in the end he had a speech censored by the romney people and you have a very very great difficulty given electoral rules to get on the ballot if you're not a republican or democrat so you have in have this built in headwind but he also another explanation is we have got we've moved from a republic that celebrated a free speech and individual liberty to one where there's a general consensus across the board of this idea of empire so bush and cheney and obama and romney are basically saying in the same libretto with regard to our need to lead the world who will lead it if we with our great angelic attitude doesn't do so so we think about intervening in syria and we intervene in libya and we've got troops and and cia in uganda and we're fighting wars in afghanistan bleeding over to pakistan and we're in yemen and all these places and this is at a staggering cost which is causing the budget deficit we have a national security budget without one going to rouge trillion dollars. taking over the entire program and mentioning everything i want to mention so let me go to

christopher's so everything's constructed consensus is already constructed before people vote this is essentially what bruce is saying. i totally disagree with bruce and with nicholas i think there's a huge choice a huge difference in the outcome of this election if romney wins if the republicans win the white house they will also probably keep the majority in the house and wins a majority in the senate and if the republicans control all the important political positions the white house the senate and see house then you will see a huge difference america has a huge dept more than sixteen billion dollars that is more than one hundred percent of g.d.p. and the next four years will be about who pays for that and i can tell you it will be a huge difference was obama controls the white house or mitt romney controls the white house at the moment in the debates you can see that because both of them are timid to articulate what they want to do. the moment you don't see it as

a debate but if you follow how republicans think and how democrats think and that it's the huge ideological difference i'm coming from germany a country where most political parties agree so all social democratic parties in the states in the united states live already for almost eight years you have a huge fight at every election whether you want to have less state less taxes or if you think the government is also responsible for the poor and that you have to subsidize poor people there i mean. go ahead jump in bro i think that misses the point the the fact is that you know you get have an ideological debate to some degree during the campaign about when it comes to actually governing it's the same old story obama said lots of things during his campaign and then he renounced virtually all of them when he became president and that's what you can expect with mitt romney romney's got five positions on every single issue that he's jumped forward and back and with regard to the youth vote

it's historically true very very tiny turnout where that youth vote there they haven't got the the income yet to worry about the taxes to them the national debt sixteen seventeen trillion is just a number and if you look at the so-called differences between the two even if you take the most austere budget of paul ryan that's viewed as the most radical it still doesn't lead to a balanced budget till about twenty forty and it's the difference between his budget and obama's is the difference between a twenty five trillion deficit i mean national debt in two thousand and twenty as opposed to twenty three trillion which is trivial with regard to the impact on the economy and the drying up of the funds for investment and otherwise and if you talk about one of the things that romney is going to do that are going to be repeal mr mr obama's programs there he said nothing about immigration with regard to the amnesty with regard to the health care act he said well i got to keep on twenty six years old you you have preexisting conditions will continued on. for those who

already have insurance all these things just indicate he's moving around at the margins and if you talk about even when you have a president controlled the congress obama had a democratic congress in his first two years and it is very program just like bush if you're going to nicholas lemann over the last four years the one percent the so-called one percent have done pretty well the rest of them haven't that's so what's the difference between republican to democrat right now. wall street we call it goes right to. the core issues of the americans or pleased to see the snow is a situation where we have a democracy that is not working world were the reality is that we have great plutocratic we control republic that is working very well indeed. of course it is whether obama or second term will make a shift there and tax the rich this is the basic issue whether we are going to come there and let the world think we're through with the one percent. it was

a staggering event it has to use a different it's going to be selected. as a word on this is really where you go ahead jump in we've heard from the answers if what we have which we have obama who is raising a billion dollars you know and the c.e.o. you runs these fundraisers fifty sixty one hundred thousand dollars for a dinner i mean he's going out every day getting money from fat cats a billion dollars the most expensive campaign ever one hundred ninety three million dollars in the last month alone and he's not going to be in the hands of the plutocrats it's just people who want them to fund you know the green technologies as opposed to bailing out the banks but it's still the money that calls the tune and when you go up on capitol hill despite the statement that well there really is a huge ideological difference between the republicans and democrats it's not there i'm in washington every single day i'm up and congress two or three times a week and sure sometimes the public statements are different but it comes to votes nope they're all in favor of the government growing bigger and bigger and bigger

