all of this stuff given that it is the election. so you know let's start with some of the pretty decent economic news we've seen recently i have a list of a few of the highlights i guess you could call on household debt is the lowest since two thousand and three reportedly we've seen increased hiring we saw you know better non-farm payrolls in september and october consumer confidence climbed in october to a four year high retail sales jumped one percent in september it's better than nothing i guess better than decline so is the economy finally getting out of its slump and is this sustainable growth going to continue regardless of who's president of the interesting part of your question was the sustainable part i am going to pick that because you know ultimately i think. it depends on how you look at it from a longer term perspective versus a short term perspective if you look at it from a cyclical perspective it is completely sustainable. upward in terms of statistics. cyclical growth bud at the end of the day the question is what

happens when you have the next session given the still high levels of private sector debt especially in the household sector and with less policy space meaning you know we have high deficits in the government sector and we also have you know zero rates from the federal reserve so those are big problems from a secular perspective but i think it's it is sustainable on a cyclical perspective which means what that the central bank is propping this up enough that were going on this enormous going on going forward right you know the economic cycle will take its course and we're you know moving upward in the trajectory for this cyclical upward cycle and at some point you know the site was going to wane whether it does it of its own accord or as a result of the fiscal cliff you know it's to be determined but when that happens then the question is about sustainability over the secular you know the longer term period but over the cyclical period that is over the short to medium term say out to a year or two i think it is sustainable what we're seeing right now ok. what about

depending on who is president one of the concerns from folks that are saying the markets are worried that you know with mitt romney for example this could mean another fed chairman and ben i think has told friends ben bernanke he that he wouldn't even want another term and you could argue the markets have become addicted to this liquidity and that if they get cut off from it then short term that could be a disaster but i mean you know just for them disaster for them but my question is this idea that there would be a more hawkish central bank chairman under romney is that misguided don't central bankers just want to keep this game going are you i think it is completely misguided it's not going to happen in more over to a degree you can change the psychology of the. instituting you know installing a fed chairman who positions it one way or the other but he's only one of the number of different people who are who are voting in the city so ultimately the all of the hawks in the you know. for example they've started to jump on board to the

bandwagon of easy money and i don't think that you know they're going to stop and anytime soon ok so easy money will continue one thing that there was a fox analysis the bond investors are worried going into the election because we're going to listen to his president they'll still have to deal with the fiscal cliff and if the u.s. goes over it according to many forecasts it would go into recession you have written about the fiscal cliff you see this as a point of great importance you just referred to it a little earlier in our discussion why and what do you think should be done you know just looking at ideologically speaking my own personal impression is that in terms of you know stimulus and deficits i'm not concerned about what i would call cyclical deficits i think that you know you steering the economy in order to meet certain deficit goals is actually getting the you know the tail to wag the dog at the. the reason that the deficit exists one way or the other is because of what's

happened in the private sector so really what you should be focused on is the private sector getting job growth but you know with regard to the fiscal cliff specifically i think that. you know basically what's going to happen is that people are uncomfortable with the level of deficits that we have now that's because there was a huge amount of debt in the private sector the private sector still somewhat in need mic and people are not you know going out there and spending in the same levels so that's meaning that the deficit in the public sector is still large and people are uncomfortable with that so they're going to artificially intercede and try to cut those deficit which is the equivalent of cutting the private sector surpluses so as soon as the deficit get cut the surplus will be cut in the private sector and they'll be very negative for stock markets they'll also be very negative for g.d.p. growth ideology aside do you think that any president is going to go away and or

really do anything to cut the deficit or to address the u.s. debt because i have a hard time seeing that happen what history shows is that republican or democrat they pretty much stay on the same spending path they may just favor different interests well here's what i think the key difference is between romney and obama first of all i think that obama is serious about tax increases and so i think that one of the big differences are wealthy he wants tax and that is where the wealthy so i think one of the big differences between obama and romney is that obama will be slightly more aggressive in terms of raising taxes especially on the wealthy but when it comes to spending cuts i don't think that there's going to be that big a difference over the near term between obama and romney so over the near term i think that when you look at stimulus or stimulative activity actually obama's slightly less stimulative in that sense than romney would be because. i don't

