side aggression however the c.s. tiro also gets involved in fighting international terrorism drug trafficking and illegal immigration prison play it was reported the organization could deploy troops in afghanistan but c s t o secretary general nikolai barr do quickly rejected the rumors saying journalists misinterpreted the words of his deputy the serious cio was currently an observer organisation and the united nations. was not who mr more do share in the welcome to the show though. let's start with the recent incident on the syrian turkish border i was able to heard quite a few alarming reports recently learning rights after that both us film and so on to use it all but that situation on the border sounded particularly serious to me who feel lately as to when the turkish troops started moving towards the syrian border and you would be the first time in a long time i was really long armed go to this because this is

a really dangerous situation that they were the media just blew it out of his truck or shut up us they start the. i think it is series. of incidents between two nations may have far reaching consequences that especially if one of them is in such disarray you could or should do the crucial to turkey's a nato member syria is russia. the. with that situation really evolve into nato russia confrontation you know i don't think so that would be unlikely scenario but the events that they did happen are alarming the president if you will actually everything we have been witnessing for the past few years in the bus leading is good points in one direction we are shifting towards global instability option global and needs to be used if i'm referring to. the whole arc of instability that

spans you know in the arab world beastly consequent libya the murder of the libyan leader at the situation in syria situation in lebanon and the numerous problems in the caucasus problems in africa the world music heading toward instability used to be with his you're saying the world is heading toward instability. do you mean we may have another world war coming our way to not a year when you stop there i wouldn't go that far but the number and intensity of local conflicts you can each story is definitely increasing it's going to. hypothetical it. should need to join the conflict on turkey's side. what would be the sea studios response with regard to its ally syria. are you considered your options in a sea of steel. you want to move strictly

speaking we in the c.s.t. you don't view syria as our l.-i almost never come talk to actually we don't even have any interaction or any contacts with syrian security agencies which so we just money there the situation there in the book and i really hope it doesn't it doesn't get to the point you know where we have a military block or an intervening on behalf of one of the nation's. capital and i really hope that this water incident will soon be over and the other problem is will be resolved even though at the moment the situation is actually getting worse someone who because right after this incident we will have a problem with this plane which was an route from moscow to damascus but it was turkish fighter jets made to land in turkey. so the conflicts between the two nations is obviously escalating the conflict there but i still believe that common sense will eventually prevail if you could ignore the. lots talk about this plane

in more detail. how did you react to what. we're involved in any discussions with political leaders or with the military but no one really has been no discussion on this issue hurt their careers that our reaction of course is extremely negative because they used warplanes against a civilian aircraft that's hard to even though they could have used diplomatic channels to resolve all the problems if there were any more actually i'd like to go back to what i said earlier that there was another the world was heading towards global instability so it could do it. today we see lots of signs indicating that the whole system security is about to collapse it was a process. for example we see the leader of a nation being murdered. we see nations your own supplying arms and money come from one of the sides in an internal conflict and was the former short regime i mean and

they're supplying arms to rebels not to the legitimate authorities. right even though the country has a legitimate government we see warplanes used against civilian aircraft but it's the soldiers of one country killing peacekeepers from another country as it was in two thousand and eight we see investors killed we see ambassadors killed people we see a u.s. diplomat killed in an arab country tourist this is what concerns us even more. and what's more we see diplomacy is that you're being replaced with sanctions six something we see tougher sanctions against this country more sanctions against this country. everything indicates that the world really needs the global security system the direction president suggested just a few years ago i must limit on bush or bush from a short one. recently you signed an agreement on creation between the c.s.t.

all secretariat and the un secretariat is it part of your africa man some of these holes or is the something totally unrelated. if you will and want to remove the united nations as an umbrella organization in the world with which we should cooperate with a memorandum and cooperation in fact i just came back from new york where we signed in other memorandum on peacekeeping cooperation. agreement this means torch that we in the c.s. to you does not rule development but he's giving theories as part of un efforts to establish what i'm called to your conducting a peacekeeping exercise or acknowledge you just called there a lasting brotherhood twenty twelve that's a very you invited unit was or. what makes this exercise special lists and why do you see it is first joins us the sister has conducted drills for a number of years what do you say it's the first time. indeed we regularly conduct

exercises with various forces but it was only a year ago you know what we completed the formation of our own peacekeeping force it was a start it today our peacekeeping force is forty five hundred strong at the other this number and eight hundred are police and the rest are troops. to go to from there once we completed the formation process we started the company training program but we began to develop coordination even the tween units we can different countries is going to keeton so this is the first exercise for the c.s.t. oh a peacekeeping force because you do want to of course we've had un observers because we follow un standards un guidelines and un practices and we're going to through them collapsing in the park and we always say that we will only gauge in peacekeeping t.v. if they are saying you must by the united nations as i mean. this is not the first time you come to our program when you were here on our show a couple. years ago you told us that you would refocus on internal threats rather

