you know i believe they're mean what more could they do i mean if in the if you put stuff out there that you don't want to be out there that you shouldn't do it where you should just keep your private stuff to use to influence with and all over the place is going to get worse as we move into the future or are we going to figure out this privacy thing are going to get worse because the more pirates overseas the more they want to go because between making weapons and stuff so see they want to get as much information about terrorism stuff so they're going to document more just to protect they're going to embed us with chips and you know everything we do yeah basically whether or not you think the government storing our tweets is an invasion of privacy and the bottom line is you better think twice before you tweet because you never know who might be listening. all right well that's going to do it for now if you missed any part of today's

story is that you are in luck we post all of our interviews online in full to go to our website youtube dot com slash r.t. america where you can click comment and forward our stories to your friends or for the very latest information on the stories we covered and a few that we just didn't have time to get to check out our website as our dot com slash usa you can also follow me on twitter at meghan underscore lopez today i want to know what you really think of all of this media or an asteroid talk tweet me your thoughts i promise i won't keep them like the library of congress might recognize that with host abby martin is coming up next at the top of the hour so be sure to tune into that you're sitting down with the director of operations for antiwar dot com to find out what the real state of the antiwar movement is see you back here at eight.

well. science technology innovation all the latest developments from around russia we've gone to the huge earth covered. the worst you're going to say the only white house of the day the radio guy and. what you want. to do because you never seen anything like that i'm cold.

hello and welcome to crossfire where all things are considered i'm peter lavelle five tiny pacific islands one big problem for japan china and the region what is fueling this dispute domestic nationalism geopolitics and natural resource grab all of the above then there's the question of what is called the pacific pivot is washington's pivot focused on challenging china's great power ambitions.

to cross out this heated island dispute i'm joined by she cocoa goto in washington she is a northeast asia associate at the wilson center in hong kong we have andrew bloom he is an international an independent china specialist and in philadelphia we crossed him and then he is a writer and blogger for counterpunch all right folks cross talk rules and i think that means you can jump in anytime you want to thank you to our guest in washington d.c. i mean if you were to create a hierarchy of what this dispute is all about what would it be containing china resources the american pivot what's your number one. well the the just beauty between the the japan and china really started with the grab for resources it has since then evolved into redefining national identity japan sees this as their own territory china has disputed that agreement and it is it is something that

both sides simply cannot recall the filing against and we are finding ourselves in a deadlock over who owns what and it is it is a very terse situation that really cannot be rationalized that the stage ok andrew if i can go to you i mean yeah i nationalism can be very irrational here but what direction is is going into we've seen it a little bit of the steam blowing off now of the last few days but it hasn't been resolved so what's the major issue for you well i think at the order of events is not exactly like bart i think we should look at how the world order has warped don't forget that territorial disputes between china and japan have been on the table for a long long time so why now and also it is the this or core grab for resources you know it's only happened only recently where is the all of the spills

as i was saying are have been on the cards i think what's happening is there was a major shift of events after the american pivot to asia now the american people it is not. just about china is because of the change in the world order america's capacity to lead has is the climbing is still leading but the capacity to lead is the climbing according to the national intelligence council report based in washington should be in the at the national intelligence council is in washington d.c. . so. america has got to reconfigure is assets around the world moving . a lot of the. that the resources from the middle east and concentrating to where it counts is asia but because of that because of american spirit in our

military pies with china's neighbors that somehow have emboldened a number came into use getting really what you're getting way ahead of me you know what it all really mean you're getting way ahead of me that's why i like you have you on the program i'd like to go back to washington because our guest in washington was disagreeing. explain this has nothing to this has nothing to do with the united states the united states has made loud and clear that it really wants to take a neutral position regarding thank our clients the u.s. pivot the rebalancing towards the asia pacific is one issue since a call could die you dispute as another what the united states has declared is that whilst they are a neutral party in these in these tense disputes if japan feels obliged to take some kind of military action or react in some way the u.s. japan alliance kicks in and then the united states which would. align itself with japan ok let me go get a that ok but the u.s.