not i don't want to ever abolish any particular program and what they do is they fund everybody's goodies by borrowing more money and throwing all of this debt sixteen seventeen twenty trillion dollars on posterity that doesn't have a vote and it's the same script you talk about right now the so-called fiscal cliff they're plotting right now to kick the ball down the road they'll do a continuing resolution real delay intrinsics months or whatever and. fashion here christiane go ahead jump in why we would be different if obama is reelected why. well obama used his majority of which was talking for the first years obama did big things for american politics he did see a stimulus program he did say health care reform he did financial market reform he added don't ask don't tell that means how you treat homosexuals in the military he had to disarmament contractors russia about nuclear missiles and he had two new supreme court judges so if you think that is nothing and it just means that america

goes the same way as if a republican would be in the white house i would just say you are not watching politics in the united states of course in the second half of his presidency he couldn't continue because the republicans had the majority in congress at least in the house and so it makes a huge difference but you will see ask people who earn less than fifty thousand a year household money it makes for a huge difference whether the republicans ryan and romney will slash all those programs or whether in some ways they will continue i agree with you bruce that both parties have no good plan how to cut the deficit that is a big problem but when you come to the question what are they willing to do to cut the deficit then for the republicans it's even worse they want to slash taxes for the rich and obama and the democrats want to raise taxes for the people who can really afford to pay a little bit more ok because of your last word before we go and before we go to the break i had gentlemen. well the fact is we don't know what obama would do

a second term in the first term is very constrained to a large extent by getting elected in a second term and the other one people overlook is they see obama as a standard mean stream american that they grew up in a y. in a very different culture we don't know what barack obama really fix and it's quite possible that he's a populist on the scale ok gentlemen we have to go to a short break and after that chuck wright will continue our discussion on the us political system stay starting. to. see. the. secret laboratory to mccurdy was able to build

a most sophisticated robot which on fortunately doesn't give a darn about anything turns mission to teach creation why it should care about humans and. this is why you should care only on the dot com. even in the autumn of the years. it's never too late to start. try extreme bearing like. lifting championship. or become a. gold.

by horse. by tractor. by car for the road and it's. as a carpenter. as a stove setter. as a farmer. as an assistant. as a friend. as a relative. delivering post and delivering goods. wealthy

british. market. was really happening to the global economy. the global financial headlines. is a report on our. blog .

welcome back to toronto computable remind you we're talking about the u.s. political season. and. ok bruce i think we're back to you i mean why isn't in this campaign another presidential campaign speech that the americans made in predicting this year don't talk about obama's use of drones incarceration of poverty levels a lot of these these are really serious problems in the united states and i don't see people debating it at a high level ok why is that why is that shut out of political discussion and everyone's talking about big bird you know i think that's the frightening thing that these major major issues of the rule of law unconstitutionality president being able to put american citizens on assassination list detentions and it will indefinitely and guantanamo accusation or trial he is god secret interpretations of

the patriot act that enable him to sweep up all of our e-mails of all of our phone conversations and keep those ca's without any probable cause you surveillance drones and there's virtually no discussion as you you talk about about a fair playing field that are not the one percent that don't get all the government bailouts whether it's the green technologies they've got huge moneys to go bankrupt building solar panels or the big banks they've got huge staggering billions of dollars for irresponsibly you know lending money with through fraud on mortgages and whatever and this is where it's frightening because there is a consensus between the republicans and democrats you know nothing happens and when you have an issue that doesn't even make the mainstream debate that's the time to worry that you're headed toward self ruination nicholas what do you think about that because i just mentioned some really major issues affecting you know good deal of the population to me not the one percent but that the presidential candidates don't debate it ok why is that is there some kind of censure not to talk about it