than the external ones that were so there you concluded the serif focusing process and what are these internal threats. it's not like we exactly for cues on a certain type of threats we rather respond to the real threats we face in the c.s.t. oh the go to the security issues we need to address the movie in which we are not concerned about external threats that much we do not expect a military conflict within you outside power but it was things came to in fact we got from did most of the problems our nations face today. to be internal and forgotten still because nothing was terrorism drugs if you did it the human trafficking. which is getting supporters in our countries. therefore we used it to the vehicle to us to counter the challenges that our nations face and

the challenges i mean the internal go to the doctors because of that i knew that. speaking of peacekeeping missions just the other day there was a real forward suggesting that our peacekeepers me go to afghanistan after u.s. and nato troops leave the country and leave the foreign ministry quickly dismissed the idea but more do you think it is possible more due in theory anything can happen i know but it's still in afghanistan is it completely untrue or if there were indeed some plans under consideration this report is completely untrue there has never been such a plan in a dia and i hope we will never have to send our peacekeepers or any were troops to afghanistan which was a legacy of goodness why is that is that because the memories of the afghan war are still fresh when our generation and the word of ghana stand is it to me first or because this. positions itself is an organization that is only concerned with the

security of its member states. if we have to address issues related to. only deal with the issues on the afghan border or in the border area secondly there is a mission that operates there and a main date from the u.n. security council unfortunately as far as i can tell you can this mission is yet to achieve its objectives and i really hope to see that they work hard to achieve the goals which were the purpose of the nato intervention in afghanistan in the first place it was the these goals they can withdraw their troops with the she says nicolai but i do just checked with general c. asti al spotlight will be back shortly after a break and we'll continue this issue looking to talk about of ghana's that stated . that.

wealthy british style. that's not on. the. market why not scandals find out what's really happening to the global economy with max conjure for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune in to kaiser report on our. mission. which brightened if you knew me about song from. feldstein pressure.

from stunts on t.v. dot com. i'm in sochi the oldest city in europe the host of a twenty fold c. in winter the cricket. song says. thank you although playing. a. saucy. thank you. some way a. doctor is a. friday is a. common. sudsy it's so true. it was the strangest attempt of a military takeover of. the murray the us president trying to overthrow a foreign country's government but his strategic games must hurry and america

recognised its defeat. questioning if cuba managed to cope with its victory not all dogs of the all politics oh god. i live here in cuba you go by the rajab but i live in the cuban missile crisis games and reality t.v. . me cleaves looking. at least. some. folks. playing polo.

welcome back to spotlight just a reminder that my guest on the show today is nick. general of the sea as c.e.o. collective security treaty organization an organization that includes the countries of the former soviet union mr burns staying with her guests and syria still has a special working group for afghanistan. and you're seeing there again a stand is beyond the scope of your organization and you can only address some issues on the afghan border at the most about any event in this working group before afghanistan or. this group is made up of national representatives from all of the member states of the group who first it coordinates our efforts we see in providing aid to afghanistan to ensure stability. we change

the data on the developments in afghanistan and we coordinate our activities to address the threats coming from afghanistan. is because we're also this is if you used to group up some of we were going to stay put and with the greater visors with a lot of information which helps prepare our recommendations for the respective leaders or countries but you couldn't be delivering your national currently this group has been instructed by the presidency would you put their report to congress on what may happen in afghanistan after nato troops leave the country in two thousand and fourteen can you continue to not in other words we want to know what scenarios we need face there most importantly we steps we need to take more in order to prevent this situation from having a negative effect with our countries some of. that of that you regularly mention nato in your speeches and interviews. and you have repeatedly said he would like to

copper it with nato. obviously they're not willing to engage in this cooperation. i'm following your comments and i know that you said recently that they are reluctant to cooperate for purely political reasons what are these reasons to mean that in principle both sides would like to cooperate but they are unable to do so because of politics i think you do so they don't want to cooperate with you even though common sense says they should and i think the experts who are involved in security issues but are not involved in politics have long realized there are two organizations join their efforts in certain areas and everybody would benefit from that but this is obviously one of the few there is no denying that city why then is nato able to cooperate with russia to russia cop proration is definitely developing i did seems to be unable to cooperate with the sea of steel.

and i think that's because some people in nato member states might think this direct contact with integration among the former soviet states. that it was a read some of the cables published by we could i saw them use this argument because now if we recognize this. we would effectively recognize integration among the former soviet republics. perhaps more it would be easier for them to work with their partners others nations on a bilateral basis. karimov suspended his country's membership in a sea studio this summer so what is the current status of those big stan and these are true that they meet join nato. or is this report completely untrue as well. i don't think it's true or circles at least the foreign policy concept adopted in his biggest in because. and it with you because the country cannot be part of the

