chuck hagel the secretary of defense delaying his confirmation fifty eight senators voted in favor of hague taking the pows two short of the sixty eight required to go to the next stage of the naming process republicans say the delay will allow them to find out more about the candidates hago has come in for criticism for saying the jewish lobby had too much influence in washington. and let's go back to our breaking news story this hour some one hundred people have sought medical attention after a meteorite exploded above the earth with burning debris raining down from the sky and russia's new roles there was a launch of buying and windows were shattered and houses across the region people were evacuated from public places like schools and railway stations and mobile communications did since been restored one meter right piece has already been found radiation levels are said to be within safe limits initially there were fears the incident could have been a military aircraft or even

a miss out of course we'll keep you posted. and coming up after a short break the latest edition of piece of ass cross talk to stay with us for that. helicopters flying through the air day and night rounds of assault rifle ammo popping as the choppers buzz over the land now this unique form of hell of terror is no longer restricted to those in vietnam in the middle east now houston miami residents of the good old usa can get in on the fun houston residents in terror called nine one one and scrambled for cover and even to schools put on lockdown as a military helicopters participated in a multi-agency training thrill in miami at night in the middle of downtown onlookers caught video on their telephones of blackhawk helicopters pumping loud

blank on to the people below and maybe even as i speak a flexibly scheduled military drill could be happening in jesper county south carolina you know when i was a kid they tell us about how that year old soviet union would parade their tanks around how there were soldiers all over their oppressed country even in one thousand nine hundred four or world made a point to describe our military helicopters would eternally be overhead and a dystopian nightmare world now we're living the nightmare the united states is a huge country there's plenty of room on remote army bases to do your training also last time i checked afghanistan evil which is don't look like downtown miami just who are you training the kill anyways knock off the terror trainings but that's just my opinion. you know sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something

else you hear or see some other part of it and realize that everything you. you don't know i'm tom hardy welcome to the big show. chloe and welcome to crossfire where all things considered i'm peter lavelle five tiny pacific islands one big problem for japan china and the region what is fueling this dispute domestic nationalism geopolitics a natural resource grab all of the above then there's the question of what is called the pacific pivot is washington's pivot focused on challenging china's great power ambitions.

to cross talk this heated island dispute i'm joined by she cocoa goto in washington she is a northeast asia associate at the wilson center in hong kong we have andrew bloom he is an international an independent china specialist and in philadelphia we crossed and then he is a writer and blogger for counterpunch all right folks cross talk rules and i think that means you can jump in anytime you want if i go to our guest in washington d.c. i mean if you were to create a hierarchy of what this dispute is all about what would it be containing china resources the american pivot what's your number one. well the the they just be huge between the the japan and china really started with the grab for resources it has since then evolved into redefining national identity japan sees this as their own territory china has disputed that agreement and it is it is

something that both sides simply cannot recall the filing against and we are finding ourselves in a deadlock over who owns what and it is it is a very terse situation that really cannot be rationalized that the stage ok andrew for i can go to you i mean yeah i nationalism can be very irrational here but what direction is this going into we've seen it a little bit of the steam blowing off now over the last few days but it hasn't been resolved so what's the major issue for you well i think at the order of events is that exactly like bart i think we should look at how the world order has warped don't forget that territorial disputes between china and japan have been on the table for a long long time so why now and also it is the this or core grab for resources you know it's only happened only recently where is the all of the spills as i was saying are have been on a cart i think what's happening is there was

a major shift of events after the american pivot to asia now the american pivot is more. just about china is because of the change in the world order america's capacity to lead has is the climbing is still leading but the capacity to lead is the climbing according to the national intelligence council report based in washington should be in the national intelligence council because washington d c. so. america has got to reconfigure is essence around the world moving. a lot of the. that the resources from the middle east and concentrating to where it counts is asia but because of that because of american spirit in our military pios with china's neighbors that

somehow have folded and a number came and you're getting really you're getting way ahead of me you know what it's all really late and you're getting way ahead of me that's why i like you have you on the program i'd like to go back to washington because our guest in washington was disagreeing. explain this has nothing to this has nothing to do with the united states the united states has made loud and clear that it really wants to take a neutral position regarding think iowa. the rebalancing towards the asia pacific is one issue and say kochadaiiyaan the dispute is another what the united states has declared is that whilst they are a neutral party in these in these tense disputes if japan feels obliged to take some kind of military action or react in some way the u.s. japan alliance kicks in and then the united states we wouldn't. align itself with japan ok minus let me go and get that to ok but the u.s.

