below and welcome to cross talk we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle the residents of the falkland islands or moby does have spoken they wish to maintain their status as a british overseas territory argentina has dismissed a referendum is folly it would appear the twin pillars of the international order are on a collision course does self-determination trump the sanctity of sovereignty. to cross not this island dispute i'm joined by lou coffee in washington he's a margaret thatcher fellow at the heritage foundation also in washington we have willard. he is a research fellow at the council on hemispheric affairs and in london we crossed to

richard got he is a former latin american correspondent and editor for the guardian or a gentleman cross-talk rules and i think that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it richard if i go to you first the recent referendum overwhelmingly passed so we should recognize self-determination of those people living on those islands yes or no. determination doesn't apply to a smooth group of people living on an island miles away from the mainland of britain ok that was very clear it looks jump in. but i tell you it certainly does it doesn't matter if it's one single person they have the right of self-determination is clearly outlined in the u.n. charter this is a very fundamental right and they have exercise this right and the world should listen ok you guys are being real quick here alex. it. could be short for the past few years the argentine gorgon has accused the u.k. of karri not a policy of twenty first century calling at least in the islands i think they were

for him the most interesting and important tool by the u.k. to show that the wheel of the island being respected the need for people to have lived in most of cases most cases for their entire lives in the silence ok richard but peter peter out peter i would say that it's not what is going to look at every church or as you say be very lively richard first place. and the problem is it's not a question of what the island does think it's a question of the sovereignty of the islands and the see around them and that present belongs to britain and it is claimed by argentina so the views and thoughts of the islanders that completely and absolutely irrelevant all right go ahead irrelevant that is not true the the wishes of the will of the islanders is very important here this is what it's all about it's about what do the people of the falkland islands want to live under do they want to live under the crown united

kingdom or do they want to be part of argentina they have overwhelmingly decided that they want to be part of the united kingdom and this wasn't a tool by the united kingdom actually this was the whole referendum idea came from the falkland islands governments it was the falkland islanders themselves that have the right of self-determination and shrine into their constitution as the falkland islanders themselves have decided to exercise this right of self-determination now david cameron in london said that he would back the falkland islanders no matter what the outcome of the vote and they he has done so in argentina needs to listen the people of the falkland islands want to remain british very clear alex is it an either or situation here as it was just described. pretty much unfortunately we have to look at this from historical perspective i think both argentina alone have been fighting for control of the island scene and making sense you've seen. the day when the u.k.

is accused of how unix there. they used to leave their lands and the brawl in their own people and we depending on who you ask nor are you or a british historian going to tell you a different version of probably just plain history. obviously both nations are not going to agree on some kind of sobriety is not on the table the u.k. has always said that and i actually disagree we've what look said i think d.c. said toure especially because argentina has been trying to get the sympathy vote from latin america from the from the developing world but a saint or the u.k. or the evil if the evil can through they're trying to steal the last of curry not like a city's twenty first century call nearly sim and the u.k. straight to. a friend can go around and say you know no we're not imposing our will anybody the people believe in the islands are happy with the current relationship with the u.k. and we're respecting that and we're protected look you want to jump in go ahead.

look around the league are looking for zero to look first go ahead look. i find a shocking that that there is a whole group of people around the world who simply want to ignore the wishes of the falkland islanders and this is an extension of the campaign by argentina to dehumanised the falkland islanders quite regularly we hear argentine officials describe the falkland islanders as a as a population and not a people the argentine foreign minister a couple weeks ago in london even went so far as to say that the falkland islanders the not exist these are outrageous comments these are the words of colonizers and it's absurd to think that a country that's supposed to be a member of the g twenty part of the democratic community in the world would make these sort of claims ok richard jump in. the falkland islanders the people who live on the falkland islanders do not constitute a people they are british subjects who happen to live in the islands and it's worth

saying that more than thirty years ago the british gathered and three thousand people live on these islands i would disagree with you richard go ahead keep going up never mind never mind more than thirty years ago the british government including this is that were very keen on the gave the future of those islands with argentina and they came very close to an agreement which was spoilt by the argentine military invading the islands but that the situation has not changed in that in those thirty years the british or still to be keen to negate the eight sovereignty because traditionally over the hundred thirty years in which the british have occupied the islands there the legal department of the foreign office has always had as to the belligerent he of the british claim and so it's perfectly legitimate for the argentines to suggest that should should be a dialogue about the future ok alex you look like you want to say something all

