broad vision if you are going. with the old what came before. r t exclusive we'll bring you part of an interview with the embattled syrian president bashar al assad what he says about the ongoing conflict inside his country and what would happen if western forces try to intervene. and the bradley manning saga continues as his case moves slowly through military court new details are emerging on how his lawyers plan to fight for their client details coming up. and trying to clean up and rebuild from hurricane sandy the new york and new jersey areas face a long slow recovery but will some businesses actually make

a profit off of this monster storm that story coming up. it's thursday november eighth four pm in washington d.c. i'm meghan lopez and you're watching our teeth. well we begin this afternoon with the latest information coming out of syria twenty months more than thirty eight thousand people dead and still no signs that the civil war there that has severed the nation at the scenes is anywhere near over several big events have happened this week that have the potential to trigger some sort of action first president obama won reelection and international leaders are now calling for quick and decisive action also turkey is asking nato for permission to line its borders with surface to air missiles which would effectively create a no fly zone in the region and british prime minister david cameron has promised

president bashar all assad safe passage if assad chooses to step down but that's unlikely or to international was granted an exclusive interview with the embattled syrian leader who says that the that he will live and die in the country here's part of that exclusive interview where he talks about the potential fall out from the u.s. intervention in the region. i think the price of vision if you just happened is going. to be more of an old world came before because if you have a problem if you drop the phone call or think you know it's him and stability in the region and coexistence it's it will have to go in your face but if it works from the atlantic to the pacific and you know the because you know but it's on both of them i don't thing. to do with who's going. to go but you do so nobody can predict what's next and as i mentioned in that interview

bashar al assad went on to say that he will live or die in syria raising serious questions over whether he just put a bounty on his head since he has essentially stated that there are only two possible outcomes to this conflict and r.t.e. international's interview is getting a lot of attention the new york times wrote an article with a headline reading syrian president warns against foreign intervention in syria and even c.n.n. is picking up on the interview with its coverage but this was an exclusive interview given by bashar assad to russia today portion of it was released today not a surprise what we're hearing so far we've heard an entrenched a defiant syrian president bashar assad. meanwhile a landmark meeting has been held in qatar today between the different factions of syrian rebels this continue this comes amid growing international pressure for the movement to get organized if a transition is to take place now the ongoing syria civil unrest is now boiling

down to secretary in violence between the sunni majority and assad's group the all white minority and in this interview a big question assad presented was the possibility that fundamentalists will rise to power once he goes now our team will be airing that interview tomorrow afternoon on our network so be sure to tune in. and moving on now more information coming out today regarding the trial of private first class bradley manning in an attempt to reach a deal with the government the accused wiki leaks his defense team appears to be trying to work out some sort of deal with the government to get things moving forward again a statement released by bradley manning's defense attorney david combs said quote p.f.c. manning has offered to plead guilty to various offenses through a process known as pleading by exceptions and substitution to clarify p.f.c. manning is not pleading guilty to the specifications as charged by the government

rather p.f.c. manning is attempting to accept responsibility for offenses that are in capsulated within or are a subset of the charged offenses the court will consider whether this is a permissible plea so if it's not a plea deal manning is after then what is it and what are the chances that the court will accept the steel well for more on the case of the bradley manning i'm joined by josh gerstein white house reporter for politico hey there josh can you first off it go ahead and explain to us was exactly is going down here can you can you break down these latest developments. well it sounds like it's not a plea deal but it's more of a plea bargain offer from manning and his lawyers there is a very serious charges manning is facing including aiding the enemy which is punishable by life in prison in this case and so they're trying to basically make sort of an opening bid perhaps or maybe it's a middle of the game bid to put up some more minor charges or more minor offenses

and see if the government might basically say well you know what if you're willing to plead to that that's good enough and the court can always for check this or they can accept it and they can still try him for some of the other things that they have him for he's facing of course up to life and present giving the twenty two counts but can you explain to. us as the viewers and to myself what's the point of doing this if that the court can simply accept it charge in any way well i think the defense team here is trying to dramatize the way that manning has been charged a lot of people feel that the case is over charge meaning that based on what manning allegedly did here to charge him with aiding the enemy for posting something on the internet for example is taking things a step too far and i think the defense is either whether it's a plea deal or whether it's just sort of a public bid to emphasize the fact that manning is being punished too seriously or facing too serious punishment i think that's basically the gambit the defense is