is involved then ok very much involved in let's go to philadelphia what do you think here we got to the pivot real early in this program i'm glad go ahead lynn go ahead well i would respectfully disagree with that assessment because i think u.s. is really behind this dispute the u.s. is playing off japan's fear of falling behind china or losing is primacy in asia and is also playing off the fear of all in the asian nations towards a resurgent china such as vietnam the philippines and other countries so the u.s. is using this. as a catalyst as a mechanism to stay relevant in the western pacific so as long as these asian countries fear chinese of bullying them but u.s. has a role to play and they can sell weapons. you know and it can stay profitable otherwise it has no role in it was in the pacific so u.s. is really behind this is going to japan towards this confrontation station which are now because the issue was dormant for decades there was no you know no overt

conflict until recently japan initiated this so this rather suicide tactic is really instigated by washington d.c. i believe it let's go back to washington d.c. then. yes it is that it has been a tension kohls the subject over many centuries but it's only really bubbled up over the last couple of years but really i believe that the genesis of this is not the united states but rather the governor of tokyo who decided that hey we're going to spend money the government of tokyo to buy these privately owned lands and then the japanese government intervened and said ok well we can't get the tokyo government to buy it so we've the national government is going to actually buy these islands washington again is wants to play a neutral party in this but let me play the devil's advocate. say the united

japan feels more strongly strongly about going in. to take military action to take to take over these islands because it has the united states backing what would happen then then china has an excuse to take military action against japan then the united states and japan can declare war on china and and then china will possibly have backing from north korea and we see this big big fall out and we are seeing and we would see a repeat of one nine hundred fourteen world war one when the assassination of a crown prince by some serbian nationalist sparks off a whole global war i don't think anyone really wants this and if anyone with any russian now can think through it is it is a dangerous game so i can understand that yes it gets headlines to talk about oh yes it will sell american arms but that is not what's happening here ok andrew i mean is it really it seems like containment of china to me at least well at least

to china. to be a strategy of containment by i mean. or mean. because a lot of america's treaty difference treaty with japan but it's also. america is now forming much closer military ties with or china's neighbors including of course but australia but also as far as india you can see that there is a. and circle moment of china and that's only happened only really during the last couple of years and then of course the south china sea is a very very important conduit for the importation of oil resources which are china's the lifeblood so china naturally feels threatened now as far as to japan is concerned the recent wide japan of resorting to what appeared to be

more assertive action is not just out of the blue it's because of the rise of japanese nationalism and of course a right wing politics in japan so the politicians are trying to cater into this kind of. national psyche which says that world is many many years of the second world war and in fact a lot of the japanese people were born after the second world war including prime minister abbey so they don't see why japan should continue to you know sort of move around the world would tail behind its back as it were after all japan as a was the world's second largest economy until it was overtaken by china so all this plays into a more assertive national policy and because of that and because of the american pivot forming military allies with china's neighbors and so

a number of china's neighbors we're told tauriel. rival claims are all becoming more assertive and that feeds into china's ok here let me go to len let me go to lynn in philadelphia the other thing that held out the here is this nasty nationalism versus nasty nationalism it sounds quite dangerous. well the nationalist angle is used to play up support though mystically japan is using this dispute to rebuild its military so already is gaining something from it and abyei was reelected because of his nationalist right wing stance and his rather belligerent stance so nationalism is used in us to to gain support for whatever each country is doing but it comes down to resources and geo political reasons you know but. some money is at the heart of this but nationalism emotion is used to gain support. but i want to return to the u.s. japan. coordinated effort to. create

a front against china the u.s. is not just getting closer to you know it's allies it's us australia and india as already mentioned but also vietnam in cambodia is former enemies and the japan too is giving navy ships to the philippines and selling submarines to vietnam so this is a very coordinated effort to create a new front against china to contain china because inevitably there's going to be more of a yawn of a fight over resources because all these all these industries all these countries need oil natural gas to pursued this more inclusive growth that is slipping away from all of them all right hang on we're going to go to a short break here and after that short break we'll continue our discussion of the pacific islands dispute stay with our team.

