kelly mcevers owing to financial literacy there is still some of that. choose the music consensus you can. choose the opinions that invigorating to. choose the stories get inside the life choose the access to your office. today. these are the. secret.

mission to teach creation why you should care about. why you should care only. business is business. where is the russian economy going into the government and the central bank strategy over the past few months we have witnessed the government change its economic policies by one hundred eighty degrees of panic or sound judgment. i'm joined by chris we for he is a senior partner with macro advisory and we also have. the chief economist at

deutsche bank russia ok chris if i can start with you first is the government down the hatches because three months ago we saw spending increased we had worked on the assumption that the government would continue spending to keep the economy stimulated and now here we are. and we have an october report coming out about what the budget is going to be it's completely reversed why well i think. what is looking at is that they're imprecise instability and you know there's still a great deal of uncertainty in the global economy of course as we've seen with the the on off actions of the fed they will they want to kind of comes to tapering in of we do expect another round of police uncertainty in the euro zone as the. bank is tightening up the budget the right strategy. and i don't believe so i think it's been proven time and time again tightening budgets you know is it might contain stability for a while but the danger is you might even see some refer to retraction in the economy you know historically this is a strategy to say to the i.m.f.

as you said many times going to countries in trouble and insisting on budget cuts making the matters worse now you know the thinking is you better off expanding spending but in the right area so i think that one and you know the government is now certainly focusing on stability to the winter on to see what the global environment is like perhaps coming into the spring rather than taking risks but also it's quite clear there's a lot of uncertainty as to where the changes in spending show that serve because if you work for a government institution in there's a lot of in uncertainty attached to it it was obvious was the right strategy because again i mean what was there a tipping point for over the last three months that would make the government swing so much because you know talking to economists and people investors and looking at the economy they were assuming that the putin administration would continue with its past policies the last couple years and now this was brought to reverse yes i think one of the factors certainly was the deterioration in tax collection and some

of the weakness in the economy that was especially for now and then the second quarter of this year so i think to some degree i would say that the government is playing it safe and is making sure that going forward the budget has enough reserve to deal with potential external shocks to which russia is the supper table but at the same time i would say that we're entering into. paradigm a new paradigm of outright cuts that are going to continue inexhaustible the further down the road i think this is more about increasing efficiency and creasing that's certainly going to carry easily does spending so easy actually my view would be that probably it is possible to combine growth and somewhat lower spending as long as you have more efficient spending more targeted spending in three areas such as especially the social sphere. it seems to me you you mentioned you know when the i.m.f. goes in that paradigm here but russia is not nearly in that situation right now

it's something specific because we have austerity in europe we have a different kind of austerity we might in the united states with the budget battle coming up here but how would you put russia into that because it just seems to me that putin is just skittish about debt and he looks it is a national security issue you know he's made a speech many times over the last twelve years or so he certainly views a high level of debt as leaving a country but i don't she doesn't have high level no it doesn't mean he's paranoid about is you know maybe creeping higher and we'll see the debt level increase but very modestly i think in the next couple of years that's the plan but you know any suggestion to the budget is going to run say four or five percent deficits and then you know build up the debt that's definitely off the cards as long as it's just a result of the one nine hundred ninety s. i mean the you know this is still a waste of everyone's mind absolutely i think the trauma that was experienced by

the economy by the populace by the society associated with how great the decline was how severe the debt burden at the time was i think that still to some degree feeds this aversion to greater debt within the society and also in the top echelons of power as the a look around the sea that still a lot of the developed world does and come forward with tremendous. some ounce of that and probably this is still going to be a significant constraint the speed of work in the developed world and the speed of work we quite frankly of the world economy as a whole so cordingley i think going forward perhaps as investors have a more differentiated view in terms of their preferences they will seek out those countries that have a stronger balance sheet and is precisely in this category one of the best solvent balance sheets in the world this is this is what putin likes this is for him it's it shows that you know rush is is

a stable country it has its. books balanced it's not it indebted country because i think as you pointed out here this is this is something that is almost kind of. psychological here i mean russia can go around the world so we're a creditor nation in the world we're not a debtor nation and as you pointed out the developed world overall is an intensely indebted to be. in the one hand there is the stability and clearly you know russia looks very relatively very strong in terms of balance sheet the second part of the equation is you know good driving growth you're not going to drive growth just because you've got a big pile of cash in the balance sheet so now to we're coming into this debate over the budget and where the cuts might come and we're spending might be shuffled around that's going to be critical because again you know sort of pointed out it's where the spending cuts and where the spending will be ok you know what you guys on the spot where are they going to be minus defense because it looks like they're not going to touch that but where else in this is and to go back to chris's point here i mean stability is the key word here but if you go after too many of these