pursuing but you're right the court has to decide whether to accept this and then ultimately the military itself decides whether they want to press forward with the most serious charges that manning's face so what good can possibly come out of this other than of course public sympathy. well it brings attention to others in the military that are outside the direct chain of command dealing with this case on a day in day out basis that there is a way to resolve this without necessarily going to the mat with a full court martial is also interesting that manning decided he doesn't want to be tried by sort of a jury of his peers of other military officers and soldiers but said that he'd rather be tried by a judge all of that is really interesting as coming out of this case of course things are still hazy we're still trying to figure all of this out but we know that the pretrial hearing that's going on right now as well that's a term and whether the court and prosecutors are delaying his right to a speedy trial so what were all this play in speeding up the trial or will it play anything at all. i don't think it will delay the trial but this issue of speedy

trial is an important one you know it's put off for months and months and months more than a year basically as things went forward in the hearing that's been going forward today according to the blog reports and others we're seeing out from fort meade maryland indicates that the military has been trying to explain why we was there were something like eight or nine separate delays in the case and not all the reasons seem to be great ones one that seems to have come out is that some of the people involved only wanted to work on the weekends because they didn't want to being bring manning into these official government buildings during the week because people my god get him basically absolutely and i know that meanwhile i just want to switch gears just a little bit meanwhile the seventh person was charged under the espionage act this week that's a navy linguist station in basra and named james hit silver he was an allegedly he's a law is accused of copying intelligence files that were leaked to stanford university and although president obama was reelected it doesn't seem like we're getting much

of a change in terms of prosecuting these people a second term right. well so far we're not and i don't see that there's any reason to expect a dramatic change i think as you guys have covered extensively there's been now many more such prosecutions under obama than all previous presidents behind combined i should say and it looks like this pattern is going to continue and go ahead and here explain a little bit this espionage act that all these people are falling into i know that it was created during a world war one era so is it antiquated. well it's certainly very broad and you know most of it deals with espionage with taking military secrets or defense secrets and giving them to someone who's an agent of a foreign power but there is a part in it that's basically very very broad and elastic that says that if you take military or defense secrets whether you get them legitimately or illegitimately and you pass them on to another person and that can be anyone else who's not authorized to receive them you've committed

a very serious felony and that's the provision that had been used very very rarely before president obama came into office and now as you say we've seen come up in seven different criminal cases some of it might simply be the fact of the advent of the internet it is true now that it's a lot easier to put information out there that everyone be they friends and enemies alike has access to and i do want to focus on julian a songe of course bradley manning and julian assigns kind of go hand in hand when it comes to discussing the leaked cables that were hundreds of thousands of documents and also that that documentary the movie the clip that made wiki leaks famous and put it on the map the collateral murder video so it looks like the information the latest information that we're hearing is that the grand jury is still investigating julian a songe can you talk a little bit about the developments in his case well there's a document that came out either yesterday or the day before out of the federal court in virginia that shows that there's still an ongoing criminal investigation into wiki leaks it sounds like the federal government plans to keep that

investigation open probably until this bradley manning case is completed you know if there were ever a plea deal with manning and the government it's possible there might be pressure for him to become a witness and to testify against julian a songe we heard earlier in the manning trial that there were some indications that assad had indicated he might be willing to help manning break passwords to get into military computers so that's something the government still seems very interested in getting to the bottom of josh gerstein white house reporter for politico thank you so much for bringing us those latest developments ok thanks. meanwhile the east coast is still picking up the pieces two weeks after hurricane savvy sandy ravaged homes and communities as if the super storm wasn't bad enough the latest nor'easter storm may have slowed the process down significantly as fema and other government agencies are still trying to rectify the situation but out of the darkness from the

