to place in mali especially when we're talking about the flow of weapons into the country or the rise in tensions said looking at the terrorist attack that we saw in algeria what do you think of this assessment. who provided weapons to libya who helped fight gadhafi it's western countries at some point who have decided to fight libya because colonel gadhafi had ideas to pull africa out of poverty very smart ideas and thinking of his money tree system and it was troubling western and american systems who had to get rid of him and that's what the western is did i believe that france and other european countries are responsible for crimes against humanity during the military intervention in libya which i always opposed to the belgian parliament today we see that the weapons can come from anywhere the rebels in syria are also using weapons and they find them somewhere and who provides those weapons western countries those that countries like the usa england and belgium as of we provided we gave

a lot of money for that opus ition they are not in opposition they are rebels on that but they a coup major has the keys. now you've also strongly condemned the nine million euros in aid the belgian plans to give to syria now you were angry you say because it will be you think it will be given to the syrian opposition essentially aiding one side of the conflict but the belgian foreign minister he has said that the money will go to refugees he even mentioned those cubs or dari in jordan there are about one hundred thousand syrian refugees there do you not believe that the money will actually reach those who are suffering from the crisis. i'm sure it's always like that we always hide what we're doing we always hide movement by pretending to be humanitarian we say that but what i see is that the rebels are very well equipped and always managed to equal the syrian army so all these weapons all this money must come from somewhere so i'm convinced that

a big part of this money that we give for humanitarian purposes if it goes back to the hands of the rebels i'm absolutely sure and we've already seen that in other countries you know i think of african countries where we also give a lot of money for humanitarian purposes but that's still strange because all this money that we give them to local life quality dozens and prove they still live in misery so i really wonder where that money must go somewhere because now we've also seen a change in the rhetoric of some of the western leaders if we look before at some of the statements they made they've been kind of wary of talking about a direct intervention or aid in syria however now the e.u. is preparing to provide training to rebels in syria that may allow for the transfer of what what they call non-lethal equipment to help in that as assisting the citizens do you believe that it is realistic to make a differentiation between the radicals and the so-called freedom fighters in the

process and how can we guarantee that the equipment does not fall into the wrong hands but anyway as long as the equipment falls into the hands of the. rebels the equipment falls into bad hands because for me those people a coup organizes the only thing they want is to set up shari'a law and today syria is a moderate country with a leader who's looking at the west is not someone who can about the past honestly i can only condemn the way of seeing things as far as i'm concerned democracies and not allowed to organize a coup and sovereign countries from a their aggressor you could make a distinction between islam is a radical islamists and the opponents to the regime in every system there are some and the population that is pro asset is there as well the anything is as we noticed in countries of north africa is a libya egypt all these people who could be opposed to the local power of course very quickly removed and replaced by radicals because they have the financial

support they have the means of persuasion and in syria it's going to be the same if tomorrow bashar al assad is kicked out it will not be the moderate opposition that will take power it will be the islamists the power they will be supported by the united states why because the u.s. has an interest in the fact that this part of the world knows chaos the usa wants to allow the americans to justify a wide scale military operation that will have as its a model to kick out of power so-called terrorist governments this is the problem today this is obvious i don't understand why we don't realize it more than it is the case today them and therefore we have to fight this situation because we risk to go towards a world war and this scares me a lot because with as much manipulation this is very dangerous and peace is in danger. now you said that you believe that one of the purposes of western intervention aside from establishing their presence in africa and the middle east

is to fight against china what kind of a threat is china being viewed as or at least what kind of a competition is the west in with china. as far as i'm concerned china is not a threat to national china is a threat to the big powers on current big powers they see it is something bad to see china coming into their own playgrounds china is more and more present in africa and it's normal they need natural resources obviously it's an economic threat it's and we see that china is seizing economic resources it's legitimate there's no problem about that recently i was in the democratic republic of congo and i noticed that indeed there were chinese workers there were building highways yes but in congo i admit that these countries can be generous but i don't think that china does that for free and over see china in congo can do whatever it wants with the natural resources and exchange for services given to the population what is positive is that at least there are services given to the population on this is

a change from the western logic that we saw during colonialization with them taking advantage of africa without benefiting the locals on if this explains why former colonial powers such as france or other countries intervened today in north africa to take back some natural resources this is the case or france in mali where france is only in the hands of the us in that story this is also the case in all the northern african countries in the so-called arab spring the i say so-called because those are not real revolutionary movements when it was directed from abroad and it's always to put their hands on natural resources such as gas and your radio this is a race this is an economic war that we're seeing now honestly i prefer the africa could be free from all these foreign powers that want to take advantage of their natural resources but i mean that we cannot dream africa today is the attic of the world

it's very difficult to imagine that africa will one day be owned by africans we think it's sad but it's true because so at least i prefer that they are in partnerships where everybody. in a win win relationship than a unilateral exploitation i can't stand anymore to see african starving you know when the underground is full of natural wealth which is crazy it's all over wealth doesn't bring anything to the local population it just benefits industrial companies international companies and their managers. of course we have to touch on of the euro zone crisis sets talk about that what is your stand on the way the european union has been dealing with the crisis so far the. first and foremost i would like to say that this crisis doesn't really exist or that this crisis was invented by our leaders it doesn't exist really it's a crisis invented by our leaders in order to impose on the population restrictions today in the name of the crisis we can do anything we were juice social benefits we

ask workers to work more and to unless we were to use public services while at the end of the day the citizens are not responsible for the crisis this crisis was created by our leaders and financial markets all this was made on purpose i'm sure and who takes advantage of this it's companies they always end up with more dividends that's what we notice it is the european union which got greece spain and portugal into trouble we see that there's impoverishment of european populations and this is shocking to see to which extent it is possible to reduce benefits and put a whole population into poverty and all that because of a crisis that was created by financial interest. been quite vocal about your position on what belgium machine to do you think the belgium should go it alone now why would this be the best solution for the country. i'm for an exit of the european union of the united nations and nato because today all those institutions

don't bring cases but they are war mongering institution and we must accept it because. we say all these institutions don't work in the interests of the population will they protect interests they protect lobbies financial interests and they are in the hands of big international companies and today citizens are forgotten we have to go back to the basics fault what we have to go back to what's essential doing politics is defend said is said this on it is to fight for the lifestyle and the population in your country and today europe is doing otherwise had to friends big companies will gives them a lot of money and the citizens will leave them on the side of the road to twenty so i don't think it's normal and i've always been in favor of a social yearning and today you can save money you're in the hole and that i cannot sit at home as you know hold people in your going to the star and thank you very much for being on the program for giving us your time.

children from want to financially and have a special fate that's how it's going to. mama. child should live in an orphanage for a long child should be raised in a family during these years no legal eleven children have been returned by adoptive families. ninety eight percent of the children from our

orphanage placed we found. the child has brought us so much happiness. seals our border right on the ice fields of the white sea. throughout the twentieth century the poultry hunted for their snow white furs. russia imposed a ban on this trade and hunters have since been replaced by tourists but will these pups stay safe forever. saving seals on our teeth.

more news today violence is once again flared up. these are the images world has been seeing from the streets of canada. child hope for a shelter on the day. you . know. the.

street. protests in turkey spread nationwide this following a police crackdown on demonstrators. in the e.u. . where hundreds of demonstrators were arrested in frankfurt. being . ordered to shape the way. syria's opposition refuses to attend international peace talks just a day after the lifting of the e.u. arms embargo opens the door to lethal weapons supplied to the rebels. shot seven times while being interviewed by the f.b.i. over his alleged connection.