programs it does create instability it has an opposite effect it does in italy clearly russia is a problem right now or i guess when the shoes need to address is the build up of investment we saw a big drop in investment spending last month for example but generally over the years the level of investment in russia is too low there needs to be a big sustained increase in investment to expand you can be to develop new in. just research would create diversification and we're not seeing that right now no clearly that's you know the bigger issues to do with you know the lack of institutional reform you know the perception about corruption legal protections these are much bigger issues that need to be dealt with but in the meantime you know in terms of budget spending the government does need to get this right if they cut spending in the wrong area we're going to see lower growth and possibly an economic crisis second quarter here to agree on that was very good morning i think ultimately russia will have to find a way to reorient first goal outlays from social outlays and to investment into

infrastructure is the infrastructure ok those are a lot of to do that you need institutional reform you need to have that capability to spend efficiently and for structure so this is really crunch time now whether russia is capable of doing precisely that chris you know a little closer to home. soon that moscow's getting being is being spruced up for the sochi games ok because of there's a lot of buildings being already refurbished and there's a man meant to crush the new create new sidewalks i think you've noticed do i mean going back to work that is this being done efficiently efficiently because you know governments that's not their strongest card but this is has to be a strong card for russia to make sense of everything that both of you just said on this program look as i can see we're at a transition point a very important transition point and if you look we've expanded out a bit you could say you know in two thousand and eight putin's previous two terms

it was all about the oil wealth coming into you can be trickling down creating the consumer boom and cetera then we had crisis years or nine until say relatively or argued be still but in the last four or five years it's all been about just containing the domestic situation in the face of global uncertainty but now it's very obvious that russia in order to achieve the growth clearly it needs which is more like five percent sustained then you can go. we're going to have to have a new driver and driver must be investments so we're at the point where you must be investment that isn't going to help us with the i think you know we're at the point now where i think is much greater awareness of what needs to be done and what the consequences of not getting it right are there's a lot of planning going on it can't say today to they're doing it right or wrong what you can say is we're at the point of you know there's a better understanding to does need to happen we see some initiatives for example with the russia direct investment fund a couple of weeks ago for example the government of abu dhabi announced they were going to commit five billion dollars to infrastructure so there's the right noises

so far but it's far too early yet to be either confident or cynical to this is going to be a waste of time over the next couple of years we'll know but clearly it will only work money and attracting money from the likes of abu dhabi is one thing but the institutional reform to make it happen efficiently to make sure that money is spent and not wasted or stolen that's going to be key so getting money is part of it making sure that money is deployed efficiently will be the bigger challenge or at the start of the process i think there's also the clear eagerness on the part of the authorities to work with the private sector in improving the fiscal framework in terms of infrastructure projects we're seeing that the ministry of finance is very active and looking at specific projects and looking at imposing conditionality and looking at how monitoring could be improved in order to raise the efficiency of investment projects so i think now in my view there is

a far. far greater awareness far greater emphasis on how to render this push investment push more efficient more targeted. what you think the budget is going to look like over first world i think it. what i can say is that i believe that whatever proposals we see for. the final version will look different i think this is the you know the the budget revised budget i think that would be to start of the negotiations and clearly the stronger ministries with greater love being power as we saw earlier this year would privatization that completely change those who've got the lobbying power into political muscle you know tend to come out of this much more favorably so what i'm hoping of course what i'd love to see is you know a big cut in defense spending going to see that you know you're likable you'd like to see money going into the social sphere into areas that you know can can can sustain consumer activity and that's true but i think this is one thing for office

. very difficult to get good after a short break we'll continue our discussion on russia's economy state with. wealthy british. explicitly. markets why not. come to find out what's really happening to the global economy with mike's concert for

a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines tune in to kaiser report. and.

i.

mission. critical three times for charges free to make amends three. three. three. three blood canceling video for your media project a free media oh god r t dot com. live right on the scene. search tree limbs and knife with think the germs. splinter. and instead live. b.l.m.

