also follow me on twitter at liz wall well they were back here in a half hour. there hasn't been anything yet on t.v. . it is to get the maximum political impact. truly is war hopes journalism on the we. we want to present. something real. good afternoon and welcome to capital account i'm more and lister live from new york where we continue to take the show on the road to take on wall street's bull straight at the feeding trough here are your headlines for friday july thirteenth two thousand and twelve a barclays employee reportedly told the new york fed back in two thousand and eight

that the bank was under reporting live for now you'll recall timothy geithner was head of the new york fed at the time he's under scrutiny now with lawmakers wanting a probe of libel regulators we asked though why so much outrage over libel manipulation when interest rate manipulation is what central big stew as their jobs you'll hear from jim grant editor and founder of grant's interest rate observer on that in our sit down one on one interview with him at his office down on wall street plus peregrine financial group c.e.o. has been arrested in the note that he left before attempting suicide he admitted to fraud and also said that he'd been forging bank statements undetected for twenty years allowing him to steal millions of dollars from customers is fear of your money being taken from a firm like p.s.g. or m.f. global contributing to what our guest calls a bubble and perceived safe havens the girl here the answer to that plus in

a very special friday the thirteenth loose change dimitrios xenos our producer and i thought. a church and graveyard right near wall street where we discuss a tone meant and invoking the spirit of the law when it comes to financial crimes let's get to today's capital account. we are back on wall street today now after yesterday we descended upon the floor of the new york stock exchange and behind me today we're crossing the street for what you could call an alternative exchange we have the opportunity to sit down one on one with jim grant editor of grants an interest rate observer from where he really does is observing jim grant let me just say it is a real honor to sit down with you thank you so much for allowing us into your

domain longer pleasure well great thank you so let's start with because there is a huge outrage about this library scandal and when we actually first process this news we were thinking ok jim grant is probably saying this is what central banks do every day and in fact you have been saying that you've been out saying that so why are people so outraged about why bore in banks attempting to manipulate it when this is the job of central banks that we all live under wrote the private bankers the appeal it rates on the quiet when they think they can get what their way with surreptitiously opportunistically rarely the central banks you work for a living. so it seems to me that the london interbank offered rate scandal is almost infinitely insignificant compared to the prevailing problem of the manipulation market systemic play openly and on principle by our central bankers so do you think that the outrage at the banks as mr acted over libel sure would be and

there are turned around and the outrage of the people who manipulate the rates on which live bore from which libraries ultimately derive libraries a is a rate that is strived in in very good part from the prevailing level of rates that the central bank said or fix to use the proper word so the federal reserve the european central bank the swiss national bank all the rest are in the business of imposing their judgement on the marketplace and they do this many ways most visibly they they set a money market interest rate that goes in this country by the name of the federal funds rate. that rate happens to be zero zero zero s. before tax mind you so the savers could zero before tax the speculators get to borrow at zero with which to finance their speculations so one can make. a good many arguments against the nebulae sion of rates and i have but the

library scandal it seems to me is is this as a scandal is almost infinitely insignificant the significant scandal is that is the ongoing particular action of rates by our central banks why do you think more people are making that connection have for so upset about live our lives why aren't we more upset about central bank manipulation of rates as a realist i think that i think there is a ritual loathing of of big money and big financial institutions that are certainly understandable not entirely misplaced because these outfits are kind of state sponsored cartels in good measure you know they. know. that many of them would be standing upright and solvent except for the intercession of the central banks. now that i think of it just celebrating its two hundredth birthday. is only two hundred years old thanks to the taxpayers yeah yeah

afterwards they said even though it's anybody else would be worth it to us yeah yeah so it's it's not as if people should feel some. throbbing resentment against these mega financial institutions that they ought to but they ought to it seems to me. resent more thoughtfully and fundamentally and a more thoughtful and fundamental source of resentment is the government managed and directed central banks that set the rates. really are the basis for things like why for and just along those lines to follow up do you think that it's monkey see monkey do banks see central banks doing this and things are going to get involved. i'm not sure it's the it's the traders the money market or treasury desk or these banks say ah if they do it will do that i think what free traders are saying is i

think we can get away with this great write yeah those e-mails now and those are just some fun fodder for at least outrage in themselves but i want to ask you know you have said before that living in a central bank world is like living in a hall of mirrors or living under a central bank it's like being in a hall of mirrors and then more recently i heard you compare it to the truman show that movie where we're truman is in a fake world but he doesn't realize it until he's going along in his rowboat any hits actually on the campus and this is the limits of his fake world i think you said we're already there so does this mean we're at the end to arrange things can continue to manipulate the fake world that they want. i think that we exit the fake world when people decide that they are living in it the jim carey character and in the true insured made this discovery when the proud of his rowboat five member right. tore through the fake canvas sky.