a consensus not to talk about these issues nicholas in sacramento go ahead. well one of those just in mainstream journalism having been stringer annoying a lot of journalists is there's so much bad news in the elections that right now in this year journalists just stop writing bad economic news they're tired of bad news . but i did notice on google trends that the term the great recession has dropped at the beginning of this year just dropped out of mainstream media so we have this picture of know that the great recession is over and we're in recovery i live in this i work in valley where the great recession is going just fine and we're not worried about a. double dip because the first that there's going to strong so right here the water phones are closed about their own public bathrooms their clothes the economy has tanked and it's staying that way and the question really coming up in the second term is or are we going to pull the money out of the rich people's pockets i'm building it for because i'm glad you brought up money kristof i'll go back to

you in frankfurt i mean another kind of taboo topic is campaign finance ok where you get your money ok and since two thousand and ten you don't have to say i mean that's even more corrupting of the political system ok i'm a child of of watergate i remember campaign finance was really important you know and were rules and now they're all gone ok so again it goes back to the one percent and the one percent support romney and obama. well i don't agree it is true is that the american system of financing campaigns is totally strange for us and western europe as it is strange for us and as well i suppose far too big money is involved and i think also if there's too much money involved is this corrupting politics in a certain way but it is not true that these are subjects all the time as a written about it it's talked about in t.v. presidential candidates is scaling it are they discussing it no they're not. yeah

ok are the only voice we're getting are you going to or is this which i heard i happen to live in the united states and i can tell you is that people are not all the time only paying attention what's to come to that so there's a much broader the debate in the united states in t.v. channels and newspapers almost every day you're going to want to hear. what impact does it have when the political parties agree that they like the status quo with campaign financing their way and there's no matter what the public says it doesn't matter what the probably about but you know why it i mean of course you can say is that they're all agreed they don't agree so democrats don't like the new law so that you don't have to tell if you are a political organization the issue of the money the money they will do if you have money when they don't tell anybody where they got it from bruce to you it's difference how both are you ready for some of the. campaign the issue of campaign finance has been complicated by decision of the united states supreme court called

citizens united which held that there's a first amendment right for corporations labor unions to spend unlimited amounts of money as long as they don't coordinate it with a particular candidate the coordination is really a joke because they have people who have worked with the candidate for fifty years they know exactly what the candidate once said and then runs these so-called independent expenditure groups and spends twenty thirty fifty one hundred million dollars it could be an individual like sheldon adelson who's put in twenty thirty million to romney's campaign the democrats are a stop from complaining about it because they go get money from the george soros isn't super rich in hollywood and of course the media and some sentence joyce said because where's that money spent on advertising the t.v. advertising you know rates and they make huge amounts of money off of carrying these ads but i want to go back to i think to the central point you made these critical issues not being debated the most important one to me is the president's claim of unilateral authority to go to war whether it's in libya or if you're in iran and yemen. and this the last time there was a serious debate

a presidential campaign in one thousand twenty turned on league of nations in the united states and that was an issue over whether the president wilson was going to through the league of nations be able to unilaterally commit the united states to go to war without congressional authorization and when we think these wars cost trillions of dollars brave men and women dying and at a time when we're running these huge deficits we spending still three hundred fifty million dollars a day in afghanistan bombing rocks you know with with our soldiers there a million dollars a cost of a one to one troop sten spending there and with this issue not being debated that because only congress can authorize it we're doomed to do financial bankruptcy because we can't sustain you know permanent war global war everywhere aside from the fact that encroaches on our liberty at home but that's the big issue the president gets to go to war when every feels like it will be the founder of shellings in the constitution for i don't know if i'm going to because it seems to me that you know obama or the president the united states can go to war against any

individual he or she wants now with impunity and i think the republicans and the republicans on sea level problem with that they don't seem to have a problem with that at all i'm talking about drone congress ruled over for the war you know it is it is a long time before obamacare morn. go ahead bill i understand it's not it's it's certainly not always did it first appear on obama's watch that's for sure here over you know it's very consistent it's consistent and i wonder yeah watch ok now exactly it's been in states been institutionalized in forged into what you would call an executive power doctrine even though it's counter constitutional and the whole reason why is that our founding as a nation over two hundred years ago we debated about half of the time on the constitution as ensuring only congress could get us into war because executive branch had a tendency to magnify danger because that wartime they get all the power the taxes the money the contracts the footprints in the sands of time you know being number one around the world and now we moved in turn that concept on its head and i can