. welcome back to on the money where the business of russia is business i'm peter all about your mind we're talking about russia's economy and government strategy but before we continue our discussion let's have a look at this report. production levels in russia have surpassed be crisis figures this is quite an impressive accomplishment compared to the other g eight economies the u.s. and germany are only nearing pre-crisis production levels while france and italy still lag far behind the brics countries are in the lead china having doubled its two thousand and seven figures and india expanded its production by over thirty percent for russia the current industrial production index exceeded that of two thousand and seven by six percent manufacturing of consumer goods has been

expanding in the last months especially clothes and shoes as well as plastic paper and rubber goods however this growth is offset by a slowing production of such important sectors as electric power and engineering investment activity in russia has also slowed still average supply of capital goods over the last three months is eight percent higher than in two thousand and eight in particular car imports figures are much higher than before the crisis as for the state budgets it was marked by a sound performance in the second quarter of twenty thirteen russia's budget surplus amounted to two point three percent of g.d.p. nevertheless analysts expect a short fall in revenues toward the end of the year this cursed pons with the government's preparations to reduce spending president putin called for a growth oriented budget with but at the same time has asked for cuts in spending to much the budget incomes according to putin the high debt load is an issue of

national security if nothing is done by twenty fourteen our country will face certain deficit next year it will. be more serious than even more than that and in the end we will find ourselves in a very difficult situation if we are responsible if we want to feel confident probably a bit more modest during a certain period of our life but nevertheless be sure that nothing collapses blasts or falls apart then we should act carefully and professionally a stability course was the highlight of the russian president's budget message in june i revised budget for the next three years is expected on october first lisa look on the money r.t. . ok chris let's continue with the russian economy on the back of this report here can you have a stability budget and still have a productive good high productivity because it seems to be kind of

a binary here mr. has offered alternatives to the current strategy of the government does it make sense to you you can for a while you know clearly you can mentor for a period of months over the winter and emphasizing stability shouldn't do that much damage does that work in terms of growth but you know the danger is of course you get hooked on stability you know everybody refers back to the brezhnev area search over stability you know gradually became stagnation and we you know we're the last decade or more saw that fear is still in everybody's mind to the government just gets stuck in this mindset of stability and doesn't take the risks in terms of the right spending or efficiency or investment policies etc then you know we'll end up in this low growth environment for far too long when we clearly need initiatives to drag up investments on the radio and sometimes those decisions are painful as in any economy and i get in that becomes a political issue here it does have a point in many ways in looking at you know you know making stability the be all

and end all of everything in doesn't necessarily create growth and he was right in two thousand and eight mr calderon was right there because. if russia spent all of its oil windfall at the time to develop some big projects and lost a lot of the money at the time the economy would be very overheated and going into the crisis. there would be a tremendous correction even greater than the one we had in two thousand and eight two thousand and three all really quite minor compared to what happened in western developed countries and which was certainly far more smooth i would say interims of the social implications for the wider strata of the population compared to what we had in one thousand nine hundred eight because there were these reserves that were used for the benefit of the broader public so i think that kind of strategy was validated then and it will continue at least to some degree to loom large and to be very significant in terms of the strategic view of the russian authorities but one

other point i wanted to make is that we shouldn't solely focus on the budget situation when looking at the potential efficiency improvements one major area which is frequently overlooked is of course the corporate sector including russia state companies and i think in terms of forging ahead with better corporate governance and terms of controlling costs far better than they used to do before i think this is clearly one of the top priorities for the next several years. it is all brings up a good point because we keep talking about what the state is doing with the the the corporate sector bears are an enormous amount of responsibility as well sure of course a big chunk of the industrial base is state controlled right is linked to this state and from others so we have tended in the past to lump the two together and the kind of non-state part of the industrial base is certainly growing it hasn't been significant independence but it's becoming more significant the likes of

companies like mike need to all have very you know comparable valuations to similar companies in the rest of the world because they're regarded as. new generation of russian companies could corporate governance behaving well performing well so is that group but we're back to the same question again we have the short term issue of what's going to happen economy over the next six to nine months what the issues are but the bigger picture of course is just the development of of the economy of the corporate base in other words the state taking a step back and letting the corporate world and entrepreneurs get on with this i mean that's clearly you know we need to see. that we are talking about two paradigms of development this is the juncture which russia is facing right now whether this is modernization with big projects being pursued and this being essentially state led largely or is this bottoms up process of liberalizing the business regime for all of the companies and making it