is involved then ok very much involved let's go to philadelphia what do you think here we got to the pivot real early in this program i'm glad go ahead lynn go ahead well i would respectfully disagree with that assessment because i think the u.s. is really behind this dispute the u.s. is playing off japan's fear of falling behind china or losing is primacy in asia and is also playing off the fear of other nation asian nations towards a resurgent china such as vietnam the philippines and another countries so the u.s. is using this. as a catalyst as a mechanism to stay relevant in the western pacific so as long as these asian countries fear chinese of bullying them but u.s. has a role to play and they can sell weapons you know and it can stay profitable otherwise it has no role in western pacific so u.s. is really behind this is going to japan towards this confrontation station with china because the issue was dormant for decades there was no you know no overt

conflict until recently japan initiated this so this rather suicide tactic is really instigated by washington d.c. i believe it let's go back to washington d.c. then. yes it is that it has been a tension call thing subject over many centuries but it's only really bubbled up over the last couple of years but really i believe that the genesis of this is not the united states but rather the governor of tokyo who decided that hey we're going to spend money the government of tokyo to buy these privately owned lands and then the japanese government intervened and said ok well we can't get the tokyo government to buy it so we've the national government is going to actually buy these islands washington again is wants to play a neutral party in this but let me play the devil's advocate. say the united japan feels more strongly strongly about going in. to take military action to

take to take over these islands because it has the united states backing what would happen then then china has an excuse to take military action against japan then the united states and japan can declare war on china and and then china will possibly have backing from north korea and we see this big big fall out and we are seeing and we would see a repeat of one nine hundred fourteen world war one when the assassination of a crown prince by some serbian nationalist sparks off a whole global war i don't think anyone really wants this and if anyone with any russian now can sink through it is it is a dangerous game so i can understand that yes it gets headlines to talk about oh yes it will sell american arms but that is not what's happening here ok andrew i mean is it really it seems like containment of china to me at least well at least

through. appears to be a strategy of calm payment by i mean. or mean. because a lot of america's treaty difference treaty with japan but it's also. americas are forming much closer military ties with or china's neighbors including of course but australia but also as far as india you can see that there is a. and circle and of china and that's only happened only for the rebate during the last couple of years and then of course the south china sea is a very very important conduit for the importation of oil resources which are china's the lifeblood so china naturally feels threatened now as far as to japan is concerned the recent wide japan of resorting to what appeared to be

more assertive action is not just out of the blue it's because of the rise of japanese nationalism and of course a right wing politics in japan so the politicians are trying to cater into this kind of. national psyche which says that world is many many years of the second world war and in fact a lot of the japanese people were born after the second world war including prime minister abbey so they don't see why japan should continue to you know sort of move around the world would tail behind its back as it were after all japan as was the world's second largest economy until it was overtaken by china so all this plays into a more assertive national policy and because of that and because of the american pivot forming military allies with china's neighbors and so a number of china's neighbors with polar tauriel. rival claims are all becoming

more assertive and that feeds into china's ok here let me go to len let me go to lynn in philadelphia the political leader of the here is this nasty nationalism versus nasty nationalism it sounds quite dangerous. well the nationalist angle is used to play up support though mystically japan is using this dispute to rebuild its military so already is gaining something from it and abyei was reelected because of his nationalist right wing stance and his rather belligerent stance so nationalism is used in us to to gain support for whatever each country is doing but it comes down to resources and geo political reasons you know but. some money is at the heart of this but nationalism emotion is used to gain support. but i want to return to the us japan. coordinated effort

to. create a front against china the u.s. is not just getting closer to you know. allies it's us australia and india as already mentioned but also vietnam in cambodia is former enemies and the japan too is giving navy ships to the philippines and selling submarines to vietnam so this is a very coordinated effort to create a new front against china to contain china because inevitably there's going to be more of a yawn of a fight over resources because all these all these industries all these countries need oil natural gas to pursued this more inclusive growth that is slipping away from all of them all right hang on we're going to go to a short break here and after that short break we'll continue our discussion of the pacific islands dispute staying with our team.

