some privacy laws need to be reviewed normally in an offline world you would have cooperation between governments that would respect international human rights standards but as these companies in the cloud are often conducting systematic best business new united states direct access warrant all over the world internet surveillance is increasing and at quite breakneck speed so a solution would be. to at least try and come to some international standard of how to resolve all this and what does privacy mean i know that this is a very ambitious goal but as we all move into the internet and as we all as it all becomes a part of our daily lives free speech and privacy online is becoming ever more important. the u.s. is about to get a taste of its own medicine for most kept it up until this official response to travel by the russians seems to reach and he writes details just ahead. also

explain why china and india's dispute over oil and gas see about fall after both countries. wealthy british style it's time to. market why not. find out what's really happening to the global economy in cars a report on our. talk

about one hundred here. now britain's government is a failing to get people back into work recent figures show more unemployment people find jobs on their own and those enroll in the government's flagship program while critics also say it's format startles and individuality jobseekers may have sort of first met one of the many frustrated job hunters. some months now twenty

five year old jay paxton's been keeping a video diary about his experiences on the government's work program today were previously usual to work programs the government's flagship scheme that pays private sector organizations to place people in work and they called it a revolution in welfare the first figures released since its launch revealed a resoundingly failure something that hasn't surprise j. in the slightest. they've left a to go and keep his appointment now it seems pretty tightly regiments and we watch people running in all morning to keep that appointment g.'s been coming to this job center once a fortnight for the past six months that he's been on the government's work programme in the time he hasn't found a single job unfortunately that's not uncommon the latest figures released by the

department of work and pensions say the job is just one of hundreds of thousands of people signed up to that work programme skein he found absolutely nothing. in fact between gene two thousand and eleven and july this year of all the people who were signed up to the work program only three point four percent were found work far below the target of five point five percent which is the number of people who find work without any sort of program it means that people like you and i typically less likely to find a job than if there are no work program whatsoever can you talk as he is sort of the last six months what has the experience been and on a daily basis with this work program well. einstein once said that the definition of insanity is to do one thing. and expect

a different result i'm after doing the same thing and getting the same results for six months i'm starting to feel pretty insane every year and it is maddening the frustration be anguish despair most of the time in the experience is having serious effects are actually gone to the doctors a couple of times because of our sleeping cycle problems i'm sleeping way too much and i should be to the doctor. sounds interesting from what sounds pretty horrific grinding you feel in this truck missed so i filled in the truck listeners like you got clinical depression. figures. i was like yeah science i'm going to be the next greatest thing show the world it's like i don't want to take these pills i'd rather do something more constructive things are pretty much gone. manic tells us that the one size fits all formats is the work program it's stifling the individuality of young. people i speak to

quite intelligent quite bright some of them have to research. some of the quite well skilled and they hate being told what to do and they like to take appropriate actions themselves and usually quite good at finding work for themselves it's just that it is difficult with a work program what we see now is that in fact when you get the best of the private sector involved when you pay them lots of money they actually do worse than doing nothing at all we asked the government why the program was pretty things such poor results and why the figures they really seem designed to musk the chilly extent of the faith. they responded saying. it's ridiculous to suggest the work programme is not helping people into work despite being faced with their range comings it seems the government still doesn't want to listen to people like j a telling the loud and clear i regret to inform you that on this occasion you have been unsuccessful. so.

london. russia says it's drawing up a list of american officials it considers guilty of human rights abuses it's in response to the so-called. banned russians approved by washington lawmakers this week it's named after the lawyer who died in a russian police custody in two thousand and nine the u.s. blames moscow for his death a journalist says the raw exposes american people crecy russian foreign minister should respond to such an obvious insult where the united states probably the preeminent violator of human rights at this point in terms of scale magnitude and depth pointing its finger at anyone certainly the person who's having their finger that finger in their face should reply point out you have no standing to accuse us of anything and stand up for themselves canada has been voting and acting in concert with the united states for the last few years now if you look at the

votes on israel for example you'll find the united states canada and you know like some small rock in the middle of the pacific voting on one side and the rest of the world on the other one china has warned india against pursuing all exploration in a disputed south china sea this after new delhi threatened to send warships to the resource rich area to protect its interests but as you know pissing off explains the conflicts between the two nations could see both countries lose out. as china and india rise economically their military muscles are growing as well both need energy to keep that kind of growth going and that may be putting the two asian giants on a collision course because of the mess that nationalism the indian government cannot afford to be seem to be weak in dealing with china obviously a higher power with government. over two hundred billion barrels of oil and large

amounts of natural gas that's more than the vast majority of the world's energy rich nations have all hidden under the south china sea china claims most of the territory for itself but india has also managed to get access by buying a stake in a vietnamese gas field shortly after hanoi accuse chinese boats of sandwich dodging exploration india warned it's ready to use force to defend its interests hopefully as i said they choose not to lead to a lot longer term conflict but you know it's it's a new me inevitable because both these countries now large ambitions of becoming global actors and players both china and india have been pumping billions of u.s. dollars into their armies and navies holding drills on a regular basis and beijing has also announced its police will soon start to board and inspect foreign vessels surely the vast oil reserves in the south china sea are just too big of a cash for now they're trying out working here to pass out what i really want to

accomplish between the two economic power houses says it may be a game that neither can i when the two asian giants can't afford any weaknesses and that would make it easier for other countries to take a bite of the vast resources the u.s. has long been increasing its economic and military presence in the region this in yes there west strike to pick this expansion by both china in terms of the last. four bowls that the last thing that they want is a military clash so if the two eastern powerhouses can share nicely they catch me they will go to some other players already prowling on the sidelines you've got this going on of our team. well coming up artie talks to the man behind the documentary called secret city about who he thinks really runs london and after the break stay with us.

