that's impossible but i would say that it seems a bit of a stretch and the logic of it is not at all clear at the same time i think that there are there are plenty of reason to believe that there are forces within lebanon itself i.e. the g. hardest of the sunni jihadist movement particularly based in the north who have their own interest in destabilizing lebanon and who would be very well aware that the assassination of a leading sunni figure within the lebanese government would be the perfect formula for doing that as well as for energizing and giving momentum to that very soon a jihadist movement and i would just point out that this is indeed what happened after the assassination of wright president hariri in two thousand and five that was precisely what happened ok so i would suggest that there is an alternative explanation ok in

a cloud if i go to you in beirut with what your interpretation of this because there's so many different one thought there go ahead there are there are it's a very confusing situation but let me just remind you what president bashar al assad said a few months ago when things started going really bad and he said that he would be willing to set fire to the entire region i don't know these were his exact words but it was more or less along those lines that he would destabilize the whole region and so this could very well be along the lines of what he said the other thing is gareth just said there the assassination of a government official this is more than just a government official this is this is the assassination of the head of the intelligence services. it is very serious when you're sensing someone of that stature you're you're you're demining you're taking apart the structure of the states so i think it's not just a minister of state or a. a politician that's been skilled it's someone who is very important imagine in

the united states if they killed the head of the cia or in russia. with the security forces there that. if they killed those people this is what we're dealing with today you're you're you're you're taking away the structure of the of the lebanese state and that's a very dangerous. few and be rich not very difficult to destabilize lebanon is it. well the situation has been very tense since the assassination of prime minister former prime minister if you had it in two thousand and five there's been a really there have been some clashes between the two different groups in lebanon on that. you know supported by foreign powers. but i don't think there to destabilize the situation lebanon is in the hands of mr ass or in the hands of fourteenth of march or in the hands of the the salafism the north or even in the hands of hezbollah if this is

a matter that is in the hands of the international community and i think the fact that lebanon has not drifted to a total as state of chaos and the past three or four days is because the international community and more nominally i would say the representatives of the five permanent members of the security council have made a clear statement that they support the current government and they support because they want to the situation to remain stable in lebanon and so therefore there because they know very well that if things go out of hand it will be very difficult to to regain their minimum stability that is required in order to reach a political settlement so i think at the end they know very well that any clash between the two groups will actually involve international powers and they are not ready for that and i think especially the americans the americans have elections coming up and i think it's election time and when it's election time it's it's not very wise to go into a battlefield where you don't know the where the results are not guaranteed and the

evidence that the results are not guaranteed is that so many western governments thought that the syrian government was going to collapse the first two months three months four march now it's been two years of fighting and destruction and and i don't think there are any sign that their achievements it is going to collapse on so that that that is really will a situation not allowed on the site about syria gas if i go to you i mean people are saying they're outside meddling inside of lebanon but it's outside meddling inside of syria this is why this is all probably happening. well of course and this is a situation where there's really no possibility of a resolution of this of this civil war in syria without the international community doing much more to try to bring about peace i mean that has to be there has to be a shift in the international community i.e. the united states the europeans in particular. from

destabilizing syria and to getting rid of assad to trying to find a way. toward a peaceful settlement that that's the only possibility and i think that that is the missing piece still at this point you know i do understand i'm quite ready to agree that that u.s. policy while i think it at the beginning it was simply interested in destabilizing i.e. getting rid of assad's regime but i think that it is now aware that the dangers of that are almost if not at least equal at least equal to the advantages of getting rid of assad and that what could come after that could even be worse than than the regime so i think that there is a degree of prudence now that was absent at the beginning of this of this adventure in syria cloud what do you think about that you think there's

a rethink going on because the rebels certainly don't seem to be changing their mind. the rebels are getting stronger i think. they're getting stronger they're getting more arms they're getting more support from saudi arabia from turkey from qatar from the u.a.e. from the united states from france great britain i think what needs to happen first of all is i think that the united states and the especially the united states needs to start thinking outside the cold war era i think we're still very much thinking cold war terms i think russia has to become more involved in a positive manner in getting a cease fire and change in imposed in syria russia still has a lot of influence with syria it's probably the only ones with along with the iranians and the chinese to some degree but i think russia has for historic reasons a very important role to play and i think the americans are missing the opportunity there and instead of using the russia as

a partner therefore they're trying to seek a long cold war terms and it's upsetting moscow of course ok you know if i go to omar i mean everything they clog just said there you know with the arming and saudi arabian everything out that's all bad for lebanon it always is bad for lebanon when stuff like this is happening. well yes yes it's bad for lebanon and any any any involvement of the lebanese in the syrian conflict is bad for lebanon are it on the side of the regime or on the side of the rabble i just want to say that you know the there has always been a call that russia can play a bigger role and and that russia has. interests in syria and therefore it should play a bigger role and but i think it's a bit misleading because the there are two sides of the story so well the russians the iranians the chinese and their g.m. are saying that the americans and the europeans and the and the western community