damage and destruction caused by superstorm sandy a ray of economic hope private companies are teaming up with the public sector to rebuild infrastructure damaged by the superstorm everything from homes to tunnels to roads are in the need of repair all along the eastern seaboard and businesses will no doubt benefit from the reconstruction efforts and possibly the economy might benefit as well so discuss all of this is producer rachel courtesy as she joins me in the studio now hey rachel so go ahead and break this down for me how are these private businesses contributing what kind of contracts do they have and what does this mean for the east course east coast so there are two major ways that public private partnerships can work in the sirkar the first way is that essentially private businesses take over for the government so for instance still essentially buy a road off of the government and after that bill benefits a they'll they'll have to deal with all the repairs and things of that nature but at the same time they get all of the revenue from tolls and from any other sort of

profit generating revenue like even. along the side of the road things like that the other way to do it is to actually have the businesses from the outset be the ones who build the roads to begin with and i think that's what we're going to see a little bit more in the wake of superstorm sandy seeing as these roads are entirely destroyed to begin with so instead of having a bond measure where in the government borrows money off of taxpayers to pay for these new roads what they'll do is essential to beat out those roads to businesses who will then do it and again take all of the revenue in. from having built it it will essentially be their road that they build for the sake of the government so we talk about what the east coast will potentially look like under these kind of this kind of partnership are we going to see tolls on every road and also i want to bring up the fact that if it is that these roads are going to be paid for by tolls is there really any difference between charging people taxes and these tolls that's

a really fantastic point and i think that that's exactly how we've got to look at it so you're saying people are saying oh well we don't have to borrow money to pay for it but instead with kind of a penny wise pound foolish policy because when the government issues a bond in order to pay something they continue to have control over for instance how much the tolls will cost over time as soon as you have something like a private enterprise taking over you'll see that that's not the case anymore they can raise the tolls pretty pretty much whenever they want they have something called non compete clauses which means the government say won't be able to build another road or bridge nearby because i'm a complete compete with the ability for the privately owned road to raise revenue and things of that nature i want to bring up an example of something that happened in two thousand and eight that was essentially a public private partnership that in my opinion has gone a bit of rye in chicago mayor daley in two thousand and eight centrally leased out all of the chicago parking meters thirty six thousand of them it's the third

largest kind of parking meter group in the in the country they leased it out for seventy five years to a morgan stanley group that it essentially assembled that was one point one five billion dollars which seems like a lot of money much of which was used to plug up budget holes and things of that nature so the daily could pay for public employees the issue is that new research coming out shows that over these seventy five years what's actually happening is that. they're going to make the morgan stanley group is going to make eleven point six billion dollars out of the deal altogether now the way they're going to do that is they've already boosted rates they're changing around the. parking so that you can fit in more cars which is a good thing if you're really good at parallel parking a lot of people myself included aren't so that's a little disconcerting and they're adding hours to that require fees often you know after six pm you're fine not to add in money that's not the case in chicago anymore another issue is that let's say i want to have a street fair i can't close off the street because by contract those parking meters

have to keep running to make sure that this company is making money and rachel that's a really good example that you bring up however what i am saying in the different articles that are being written about this is that you know the system it's no secret that these states these cities are in some type of a budget crunch and that this storm only adds on to it but from what i'm understanding it could actually be cheaper for these private entities to make these public roads but you're arguing that invests in the short term you're arguing that in the long term it can actually not mean cheaper i think it's really difficult to determine the value say of parking tolls excuse me parking meters of road tolls over the course of seventy five years when you lend something out for that long of a period of time you have no idea how much money you could be losing and i think that in particular there's a lot of secrecy regarding these deals in the case of chicago for instance mayor daley proposed this idea only two days before it went to a council vote that's very little time for independent groups for the inspector

general for people like that to actually go in and determine whether or not this is an effective deal for the people of chicago and i think over time we've learned that it's not that again over time they're actually losing a lot more revenue in order to plug up these short term budget holes and rachel let's talk about what's happened to save the citizens have if any in this private public partnership yeah well as i said before i think a lot of it is really guarded in secrecy not only the fact that these deals and contracts aren't presented until right before they're made actionable but another issue is that they're entirely written in legally as they're written in jargon and it's really difficult for a normal. to look at this and say oh the let me see this over time is not going to cost us that much money or it will i think that the analysis is very difficult to determine so there at least needs to be more time given and i you know in the in the case of hurricane sandy there are people in new jersey in new york and all over the eastern seaboard who are certainly suffering right now so i think that time is

