the commercial banks then the. banks what about the highly leveraged institutions nor a responsible old school what about the rights so what about all the special so you see it's more. you know he banks are the main reason bad banking system is the main reason that triggered the banks. of. the. as responsible including the us computing. to the rooms. of all soldiers of a rating agency. of course you know the bank and non-banks and the naive belief that we would you know with real there was an automatic correction of the market themselves the theory of efficiency of markets was also paul.

right to see. first rate. and i think picture. on a reporter's. instrument. could be in the. following welcome across all things are considered on peter lavelle tongue tied in stumbling this is one description of american foreign policy. the middle east today

secure country iraq afghanistan libya saudi arabia israel egypt syria turkey and even around and each washington finds itself either the odd man out leaving alone or leading from behind in a muddled pack is the u.s. simply out of touch or is history in the region nearly going on. cross-talk washington stumbling policies in the middle east i'm joined by my guest host in washington she is a journalist and antiwar dot com we also have stephen slawson juror in new york he is a senior fellow at the century foundation and author of the book act of creation right crosstalk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want it's only the three of us so please do jump in keli if i can go to you first in washington it seems that there is no narrative right now in looking at washington's and its western allies but its approach to the to what some people would call the greater middle east which of course includes around i mean i and i'm an avid reader of

antiwar dot com and i just don't see any kind of narrative i used in the introduction of this program the word stumbling and that's what appears to be stumbling go ahead. yeah and i would take a different tact i don't think it's stumbling but i think what washington's approach to the middle east and its foreign policy over the last several years has been you know as a tale of lost opportunities when obama came into office he was pretty much handed a narrative he was handed a narrative of the arab spring and as a young fresh face who had promised much on his campaign in regards to. liberation and revolution. particularly with his speech in cairo he has it's pretty much fallen down on the job there he had a chance to you know defend advance the agendas of the revolutionary

movements across the middle east and he decided to basically to succumb to the elites in the middle east to the agendas that competing agendas. in that in that time he has pretty much drowned under those agendas and can't seem to find his footing there is no coherent theme to his point foreign policy whether it be in the middle east or in the broader global sphere and i think that has caused some critical damage to the confidence that both domestic front and globally in in america in terms of what it's you know what its role is as a dominant power. and as a leader and without that coherent theme without that coherent strategy he comes off is a second guess or a guy who doesn't follow through on his on his goals and and and i think the time

is running out for his administration. to advance some sort of legacy where his foreign policy is concerned you know if i have to agree with. him. the map of the middle east in my head right now and i'm just going from country to country and i'm going you know like libya egypt israel saudi arabia of course syria is a little bit different in iraq i mean nobody in those countries particularly cares what the president of the united states says about anything these days they most of them don't even seem like they want to even answer the phone i mean how did this happen and i don't want to make this into an anti obama program because i did say in the introduction is it is this historical process sits in front of us is it's uncontrollable it's no one country can. deal with this coherently because it's impossible to deal with in a coherent way go ahead stephen i'm trying to get a way out here not just to say it's obama's fault because that's an easy thing to say go ahead. i don't think any american president could get

a grip on what is happening totally on the arab spring consequences and developments the fact is that you know i certainly there are problems that i have with the obama foreign policy particularly in the middle east and elsewhere but on the broad vision of what he promised in his campaign his presidential campaign in two thousand and eight he has fulfilled his promises he got us he has gotten our troops out of iraq he was starting to the withdrawal of our troops from afghanistan and in his second term he has now asked his secretary of state to start talks between israel and palestine which was not something that happened for years particularly under the bush administration and he has tried to you know but see that steven i'm sorry sincerely i mean i mean i mean they see that but obama's been essentially humiliated when it comes to the issue i mean time and again when an

american official shows up in tel aviv if there's more settlements being built i mean it's really quite insulting and it seems to be intentionally that way is that and i even said it was going across all the countries i mean the israelis don't particularly care what obama has to say about anything they're just waiting for him to leave. i think you're being a little unfair i mean the point of negotiations is perseverance you can't have one and expect of a settlement the day after it begins i mean this this is these talks have been going on for only a few months and they're going on since we've been going on in the senate has a lot of the solution and would be going on during the conflict and to give me a break give me a break off what was. the still going to be going on again kelli if i can go to you when we look at all of these countries here the united states the decision and i don't understand your point you would prefer just continuing what is going on without any negotiation without any torpedo and united states government.