believe that romney is going to cut and i don't think the republicans in congress want him to cut because they know that that would lead to recession and that would be bad for the republican party so what instead they would do in order to keep their bona fides as cutters is look to the longer term that is so security and medicare so you're saying it's a calculated kind of political interest because then they can preserve things now and they can sabotage the future or cut from the future i don't know if i would use the term sabotage but i did our job because there is that there is a there is a sound obvious argument to be made for cutting long term spending and some of the long term entitlements are reforming them but you're saying they would push the pain down the road so that'll be long after they're out of office exactly there was a look you know we we want to cut over the next you know twenty or twenty five years trillion dollars out of the government this is how we're going to do it and it's going to be heavily weighted towards social security and medicare and things

like that defense spending will will will go relatively unscathed will be some minor cuts in discretionary spending but you know at the end of the day you know the large majority of the outlook is in the government's budget is in defense of medicare medicaid social security so that's where the cuts would have to be if you were going to look at it from a long term perspective and so that's what i expect in terms of both candidates tax plans what we know of them at least obviously romney has not said what. tax expenditures he would close or what really happened in terms of both their tax plans and assuming that they don't relate too much to spending what impact do you think that there are two policies have on the economy do you think there really will be one where there are different tax policies you know there are those in romney is slightly more stimulative than obama because when you know if you're lowering taxes look at his rhetoric what he's saying is that you know i'm going to close all these loopholes and therefore you know but i'm going to i'm going to lower the. tax level but i'm going to close loopholes will be neutral in terms of

taxes anyone who's looked at those numbers knows that's never going to happen it's never going to be like that so he's in a quandary the question is how is the how does that quandary get resolved. are you going to have a larger deficit or are you going to start cutting spending more and i think that what's going to happen is they're going to have unexpectedly high deficits and you know over the near term and even then you're wrong the deficit. even bigger than they would under obama with all depends on growth that comes from having these tax cuts that he's going to have over the near term yes i think deficits will be slightly higher under romney unless obviously it leads to a recession because you have the sort of self fulfilling prophecy when you cut you know when you increase taxes and therefore you know suck money out of the private sector if you do hard enough it will cause

a recession to to her and then potentially you could actually get larger deficits what about the role of private debt because we talk a lot about government debt but private sector debt is something that plays heavily into the economy and you had a chart that you posted on your web site actually that i want to bring up that shows what's in this is the. i can't see it that well there we go debt service ratio and then debt to income ratio the debt to income ratio and gray and the debt service ratio in blue you see this is important what is this show and why is it important you think would showing secular unsustainability in the private sector of the you know the things that are causing a recovery right now so what you see is debt service ratios dropping precipitously after two thousand and eight because of the stimulation from the federal reserve your interest rate exactly but you see the debt to income. ratios

dropping much less precipitously so they're still incredibly high on a secular basis so you're up here in the year two thousand and twelve but you're way down here say in one thousand nine hundred seventy five and that difference is going to be crucial when you come to the next recession because you can't have the same types of stimulative policies you can't lower rates you know five percent because you're already at zero right wanted to doesn't actually net financial assets to the private sector it's just an asset swap of one for the other so how are you going to how we're going to do that except by deficit spending basically deficit spending is politically unsustainable and you're already at zero rates you have a big problem yeah and on that note deficit spending being unsustainable politically ellerey and says hey whoever's president there at the end of their rope whether it's with fed policy or fiscal policy they've done so much already people have had enough what more can they do which i would say would be a bad thing edward thank you we're going to continue this conversation shift gears

to europe find out what we've been missing while we're focused on the u.s. elections and also what we can learn looking at the u.s. that we'll have more with founder of credit write downs in a minute still had to could france be in need of some shock therapy we'll tell you about some dramatic proposals to fix their struggling economy and of course the resistance to them in tonight's loose change that's in a minute. the issues that so much of. which are. on. america's political phone has finally come to an end it was a really good choice to what degree was this campaign season only about.

it'll. see. my i've. i've

. download the official ati application to the sofa choose your language stream quality and enjoy your favorites from matsushita t.v. is not required to watch on t.v. all you need is your mobile device to watch r.t. any time.