you can tell an ordinary russian siberian and the blink of an. anthropologist. those days siberians were different clothes different food. different animals but what about. my journey began in two men but the big city was all shiny skyscrapers and shopping malls much like any other prosperous russian. so i decided to try. a small town just outside. dumplings came from here to dominate the russian cuisine but only in siberia. with cabbage and making sure you can have as

a starter main dish. although it may draw. most people in siberia see nothing wrong with hunting only if you decide to participate. when you look upon martin. as in the middle of a swamp only accessible by transport. and when. it's inhabited by siberian a large muslim minority that migrated head before the russians. and this. israel. maybe not this. tori's approaches but

distinctive enough to show that alter oldies he has siberia still don't quite like anywhere else. today we're joined by dr lisa alter the writer behind the secret city documentary which is all about the city of london corporation the governing body of the one square mile that is home to the u.k. financial industry to actually sell to thank you very much for joining us today can you tell me what the city of london corporation is and what it does the corporation of london or city of london corporation is the government for the city of london the square mile the financial district which is actually the real city of london the rest of london isn't a city and its role is to basically lobby for the city but the thing is the city's

been taken over by financial interests and banks so the corporations actual role has become to lobby nationally regionally internationally for the banks located in the city of london in the financial interests that it bothers the title of the documentary is secret city what so secret about what it does i think in the first instance very very few people in london and certainly elsewhere in the country know about the corporation of london heard about the corporation of london they might have heard of the words the city of london but usually in the context of an economic reports that kind of flags it merely is a district within the city of london but it's actually a city and when you've got a city that people don't actually know about it secretive ok the corporation of london itself is in many respects avoids freedom of information education for example it's not publicly accountable in any other institution and so secrecy is in its very nature what's the formula if the city of london wields too

much power and needs to be democratized how should that be done i think the only way it can be done is through strong campaigns that try to tackle the governing structures of the city. london but also try to lobby parliament but where is parliament reluctant to legislate for the corporation of london because of these constitutional issues it can do if it wants but the political wills never being there and so really every m.p. from london whether conservative labor or liberal democrats should be lobbying for change because if the vast wealth held by the corporation of london were integrated to the rest of london it would be a very different city and in the poverty you see he would probably be eradicated with that money do you feel that the city of london corporation would be morally exonerated if they did more to help the poor buyers around them not really the because the corporation of london is kind of ultra stick it gives quite

a bit of money to charities it has all sorts of charitable charitable foundations but this is putting band-aids putting plasters on whims it's not doing anything structurally to change the relationship between this state within a state government within london that no one knows about and the surrounding boroughs which are extraordinarily poor but how is it possible to democratize the corporation if the financial industry in the u.k. and the government are so closely connected when there's no political will it's impossible to impossible to make that change i mean there's all sorts of things that could possibly be done which is by packing the corporation of london with people elected on a reform ticket a government that has the political will or that can be forced to have the political will through its manifesto for example can can make that legislation then perhaps things could change but it's a deep set problem and i think it's a bigger problem than just the corporation of london it's

a problem about the role of capitalism in the world about the role of finance in particular as a force and a power but surely every industry has a lobby the manufacturing industry the tobacco industry isn't it a natural element of a capitalist society now. i mean it is in a sense in the sense that there's a lot be there ok but the problem is we have an effective governments. an effective state building built around a single interest so it's the integration of that lobbying function with the political structures with the governance of the city with its effectively a states that's the problem and that's distinct from all of the lobby groups there are there is that say that protecting the city's interests is what's keeping the u.k. out of the euro zone and it's what drives david cameron's hard stance on financial issues is yes without a doubt it we mustn't mistake a relationship of force for what the real relationship is it's not the city of

london's could jolene david cameron or even tony blair before him these are people who politically ideologically are in sync with the interests of the city of london but without a doubt british policy in relation to the euro in relation to the european union in relation to things like the financial transaction tax is about the interests of the city of london has a particular interest and that interest has damaging effects on other sectors of the british economy no one seems to have been prosecuted in the us or in the u.k. for what led to the global financial crisis back in two thousand and eight or for the interest rigging scandals here in the u.k. why do you think that is because there's a rich network of association between bankers lawyers judges politicians i mean this is a network of people who do each other favors rub each other's backs and so on and so forth the other reason for that and i think this is really crucial in this is something that really people don't know about it's the the kind of propaganda