to it to get a conflict going moderate fair or broker it's shown itself repeatedly not to be a fair broker and that's my point here if we look at the middle east here you have the united states with very different principles in interest in there colliding go ahead keli jump in i have to agree with stephen that yet no one president can control the events involving advance in the middle east right now and i and i didn't mean to suggest that at all i think what as a journalist and as a consumer of news and current events i think the problem that i see is that. president obama is not projecting the image of a strong and confident player on the global stage right now. that said the diplomacy that seems to be coming from washington it appears to be just falling down and falling sure of expectations of the united states as

a superior negotiator as a superior diplomatic player we see what happened in egypt i'm going to go out on a limb here i mean after the arab spring after the. resignation of the forced resignation of mubarak and the jailing of mubarak and the election of morsi and the brotherhood party. there was a space there where the united states could have played a critical role in maybe helping guiding just assuring more more seats on a path that would have maybe brought some advancement of jobs economic development i don't know i am i am not the mad here but it seemed as though that in that period of time the united states faltered and its the plough mysie there were so many competing interests and i think that the obama administration often follows

victim to all of the competing voices on the stage that he does it make a strong path ahead he doesn't he doesn't just he doesn't project that strength as a leader that's going to do the right thing and i think in that space. in the first rule i think the. last ok and just one piece of it. ok you don't like that you are coming in and telling him how they should conduct i understand that in any case when the morsi thing they did try to put pressure on him to produce create a coalition government bring in the opposition he refused to do. to that there's not much more the u.s. could have done as it is right now we've suspended some of our military aid but it's had really very little impact on egypt i think the more crucial issue is iran's now in iran the u.s. is trying to start talks with the iranian government and yet it's getting clobbered

in the middle east by the saudis who don't want to do it by the israelis or don't want to do a very good friends good friends because it's refute you know congress itself the doesn't want to do it here he's trying to do a good thing for the world for bring peace of media nature to the middle east and he's getting you know killed from all sides i mean you can't win in these situations but you've got to believe in what you want to do when you want to bring some sort of settlement. both in syria and iran and al and israel and palestine and if you don't do that well all right forget it you just withdraw from the the whole area and let it go into a conflagration well it probably will be that way if we stay or if we go it's really it's a no win situation i think at this point go ahead kelly. well i and i and i and i i completely agree with steve and i think the point that i was making and just to to

launch off what he said yes obama has to believe what he's doing and i am going to give him the benefit of the doubt that he does believe that negotiations need to go forward it's just that he does he is not doing that in an effective way in terms of controlling or at least reaching out to members of congress so they don't they don't torpedo his efforts you know in the arena negotiations and getting back to israel you know maybe he believed the right thing to do was negotiating with morsi and was helping them on a path but he didn't do it personally and it is about image it is about the show it is about appearances you know he had he had lower level diplomats going over there he had i and i you know i believe it was secretary hagel was working on that on the case but he didn't show up personal interest and what was going on in israel and i think it's the show it is the appearance it is public relations it is imagery and i

think that he's fallen down on the job or that were that were there where that is concerned that that is exactly what's happening in iran now he might believe that negotiations are the most important thing as opposed to saying sions but he's letting all these competing voices drown out his his mission ok we're going to go to a short break you're showing strength we're going to short break here now for a short break we'll continue our discussion on washington's foreign policy in the middle east stay with. us.

i almost told her my language and all but i will only react to situations i have read the reports so unlike the pollution i know i will leave them to the state department to comment on your letter play the monthly's say it's a hit list or carry a car is on the docket. they go no more weasel words when you made a direct question prepared for a chase when you have to punch be ready for a battle freedom of speech and a little down to freedom to cost. a little. bit.

