as a day until they dig up their vegetable garden which is on their own property and mealy people who write these articles drug comparisons to communist russia where people weren't allowed to grow their own food unless the state allowed it yes the revolutionary period in russia forced agriculture to change rapidly and often against the will of many of those involved and this did lead to starvation revolution isn't fun but what about after that while stalin and khrushchev gave out a lot of which are private summer houses where people garden and also there were markets in the soviet union where people could bring the food they grew to sell to see all these pictures behind me these are people in the soviet union selling food they produced privately and legally but there were some moments in soviet history when there were some taxes placed on the sale of your personal goods from your personal labor which according to russian website history of taxes was around ten percent whether you love or hate communism more than anything doesn't matter this half truth about shooting soviet gardeners burns like wildfire on the american side

of the internet the real truth is that in fact when the us government for every reason in various forms clamps down on private gardens it isn't the same as communism but it's actually technically worse than communism for the majority of its life span where you could guard it up as you like excluding the brutal revolutionary period but that's just my opinion.

hello and welcome to crossfire where all things are considered on peter lavelle syria and the neighborhood as washington stumbles its way through the syrian crisis there are those who see this horrific complex as a perfect opportunity to topple assad then to move on to turn around at the same time iran in the u.s. are said to engage in direct talks for the first time in thirty years so what's ahead more complex for the start of pragmatism and compromise. to cross out the iran angle to the syrian crisis i'm joined by mohammad marandi in turn he is a professor at the university of tehran and in washington we cross to eunice he is the president of the baltimore chapter of muslim community usa originally crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it professor marandi in turn i know you follow western media very

carefully and you know when i read the neo cons in the new york times and all the other organs there and there's always that here and there like all my goodness this is the opportunity we've been waiting for for a long time three for one side hezbollah and iran but unfortunately for mr obama he hit a brick wall how do you look at how do you when you read that kind of narrative what's your reaction. yes i think when we hear people in washington say that a strike on syria sends a message to tehran not only is it immoral but also it shows that indeed tehran is very much in their calculations and the united states wants to weaken iran through striking the syrian people. but i think that really what happened is quite the opposite obama has not only isolated himself internationally and destroyed whatever was left of his public diplomacy capabilities as

a result of coming to power with a slogan of change but also in addition ties leaving himself. across the world he is isolated himself in the united states as well not only is the u.s. public opinion deeply against the war but also the senate and congress they have been forced to think twice about endorsing aggression against the syrian people and i think that we can and his position significantly while on the other hand the iranian position has been strengthened right now. just over the last few days we see that the iranian president has met both the russian president as well as the chinese president and the relations have warmed as a result of american actions and also the recent iranian election with a high turnout and. a high degree of. support for the president both

by the electorate and also his rivals puts iran in a very commanding position right now but he what do you reflect upon that because you know even white house officials say it sends a message to to run i thought we were trying to save the people of syria i mean do you find that disturbing because that's the only that's their fall back position it looks like to me exactly peter not just me but the tens of millions of members of arm of the muslim community the global arm of the a muslim community or position on this issue has been very clear for a number of years which is no war nor force we need to work with diplomacy the world is a very complicated place and we have a spiritual leader who has written letters to these countries and we have been very vocal and very clear about it that these uni lateral wars we marginalize united nations they are to no one's benefit not to america's benefit and not to syria or iran's benefit you know we are killing those people that are already dying of

hunger and disease and they need our help you know they need. assistance not our bombs first time or anything about hunter and i'm really a cynic i sed i still do truly believe that iran is the end game here but at the same time the irony of ironies we're going to have a meeting between the leaders of some leadership meeting between the united states and around so what's in play here is this just fake diplomacy we tried our best type thing because the obama still he says he can strike syria anytime he wants he doesn't need congress. yes well i'm not sure if there will be any direct talks between iran and the united states at this stage because american actions in syria the threats of made things more difficult and of course there are also the american sanctions on the iranian central bank the united states has been trying to make ordinary people in iran suffer by placing an effective embargo

on the iranian central bank medicine in in this country has become much more expensive some medicines are almost impossible to import or when they are imported the price has gone up dramatically so as a result many ill children and especially cancer patients and women have died so there is a great deal of anger directed towards the united states right now any run and but i think the important thing really is that recent events have shown that the united states is not really as strong as it. presents itself to be obama it was clear was looking for a way out of this situation and he should be very thankful to the russian president for providing him with a way out. it was clear that no one was going to accept any strike on syria the united states has already played a very immoral role in syria in the sense that it's been breaking international law