can do can do more by stopping the smuggling of weapons by pushing the saudis the qataris the turks and the and their allies to stop smuggling weapons into syria and i disagree that the americans are not taking the full opportunity there taken a full opportunity and the evidence is that the as the other guest said from beirut that the the rebel groups are getting stronger yes they're getting stronger in terms of military equipment also i mean the today the year doubled. as was the case in afghanistan against as always union and the and that in the past century they have now. missiles a drunk missiles that anti-aircraft advance missiles that are are being smuggled by the americans through their allies to the rebel forces so but the situation and the solution the situation points that the solution is not a military solution there should be a dialogue between the different groups inside syria as sides still enjoys some

popularity in syria and therefore there should be a cease fire there is a chance now to have been called for a cease fire adjoining becoming a it and hopefully there will be this will be a start for a longer ceasefire longer true is that will allow the different groups to come on the dialogue table and. find a body to conform to show yes and i would agree with me i don't know what we're going to knock you out of the break here cause you're agreeing or disagreeing jumping go ahead sure i am i'm i'm i agree i think i think it's very important that a solution is found if i think it's important to take a step back and look at look at the situation overall the middle east and how it relates to over the years and if you look at it in currents of ten years since one thousand nine hundred eighty eight. let's take that as a starting point the creation of the state of israel every ten years it's gotten progressively worse and more dangerous and the weapons are getting stronger and more powerful and more dangerous and more more lethal and we're not getting anywhere it's just i call you let me jump in here and we're going to go to

a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on lebanon stay with us. and. we'll do the. previous solar power this month the moon is the center of our universe the tides of forever while the sun's rays can be fickle innovative construction methods life costs as well as environmental damage while brand new turbines boost efficiency with a simplified design and batteries lake's can store energy discover a new era of please power driven by the moon known jump here on r.g.p.

we've got the future. up up up up up up. up up. up a.

little bit so much brighter if you bounce from funniest impression it's. nice from start tsotsi dot com. if. it is easy peasy. it leaps. up. it's.

it is. a. welcome back to crossfire people call to remind you we're talking about lebanon and its turbulent neighbor. ok i guess i'd like to go back to you in washington when it comes to lebanon there's never

a disinterested party ok and i'm thinking about the united states has been in iran ok i don't think the americans really care much about lebanon at all they look at it a different picture and there's an israeli angle also to this sure the the americans are always going to be looking over their shoulders at what the israelis want in lebanon and that's certainly a major factor if not the dominant factor in u.s. policy has been for many years going back to the one nine hundred eighty s. clearly we know the story about how the israelis really put the pressure on the united states and somehow got them to. allow the the terrible massacres that that really are still remembered in lebanon of course in the one nine hundred eighty two so i mean this is this has been a major factor but i think the united states also you know does take into account. you know what is the likely hood that the policies that it follows

will have implications for the rest of the region and and i think that they as i said before i think that there is a greater degree of caution now than there might have been a few years ago about destabilizing lebanon there was a time when the united states was more or less openly making it clear that it was encouraging a coup against. the government in lebanon and in syria as well so there's there's reason to believe that now the united states is. much more cautious about the the costs and risks of destabilization i want to come back also to to ask my fellow discussants here what the logic is to believe that the syrians could could gain by an

assassination of this prominent sunni figure and you know quite correct that that he was in a very sensitive position as head of intelligence for the internal security forces but it's simply not clear to me how that would be expected to play out how it would help syria rather than simply add to its problems by potentially leading to a change in government which would be more sympathetic to the rebels rather than to syria ok claude you want to feel that question it's a good one yes that absolutely is it's a good question let me just. address something that that garrison said just just a few seconds ago he said that the united states allowed or israel the nice allowed the massacres to happen i don't think anybody allow the matter snap and the they were carried out without permission of the united states is just i'm not here to find a u.s. policy in lebanon far from it but anyway that's just to set the record straight to

answer that question about how syria benefits from killing someone like we sound as us and. keep in mind that if several things first he was he was very influential and he was very anti syrian he was pretty large fourteenth yet you had very close ties with the u.s. intelligence services with the russian sorry with german and with french intelligence agencies so he was not a friend of syria now for syria to they also didn't like the fact that he was. he was looking out for the interests of march fourteenth and lebanon more than he was not syria's mansour i wanted i would assume to have someone with more subservient to them as they often find the case with other lebanese politicians he was not one of those so it certainly helps them to get rid of someone like that who

is investigating the death of who investigating certain syrian actions in lebanon so i think it's just goes along with the game the syrians have been playing in lebanon all along it's just more of a continuation of what they were doing because now i can is this that. if i can jump to him in character had. so sorry don let me let me just say it's just not clear to me why the results of that assassination would expect to be expected to be you know someone who would serve the interests of syria i mean the history here is that you have a very. carefully put together compromise within the lebanese government in which you know pro pro syrian and pro hezbollah people are cheek by jowl with people who are anti syrian and he has below i mean you know you