effort the city in the corporation have put into changing public perceptions of the crisis if you remember in two thousand and seven there was a housing crisis it spilled out became a financial crisis a big financial crisis largely with private debt as well as other aspects of finance economics and public perceptions of that over these few years the recent years have changed to turn it into a. problem of public debt a problem of government spending it's not the fall of the bankers in the insurance companies in the financier's it's the problem that we've been giving too much money to wheelchair users that's what's caused the crisis that didn't come from nowhere that's not a change of mind by analysts the city of london corporation the city of london itself spent nineteen million pounds in two thousand and eleven alone in propaganda in lobbying in trying to change people's minds about the nature of the crisis and

this is one of the reasons attention is being taken away from that and it's other people are being punished a senior bank of england official recently said that the occupy movement was both morally and intellectually right in its attack on the international banking system do you think what's happened is going to bring about lost ing changes to the sector i don't think there have been changes i mean there have been some one way but most of them have been the other way you know we've heard of reductions in corporation tax they've avoided the tobin taxes financial transaction tax they have now reconsolidate their power i don't think anything has happened in this country to stem the power of the banks in fact quite the opposite they've got away with it they've got away with one of the pick is kind of financial crimes in human history london is now one of the three command centers of the global economy that wouldn't have been possible without the city of london germany's a much more powerful economy than the british economy but they haven't got any

pockets of undemocratic nepotistic rule which is untouched by the german government so lord glasman morris glassman has long argued for for the rest of london the whole of london to be incorporated the city of london has always resisted expansion to allow the rest of london to be part of it so we are right now and people living in london are actually living in the city of london you call the city of long. some corporation and undemocratic pocket within london as a whole other any of the borrowers in the u.k. that are this similar type of exception to the general rule you know there's nothing like the corporation of the not i don't think anywhere in the world i mean there are some anomalies we know of like the vatican and so on but they're very very distinct and we know about them the whole point of the corporation of london is people don't know about it people don't know what it does they don't know about its role as the financial crisis continues the media is increasingly hungry and

searching for people to pin the blame on for the country's woes do you think that villainize in the city of london corporation conveniently fits into that quite fashionable anti banking narrative. i think again it's not really vilifying it's saying look there are some really good structures in the corporation of london and some very good ones but they've been subverted and i think when you've got an institution that's been taken over by particular interests whether it's finance or football you know if football runs the country that's probably a problem too and i think that if we shy away from asking questions about these institutions if we shy away from trying to shine a light on them then we're doing a disservice not just to ourselves but to the rest of the country and indeed the world i think the whole point of living in a system that's supposed to be democratic is that we're supposed to be able to shine a light anywhere and the more we hear that it's a form of bullying or

a form of unfair attention the more we're probably doing the right thing what's their response to the film then like i know that you recently had a screening in the house of commons the response was fantastic and in parliament certainly that was hosted by john mcdonnell and lots of sort of activists and journalists and from from here and abroad turned up and you know they gave us their feedback in the session and at a lot of it was wow just because they did i've never known about this stuff you know it's all eminent people professors and doctors who have never heard of the role of delivery companies have never heard of the role of thomas gresham setting up global financial capitalism so i think just exposing that historical fact was very well received but also the eventual consolidation of the power of finance as an explanation for how we got to the current situation today i think to hear a priest explaining how the corporation of london is set up or

a religion of consumerism that in some respects can explain elements of the last year's riots it's positioned lots of different discourses lots of different ideas in relation to this. and historical explanation and i think people really appreciate that a lot of people are asking what do we do that and why how do we you know how do we change it and i think that's good to have that kind of response so here you go to if you want to change it there are various groups the grew up with the occupy movement actually in a round that there's one organization called reclaim the city that's been trying to strategize at the moment and try to kind of reclaim that portion of london for the rest of london in the country as a whole to to drag it into the democratic system i know there are a number of people looking at running for election again to the city of london corporation and they're going to try to make some changes from the inside but it

requires you know the media the press to start paying attention to this not just to have finance stories on the back page shoved away for business people to read these things are relevant to our lives if you know the sun newspapers got a number of readers who have lost their jobs they need to start thinking about why those people have lost their jobs and how the economy is dominated by finance and tells this story to their readers because that change will benefit them. thank you very much thank you. download the official application to cell phone choose your language stream quality and enjoy your favorites from outside now a t.v. is not required to watch on t.v.

only you need is your mobile device can watch on t.v. any time. to speak your language. programs and documentaries in arabic it's all here on all t.v. reporting from the world talk sports skiffy ip interviews intriguing stories for you. in troy all t. arabic to find out more visit our big teeth don't call. six. zero zero zero because we're going to look at the experience before sneering words on the card. the model for service. so

kids before sponsorship. nations before college. costs. they are all here to make. chimp and the client. wealthy british scientists some time to experiment. markets finance scandal. find out what's really happening to the global economy with max cause or for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune into kinds a report on our. years under siege.

destruction without seen. what could have been just ruins and saved by a great sacrifice. and restored by human jets it's. a remarkable reminder of courage and selflessness. proof putin is of more if people. can tell the russian side. the mission free a critic a should free transport charge is free to make amends free risk free studio type free.