along with dictatorships like saudi arabia and qatar it's been funding al qaeda you know it's extraordinary that al qaeda today is being supported whereas nine eleven has just passed and all these wars on afghanistan and iraq and all the misery that the people of this region have gone through were all in the name of the war on terror and the war on al qaeda so this sort of hypocrisy on behalf of the united states and during the obama administration really shows people that there is no real difference between obama and bush and i think that that. really we can as the united states in its confrontation with iran claim if i go to you in washington if we do go down this diplomacy route for syria iran has to be involved now can the united states that down at the same negotiating table with other countries in the region with russia also and sit down and try to negotiate an end to the civil war because i know the around side would be willing to do that but does the united

states have the political maturity to do that i mean that's one way to end this conflict if washington does want to see the suffering of the syrian people and we should and we must peter because this is the first time or at least after a long time that i believe that there is not a clenched fist on the other side president rouhani has very clearly made his intentions clear i believe that the world is a global willage and it does not do any harm to the credibility of the united states you know this question is brought up all the time that if we don't hit syria some credibility will be affected and i believe we need to understand that our credibility is also affected when tens of thousands of these children die of not getting their medicines because of the sanctions when we stand by on the sidelines for two years and lead one hundred thousand people die in syria and i think our credibility is also affected when we just put united nations on the side and we believe that you know we can go in into any country without any direct national

security threat and there are a lot of people united states who are saying that today so i believe it's very important for us to sit with all these people on the table it does not make us small it is not a sign or symbol of weakness it is a sign of maturity and if you go back to president barack obama's two thousand and eleven address that he made to the state department he made it very clear himself that those policies of national interest do not work anymore and we need to work with other nations so now is the time when he's under pressure from all sides and i'm really anxious to see which way he goes and by the way. called him a coward i believe you know that's also risky because when to leaders take strong positions if he goes to the negotiating table a lot of people now will say well you know way out any way he's trying to save face we're just making his job difficult by doing that i think we should give him credit if he goes down that road as him or any i'm trying to read your mind to be joint react as well. as i was going to say that well first of all on the iranian side

never had any clenched fist that united the iranians have been saying from the start that the united states has to change its attitude towards the country instead of constantly threatening iran with military strikes like it's been doing with syria and said of sanctioning ordinary iranians which it's been doing for years instead of supporting extremists in the region and invading country after country of the united states behaves in a reasonable and rational manner the iranians have always been willing for rapprochement so this is no mr marandi show here you know i have to correct you i mean iran's supposed to be a rational actor right you're the crazy people right that's what i've heard for thirty years i'm an american that's what i've heard so maybe you need to let me go to the restroom or any friends there and let me just go ahead go ahead of you just just two points one is that actually the response to this is his in something i

want to state about what your previous guest was saying and that is that the united states in syria has not been on the sidelines actually it has a great deal of blood on its hands it's very interesting when you hear western commentators speak about the government and the crimes that they have committed whereas the united states has been supporting hard eating in head cutting. barbarians for over two and a half years now the united states is a willing to confront iran and support al qaida which carried out according to the united states a trial. cities in in the united states and in new york itself so you know which is the irrational to here is it the united states that ten twelve years ago was fighting against al qaeda and it's now allowing al qaeda to thrive or is iran ok for him you want to quickly respond to that before we go to the break. wish

there to know how much more and he was on piers morgan when i watched iran's president ahmadinejad i largely agree with you mohamed but i think our words have consequences i listen to that interview for one hour and you did a better job in the past two minutes than that person did in one hour i think this is the job of the leaders today to come out and use the kind of language that brings us to table not the kind of language that only is going to inflame the situation further because you are you you have a great opportunity here and i think we're probably saying the same thing but there is some blame to be put on both sides that we when we try to act tough or people suffer all right gentlemen i'm going to jump in here we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on syria and the rest stay with our.

they all told me my language well but i will only react to situations as i have read the reports so i am likely to push the no i will leave them to the state department to comment on your latter point of the month so it's ok yeah the car is on the docket. no more weasel words. when you have a direct question be prepared for a change when you have to punch be ready for a battle for the office speech and little down the freedom to question. think. we're going to go did you know the price is the only industry

specifically mentioned in the constitution and. that's because a free and open press is critical to our democracy. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and our proximity we've been hijacked by handful of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers once i'm job market and on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on in the world we go beyond identifying problems. rational debate real discussion critical issues facing death by ready to join the movement then walk they take. the leap.