my juggling job. to hack work and get caught when lobbyists money and lawmakers are combined together that's where the problem of

corruption comes from. i don't know the document's. keep up a smart look. there is also. another word behind that which is how to influence the institutions steer clear of provocations don't answer any question. came into the office and found banners hanging around the office and lots of strange faces around so i said what's what's happening will somebody please tell me what's going on and they said oh we've come to occupy your building. possibly they want to do a confrontation possibly they wanted me to ring up the police to have the police come in through the mail but it didn't seem to be a good idea to learn the european way with brussels business. in the uk risky

it's one person one fold but in brussels business it's one euro one fault. oh.

please. welcome back to cross talk for all things considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're talking about the japan china i would just be. ok i'd like to go back to washington i guess there was very angry that you couldn't jump in before the break and i was your opportunity i'd like to this you know preface it is that it's what we heard at the very end of the program of the first part is that the militarization of the region and this sounds very very dangerous going back to your nine hundred fourteen comment go ahead. i want to repeat again that the east china sea territorial dispute and the u.s.

pivot towards the asia pacific region are two just french and two separate strategy but what about the timing the timing is very interesting you have to admit that. don't you think the timing is yes it is it but i do believe it is a coincidence the really really balancing of u.s. military forces is not something that you can just do overnight it takes years upon years of decision making and strategic planning it is the reach shifting of military forces from afghanistan and iraq into new interests and that kind of situation has been in play for the past decade. and i also want to add to that i'm i'm getting a lot of. concern about this idea of china being attacks china against the world and that the united states was leading this global attack against china if we do look at the numbers though u.s.

china relations have never been as as close as they are now in terms of capital flow from one side to the other in terms of people to people networking and ideas exchange this is not the cold war it is not the united states against china so i think that really needs to be highlighted and never has the white house declare that china is the enemy but at the same time of the washington is very concerned about is the military modernization of china and the the building up of arms by china that that is certainly something that is being considered seriously by washington and that is the heart of the rebalancing towards towards the asia pacific region but again there is the threat of north korea there are other concerns it is a rear and it's also wants to the united states also wants to burden share its

oversight of safety in the asia pacific region and it really wants to reconsider and really re define its alliances with its existing partners ok andrew but i mean in beijing we don't see it that way b. c. that there being a target of a possible aggression from the outside mark think of preaching sees the situation pretty clearly not only in terms of the asia pacific but you perms of the world order as i was saying before because because if you look at the the the these so-called pivot is really part of a real balancing of a response to a change in the group order according to brzezinski who is the course is the boy in american foreign policy whose latest book called strategic which. can actually see how americas could maintains leadership in a changed world dividing the world into the west and east the west of course includes russia and turkey so it's balancing that with the west means trying to

bring russia in for example in the with the b.t.o. and try to bring turkey in into the of the fold as it were in a kind of balancing row in the west but as far as the ease is concerned brzezinski calls this a complex beast now how to culture balance the complexities where most of china's neighbors are china's largest trading partners and they do not want to sour the relationship with china but of course most of those neighbors also fear that china is getting to bake in its us like a one thousand pound panda and even though it is of good intentions and and a lot of the countries fear the time is getting too big so america comes in and provides a kind of military umbrella and and try to rebalance the kind of geopolitics there but if you if you are in china your cost be be very very. worry because as i was

saying the pacific and the south china sea in particular is china's that is the conduit of a lot of resources and an and and in fact china's trade on which china depends for its survival so i think that china is extremely worried and that adds in to and that also if you add into the kind of total tauriel integrity which is of course as a baby a sour point in terms of china's national psyche don't forget the china saw its sovereignty infringe for for almost a century because foreign aggression and that's why there was a rise of nationalism as well in china so all these forces coming by lay ok watch. then jump in this is crosstalk go ahead yeah i i just i just want to disagree with most of that basic premise about a new global order but i did actually want to point out the role that russia can