extra. live live live . please. welcome back to cross talk we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle to

remind you we're discussing washington's foreign policy in the middle east. ok i'd like to go to stephen in new york steven in the first part of the program we were talking about the lack of a narrative coming out of washington when it comes to the middle east what narrative should it be to be effective because it seems very ineffective at this point. well you know he gave a speech in egypt in three or four years first year of his term in which he talked about the need for democracy in the middle east and that was his narrative and it's a narrative which is traditional to american presidents goes back to the founding of our country so i don't i don't i think the vision is there i think the question is the tactics how to how do you promote democracy in a in a troubled area in an area which is going through turbulent transitions it's

a very difficult conundrum and i don't think that any american president has any weapons that it's his his or her disposable that will magically make everything better the fact is that we are observers were not people participating directly in the process that's up to be a gyptian for the syrians the iranians the saudis i mean this is something that they have to deal with in the end we can simply start oil talks we can promote negotiations we can give economic aid but in the end it's their problem to deal with ok kelly i mean if we go ok if we can go back to cairo it's been mentioned here i mean why in the world would the united states speak about democracy when its closest friend in the region is a tyrannical regime called saudi arabia and saudi arabia is moving to bahrain i mean you know i think these are horrible things in the united states has really deplorable and all through the middle east they were these horrific dictators and

how can we turn around and say we want democracy when hamas has an election they don't like the outcome forget about hamas has a law gets elected you don't like the outcome forget them i mean i find this truly hypocritical and i think it damages the united states and it damages the perception of the united states with people on the ground because they say these people these want these americans they to support dictators saudi arabia is the best example. well yeah no i mean it is a conundrum of the president he did inherit this i mean unfortunately you know he did he did you know cast the cast the first stone and he said in cairo that he that he. was going to advance this new vision of democracy and he was going to support these democracy movements unfortunately got very complicated and which he was he was facing a host of allies in the middle east the elites the monarchies who were counting on

him also to stop these rebellions and so what did he do he did nothing unfortunately and i don't know what the answer is but i mean if you take one example you mentioned bahrain maybe he should have took a ricks there maybe he should a took a risk and sided with the democracy movement and bahrain and said to the allies listen we're going to do what's right here ok i mean we have enormous investments over there i think that we would have been able to leverage very well when it came to supporting the democracy movement to supporting and following through with a vision that i had brought had been cast in cairo we could have leveraged and we didn't we did not take any risks and i think that people across the world would have more appreciation and confidence in washington if they saw that they were that we were taking some risks in favor of doing the right thing and that is

supporting freedom and democracy just like we said we were going to do it's about follow through and unfortunately when you look at iraq and you look at afghanistan yes we're leaving those places we left iraq are leaving afghanistan but where was the follow through where is the diplomacy in iraq to make sure that that's a better place for people to live and we know it's not going to happen in afghanistan and people see this all over the world and they are low. back in confidence and america right now because of it ok stephen you want to jump in in new york go ahead i would disagree with the proposition that somehow a bomb was responsible for to happen in iraq or iraq obama opposed the war in iraq he wanted to commit our troops to afghanistan where the where the. al qaeda came from originally and had we not gone into iraq we would have focused on in afghanistan a might of. the rebellion there of the taliban much more quickly and efficiently and helped rebuild that country any way we're talking about the past the present is

what we see the bomb is inherited i think you have to play he has a bad hand to play he's playing it about as well as any person really could play it given the realities he has to deal with the saudi arabia which is our authoritarian he's not about to you know commit american troops over three for the saudi arabian government produced marcus lee i mean first well you know they did it in afghanistan certainly not a good days i mean if you were a democracy in iraq turned out to be a disaster you think that's the kind of example that american americans will so you know with even though war was illegal it never should have happened in the first place ok but i have to tend to agree with kelly but you know you don't believe and you don't want to blame obama for the war incident but it would leaving a broken country a failed state ok we can look at libya another failed state ok and i don't exactly why we shouldn't have done it yeah you're right ok ok we'll finally have agreement

here kelley i mean he better go ahead kelly go ahead well i you know and i don't want to suggest that the way that we have the resolve these things is to send troops and occupy other countries i guess maybe this is my naive today but i would i would like to believe that we have the diplomatic prowess as the united states as we've always had during previous administrations to foster better. ships to get in there to advance the plough mysie so that perhaps we might not be able to change who the saudis are or who these dictators are but to put to basically make a one hundred percent effort to try and to to steer them away from some of the hard harshest tyrannical behavior that they make i have to believe that you know ninety percent of our foreign policy should be better diplomacy and i don't i don't see the bush the obama administration tending to relationships like in europe