a level playing field in order for the economy to muster greater generate greater going forward in a more sustainable way these are the two different views that i think currently are battling will go to bed fellows they can be again we're going to efficiency you product if the state is more efficient in spending in developing these big projects which clearly need to happen then don't yet that could be a major driver and create a very attractive backdrop of where for the you know for the more entrepreneurial expansion of you can to me i mean you know i think it is clear again using words like it different this time the flood most expensive or not. but it is important though to look at the firies stages in russia we had the ninety's then we had the two thousand two thousand and eight to me for the crisis we're now at the treasurer all of a new phase now it could go badly wrong it could end up being just flat lining or it could be to start of something interesting but what is interesting right now is

there is a much more open debate and much greater acknowledgement of what needs to be done and it's much more simple. besides i think we all have to admit that or i want to change gears a little bit about do the ring in capering. quantitative easing explain it to me what's going on can't it's extraordinary the way the fed has behaved over the summer making the announcement as did it in may and then not following through and you know again as you used the word discerning i think it's as good a word is there any to say to describe what i took from your report. is that what they've been doing for you know for the last several months and of course was we can know it's created a great deal of uncertainty particularly in emerging market world and a lot of volatility in emerging market equities and so it is if they're afraid of letting go of cheap credit i mean that's what it looks like to me and that's an intensely political issue and there are the emerging market countries that are you know getting sick and tired of importing somebody else's inflation there that's the

whole thing about. the world economy in the developed world that a lot of it is being bred by cheap money and there is a certain dependence on the part of the whole system. yeah to that kind of cheap money continuing to come from the from the european central bank etc and that means that apart from the sheer quantity of growth there is also the question of quality of course and the quality is not really there because most of the growth momentum still has to depend on cheap money coming still from from the regulators angle merkel's back ok if you're going to get tough on the eurozone i would expect what we've heard from her so far is you know policies will remain as before no major change my assumption is that that's just doesn't just holding statements on to just get a coalition gets in place but we already know to d.c. be preparing to get much tougher on the eurozone banks to bring all of the regions

banks into line which for example the definition of bad debts for example in germany ninety days. plus that's a bad debt initially hundred twenty days plus so bringing you know the banks into line could reveal some more nasties and more require more bailouts so i think it's a reasonable expectation to say that we're going to have more volatility and some concerns in the euro zone of over the winter and that combination of. dithering on the part of the fed the uncertainty of the creators and what we're likely to see maybe a move to clean house and take more decisive action in europe in that sense you could say difficult to argue way. emphasizing stability is the exact way to get out i think you know the euro zone that we need still very needed. a stiff hard and absolutely whole problem with europe throughout the past several years i think was precisely the lack of thinking tools so essentially the european union was

predicated on the set of criteria or a set of rules that countries have to abide by and a lot of the crisis that we saw recently in the past several years was precisely due to the fact that while europe was talking about the need for a lot of the other countries to follow all these fiscal rules and all of the other rules a lot of its countries were not following through on what songs about rules there were also a time to go in the budget battle and on capitol hill another big another big headache probably don't markets are not pricing in anything be assumed to be a lot of brinkmanship where you go to midnight and then there's a bit of slippage here and there but it basically investors assume deals will be done nobody will want the consequences and our view is that at the very last moment there will be a deal but at the very last minute and i only after a lot although it's not leaving it well i just i mean the world's a lot of reading very well when it gets down to that we're out of time gentlemen many thanks to my guests here and thanks to our viewers for watching us here on on the money see you next time with our.

the island is so small the termes it's the center see the center of the universe. on a tiny island the size of a football field to in the middle of a lake stands a ruined monastery forty years ago to lovers decided to spend their honeymoon here . they have no idea but the island could change their lives forever but they would change the fate of the i love. the least the never seen anything like this before you begin to cover the house. in the fortress of ice is grown in just one hour and it's only the beginning.

they would argue that those somewhat softer approach towards the taliban if you want to have political solution the most create the conditions for reaching such political solution and if we use. conditions to enable dos on the side of the taleban to to push through a part of political solution. that

. unity on syria the u.n. security council adopts a resolution to rid the war torn country of its chemical weapons after weeks of intense talks first major diplomatic breakthrough. the right to host the twenty twenty two world cup. the abuse and deaths of migrants working to build new facilities some of them into slavery. under the british public weary of warfare and coffins returning from the battlefield the government seeks ways to win support for future campaigns.