of the essence in it i would think it would be hasty to immediately sign on to a really long term partnership with the business whose main goal is profit i mean let's face it they're trying to make money and the thing is when we're talking about infrastructure infrastructure is something that should be for the benefit of citizens so over time i think that the. maybe these two things aren't as aligned as we'd like them to be herschel we only have about thirty seconds left but what you're saying is you're not necessarily opposed to the private sector stepping in and just to clarify. a little bit more regulation maybe with a little bit more explanation as to what's going on outside but also the thing is investors only really want to invest in things that are going to be profitable that means that the government is selling off things like say the eastern corridor which are very profitable for private businesses but then say look at the midwest the government is going to have to continue to pay for all of those things no investors are going to come in the government is losing revenue that could actually boost them and still being in charge of you know roads and infrastructure that no one else is interested in paying for archie producer rachel curtis thank you for that

insight thanks for having me. all right well we've all heard the stories natural gas drilling contaminating ground water and sickening residents we've seen the videos where one person after another sets their tap water on fire heck we heard our t. have even filmed that with our own cameras but it looks like the damage hydraulic fracturing causes might go even deeper than previously thought how deep all the way down to the fault lines researchers now say that extradition that this extraction method actually causes earthquakes hundreds of them this is the. first time that cause ation instead of correlation has been linked to hydraulic fracturing now you may already know how the method works but here's a quick refresher course natural gas companies come in and dig a well thousands of feet down into the earth's surface into the shale rock formation this can be seven eight nine thousand feet below the earth's surface from there the company injects millions of gallons of water and sand and chemicals into

the shale rock formation under extremely high pressure causing that rock to actually crack or fracture and that process releases natural gas bubbles to rise to the surface for the natural gas companies to collect but a new report by british columbia oil and gas commission says that the fluid is injected that flows into preexisting faults and that can cause these faults to slip thus creating an earthquake so here to get to the root of this problem with me is mike ludwig he's a reporter from truthout hey there mike first of all can you explain this correlation between hydraulic fracturing in the earthquakes i did a little bit there in the intro but if you could just really delve into it for me. absolutely i mean they're taking a stand in water and they're taking industrial chemicals and the pumping them deep below the earth nationally you know in a sense already creating many earthquakes and they break up the earth to release this oil and gas go over things in this report here is that here if you have an

area where there's some preexisting solve these liquids these fracking liquid they use break up the rock can get in there lubricate them and cause a series of other smaller earthquakes now in the past you know fracking has been linked to earthquakes in arkansas fracking wastewater injection cause earthquakes in ohio what the industry has repeatedly said is that it's very rare and compare the number of operations that are out there it barely ever happens or we're seeing here in this case this report is that it could be actually much more common than people thought we just haven't had the kind of psychological data to put it all together and of course we are starting to see some of that data come out one area in particular as in ohio can you go and talk about what they found with earthquakes in ohio if you do know and where those at the centers for those earthquakes were located. right now about two thousand and two forgive me two thousand one hundred twelve there juries are twelve smaller earthquake with the final earthquake ranging

about four point five on the richter scale that was actually felt for miles around these all happened near youngstown and north eastern ohio now investigate these earthquakes later in the summer and found out that regulators actually had this huge action well it wasn't fracking well but they were taking waste water from fracking operations and rejecting them into an older well they had it headed to the highest pressure of the well known high on the ignored and logical data showing that earthquakes started to erupt in that area and they continued to allow the pressure of this well to increase until finally the governor had to step in and shut it down last january and so this this injection well of wastewater is actually allowing the way this water seep into a precambrian preexisting fall because the earthquake and we do know that just to put this in perspective like that these earthquakes are all relatively small there between two point two and three point eight on the rector scale many of them are not even felt on the earth's surface and no damage has been caused to this point so