and dancing and creating better relationships personal relationships with other leaders so that they can get in there and that's talks can happen. i don't want to advance war i want to advance peace and i just don't see the obama administration as as as is putting the best effort into making those those things happen. again and i disagree i think raman ministration has excellent diplomats but look at giving let me give you the situation we're trying to make a peace deal with a room who's protesting most recently saudi arabia i mean the problem is use very complicated you're working on many different levels and you're not always going to get total agreement and what you trying to do you do try to stick to certain principles and i'm trying to bring peace to the middle east. and i think we

both kelly and i would agree with you but you know i mean the united states is using sanctions against iran to get certain political outcomes why can't the united states sanction saudi arabia to get political outcomes as well. saudi arabia is a peculiar situation when you know the u.s. government first had its relations with one under franklin roosevelt one of the great promoters of human rights i mean there are certain realities that any american president have to deal with and one of them is sort of arabia we're not going to change the government we hope that out of evolutionary change out of pressure from the outside saudi arabia will change i mean there now at least the women in saudi arabia are not define the government by trying to show that they can drive cars alone so these things will happen gradually but meantime the most important issue is bringing peace to syria to iran and to the israel palestinian

conflict isn't that what american president should be focusing on that's the most crucial issues that face us as a country well kelly you know all these great values are used and in a very specific way a very discriminating way you if it's a friend you overlook all of their. deficiencies if you don't you don't get in line then you get the the worst of the worst i mean everything stephen just said about you know waiting and development you could say that easily about iran as well but that's not part of the narrative inside the beltway is it. no i don't i don't think it i don't think it is and just to get back to to us even said about saudi arabia middling in scuttling you know the negotiation process with iran i mean this goes back to what i said perhaps this is an outgrowth of the fact that obama hasn't built up the confidence and shown the right amount and the right balance of strength and outreach so that he is drawing he's

creating a situation where you have a congress you have israel you have saudi arabia you have france all trying to scuttle you know the president's vision in the negotiation process and iran because that maybe they're just they don't see him as a former you know as formidable as he should be i mean i realize you don't want to make this an obama and anti obama program but i think it all goes back to how he presents himself and i think that he hasn't he hasn't shown. his formidable the formidable side where where these these these players whether it be israel or saudi arabia or france or the congress are seeing are afraid not to go after him publicly or go after his his vision publicly and i think you're seeing the outgrowth i mean look at what happened in syria look at what's happening what happened in libya no follow through there in afghanistan and the pivot in china we

are supposed to have a pivot to south asia we were supposed to start and you know a whole new. and military influence there and what is obama doing it cancels a major trip to the summit there a major summit there and what happens china fills in the void and everyone in asia right now is scratching their heads saying lamone or him and he have it within to say this is not is a situation well right he right he answered i hope we gave our viewers the generated visions of american foreign policy in the middle east and i'm quite satisfied with that many thanks to my guests in washington and in new york and thanks to our viewers for watching us here at our peak see you next time and remember crosstalk.

if you are targeting only one scapegoat that would be responsible five with you say that you think the banks the commercial banks then what about the non banks what about the highly leveraged institutions nor a responsible old school what about the phones fights so what about all the special vehicles so you see it's more generalized you know him banks are the main reason the bad banking system is the main reason that triggered the banks part of the whole. entire pool as responsibility including the us computing. account to the accounting rules.

of course also all the rating agencies of course you know the anti bank and non-banks and the naive belief that we where you know were real there was an automatic self correction of the market themselves the theory of efficiency of markets was also part of the school's. if you. start to construct. don't want to. give don't want to meet gangstas don't want to. they don't want to know the time a kid came be we can see. you just meet others out of the right

in the hood. i said. i don't want to die. i want to die young young a. secret lover touring. was able to build a most sophisticated. fortunately. mission to teach me the creation why it should care about humans and. this is why you should care only. this immediately so we leave that maybe. by the sea potion security. policy. issues that no one is asking with the guests that deserve answers from. politicking

only on our team. breaking news on r.t. pictures emerged allegedly showing the deadly plane crash in russia's republic of tatarstan with the jet nose diving and bursting into flames. on the victims' relatives are being treated by psychologists ahead of the start of the identification of the body. also the south british bedbugs u.k. intelligence is revealed to have been monitoring the hotel troops of top diplomats around the globe. and they mistreated migrants amnesty international calls on to come over the severe abuse towards foreign construction workers.