it was saying it was built when the united nations was looking for the. weapons of mass destruction in iraq and the syrian said look we would be ready to negotiate further sites to be visited but this one is urgent people died at the top and only a few days ago why don't you send your experts no wait then they serious ask us and we did send our experts who took these samples in full accordance or is the organization for condition of chemical weapons rules we ensured be uninterrupted custody of these samples as it was delivered very not b. c w a certified laboratory was in allies in moscow and the results available to the security council we made them available i think in late june early july and we are convinced beyond any reasonable doubt that. this was the incident the

provocation staged by the opposition the gas which was a type of the rain was whole may be a rocket of a soulmate and some other. facts established during this and that this is indicating the same direction and we also have good reasons to believe that the twenty first the focused incident was staged by the same group of people the gas which was discovered at the no lies by the un experts is very much of the same. substance as the one used on the nineteenth of march but the one which was used in august is much more concentrated and some other facts which you can. get from the inspector's report and from other sources readily available on the internet and elsewhere convince us that it was it was a provocation staged by the opposition. to know that there are so many.

evidence shown on the internet and elsewhere indicating that some foreign car countries or some representatives of foreign countries had something to google that we cannot say for certainty and we don't want to accuse anyone on the sustainability and undeservedly but. since those evidences has been floated wide broadly when the security council agreed on that resolution twenty one eighteen on the chemical weapons of syria it included by consensus a special clause which says that we are categorically against any. attempts to give chemical weapons so their components don't state editors that this is prohibited and then the security council also by consensus called upon all

member states in particular on the neighbors of syria not to allow the use of be a territory for the purposes of producing delivering the chemical weapons so their components to the syrian opposition it's a very important message and they do believe that this reflects the seriousness of his reach members of the security council all of them big those reports which we are discussing going back to the idea of it being a provocation it's your find belief that that that is the case why do you think you've struggled to convince the international community that that is the case but i think right a number of people have been biased from the very beginning they have been obsessed with is the. projection of this situation is enough for. many to station of the arab spring as the fight for democracy for a better life against the guy runs against the. dictators and so on and so forth

and as the. actual situation of the ground as the real life was producing more and more facts that this is a large extent and more and more so about radicals trying to get hold of these huge regional. people who already committed themselves to a different interpretation they had difficulty in admitting that they were wrong. but bit rules and this understanding of the of the danger of the radicals which they present to syria and the north african region in general it's being understood more and more and this was very obvious when we met was john kerry and we basically said so at the press conference in new york and at the press conference here in indonesia a couple of days ago but the process has begun i p c w have begun the process of dismantling syria's chemical weapons arsenal you believe this being

a number of provocations already do you think that could bring more is there a fear that the radical extremists could try and undermine this entire process yeah i do believe that this is a very possible scenario and we would like to avoid that at any cost. actually the incident on the twenty first of august happened when the u.n. inspectors eventually arrived to syria and started doing their job they were first subject to some sniper fire and the culprits have not been found and then there was this provocation under their nose and you know just me a logic says that the government had no interest that no had no advantage in doing this. and. that's why again i come back to that resolution twenty one eighteen given that said experience we agreed by consensus to do right and to this resolution that it is not only the government which must fully cooperate with the p

c w or with the united nations to finalize the program of disarmament it's also all syrian troops deposition all of that who would be responsible if something happens to the inspectors because of the a provocation and who would also be responsible if they use a game that can make a weapons whoever uses chemical weapons would come to the security council to respond. let's move away from syria because of stay in the region because america conducted a couple of come on day ranging in africa over the course of the weekend in libya and somalia as part of the war on terror do you believe that such action is making the region safe. while they think that whatever you do you must be covered by international law the international law regarding your code but that a reason is not yet complete. there are some soty in convention sectoral conventions of terrorist attacks in this i see.