right ahead you know much about it like a salad first go ahead jess just just very quickly like i said i talk read the accounts by the argentine historians they have their own version of what happened in our lands and why they have to cling to a to say that big big got to learn from this spanish chrono believe after we got the independence and then the u.k. came so i think we can probably see here sit down discuss nineteenth century. for the next two hours approaching the company agreement but i think what's important is that these were friendly house humanised the falklands dispute it's not just about the land it's not just about the oil which we'll talk about that in the second round and in the second factor. good but that's human that had to go heater enough faith to the dispute saying yeah ok we'll go ahead jump in. peter i think is worth actually exploring a bit of the history here you know the the what we now call argentina said they

broke away from the spanish empire declared independence in one thousand sixteen the last spanish settlement on the falkland islands was eighteen eleventh's at the time of argentine independence spain did not have de facto or sovereign control over the falkland islands so the idea that argentina would inherit something that spain didn't even have to give is ridiculous and eight hundred thirty three when when the british warship h.m.s. clear arrived to the falkland islands to reassert british sovereignty there there was first declared in seven hundred sixty five they expelled only the argentine military garrison twenty six soldiers ten of whom were implicated in a recent murder at the time were kicked off the islands the argentine civilians that were living there were free to stay and many did so in fact so fast forward today the history is interesting but actually it's not that important what is important is the will of the falkland islanders themselves they have said they want to be british and we should respect that they can be british but why do they have

to have ok alex go ahead jump in go ahead. i mean to say that i take exception with when were that look say when he said that there are you then so there's that where they are the same time we're free to stay or leave the islands i wish when the i were and they would be working i think that sounds really weird when it comes to that but. you know how we see the world i've never seen i've never heard of calling the empire some spain the u.k. france. what i'm given much for two people belief. usually just make a decision for them those. were allowed to say it was a belief ok look this is crosstalk going it was a fact that it was a fact argentina it was a fact that argentine civilians were not only asked to and allowed to but many did stay after eight hundred thirty three and there was never an indigenous population on the falkland islands or were expelled by anyone the first inhabitants of the

falkland islands were european so this idea that someone was kicked out in another power and planted people is absurd is just not true and this is the same line we hear over and over again from when i was ari's and it's simply false richard go ahead before we go to the break it will go to richard well. i'm afraid it's just not true the british seized the islands in eighty thirty three and subsequently settled it with britain from the folks from cent believe it was a british colonial project in ok so they were colonized yes i'm not sure they're going to come for richard they're colonizers right absolutely right look not true. it's simply wrong it's historically inaccurate and it cannot be backed up with any historical documents are dead and there's alex go ahead before we go to the break the problem is that. the promise that these these items never had an

indigenous population to begin with so we see the question is who got there first who in how could that be the item for the longest time who has a legal claim to them or use a day like i said it depends where you are you going to get different accounts from the spanish the argentines did their body from the islands the islanders themselves i will simply called them islander so i will not call them call in the soul or. i will simply say they leave there now and they have had half don't need for no all their lives probably right lou people who go to the break will quit thirty seconds yeah well say that although the history is of the falkland islands is important in there is a clear historical case for british sovereignty over the islands it's actually secondary to the fact that the people the falkland islands went to be british and that's actually what we should be focusing on is the fact that ninety nine point eight percent of those that voted wanted to remain british overseas territory or german have to jump in we have to go to

a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion of those disputed islands stay with us. you know how sometimes you see a story and it seems so you think you understand it and then you glimpse something else you hear or see some other part of it and realize that everything you thought you knew you don't know i'm tom harpur welcome to the big picture.

of. me it is easy to you it's. just. such.