why should people be worried. well there was some minimal damage actually caused in arkansas and ohio and restraints that were eventually linked to fracking after a lot of review and a lot of kind of going back and forth among state scientists and geologists there has been some minor damage but what we have to worry about here is that there's an industry that is moving and drilling much faster than regulators and as we can see with this report just coming out today much faster than science and so there's a lot of we still don't know and as it rapidly expands we have to wonder who is going to step in and make sure they don't cause some problems that are bigger than we've already seen maybe some shakeups that are perhaps more violent and also that our water supply are in danger when you're breaking rock you're causing many earthquakes what can you know is it possible for these chemicals to migrate into refers and into drinking water supplies and that is another big concern and i want to know from you from all your reports and from the people that you've talked to do you think this has the potential to have serious consequences in the future what to

start out small earthquakes because a big potentially become big ones. i don't know of these could ever become very big earthquakes i think it's possible that if a very large. fault somehow gets lubricated and geologists have mass was good we could have something major but there are some areas of the country with histories earthquakes there are active drilling happening right now so what is important is that we have really solid it unwatchable data and really solid geological oversight by regulators and you know by independent groups and mike i do want to go ahead and bring up a graphic really quickly kind of showing where all of the fracturing sites are within the u.s. most of them are in. pennsylvania some are in colorado texas north dakota so they're all over the place and if you see all those little black dots on your screen those are all of those so called for accidents have happened not necessarily earthquakes but for accidents some cells of spilling and whatnot so given all of

these areas i mean not very many of are happening in california california of course is where most of the earthquakes happen in in the u.s. so do these companies consider where these fault lines are or should they in the future will this research help them to figure that out. i think of it do consider where these fault lines are but you have to realize they're parroted is to get the most out of their drilling as quickly as possible they're taking all the time to make sure they're voting false i would say they haven't i mean a fault was not avoided no iow there's been small earthquakes you know measured here in british columbia and ashes and these drilling intensity zones like in arkansas or in areas where historically there have been some massive earthquakes so it's you know i can't speak for every single company we hope that they're all doing their job right but as you can see this argument some accidents so you know that has some cause for concern and you know arkansas is one of the places where thousands of very minor but thousands of earthquakes were reported after an intense

feeling has happened there's been more problems too recently gas and drilling related disaster just happened where i am and we where a massive five and a half acre sinkhole just opened up in the bayous and they had to evacuate other people and as that is an area that has been drilled for twenty years pennsylvania has had to drill that heavily for twenty years what is pennsylvania going to look like in twenty years i mean these are all the kinds of questions we have to be asking ourselves mike we have only it's very short time about thirty seconds left but i do have to get to some of the solutions one of the solutions that the bay see oil and gas commission reported was simply lowering the pressure of the water being injected as a ground very quickly is that viable i think that that could help but we really need solid sized logical data we need seismometers in every area where there's major gas drilling happening that did not happen in ohio it was not having british columbia it was not happening in arkansas and we saw i was a place that we need that need that data like ludwig reporter for truthout thank

you so much for joining us having me. all right capital account is up next on our team let's check in with laura lester to see what's on today's agenda hey there lauren hi maggie and you know a report came out the wall street journal did analysis actually and found that more than two dozen companies before they were going to declare bankruptcy even though they knew even though they were preparing even though they were on the fritz they didn't tell their investors they didn't reveal that information to shareholders now you might ask why this is very important information if you are invested in a company that's about to go under and guess what the law is on their side so this is another example of kind of one of those weird murky gray areas where maybe doing the wrong thing is wrong but it's not illegal so we're going to talk to a behavioral economist about why people do these bad things and how to deter them we're talking about wall street that's coming up next on the capital account was lauren lyster so thanks so much for that update lauren that does it for now for more on the stories we covered go to youtube dot com slash r t america or check out

our website r t dot com slash u.s.a. follow me on twitter at meghan underscore lopez say back here in half an hour. sometimes you see a story. you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear

or see some other part of it and realize everything you thought you. are welcome to the big picture. download the official. language stream quality and enjoy your favorite. t.v. is not required to watch on t.v. all you need.