welcome back to cross talk we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing syria and iran. ok my home if i go back to you in town it was about ten days ago benjamin netanyahu the israeli prime minister told c.b.s. news that iran is building intercontinental ballistic missiles that could strike the united states in a matter of years. i think you know where i'm going here i mean talk about this study now make because you know when it comes to iran people in israel has a big hearing be in the lobby in the united states has a big hearing is that in america's national interest. i mean the united states is basically because of israel. pursuing policies that are totally against the

national interests of the united states the united states out of spite because of its hostility towards iran has allied itself with it has a light it's indirectly at least with saudi arabia the place where the. like ideology stems from with talent dictatorships like that it is allied itself with the worst worst regimes in the world and it is behaving and it is supporting these groups just like it was supporting. the contra rebels in nicaragua in the past it's supporting regime groups in regimes that are against western interests against regional interests against the interests of the whole world but it's doing it basically out of hostility towards islam republic of iran and because israel is pushing it to do so but one of the interesting things right now is that despite

obama's attempt to get support from congress and the senate and apacs full support all support it was failing to do so and i think that's a major defeat for apac as well so i'm not saying that a pax influence in the united states is waning but i think it is significant but obviously it's in the interests of the united states to behave more rationally towards iran both the previous administration and iran and the current administration have always been willing to deal with the united states to move towards rapprochement but the united states really has been unwilling to do so so far and with regards to syria the iranians are very suspicious about the united states and its claims that the syrian government was behind the attack space sickly because of its own history with the united states the united states in the one nine hundred eighty supported saddam hussein helped to me to use chemical weapons against the iranians and the iraqis and then. according to wiki leaks documents the united states was telling its diplomats to blame iran for the chemical attacks in

other words to blame the victim so the iranians are highly suspicious about the united states with regards to what's going on now in syria because the united states was involved in mass murder in iran and they were supporting saddam and trying to blame the victim for him if i can go to you in washington you've been living in the united states for a long time how do you perceive when you hear this and iranian rhetoric in the media and it's nonstop it's twenty four seven it's an echo chamber how do you respond to that. this is again you know we americans we love to simplify complicated issues and one liners this is yet another example of a simplification as all muslims after nine eleven all of us were declared suspects it's it's the same old mentality that all black men are suspicious i think the country is moving away from that peter we were just talking about national interests a minute ago i think we americans have learned we understand now that we have not

served our national interest but these endless wars of the past twelve years we wanted to eliminate the guy that was our national interest when we went into afghanistan eleven or twelve years ago guess what today we're trying to fight al qaeda in syria that's like a doctor who's trying to resect a tumor in the big toe and twelve years later the same tumor is in the neck that's what has happened you know we are trying to eliminate the national interest we wanted to protect the oil supply today the oil supply is in jeopardy our national interest to was to keep weapons of mass destruction at bay and have better control over those weapons and today we all are afraid that militants may get their hands on those weapons of mass destruction so i think it's very clear that the policy of national interest is not working and that is why the arm of the muslim community stands very clearly that it's when we when we teach what we teach our children in schools here peter we teach them liberty and justice for all there is no word

interest in the in the pledge of allegiance so i believe the american values and that's why i keep repeating that that we need to go back to our own values which are absolutely around justice and equality for all but the past twelve years the world has not received such and what that has done peter it has depleted our trust the moment i say a national interest the signal i'm sending you cannot trust me because whenever there's a fork in the road i'm going to look after for my own interest the world does not need to hear that anymore and that is the reason why. you look at palestine or bucket stan the trust of u.s. government as a neutral broker is less than ten percent how do you have influence at a part of the world where ninety percent or more people don't trust you as a neutral arbiter i. say really care so i think the us doesn't really care because we'll just bomb those people who doesn't like i'm sorry for being so glib here professor marandi so yesterday we're going to start sorry that we are. ten years

old we can ask people for you know thousands and thousands of miles in the middle east goes back go ahead go ahead professor marandi i think it goes back far more i think it's not just the last ten years i mean. i think corporal manning. through has helped us to recognize that this goes back a long way and just regarding chemical weapons i mean agent orange in vietnam depleted uranium in iraq supporting saddam hussein in chemical weapons in the one nine hundred eighty s. thing is around to use white phosphorus on palestinians the you know this is this goes back a long time it's can it's a consistent pattern. that comes from the united states and president after president has condoned crimes against humanity for decades now in the united states but i'm hoping that this is changing because americans are becoming more aware of the situation despite the fact that the western media has been trying very hard to