i'm not sure how many investors are yet at the moment of realization that the values they see are derived from manipulate interest rates the interest rates are really the. the basis of so much of we regard as value. i am afraid that the that the moment of more or less universal realization is a way off but perhaps at the margin more and more people saying he would have second thoughts guys not real right this guy this water is it's like plywood right how do you think that would take because you could argue that existential crisis that truman had maybe was exhibited in the markets in two thousand and eight there was an existential crisis but what do you think it would take for i don't want to acknowledge that there is a there is a more interesting and and i think more historically remarkable existential event. in which we have been living lo these many decades which is the almost universal

acceptance of pieces of paper a stamp with the pre-mature of sovereign governments claiming to represent wealth your currency. and in fact it does pass for currency people take it and the dollar is a little miracle of faith because it passes for value the world over you stand in the street corner of moscow one hundred dollars bill and people will think better of you for. but the idea that that these pieces of paper no intrinsic value could indeed represent actual value this is a heresy for most of the world's history that has only recently come to be accepted as an article of fact. and i think posterity will look back on our collective acceptance. of these items of colored paper as money and say they believe that if you read the text in a federal reserve note it says no no now

a note is. this is an instrument of debt is a promise to pay something. promise to pay what well nothing actually and there was a guy who worked at citi bank for many years and was one of the most thoughtful and perceptive server critics of the fed's name was john exter and he's no longer with us but used to say you know there's an iou nothing you nothing so we're talking about the truman show and about our collective acceptance of canvas skies and plywood seasoned. and imagined towns i think that to be the article of paper money which is so much a commonplace in everyday life and of commerce and great investing in the city i think that will be seen in retrospect by our heirs in a sign says this thing of a maze of the same for forty years and counting we believe that so our air is so do

you think the next generation will make this. this distinction or i don't think you have a crystal ball here i'm just curious of all it's generally it's been broken for some . decades. i think that. that i think i'm beginning to see signs of people questioning the legitimacy of these certainly the euro has come under some scrutiny you know euro is the currency of a confederation which an american might say makes it confederate money and we know what happened in federal money. and with faith based currency i want i want to stick to this topic i have faith in the people that print it so the federal reserve we saw the at the mc minutes come out earlier this week and oh no it wasn't enough for the markets they didn't promise end of that easy money was going to come there wasn't enough of a sense that it's coming do you think that the fed has run out of the tool

instilling optimism. or hope well it was it is a as it were kind of a drug dispenser when it's five years it's taking larger dosages and they said minister of some soul searching about whether they have run out of technique. so they might do something more even more dramatic maybe rabbits and have something like that. but there was an expression in the fed minutes of. of consternation that. the techniques at hand were not sufficient to off in a maze. so they might do something else but it is it is a pretty worrying sign that the. these massive massive materializations. of money or whatever they call it you know the is no longer having the desired effect. do you think that the power of percepts

chen is more important than the power of the printing press for the federal reserve that it which is wrong or a great question i think perception is ever so important the. markets perception that the fed is can is in control is an important element in what the fed does. yeah i mean that the what the fed is doing in fact is to cause to come into existence. untold hundreds of billions of dollars as defined which take the shape of electronic impulses that stored in somebodies hard drive of the federal reserve bank of new york that really create no wealth. that at best lubricate the census and the expectations of people who may choose to materialize themselves bank crimea it all

gets to be very kind diet and rather mystical so perception faith is is part of the this magical mystery tour that we call central banking and yeah do you think that power perception has run out for for the fed i think that the market is increasingly skeptical in the market needs more and more these larger larger dosages of whatever the fed's dispensing. coming up you will hear more of our interview with jim grant and still ahead if library manipulation central bank manipulation p.s.g. fraud and that's global fraud all have you looking for a way out of the financial system you may be interested to hear what jim grant has to say about planting trees and first or closing market numbers.