you. get. to. the service. welcome back we are so focused on talking about the u.s. elections they are today after all but what about europe what is going on in europe that we've been missing and what can we learn from europe about what may be coming for the united states edward harrison is with me as founder of credit write down he's helping us assess all of this so now edward i have to admit with europe going

on so long and feeling a little like groundhog day with the eurozone crisis i'm a little behind i know angela merkel said that this is not going to be over in one to two years we're looking at five years at least so are we doomed to five more years of groundhog day type news out of the eurozone and what are the key things that we should be not miss saying with our eyes glazing over at times. we have to be thinking about political sustainability versus you know what i would call debt deflation on the one hand you have the path which is that you know in countries like germany people are saying these people in greece or spain and so forth they really need to tighten their belts we've done therefore they need to do it as well but at the same time we don't want the whole thing to spiral out of control so we're kind of going to you know we have to give them some help in some way shape or form but at the same time we want them to meet the grid in a in

a harsh way but that's politically unsustainable in the countries words where debt deflation takes over and we've seen the muddle through exam so doing we see this on the modeling group for four or five year we've seen greece collapse spain is actually muddling through they're in a very dire situation the question is will it get more dire will become more greek like will collapse but they're still in the euro zone they're still on the euro they're still passing these measures despite the fact that their populations are rioting or protesting on the streets and i was going on in this class sustainability comes into play you. you know increase in levels of factionalism of extremism in you know the golden dawn party in greece you have separatism in catalonia separatism in the u.k. which is isn't part of the euro zone in scotland these are the kinds of things that start to happen the whole political system starts on rubble so basically it's

completely unsustainable the present course from a political perspective people are going to put up with the for another five years something bad will happen and therefore they'll have to react if they don't react quickly enough then you could see the eurozone collapse entirely so you don't think we'll see just kind of this same modeling through for five years do you think we'll see fireworks somewhere in between there where we see what i'm going to default we've already seen her works with regard to the e.c.b. wasn't a year or two ago when people said no way they're never going to monetize right look at them they're printing money basically monetizing right now propping up spain and italy without the e.c.b. spain and italy would default their interest rates would have gone through the roof that's the kind of thing that's going to happen eventually you know you hit the wall and then the have to make a political decision do we go to the next level or do without the whole thing collapse and i think that they've already gone so far in trying to keep this whole thing together that they will go to the next level that is they will do whatever is

necessary in order to keep the whole thing from from collapsing but will it be quickly enough that's great that's the question right and looking at europe you can say this is exhibit a for what happens when you cut spending dramatically without addressing the debt without writing down and nothing of the debt to where private investors feel comfortable going in and investing in a country anymore i mean the private sector has collapsed in greece to give an example how long can the u.s. forestall this kind of result i mean you cannot print your way into prosperity or borrow your way to prosperity would you know the u.s. is in greece. look at japan they have you know go to any one of that g.d.p. i mean just run through an experiment mentally if the federal reserve went out and they said you know things are terrible in the u.s. with regard to fiscal sustainability and the debt and so forth so we're going to go we're going to buy up one half of the existing treasury stock and we're going to

just take it into the federal reserve what would happen as a result of that and they said categorically this is a one time decision that we're going to make but the first thing you notice is the u.s. government prints money that is their own currency it's a liability they've created it's not some external liability that they have to do they can just you know buy it up secondly if it's a one off then what you see is an immediate fall in the price level you see rising inflation but it's not necessarily sustained inflation so the point is when you talk about sustainability it's completely sustainable it's their own currency it's not the same as in greece or in you know in germany even where they have debt to g.d.p. of over eighty percent. currency user that could completely go bankrupt because unless the e.c.b. prints money right but then you why even when you control your currency printing money can create money but it doesn't create wow you know it does only when you know what happens when the printing of money reaches the end of its rope would

doesn't reach the end of its rope what happens is you get a situation like in the u.k. i look at the u.k. post world war two as a perfect example of you know the money printing inflationary route to getting out of problems they had over two hundred percent debt to g.d.p. after government debt to g.d.p. after world war two almost two hundred fifty percent so what happened massive depreciation the currency massive amounts of inflation bouts of inflation lower standards of living in you know the sick man of europe. low low real g.d.p. growth and by the one nine hundred eighty s. the debt to g.d.p. was sixty seventy percent so that's would have no default but you know pain for sure for the average fellow my old version of greece not the dramatic contraction they have but many of the same symptoms of inflation a lower growth of those same factors you could mean basically you're

talking about in a religion of wealth you're talking about people being relatively speaking poor especially as compared to their counterparts in germany switzerland and other places that didn't have the same sort of inflationary policy right before we go i thought it was really funny peter hooper a chief economist at deutsche bank and a former fed official said that there's so much pent up demand in the us then that is where regardless of presidential policies that's going to drive the expansion for the next few years where is this demand coming from the coming from as well i mean there's in for the demand if you have infinite amount of money at your beck and call but the reality is is that people are still and in the private sector there's no pent up demand except to the degree that people are taking on more debt you have to you have to see much more job growth and we have to see much lower debt