military alliance and a host of other countries military bases or troops who only say tory is biggest band will be participation and this is crucial it is your dissipation membership they have suspended we hope this is a temporary measure and then why did they take this step and i think they did because countries vastly different approaches to building a collective security system started six of the member states have been saying we should join our forces we should form a combined force in which we should set up negative for coordination so in the middle should work together in various areas but i won't go much into detail but the government is biggest in keep saying no we want to do everything within it by that reform it only knows we're not interested in collective activities. when we say we should coordinate our efforts in aiding afghanistan's post conflict like instructions to the biggest and says it will only work in

a bilateral format with him guess ten human not only do they declined to engage in collective efforts but they insist there should be no collective efforts on treading or charters so. what happens if one of the seized your members who decides to develop these bilateral contacts and perhaps even interest send their troops to afghanistan. would you do you need an approval from the a.c.s. cio they're free to do what they want. they don't need an approval to send their troops to keep their word in the news but they need an approval if they want to join a military alliance or under the new rules a third countries military bases or troops in their territory. recently we had need to representatives on our show and i asked them whether georgia could join . nato any time soon and they said no we have no plans to accept georgia right now

we want to see first how the election. does this mean that you and you will soon become a nato member you should really ask nato of course but what do you think i just here would need to say they say that the door for georgia to join nato is not closed and we should we think that any mechanical expansion of this military alliance that was in violation of the understanding we used to have about nato expansion in the one nine hundred eighty s. but if you would be counterproductive to go back up nicely especially in the case of georgia with disputes. once again this is not just russia's position this is a point of view shared by all member states by it and. so i think these developments with regard to georgia can only aggravate all the negative trends in

the former post sorry territory. and let's not put an actual. practical in the same thing recently about the matter with the troops just a couple days ago and he said it i quote expansion of nato operations so those are a threat to our territory there and we need to neutralize these rats it's going to look at what are these threats to our territory that wouldn't talks about just one thing somebody may seize our territory you know how do you plan to neutralize that i think. he meant to say that we see military facilities and infrastructure being set up along the perimeter of member states so the new primarily russia and other areas we see forward operating bases being set up in bulgaria and romania we see missile defense installations being deployed with arms being supplied to georgia and so on but because. military infrastructure purpose

if its military infrastructure is being set up purposes. which countries do they target what are their objectives why would they spend hundreds of millions of dollars to set up new readers sites. it is men for protection against iran but we all know this is not true so i think this is what president putin meant our view is that need to pose a threat merely c.s.u. member states especially russia and naturally every nation has to take appropriate measures. so roughly that's what the president must have meant. let's go back to cooperation between the two and they're so used to you. i know that you personal support such cooperation of course how can this cooperation benefit us here in these words mutually beneficial but all the time. i will feel

better if i know that has made friends with the rest but what benefit do you see. we have serial areas where we can cooperate. first at the nato operations in afghanistan. that you are aware of the transit situation. collectively not in a bilateral format on a collective basis we can provide assistance in supplying the international forces in afghanistan. secondly not coming drug trafficking out of afghanistan. nato forces are deployed in afghanistan and we can work on the water in the border areas that we can join our efforts in cordon it our t.v.'s there next naturally in many disasters. we can hold joint exercises coordinate our emergency relief efforts for the opposite message we can also exchange data our forces we can collaborate in

producing military analysis of the current situation so there are quite a few areas where we can work together and benefit from it. russia is the dominant. adding force militarily to both among the former soviet republics and in the sea a studio but would you do you think this will always be a case do you think we may ever face a situation where it will be some other country not russia playing be a leading role in this year's geo. that are in their case russia would not be interested in being at sea still members that it's business war goes all i can say store is that russia is certainly one of the core members in the c.s.t. oh by economy it is superior to all the other member states in economic and military terms today it is russia who supports other member states stories but i cannot see russia done in a c.s.

to you all decisions are based on a consensus. i can give you dozens of examples. just something you and another member state would object to it's an organ we would do something else instead but this is particularly true is because standing at the moment to me they have stopped us from developing some areas. were very interesting. but now they have left or suspended their participation right i mean you know what russia did not dominate the c.s.u. russia has never imposed anything. nor does it dictate is actually very tactical units but if one of its partners objects to something russia would never go twisting their hands you can take my word in that space thank you unfortunately our time is up but i should say just to remind that my guest on the show today wasn't about to do that exactly general c s b and that's it for now for all of us if you

want terror cells public to drop mail and squat life we'll be back with more comments i was going on outside russia and so let's stay on our team and take it. gold fever. turnstyles hands into slaves. my father but also among brothers

involved in the monsoon and since i started working in amman i stated. multinationals. is a cash cow to be milked dry but i think that in this country gold medal logie as an environmental cost which is an acceptable local business was labeled illegal and controlled by criminals you know in order to protect our lives our families and to work in peace. most but we are forced to pay protection to illegal groups what price is colombia going to pay for. the modest effect on r.t. . for the. science technology innovation all the least of belem inst from around russia we've

got the future covered. eleven mission free accreditation free in-store chargers free. range and free. free still child free. old free blood counseling videos for your media projects and free media down to r.t. dot com in.