nuclear terrorism and so on and so forth there is a draft of the comprehensive global convention on counterterrorism which is being negotiated for. more than ten years i think. because of basically one problem. some people believe that some of those who use terror as the means to achieve their political goals cannot be called terrorist because their freedom fighters and this is a contradiction which is rooted deeply in the recent history several decades ago the freedom fighters war as it. was korea and you know to describe the dns in the universe going to start. in some other countries and then these three the fighters. turned into a nobody is asian to be sure no color coded. there on the nine eleven. so my

point is you can that. you can that have good terrorism but there's second. you can the. strength of the war. by violating the law. and if you say that your national oil los you to do something it is fine as long as you do this inside your own city as a. as you go international you really have to be sure that there is an international law which you respect and which you feel there is a look you in the international world quite a number of things including situations where. there is no interest. because the fleet all over the world and people around you. but again the international law provides if these the existing international organization cases provides for operatives of

a country who is hunting to get in touch with law enforcement agencies so because response was territory to go ease and then to agree implement certain procedures we would be very much in favor to make sure that we all fight terrorism in accordance with his own national lawyers that there's always territory and in accordance with international law we should meet must be further developed the alleged targets in nice raise over the weekend with what the mastermind behind the one thousand nine hundred eighty u.s. embassy attacks in africa and allegedly the man behind one of the men behind the attack in the westgate shopping center in kenya they were they were the individuals apparently being targeted is the action here of targeting these individuals the u.s. action is this an example of what president vladimir putin has recently described as american exceptionalism. well i wouldn't say that this is exactly an example of american exceptionalism go there it goes denotes. you know you know that they want

to be exceptional they say they say they're exceptional. it doesn't always help in the dialogue with the people. you know we i wouldn't go into the description of whether this is a manifestation of exceptionalism or arrogance of power or whatever we discussed with the united states similar cases when a couple of fresh and citizens on the. boot and another you. were basically kidnapped yvonne from thailand another one from liberia. first they were approached by f.b.i. agents posing as members of some drug cartel and a war. basically provoked and discussing no for a. did not solicit but the agency for tourists awaiting them to agree to provide the services. planes something else. and then they

were arrested and brought to the united states in violation of the law of thailand and in violation of the law of liberia. they were given sentences twenty and twenty five years respectively just for. criminal intent not for actual deed and this criminal intent. by the opinion of many lawyers was not sufficiently proved in the united states court the floor. and we believe that this is this is the way you handle international relations it's not the way you fight. criminals even before you you know prove that they're criminals before they can testify to in a court of law can we move on and talk about iran if that's ok following the u.n. general assembly in new york that seems to be cautious optimism about tehran's new approach. perhaps not from israeli prime minister binyamin netanyahu he said that

in face the united states. is in the process on the path to being. by iran's new president hassan rouhani i just wondered what you made of that you know his assessment of that situation. will certainly world welcome the mood which was prevailing in iran during the general assembly general debate this statement of presence of carney the meetings of his and ministers that reeve who attended the. meeting of three plus three group on the renewal nuclear issue both president rouhani and minister zarif said that they would like to resolve this issue and resolve it fast they were saying six nine months would be enough if everyone called the right so i agree the main thing is for iran to cooperate because they run those the questions which have been raised by the international atomic energy agency supported by the security council this questions has to be clearly fight fully. and

really fight that the round scheduled a meeting with a experts executive on this subject they have to answer i think up a dozen or so questions which has been with us for for many years. then there are also agreed to have another round of negotiation. the resume the negotiations with the three plus three group which would also take place later this month. and. iran has a legitimate right to know the end game as they say and the end game as far as we are concerned as president putin repeatedly stated. should be the recognition of the rainy and right to the benefits of the peaceful uses of nuclear energy including the right to enrich uranium for the fuel purposes only provided that they run closer sold the shoes which is a and puts it in its entire nuclear program on the food and street going through

all of the edges it's a very elaborate and exhaustive statement and i think that if other members of the three plus three retire a disposition. then it would be easy for us and the iranians to set their road map step by step approach when the run takes a step expected from team from it by the international community and the international community relief's sanctions to some extent and then as we progress on the a section but action for action basis we must arrive to a point where everyone would be satisfied that the radio nuclear program is entirely peaceful. and then iran should be out of any sanctions suppose. the sanctions imposed by the security council but also unilateral sanctions as for. you know the statements regarding the iranians playing another game and trying to