can play in all of this what's very interesting is that there are territorial disputes not just in these china there's quite a few of. them there are quite a few and the one in northern territories the curl islands is something that has been a huge problem since the end of world war exploded today but at the same time but the tank i'm at a table with would say who's acting reckless right here ok japan and russia agree to disagree ok they don't have their fleets going after each other ok it's a big difference so when let me go to you i don't know that it would appear here you know but who's being reckless in this situation both sides all sides. i just i just want to get back to the resource issue as far as you are subverting china and challenging china's access to resources just look at africa u.s. is actively working against chinese efforts to secure resources on africa when it not khadafi for example is shredded chinese oil contracts in that country so china

is very vulnerable because it needs oil from far places that the u.s. can block off through the sea so that's why is focusing is nearer to home towards the south china sea and the east asia see what has to remember also the symbolism of. china loss these islands in hundred ninety five when everyone thought that it has a larger and stronger navy and japan to everyone's surprise. defeat in china back then and took these islands so you know the woman has forgotten about this but china hasn't so it is very specific and peculiar that japan is raising the issue this issue now because this issue was dormant for decades they say that is natural gas and oil in the sea there but it hasn't been developed in fact japan hasn't done anything with these islands for decades so to raise the issue now is is very interesting to say the least andrew what's a solution what's a win win for both sides all sides if that's possible. well i think that as i was

saying this problem had been on the table for many many years it's only until the folk past couple of years that everything seemed to have flare up china doesn't want a war because china's the you have huge problems the contend with more america want to warn or for that matter to plan but because of what all these forces coming into play we have a situation where things can get out of hand very quickly so i think that the both sides should really set aside that agree to disagree as it were the differences and then explore areas where they can cooperate for example i mean there are lots of. resources in that area and then there could be areas for joint exploration for example and of course the the the kind of marine life some of them deserves maybe a bit of conservation efforts and of course the finding the the code of conduct you

know was certain red lines should not be cross because once they're cross then the danger for unintended consequences would be very severe with like sending military aircraft you know cloak flying close to one another or you've been sending for ash you know sort of warning. shells or that could really leap into a kind of military confrontation because the danger is that once that was a war once that there was some military crash between china japan america has got to be involved on the side of japan because of the of the treaty of the defense treaty and once americans got involved everything asked so this is the very dangerous situation and if we go back to washington i think there's another historical thing we should remember during the cold war the soviet union in the united states had certain standards to communicate with each other in a crisis does china and japan need that now. or developing personal relations is

critical in defusing the current situation i think hit the nail on the head the two sides do need to come. together to agree to disagree and we are very very far away from that situation at that moment and so the personal connection the trust the communication pipeline needs to be a stop listen and used very very frequently at this stage one of the biggest worries that i have at the moment on a practical side is the two weeks ago there was a ridge or that was shot out to japanese. defense. ships and shooting a missile is a two step process you fire a radar right and then the missile follows that radar trajectory for china to have done that is very alarming it is an act of aggression but the fact that china the

chinese government is denying it it's all very interesting either china. the chinese leadership did not know that that happened and that it was just on a grassroots level at the ship commanders level that is worrying if that is the case because that means the ship commanders have. considerable power to set flame on a very incendiary situation or it could also mean that the chinese leadership has complete knowledge and understanding of the situation and it ordered it and that opens another kettle of you know. folks fascinating discussion we didn't resolve the dispute we'll be talking about in the future many thanks my guest today in washington to help us and in hong kong and thanks to our viewers for watching us here i see you next time and remember crosstalk.

lisa bloom. is a. choose your language. of choice wake up with no influential person to say still some of. the concerns here to. choose the opinions that invigorating to. choose the stories that entire blogs choose the access to your office who. will. science technology innovation all the list of melanin spam

around russia we've got the few jerks covered. bases based on. you know care read. play. music. concert the show today how to sing we've just had a studio upgrade like a month just to go to the debate which is basically devoted to the united states. would take mass shootings for the rich kids or to say new books must someone tell them it's a stop the bloodshed on this one comes to prevent government coming is there a common sense of the simplest.