in the household sector and then you have pent up demand but right now. i see that is completely ridiculous completely and even if people borrow more to spend more tell me how that's sustainable and how how it's a great way to really recover as an economy will have to leave it there for today but thank you so much edward for guiding us through presidential politics and europe as well as opposed. all right let's wrap up with loose change to reach three covina long list for nice to see on this day you know it's not just the united states it's struggling obviously as france's economy is struggling some of us come forward with

a what you could call severe approach someone say to fixing their economic woes here is former c.e.o. lou we go to his suggestion. there are twenty two main proposals designed to stop the slippery slope we're on and to support investment this is what i call a competitive machine which is actually a competent shop i can trim the numbers for a proposal that's twenty billion euros of labor cost cutting for businesses and ten billion euros for employees. so there's this government sanctioned report that is urging these kind of reforms in france and according to reuters the president francois hollande is likely to shrug them off so the thing that strikes me is. is this just what we see widespread that politicians do not ever want to make the tough decisions on their watch that they wanted yes there is the u.s. or the or france or wherever of course i mean think about it what's the incentive

there is none of your old going to get reelected you're not going out right forte i'm saying these sets of structure for a politician is just to do the here and now to worry about now and increasingly that's become the the modus operandi across the economy in general it's all about now so it actually incentivize politicians to do what's already in there and set them structure so yeah you don't you don't expect any change in voltage is that's why it has the force on them and that's why in those countries in europe that have actually been shut out of the bond market as you say are the markets enforcers for sure but then at the same time those politicians are again do what's in their best interest except this are not even answering to the electorate anymore they're answering to their overlords the use of theirs and then the i.m.f. so they're saying ok we'll cut spending because we never would do that otherwise but this is almost a false on our day we won't play hardball a negotiating on our debt so they're really destroying their economy so they're both politicians in general from what i've seen i know you read about frank and that's the argument about lincoln there you i don't know how good they were really i mean in history we always want heroes but right i don't i've never lard never saw

a politician that i ever like in retrospect i liked obama on and i knew that any modern day politicians going on to become heroes let's move on because speaking of heroes there have been some helping out with the devastation wreaked by superstorm sandy it's still being felt that one point nine million homes and businesses last night were without power there are ports that remain closed the marine terminals they were closed over the weekend but despite sandy's massive destruction which you know new yorkers did find a story to line up added by the latest apple i pad. what i've seen uptown is downtown was arguably out of power i think at that point so on the one hand we see such devastation and a city rendered powerless by a storm literally literally and on the other hand we see just these weird things

that can still go on it was the tick that's pathetic i didn't realize that was during the part of the during now i did realize that right now it's a big bloomberg was a big fan of it because he's like this is going to give moral support but that was a surge it was a marathon only someone like bloomberg is a billionaire would actually think that these things are morals like you should be focusing on archly but the people in the rockaways who are like it's like a scene a lot of the flaws right ok or no escape with right ray liotta look i mean i never thought i'd say this i'm over apple i'm over apple after the i pad you can you believe you're one of the colts i'm going to call look i like apple i like the computer it's amazing i like the operating system i'm glad i have an i phone i don't want to send a song i know it's better better bang for your buck up now about the i phone but i'm going to all going to an apple commercial understanding kind of over a reliable recalls and with the i pad maybe i'm just like you know what is there what's new here guys yeah but i still would never go to microsoft and i'm not in a linux platform or internet right platform right ok i will want to leave it there for today except all we have time for but thank you so much for watching be sure to

come back tomorrow and in the meantime you know you can follow me on twitter at lauren lyster you tell like us that our facebook page watch is on you tube or on hulu and from everyone here thanks for watching and have a great night. excuse me can i speak with you sure. let me explain my son died in iraq i don't agree on agree with you know. my son isn't isn't in the arena i don't know what is copy of what he's trying to for you shared. your country. with a country your age. you cross the moon or in hope to help you found it. in

so many own says war. plug. plug. plug.

plug plug. her. mother mission free accreditation free in-store chargers free to make amends free. three stooges i prefer. the old free blog plug in video for your media project for free media dot com in. place.