potentially deadly blizzard taking aim for the northeast it's expected to hit stunning in a few hours from new york to maine we have team coverage of the storm. but what we're watching is the very heavy snow moving into boston proper earlier today it was very sticky you can see it start to become much more powdery down the line there's still a lot of snow out here a good place for snowball fight. d.c. it is going to pretty incredible day there and even record snowfall throughout much of in life nobody is allowed to be driving lessons from emergency vehicles are exceptions.

well the british. markets. find out what's really happening to the global economy with. no holds barred look at the global financial headlines. kaiser reports.

welcome back to all things are considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're talking about the japan china island. ok i'd like to go back to washington i guess there was very angry that you couldn't jump in before the break and now is your opportunity i'd like to see you know preface it is that it's what we heard at the very end of the program of the first part is that the militarization of the region and this sounds very very dangerous

going back to your nine hundred fourteen comment go ahead. i want to repeat again there that the east china sea territorial dispute and the u.s. pivot towards the asia pacific region are two different and two suffrage strategy would have all the time in the twenty years very interesting you have to admit got don't you think the timing is yes it is it but i do believe it is a coincidence the really really balancing of u.s. military forces is not something that you can just do overnight it takes years upon years of decision making and strategic planning it is the reach shifting of military forces from afghanistan and iraq into new interests and that kind of situation has been in play for the past decade. and i also want to

add to that i'm i'm getting a lot of. concern about this idea of china being attacked china against the world and that the united states as we're leading this global attack against china if we do look at the numbers though u.s. china relations have never been as as close as they are now in terms of capital flow from one side to the other in terms of people to people networking and ideas exchange this is not the cold war it is not the united states against china so i think that really needs to be highlighted and never has the white house declare that china is the enemy but at the same time of the washington is very concerned about is the military modernization of china and the the building up of arms by china that that is certainly something that is being considered seriously by washington and that is at the heart of the rebalancing towards towards

the asia pacific region but if again there is the threat of north korea there are other concerns it is a rear and it's also wants to the united states also wants to burden share its oversight of safety in the asia pacific region and it really wants to reconsider and really re define its alliances with its existing partners ok andrew but i mean in beijing we don't see it that way b. c. that there being a target of a possible aggression from the outside mark think of bridging sees the situation pretty clearly not only in terms of the asia pacific but you perms of the world order as i was saying before because because if you look at the the the these so-called pivot is really part of a real rebalancing of a response to a change in the group order according to brzezinski who is the course is the boy in

american foreign policy his latest book called strategic which. can actually see how americas could maintain its leadership in a changed world dividing the world into the west and east the west of course includes russia and turkey so it's balancing that with the west means trying to bring russia in for example in the with the b.t.o. and try to bring turkey in into the of the fold as it were in a kind of balancing row in the west but as far as the ease is concerned brzezinski calls this a complex beast now how to culture balance the complexities where most of china's neighbors are china's largest trading partners and they do not want to sour the relationship with china but of course most of those neighbors also fear that china is getting to bake in its us like a one thousand pound panda and even though this way of good intentions and and

a lot of the countries fear but china is getting too big so america comes in and provides a kind of military umbrella and and try to rebalance the kind of geopolitics there but if you if you are in china your cost be very very. worry because as i was saying the pacific and the south china sea in particular is china's that is the conduit of a lot of resources and an and and in fact. china's trade on which china depends for its survival so i think that's. extremely worrying and that as seen to and that also if you add into the kind of total tauriel integrity which is of course as a baby a sour point in terms of china's national psyche don't forget the china saw its sovereignty infringe for for almost a century because foreign aggression and that's why there was a rise of nationalism as well in china so all these forces are coming by lay ok