do people. i have not seen any. confirmation by any intelligence be russian be to european be united states be mossad. which would categorically so. say that iran iranian leadership has taken a political decision to military nuclear program no intelligence agency on earth was able so far to make this conclusion and we spoke to the near it can go to just the recent and their greed that iran has not taken the political decision to go military in its nuclear program program and therefore we all must avoid statements which were just going to ease the parties to these negotiations and concentrate on the chance which was certainly what about

israel's suspicions let's say of tehran is there a. concern that their position or israel's position could influence washington and perhaps jeopardize the resumption of if you can it oh no i don't think so i think the israeli position is motivated by. you know a conviction that this would be iranian nuclear bomb would be. absolutely existential. unacceptable for israel but it is unacceptable for anyone record security against any new. nuclear military nuclear powers to have people on this earth be around be to north korea be genuine. but to make sure that this is not the case we have to resolve these type of situations by negotiations and not by threats and not by military strikes because as you as you as you put all your

emphasis on the resulting abuse by force there would be more and more countries who would say you see iran didn't have a bomb and it was bomb so let's think i'll be can can take care of our own security and then the response the proliferation of nuclear technology. yes and chemical weapons and biological weapons. will be multiplied so any threat the fuser four stories over just like these. absolutely counterproductive from the point of view of our common goal to strengthen the nonproliferation regime. change tack and talk about if this is ok the the greenpeace activists have been arrested by russian authorities musk a saying its actions are in full compliance with with international law yet the dutch government is not saying illegal campaign to try and get the people being held to get them freed i just wonder what the very latest

on that situation was if you can bring us up to date with the very very latest from the netherlands unfortunately is not about the greenpeace but about on acceptable treatment of the russian diplomat who's apartment was. forcefully opened and who was taken. to. who was apprehended by police a couple of for several hours. in violate a gross violation of any diplomatic conventions the other conventions and the rest without any explanations destination was given that somebody told the police that she and his was. treating the kids doing four year old kids which is absolutely unacceptable. apart from any from any diplomatic privileges the police has no right. to enter an apartment of a diplomat and we expect i would judge friends to issue an explanation to issue an

apology and to punish those who violated the vienna convention. this happened in the hague the seato the international court of justice is absolutely absurd. on the green case issue we have been. here. ringer bowed the activities of this vessel arctic sunrise for many years they have been engaging in provocations all over the world. in some cases in all cases they were they were punished one way or another. they will paying. big amount of penalty in some countries and we have been the warning were such qualities in the divorce that they should really take take a close look at what this vessel on the dutch flick is going to do in the arctic waters and dangerous. dangerous because it would it would be to do what

platform which was working in the future as. well believe the legal procedures on the way the dutch initiated the not to be thrust procedures so let's let's rely on the legal procedures ok going back to the situation with the russian diplomats and in the netherlands what i said russia consider that i was in response to this. well we must. be not late to get an explanation from the dutch government an apology it's absolutely unavoidable and then we want to know what what disciplinary measures would be taken in regards these police officers and then when we get a reaction. on these demands then we will see how we will handle the relations for the. final subject i want to talk to you about if that's the case afghanistan because drug trafficking is an increasing problem i believe for russia from from

afghanistan just wanting what moscow has planned for when one thousand troops withdraw when with with that night and with your imminent what moscow is plans are to try and counter this problem well this has been discussed before a couple a few us already investigation of this draw off ice. but this was discussed not just inside moscow. with our allies in the organization of collective security treaty. and also in the shanghai cooperation organization which uniquely. comprises ideas member so as observers afghanistan and all its neighbors and there is a special program in beijing psycho place nobody's ation on fighting drug trafficking from afghanistan. the collective security threat they're going to zation is also engaged very close. it conducts regular deliberation called the intercept drug out of and so on the outer perimeter of the gun borders certainly it would be much more

efficient not to fight the. symptoms but the fight the. root cause. which which is which involves destroying the drug production inside afghanistan. drug laboratories here in laboratories especially and we have been proposing as the collective security treaty organization to be made known as the big bono i sat there establish go pretty far engine and in real time. nato reports to us what kind of caravans are moving so that on the out that the remit of gun borders it would be easier to intercept them. nato. consistently for the last eight years i think he's avoiding entering into this type of relationship my hunch is that they're doing this for ideological purposes not being willing to see the collective security treaty organization as an equal in this but the ship.