a. you know. they say. welcome back to cross talk we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle reminder we're discussing determination in the sanctity of sovereignty. ok richard i don't think anyone denies the british news of the people living on those islands but why should it be their island the british government have always

felt that it has not been very good claim to the islands and i'd like to put that directly for luke because throughout the history of the items they have the british have been very very nervous about about the argentine claim and i went to the islands about forty years ago with a british minister who was planning those states at the end of empire the wind up of empire to get rid of the island and we did get rid of the course i them's the diego garcia at the end of the one nine hundred sixty s. and we handed over the islands to the united states as a military base at the same time we tried to persuade the islanders to accept the idea that their future lay with argentina just as something like quarter room million british people people of british descent have always lived all since the nineteenth century have lived in argentina mainland argentina ok look so what makes

these islands different thing considering what richard just said. well technically diego garcia is a british overseas territory as well it's not part of the us although the us does operate air base there but it goes back down to the simple fundamental principle of self-determination. it is true richard is correct in saying that these islands have had a complicated history but the history does show that the british do have control over these islands and the people want to keep it that way you know there was talk even the one nine hundred seventy s. of doing some sort of leaseback agreement between the u.k. and argentina and in fact one of the the un resolutions that is constantly touted out by when those areas u.n. resolution twenty sixty five of one nine hundred sixty five actually called for this dispute this territorial dispute to be solved peacefully between argentina and great britain well seventeen years later after the u.n. resolution argentina evaded and he legally occupied the islands and that was

a game changer in one thousand nine hundred two with the argentine invasion that was the game changer of the falkland islands and margaret thatcher made a very clear after that invasion and after the islands were liberated that is up to the people to determine their future because quite clearly they want to remain british alex why doesn't argentina and why you ok richard go ahead this is crosstalk go ahead why do you why do you why you argue that it was a game changer on the international lol the invasion had no impact whatsoever on the base the dispute about sovereignty luke. well under one are international law with these un resolutions that are continuously mentioned by argentina or are non-binding and if if they are binding in the sense they are merely suggesting that the parties involved should settle this dispute peacefully and as i said the resolution of one nine hundred sixty five the un resolution one thousand nine hundred eighty five that called for

a peaceful resolution to the dispute in it up in a war seventeen years later by argentine invading ok it's clearly alex jump in go ahead. i think some kind of general conversation we have just don't. see in these or islands there are still a few rypien countries that have overseas territories in the western hemisphere besides the falkland islands you know you have bermuda stupor of the u.k. where they can decide if they want to be independent or remain or remain or maintain some kind of allegiance to to learn that you have. and the former dutch interiors who are part of the know a lot of the king of the nerds logic of martinique and yen which are in the department do it from are from france and you don't see like these kind of debates and even a war that has started over these are the ends and you know the swedens in the in the in the pacific unfortunately what happened if the falcons after the making

eighty two after the embarrassing defeat of the argentine military was that the claim for that became such a part of argentine national identity that they i mean whether you know you can argue that they actually have a body claim would be a breach of a. stronger claim but the belief on the sea that they are that they are wrong to them so nothing and you have discontinuous the nationalistic and you know sometimes aggressive statements by the argentines government by the argentine gorman specially do in the press and see that say you know what i have to in twenty years and the british are evil and colonials and that kind of stuff and that definitely. doesn't support of situation of negotiations of any kind ok richard it is a big domestic issue with argentina go ahead go ahead richard. it is i mean it's rather curious it's the biggest you know the biggest you for the british pool most of the

time most people in britain don't give a single moment's thought to the falkland islands the ridiculous thing is that there is a debate about sovereignty two countries claim these islands and they should get together and have a discussion about what might happen and that is what the british absolutely refused to do and i take the side of the other times i think it completely right to call for discussions so this matter can be discussed discussed amicably and peacefully ok that's fair enough look you want to respond to that but there will have been there is there is nothing to discuss here as far as the u.k. is concerned as far as the auckland islanders are concerned this matter is settled the falkland islanders voted overwhelmingly to be part of great britain and we should respect that ok sure i'm used to say that. right now we want to be so you have a garden fence or start one on their point of view you have the police and there

have their own point of view the falkland have spoken their mind. to the mission and no we haven't talked about the oil and you know the natural resource of he had but he thought of the mission that co-operation between the two companies over the islands house existed there early. night the night before both con to sign the number of fish an agreement to search for the joint search for hydrocarbons not going to stuff on the islands and i foresee a lot of these of course have been since but cooperation between these two companies has existed before any should happen again and i understand that. the sobriety over the island he's going to continue to be an issue of debate in the in the should be an issue that's going to be specially for the arjun times again. we know some of the same they get some just about the to come up with but we never get to two right he three by business is losing just i think what's going on right now