watched. then jump in this is crosstalk go ahead yeah i i just i just want to disagree with most of that basic premise about a new global order but i did actually want to point out the role that russia can can play in all of this what's very interesting is that there are territorial disputes not just in these china there's quite a few of. them there are quite a few and the one in northern territories the curl islands is something that has been a huge problem since the end of world war exploded today but at the same time but it's actually i'm at a table with the would say who's acting reckless right here ok japan and russia agree to disagree ok they don't have their fleets going after each other ok it's a big difference so when let me go to you i don't know that i could actually hear you know who's being reckless in this situation both sides all sides. i just i just want to get back to the resource issue as far as you are subverting china and

challenging china's access to resources just look at africa u.s. is actively working against chinese efforts to secure resources from africa when it knocked out qaddafi for example it shredded chinese oil contracts in that country so china is very vulnerable because it needs oil from far places that the u.s. can block off through the sea so that's why is focusing is nearer to home towards the south china sea and the east asia see what has to remember also the symbolism of. china last these islands in hundred ninety five when everyone thought that it has a larger and stronger navy and japan to everyone's surprise. defeat in china back then and took these islands so you know the woman has forgotten about this but china hasn't so it is very specific and peculiar that japan is raising the issue this issue now because this issue was dormant for decades they say that is natural

gas and oil in the sea there but it hasn't been developed in fact japan hasn't done anything with these islands for decades so to raise the issue now is is very interesting to say the least andrew what's a solution what's a win win for both sides all sides if that's possible. well i think that as i was saying this problem had been on the table for many many years it's only until the folk past couple of years that everything seemed to have flare up so tyler doesn't want a war because china's the you have huge problems the contend with more america want to war nor for that matter to protect japan but because of what all these forces coming into play we have a situation where things can get out of hand very quickly so i think that the both sides are really set aside that agree to disagree as it were the differences and then explore areas where they can cooperate for example i mean there are lots of.

resources in that area and then there could be areas for joint exploration for example and of course the the kind of marine life some of them deserves maybe a bit of conservation efforts and of course defining the code of conduct you know was certain red lines should not be cross because once they're cross out then the danger for unintended consequences would be very severe with lights sending military aircraft you know cloak flying close to one another or you've been sending fresh you know sort of warning. shells or that could really leap into a kind of military confrontation because the danger is that once that was a war once that there was some military crash between china japan america has got to be involved on the side of japan because of the of the treaty of the defense treaty and once americans got involved everything asked so this is the very

dangerous situation and if we go back to washington i think there's another historical thing we should remember during the cold war the soviet union and united states had certain standards to communicate with each other in a crisis does china and japan need that now. or developing personal relations is critical in defusing the current situation i think hit the nail on the head the two sides do need to come. together to agree to disagree and we are very very far away from that situation at that moment and so the personal connection the trust the communication pipeline needs to be a stop listen and used very very frequently at this stage one of the biggest worries that i have at the moment on a practical side is the two weeks ago there was a ridge or that was shot out to japanese. defense.

ships and shooting a missile is a two step process you fire a radar right and then the missile follows that radar trajectory for china to have done that is very alarming it is an act of aggression but the fact that china the chinese government is denying it it's all very interesting either china. the chinese leadership did not know that that happened and that it was just on a grassroots level at the ship commanders level that is worrying if that is the case because that means the ship commanders have. considerable power to set flame on a very incendiary situation or it could also mean that the chinese leadership has complete knowledge and understanding of the situation and ordered it and that opens another kettle of you know what i'm going to have. folks fascinating discussion we

resolve the dispute we'll be talking about in the future many thanks my guest today in washington to help us and in hong kong and thanks to our viewers for watching us here i see you next time and remember crosstalk. me pete.

pete. the. worst you are going to say. white house of a radio guy implausibility minutes from a quick fix i want to watch closely to go because you never seen anything like that i'm cold.