which is which is a pita because for wrongly understood prestige we're losing the fish and sea in the fight against the against drug and just. a you hopeful for the future of afghanistan i mean this the presidential election next year the nato troop withdrawal i mean. we fail that the security situation is set to improve in afghanistan so many are no less. i suffer business role is explained by the. fact that by that time by the end of next year the afghan security forces that gone their army would be in a position to. take control of the lawyer and order in the country so far the trend is built up as. and. the close of the day off is there always been more evidence we have that have gone security forces are

not going to be ready. there are serious problems in the security sector. there are problems with the taliban who do not want to. get into the national dialogue was the government. who only want to talk to the americans which is unacceptable to the government for just the reasons and as this progressed in aid as the game is being played with the taliban bypassing the afghan government. we are getting closer to the situation when the taliban would not be even interested in discussing good government of national unity they would build the interests of the taking power hundred percent. which would be an invitation for another war in afghanistan so we certainly hold that all of gun groups political ethnic. religious. pushed too and so was backstab gz.

can get together including the reasonable leaders of the taliban and start discussing the future of their country it's high time to do this and presidential elections of course. and then mark which must be taken into account it's up for the other guns to decide exactly when they want to have this complaint. but unless we have an inclusive process i'm not very optimistic about any political solution to the situation on the gun and of course related met there is the fact that while withdrawing from. afghanistan the contingency of i suffer that mary can send some other nato countries a plane you get a residual presence. the information is that. nine. provide fortified military bases that being constructed inside

afghanistan. we ask questions. about what is the purpose for this remaining presence and we are told that this is for training purposes and just for some stingo to ration some cases of necessity and it's still not very transparent and we discuss this with the american colleagues are regulated because a special channel to discuss the afghan matters and we want to get food clarity about the purpose of this presence because in combination of is. that them switch they undertake every now and then visit on another central asian country to. negotiate the presence there it raises a question as to what is the reason for this because the ice that is being withdrawn. on the explanation that the mission has been accomplished. but then well first i don't think anyone believes that the mission has been

accomplished second if it has been accomplished then why do we want the residual presence and the if this presence is projected. i would say the afghanistan. certainly would like to know what is it about its central asia is that there are. members of the shanghai cooperation organization and of the collective security treaty organization would like to know everything you know without any. exceptions because this is the region next to our doors. russia china central asian countries there are. resorting to believe that. cold duration was international community to resolve the problems of this region is very important and relevant for this. by the international community this case or less controllers must be thrown spear and what they are planning for doing this will become big and

we would like to know what it was about plans for several thank you very much thank you. mission and free accreditation three pounds for charges three. maintenance three. three stooges priests mostly blunt counseling video for your media projects a free media dog our teton tom. delivered torch is on its epic journey to such. a one hundred twenty three days. through two thousand nine hundred towns and cities of russia. relayed by fourteen thousand people for sixty five thousand kilometers in a record setting trip by land air and sea and others face.

a limp the torch relay. on r t r g dot com get. the chance to be ignored. stories others for the fewest unnoticed. faces changing the walls of lights never. so picture of today's lives. on designs from around the globe. looking. to fifty.

secret. mission to teach me.

police allegedly beat up and detain a russian diplomat in the hague president putin and demands an apology. is summoned to explain. flush with cash evasions finest snapping up prices rugs european corporations and brands lining china's my to manufacturing industry with somewhat strained new. and serious chemical disarmament is on track with the e.u. one has its progress made by the u.s. and russia at the asia pacific summit in bar.