wealthy british soil. is not on because we're going to. market why not. find out what's really happening to the global economy with mike stronger for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune in to conjure reports .

did those stores in here before going global that's not. my role. lol june. choose your. take your stuff. to. make your statement. or. you can.

welcome back so why would anyone want to give their money put it in an investment knowing that they would receive nothing in return or they would lose money after all was said and done in a perceived safe haven like a treasury or government bond well let's look at today's news cycle pia's g.'s founder and c.e.o. arrested he admitted in his suicide note he attempted suicide two fraud going on according to his note undetected for twenty years so does fear over protection of your property rights factor in to what our guest calls a bubble in perceived safe havens where you don't have to listen to me can hear from him more of our interview with jim grant founder and editor of grant's interest rate observer he's also author of this book mr speaker the life and times of thomas be read the man who broke the filibuster take

a listen. when you talk about a bull market in safe havens and people willing to level in a bubble in the same bubble incident perceive safety now see actual safety we we see in retrospect very clear all that was safe. and but paradoxically that which is substantively safe often appears unsafe for example the. two thousand and late two thousand and eight early two thousand and nine. so-called toxic mortgages selling at twenty cents on the dollar actually proved to be a fantastic investment because they had built inside them a margin of safety built on price they've been sold down to next to nothing people were sick and tired didn't want to analyze and lo and behold the dregs of this stuff proved to be a wonderful investment if not well certainly a great year long speculation similarly now we are to the. swiss

government securities out to five years yielding less than nothing are safe we are told the danish treasury bills french treasury bills german pullman's yielding less than nothing are safe the tips in this country treasury inflation protected securities yielding less than nothing are safe i submit that less than nothing is not a promising place to start investment. i mean you once investments all too frequently wind up delivering less than nothing but you don't sit out that way right right that is the same with the support of the value proposition even pass muster with a two year old that was you know they know that they're not supposed to give their money to someone they want to get money but is there our role or is there a part that property rights play and this because we've seen m.f. global we've seen i've heard many stories of customers of m.f. global who had their money taken they put it in care and financial group and now the money has been taken from there so is there a role that people are more willing to put their money somewhere they at least

perceive not to be safe because they're more afraid of it being taken. out of the mess that is certainly that's part of it i think there's an overarching fear of something terrible yet not strictly definable. and yet this is such a very a gated financial landscape there is this thing without a name this year that causes people to settle for less than nothing on fixed income investments yet there's also some strong enterprising feeling still in the world. you know the world is a presbyterian say of sin and sorrow to be sure that is pretty well yet there are companies such as google that are in the business of codifying and making accessible the sum total of the world's store of knowledge for free that would seem to be encouraging. the higgs bo's'n apparently has been unmasked i mean that every

day there are marvels and our material lives so it is a curious. it's a curious juxtaposition between abject fear and hope. of course. one shouldn't invest on the basis of hope but i am not persuaded that less than nothing is the thing to shoot for is it a little higher maybe we could do better the you know better speed of shooting higher this is kind of a creative interpretation but i was speaking to someone who was saying that a lot of swaps were done with lie bore and so a lot of those those investors will have a may have a case there may be a case of litigation for lawsuits of these banks that have been found i mean in manipulating it so based on that is it first seeable or perceivable that say verse or investors could say hey we want to sue the fed for this is zero percent we're getting on our money because they're manipulating it yes. a splendid suit certainly

the headlines would be slim not sure about the substance of the litigation but you know if let us say that litigation goes forward with respect to lie poor what to say that the. the dark powers of these commercial banks were manipulating the rate down so that means that people paying adjustable rate mortgages were paying artificially low rates that mean they had some you know some made off the state guys go back say all right cough up more money you mortgage right you have it over are wrong arguing it's right at the sky i don't see that happening either before a vote for we go. let's talk about gardening i guess is not gardening but i'm just curious if you aren't actually bullish on black walnut trees yes yeah let's look at what's with that what you have to offer ok so. the seedling of a properly. trained. oh black walnut. prue