you know pete ok ok. what i mean and i think the we got to look at oil was mentioned is it about oil and fish go ahead look ahead but as not as of oil that's a that's a very convenient distraction for those who can't build a proper case on why the island should be origin time. you know if there is oil there which many think that there is there's probably going to be a lot of it and that there the day this oil is not going to be long to great britain it's going to be along to the falkland islands governments so this idea that britain wants to hold on to the islands for oil is equally ridiculous let's not i'm going to go back to a quick point that i wanted to go back to a point that there richard made earlier that no one in the u.k. cares about this issue people certainly care about this issue and they care even more when we see the sort of campaign of intimidation by argentina against the falkland islanders you know when secretary of state john kerry went to london and

had his first press conference as secretary of state the very first question asked by british media was about the u.s. position on the falkland islands of all the issues going on in the world today that was the very first question asked by the british media ok richard jump in yes of course of course it was because they knew that they could needle the british because traditionally the british and the americans was supposed to be friends but in this case the americans the neutral between britain and. the. wall. ms patrick the american delegate to the u.n. was decided to be in favor of argentina so this has been is and will be open wound but you know i think one of the purposes. one of the purposes of the i was not going to surrender is to use it as a propaganda point in the united states and and i'm sure will luke that you will be

active in that in trying to the american side with the british and the nazis argentina alex you want to say so now i'm simply trying to be really what americans are going to double terminations let me go to alex. i will add that i believe that probably the british media asked that question to the group of state kerry because right now they are friendly with the hot topic that's going on right now it's been going and the whole the falklands dispute has warmed fortunately heated up in the past couple of years ever since last year two thousand and two or forty four different story of the war which happening in one thousand nine hundred two and so it was a very sensitive issue for both sides now to what degree can we say that the critical factor in argentina and for the entire media for the british media and for the british population now you probably will when i have a couple of polls about that i think there are a lot of problems going on in argentina for its economy that probably take

a leave of president but certainly like a mission before it's the the a dispute over the islands something that's very close to the to the to the argentine national identity when the cost to british society the british have a pretty long history globally or at least we can all agree on that hopefully and arguably the falklands war is not. a top big issue is heat up right now by the us and mean that it's going to continue like this for the for the ok for the long term richard i'm going to be the last word in the program has anything changed after this referendum anything change on the ground twenty seconds. no in trade nothing has changed at all i don't think it's a question of self-determination of course argentina would be key to exceed the wishes of the. island to maintain their way of life but it isn't possible for this to interfere with the need for the british. to talk about the future of

the island all right gentlemen we've run out of time fascinating discussion i thank you all many thanks my guests today in london and in washington and thanks to our viewers for watching us here see you next time and remember. this is a. potentially deadly blizzard taking aim for the northeast it's expected to hit stunning in a few hours from new york to maine we have team coverage of the storm. but what we're watching is the very heavy snow moving into boston proper earlier

today it was very sticky you can see it start to become much more power. and there's still a lot of snow out here a good place for snowball fight. d.c. it is going to be pretty incredible day there and even record snowfall throughout much of it might still be slightly drug listens to them urgency here. led mission free accreditation free in-store charges free. range month free risk free studio time free. download free broadcast quality video for your media projects a free media. outlet

. more news today. please. these are the images the world has been seeing from the streets of canada. china operation today please look. victims multiply here each day. it's very profitable to invest in colombia with that very profitable than is a very high return on investment. in goodall he has said that i've been working in this area for thirty years and i've always had to pay the armed groups in a meeting that is not a managers who changed their name and strategy but to still the same murderous. high ranking suspects you know coming. pretty upset about that mr president.

to president putin. but the media. i won't give an interview i'm sorry but no. investigation is a dead. end he says sick stop your bullshit and keep quiet or else you'll suffer the consequences. even if they're your bodyguards to watch themselves because the same goes for them. blood rivers from sick i've never heard of such a case as ours where so much money and gold has spilled so many gifts. for all the gold in colombia on our t.v. . blogs are at.