justify an attack on syria but you see that american public opinion is almost completely against it in this is this is really good news i think again it's difficult to be certain that there's going to be a big change in the united states but i think it makes it much more difficult for the president the u.s. president and politicians in the united states to to convince americans to for them to attack another country or to carry out further aggression in the years to come over. well if i can stay with you one way to solve the syrian crisis is through diplomacy i'm a strong believer in diplomacy after everything has been done and iran is a key player here again obama has boxed himself into a corner and he needs iran's help he needs russia's help we've already seen that kenya ran be a help to the united states in solving the crisis in syria and well can the americans will the people in washington ever change their mind about iran i mean

it's almost it defies stupidity and it defies stupidity right now go ahead well ministration after administration any iran have been trying to find a way forward to change the relationship with the united states during the rafsanjani administration the iranians allowed conoco into the country then the u.s. slap sanctions against iran during the. me administration. the iranians were sympathetic to the united states after september the eleventh and in afghanistan they both had in an interest in fighting extremism then iran was called the axis of evil during. the nature of administration the united states the iranians agreed to talks with the united states in iraq again the united states simply increased sanctions against the country and now as soon as president rouhani

comes to power the united states implements even further sanctions are on the eve of his inauguration which is extraordinary it shows that the united states simply does not have goodwill how is the iranian government. going to convince. the united states can sit down and talk with the united states when the united states behaves in such an irrational and hostile way and on the other hand the united states at this stage has isolated itself. are improving relations thanks to obama with the russians with the chinese with the indians with brics countries and other non-western countries and even in europe we see countries barry dissatisfied with american behavior for example in the case of. both both in britain for example parliament rejected war which i think came as a surprise to all of us who you know with the former prime minister in england

supporting the war and being an american political and italy for example and in germany being opposed to any aggression by the united states so the world is changing and obama really needs to change is his relationship with iran otherwise the only allies he has left is saudi arabia israel an apartheid state and the al qaeda like groups in syria and the war and others in libya as well the united states has destroyed and the europeans have destroyed libya for him that doesn't sound like the kind of crowd i want to hang out with. well i think it's a little bit more complicated than that of course talked about the military industrial complex in the usa and as mohamed said there is a growing awareness against that in the country everybody saying we're becoming war weary but that's that's not to say it's all bad there is still something very special about united states and i am a very loyal american i'll have to stand up for that because still you see in two

thousand and six more people came legally to america then the rest of the world i wonder how many of them were eugene american wars i really would like to know the answer to. ok professor marandi let me give you can see that i mean you know there is. an important point has been raised here and in fact the russian president gave a appropriate response to this idea that's constantly put forward by american officials and obama itself and that's american exceptionalism the idea that the united states is somehow exceptional and different from other countries is is i think very dangerous the united states is a country like any other country and it can do great evil as it has in the past and it is doing as we speak i miss i myself am a victim of chemical weapons i survived for any i'm sorry to have turn around you are not very happy here in seymour personal point many things today to my get into rant and in washington and thanks to our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time and remember crosstalk.

i have been negotiating in being a participant to the cio since one thousand nine hundred seventy and over all these years i have never seen a moment a moment and not a moment when trade tensions were not there. right from the sea. first trip. and i think pictures.

on our reporters twitter. and instagram. could be in the. form is probably the most complex and difficult to. believe. in the phenomenon of friendly fire probably extends back to the invention of gunpowder. kill a bunch of people who don't know the one thing their families are really us people . reading. this summer

shoots my brother in the leg not intentional because of it because it was night time for in the morning even the best even the belch shoulders. are going to make mistakes does this whole idea of brotherhood an author and an end camaraderie in this sense it was in this context it has absolutely no play. well if you're going to watch the. face i think you. should be happy with.

six people are confirmed dead and in a shooting at the navy yard in washington civilians and police officers are among the victims more than one gunman has been. the attack. a u.n. report on syria says there's no doubt that chemical weapons were used in the in all this is russia's foreign minister says the syrian opposition should be made to sit down for peace talks with the government. continues its series of reports from the heart of the syrian war this time correspondent joins syrian troops. in a damascus suburb.