of expression as a stick to beat the soviet union and now there's no need for that i think you have

to say alliance between liberals and the military and the elites in the west all coming together for mutual interests to demonstrate the superiority of the west compared to soviet and that sort of very unnatural of its tail split apart it's split apart to be within the western world they have now got things controlled to such an extent that they literally get away with murder i mean obama has now signed a law according to which the american president. has the right to authorize the killing of an american citizen without any recourse to law talk no due process which no other u.s. president in history has done even during the civil war the people who tried to kill lincoln or killed lincoln the conspirators were tried in a court how ever faulty it was no longer you can order someone to be killed and

this attack on civil liberties is of course extreme need to stir being because it rudely affects democracy i mean do you do think these social movements are happening in latin america if you look at the sort of technological adoption in latin america it's somewhere like the us force in the one nine hundred seventy s. . and it is that is the political and social interaction that is occurring in the states as a result of the technological interactions that are occurring so perhaps it is simply not possible for more industrialized countries to adopt a model of a listen to us country would we have to throw away the industrialized nations to do it i don't think so i mean most of these western states a very happily become dean dust realized and made china into de domin them to economic bar in the world like the british were in the nineteenth century and china is the workshop of the world there's been

a huge increase the actual workforce while declining in the way it's has trebled from one billion in the seventy's and eighty's to over three billion today because of what's happening in china india bouts of south america so i think the so-called advance about was have a lot to learn from the good things that have been happening in south america why not is there a model a practical model that i think. i agree with many models but the i don't think that the popular forces are concerned with changing their own societies should be looking for models i think they should be creating the models. and that's exactly what's happening so models in south america that it was but a lot of progress they're developing models. takes a believe you mentioned

a couple of times one of the most striking things that's happened there is that the most repressed. part of the population of the hemisphere the indigenous population has moved into the political arena has in fact taken political power and is pursuing its own concerns it's also happening in ecuador and to an extent in peru well the there are developing new and significant models and some of the aspects of those models the west had better pick up pretty soon or else so already over we always had this claim that capitalism and democracy goes together try to seems to be the great example of that it's even more efficient at being a capitalist state that what i never believed that capitalism and democracy go together. the chinese demonstrate that today that the most successful capitalist country in the world is not an ounce of democracy in the way it functions but even

historically for hundreds of years of its existence capitalism function without democracy till the beginning of the twentieth century i mean women were only given the vote of the first world war so either no democracy or a crime ok to democracy suits capitalism but if it clee in this notion that capitalism and democracy go together was a cold war construct designed to the russians and the east new york peons and the chinese it has no basis in historical fact. first of all we don't have capitalist societies we have one or another variety of state capitalism and that's true or ever an industrial system function so for example in the united states the state role in the economy is enormous i mean let's take what the three of us are doing right now. this is based on the. i

t revolution computers internet. satellites microelectronics and so on most of this was developed at the state are in fact exactly were i'm sitting at mit was one of the places where these things were being developed in the fifty's in the sixty's under the pentagon funding mostly it was both funding subsidy and then trimmed creation also procurement for decades this was in the state sector before it was handed over to private capital who are. commercialization and profit and if you go back to the second technological progress. in the one nine hundred thirty s. you would from literature from that period you often see the soviets talking about how this system is simply more efficient and therefore as a fission system of industry it will dominate and you also saw the nazis became

precisely the same terms that this mess if take a logical investment producing efficient industry will simply dominee other forces around it isn't this a basic if you logical constraint that regardless of what system do you want to grow so people desire maybe we will be nice to each other for a change something very very basic simple human decency if that system is not efficient compared to another system the other system will simply growing scale until it dominates. well it will but only if it grows militarily you see the united states is weak economically at the moment you know it's hugely in debt as gnome is pointed out this is a real structural crisis but it is very dominant militarily and it uses its miller creek strength to dominate other parts of the world which might be doing well

economically but and at that strength that's the problem we face is this conflict between. the desire to do something for india logical reasons and in a sort of practical reality let's say totalitarian capitalism basically being the most efficient system and therefore will go away it's not an efficient system if i take a look at china trying to growth has been spectacular but china has grown largely as an assembly plant it's primarily the assembly plant for the advanced industrial countries on its periphery japan taiwan south korea so for example takes a prox come on this huge hideous factory in china we're working conditions are utterly grotesque and so taiwanese own factory it produces apple computers i still computers and so on but what's happened over the past few

years is that china has been the assembly plant for the in the advanced industrial state capitalist countries and it's periphery and for western multinationals now of course sooner or later china will begin to move up the technology ladder fact in some respects it's already happening try to has actually begun to innovate and with solar cells that surpass those elsewhere and that will begin to happen elsewhere but it's a long slow process terry terry. both you and have had a long long life as activists. so when you look at this generation of activists now in the way it's that is that is just starting to be politically rather radicalized right i think internet radicalize youth is probably the best way that i would describe them. what what do you want to tell

them what experience that you of had through these multiple battles over dozens of years can you give to them because it seems to me that there was a moment perhaps during the eighty's and ninety's there was no continuity from this tradition of dissent in the west terry. i try avoid giving advice to younger generations those generations are so different from each other and given the world has changed so much the only universal advice to be given is don't give up you will live through bad times and you feel you know the everything is lost and many people become passive but severity which is is usually leads to despair and i think it's extremely important to realize for young people growing up today that they need to be active and active activity is something that leads to

hope and that unless they're active themselves no one is going to hand them anything on the plate that's the lesson of the last few years with this new radicalization don't give up have remain skeptical be critical of the system that dominates us all and sooner or later if not in this generation in generations to come things will change. well whole lot of things have changed over the years and they've trained off into the better trained because lots of dedicated people committed themselves to it and that history hasn't ended those changes or we can do something about them. and in fact there are there are very serious problems for example if. if the species continues on its present course.

we probably will be facing. destruction of the possibility for decent survival simply because of things like class or will use that's truly serious issue and it's kind of like. you know lemmings going over the cliff.

more news today violence is once again flared up. these are the images the world has been seeing from the streets of canada. china operation to rule the day.