have that sort of compromise. and it seems to me you know far more likely that instead of being replaced by a pro has by law or pro syrian figure you would get somebody of the same ilk as well as the possibility of course they were present of a change of government a new prime minister there are who you surround that's my point. in the fact that that he would be replaced by someone who is the same political thought as as as. there's no doubt about that but what you're doing is you're sending a message that the next guy is going to be the more careful about upsetting the syrians i mean the same thing with a very interesting point it was a smart what do you think about ok what do you think about we just an interesting exchange i think it's important but yes i think it's very interesting about what we need to actually look deeper into the identity and the function of mr have found is

that we somehow fran was was the was the mediator in fact he was an intelligence person he had contact and that's why as mr clode just said he had connections with the intelligence forces in the region and internationally and the intelligence was that he had a function to be a mediator between hezbollah and the. future movement and the fourteenth march coalition. and a very clear example of the of that is that in two thousand and eight when there was the violent clash between the two groups with salman has and did not participate in that clash on the side of mr halvey against the resort called prophecy and cruel on the contrary he acted as a mediator with simon has an organize the visit of mr howe the elite to damascus to meet with their president bashar al assad so he had a function an intelligence function yes it's true i agree with claude that he wasn't syria's man in lebanon definitely not he was more likely the saudi man in lebanon are more likely the american man eleven and the fans around yes i agree and

that could put him in danger yet he had a function and it's more important i think that than the labeling the function of the guy is good could have served this indian interests because they needed they would still need to stay in touch if they want to go out of this mess with a political settlement he is the person who can hold them in order to mediate with the other groups and there are a lot i'm not lying or i don't wanna violate and omar let me let me alone will i go again if they're going real quickly or one more point justin ok go ahead. along the same lines it is it is also a fact that we're seeing a whole house on was the key person in rounding up the intelligence networks of israel and lebanon which allowed him very strongly with hezbollah which supported that. money and also so he has played a role as just as almost this client and they're going to be i want to i want to

add one more thing yeah absolutely right he was he was responsible for the arrest i think of fourteen different israeli networks in lebanon so i'm not mistaken but also there's a rumor flying around the roots right now that this could possibly i'm just saying it's a rumor so for what it's worth that he is assassination was part message to the lebanese government for the arrest of. former information minister who was arrested and accused of planning two. of the keys of bringing explosives from syria to plan terrorist attacks in beirut so that's that's something that's floating around i have no idea who that is all right yes but. yes general general has and was also there is a third track that we haven't been looking into and the media hasn't been looking into it that yes he was very active in in what khloe just said yes he

arrested the former minister and they could the case now is that in the military tribunal he followed you know he had asked for the large number of people from specter though for spying for israel and working for israel and some of them were convicted and he also was after the al qaida people and fred had a slam people in lebanon here and i said a large number i remember in two thousand and eight he has the group intelligence force was responsible for actually leading to the death or. a man called the leader in the islamic fundamentalism or god i was under and tripoli and he was also responsible for following. leaders in the movement in lebanon so that's a that's a first possibility that i think should be taken well nomar you. know you're going to say this man had a lot of enemies did me. when you were in that situation position you're you know when you're in that job you have

a lot of enemies but let me let me just say that whoever carried this out had to know one thing that he was going to be where he was when he was at the time that he was that is information that only very professional intelligence agencies can start the kind of information that anybody can pick up that's true so whoever did that was was well placed ok ahmad like about you because you are in beirut i mean considering the history of lebanon in the civil war is there a possibility in your mind that it could be repeated. unfortunately i would i cannot. deny this. can my colleague in beirut also deny this that we have won three. crimes in the past and i've been on and there's been a lot of foreign intervention levanon there been some terrible crimes that took place here and i don't see any guarantees that it can be it can't happen again in fact the assassination of has seems like and one and my colleague from both all

just talked about the message so i was a thinking what could this message be i mean you know we started house and was supposed to he had a function also to protect politicians from assassinations and he would actually call them up and tell them you know i have heard some that i have some information maybe you better outside lebanon or you both take some extra the same discussion. that we had another half an hour many thanks about today to my guest in beirut and in washington thanks to our viewers for watching us to see you next time and remember across time. is.

watching. and waiting for you. with a video so i moved over and she told me some of. you we realized there was following everyone from early in the morning. the chance to get rid of. this to read. me. on our cheek. download the official publication. choose your language stream quality and

enjoy your favorites. t.v. is now required to watch on t.v. all you need is your mobile device to watch obscene any time and i didn't. get to see a story and it seems so. you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear or see some other part of it and realize everything you thought. i'm tom harpur welcome to the big picture. the mission free accreditation free in-store charges free. range minutes free. free studio time free.

download free broadcast quality video for your media projects a free mediocre dog our teeth on tom. what will change when america picks its president. made muslim rage walking the tightrope pushing china and russia as occupying spreads the two parties still dictate will there be change in this election a close guy every time the fifth on our team.

he won't get into the. frigid cold or powered this month moon is the center of our universe the tides are forever while the sun's rays can be fickle innovative construction costs as well as environmental damage turbines boost efficiency one to simplify design the batteries can store energy discover a new era of clean power driven by the moon technology here on r.g.p. . the future of. wealthy british style.