university has produced a strain of these things that reach maturity in twenty five to thirty years the post fifty to sixty years of five bucks at maturity perhaps because the future is uncertain i say perhaps they could fetch a thousand and so you the internal rate of return and this look at zero coupon bond of yesteryear that's like when we were we had real interest rates you probably read it i don't i don't know what it was alive. but that represents the rate of return on one of these old fashioned bonds actually paid something. so my thinking is that instead of taking one's entire risk with the federal reserve to give nature a shot at it as well right. so with a tree you're at risk of a thousand canker disease but not so much with you know with peregrine or with the right right right is different kind of risk it's never been kind of risks that are or is it is not within the financial system it is outside of the financial system

a very innovative alternative i don't know what's the what's they say in the financial quarterly so uncorrelated risk correlated risk there you go in a world of so many correlated thank you so much you know every morning down on its own you know it's artsy it's you know. i guess you could call that the mother nature risk now that is not all of my conversation with jim grant you can go online and catch a web extra at our you tube channel it'll be up shortly because i'm sure you saw the j.p. morgan reported a five point eight billion dollar london whale trading loss to date a lot more than they originally reported it would be and they will clawed back compensation for two years for the traders involved and their boss i know drew but did these clawbacks reinstate. realistic accountability you can find out what mr grant has to say about club x. but first this.

it is friday the thirteenth and we are going to be right so there's a graveyard behind me but there's a church right over here. which i don't know if you're not from new york are you haven't spent time on wall street you may not know that this is actually on the wall street right across the street which is kind of interesting and for me makes me wonder if during the financial panic during in two thousand and eight if if people were coming here. for a his things were just so great i'm sure they were but you know the irony is that the church used to have a lot more power in society in the west of the middle ages obviously than then it

does now today the fed is kind of taken over the role of the priesthood the monetary presuppose our destination where we call them or monetary priests but they used to be that the church has an incredible amount of power unfortunately now it's kind of waned a little bit now but i think that i have that unfortunately i think that for you to get back i'm a little competition is the here what i think that the fed i mean the fed has got such a strong you know stranglehold on the economy and on the culture of this country that the church should step into that vacuum it's been on competitive for a while used to pay the church for indulgences and things like that if you want to commit sin you have to pay the church i think there should be some sort of time on wall street since i mean if you want to find a way to claw back with a book club at a club back some of those bonuses apply back some of that ill gotten gain or you could do that if you could demand that bankers proportionally paying indulgence. spies' the church is a repatriates them right through the government i mean it's an ad hoc i mean it's

not the ideal system i'd like but it's some way to kind of get that money back to people well what's interesting about that is you can't legislate morality as we've seen that it's very difficult to prove some of these alleged crimes that occurred during the financial crisis and by law to measure. these morality sure it's difficult to to prosecute criminal prog you have to prove intent although a lot of these actions in the spirit of fraud are criminal tried so and the spirit that's reading in the spirit has been broken see the spirit of this material to come to slobber it's been broken and that's why we're here at the church lives the spirit yes there is the present and we've to really to bring that spirit into the law of the law and i was that it's a zombie again because the customs rizzo's fish and zombie banks we do breed to bring spirit a spirit a life of soul back you'd be right you should the government and demetrius the course there are a lot of work here at the church on wall street that brings i guess the spiritual

world to wall street we need to restore this spirit of the law that we are among the dead who we honor we are not at all of the bed we cannot speak so we want to honor the dead no no i don't i don't agree oh ok you're putting someone else on the senator's book up there were there were there brokering already there was i've heard that about that that would send a small i think the point is that on friday the thirteenth we are in a graveyard trying to invoke the spirit of the law that seems to be missing when it comes to financial crime. all right that's it for our saturday that's all we have time for from our jaunt to new york but will be back in washington on monday with charles ferguson of inside job until then follow me on twitter that or you tube or hulu and from everyone here thanks and have a great night. wealthy

british soil. is no time to go to the next we'll go right on out of. their. markets why not. come to. find out what's really happening to the global economy with mike stronger for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune into cars a report on our.