guarantee no matter who is in the pray who is in the presidency republican or democrat obama or romney they will go to war because that's their idea of what it means to be the most powerful nation on the world and now not only declare war against individuals but even u.s. citizens are now subject to being declared as objects or subjects of war even when they haven't committed treason ok chris christie if you're disagreeing go ahead germany there is really going to. not at all eager at some moment to go to war because they have had two wars for many years in afghanistan the iraq people are tired of doing it and the presidential candidates know that tired of doing it that was the reason why for example in libya they didn't want to commit more than a few ass strikes from from above there will be no war on iran so will nobody intervene in syria because america is tired of it so groups you can talk at all all the time hope the little runts they are in reality they are not because they want to and when not only is this election also the next election and to sort of the

american population is against going to another war so it will not happen. ok the president's go to war irrespective of the population ok nicholas go ahead sacramento jump and go ahead it's worth it or was it a point that obama's words of the road really cheap human error. the bush war which is the expense of war you can trust the word libya where the ships were kept offshore and therefore hundreds of tomahawk missiles we know what the bill was. somewhere you know could cost a billion dollars a billion here and a billion there but it was a very much cheaper war than afghanistan or iraq was so obama's words he started which is consistent with what the clinton clinton short cheap wars ok go ahead jump in but but that overlooks the fact that the staggering amounts are keeping you know virtually hundreds if not a thousand military bases abroad having a huge you know weapons program or we're building ships that tend twelve billion

dollars for aircraft carriers that we don't need. aircraft that cost five hundred million dollars a copy it's not just the fighting of the war is preparing to fight a war everywhere in the world the now or so-called pivoting towards asia so now china is the next day i was only on the enjoyment i said i will do some more new ground here kristie i mean being a german but living in the united states what do you think of america's cultural wars that galvanizes the the grass roots ok i think there's a number of publicans have made some obvious gaffes about. a number of things from abortion to legal rape eccentrics that's i mean it does work in america unfortunately. it is fascinating for european to watch that as a little bit beyond our what we can really understand but you know the interesting thing is people who are exaggerates ideological wars get punished by as a voter as you can see that in the senate races in missouri is that you had a republican senator a candidate who was talking about legal. how it how it could be legal to force

a woman to do to sexual activities and even when she gets pregnant that she would not be allowed to have an abortion so there was an uproar in the united states you could see in the polls how female voters were heading to the democrats so yes there are some strange people who try to force strange subjects into a campaign but when they do so they get punished and i can tell you that's a republican mitt romney who want to keep so you can paint only about the economy about the unemployment rate and this stuff he is angry when fellow republicans are trying to start but i want to know hardcore love their ideological republican be gentle you're going to give you the last word in the program go ahead. there's no doubt that the republicans and the hardcore make these social issues a campaign matter but when they get in governing they just walk away from them i know in my experience in the reagan administration he didn't do anything with regard to roe vs race there was only major very much

a riveting debate many thanks and i guess a day in sacramento washington and in frankfurt and thanks to our viewers for watching us here at the see you next time and remember. to. want. to be soo much brighter than. the sun from phones to pressure. me please don't talk t.v. don't come. close to the.

audience technology innovation all the lives developments from around russia we've got the future covered. even in the autumn of the years. is never too late to start. try extreme paragliding. or become a. cold. california desert offers an air show and an uninitiated museum was a matter you. most of the residents never

profit from the performances notion of coming our signature to their new look up and there's want to check in on you he's the alpha beta gamma he was always the fine now trying to treat his leg out with out there know what's going on they can pinpoint you. right now. shells become income mortal danger and a piece of art is still be exempt and directed. to come from pretty. bums. on our team. download the official publication so folks choose your language stream quality and enjoy your favorite. t.v. is not required to watch all its hit all you need is your mobile device to watch on scene any time.

you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear or see some other part of it and realize that everything. i thought you knew you don't know i'm tom harpur welcome to the big picture. so.