hope to taste you no longer from around the globe. look to. the old. colleagues technology innovation all the list of elements from around russia we've got the future covered. last time was a new alert animation scripts scare me a little. league there is breaking news tonight and we are continuing to follow the breaking news making the alexander family cry tears of joy at your grave things out there that have you ever read dark in

a court of law found alive there's a story made for a movie is playing out in real life. for the us i think the least for instance soon to be not even each of these been interesting for us on the trees this is the right place to propose that they quoted her journal immediately just these particular people we're working with who the fuck of it you know i was i was do they do anything. why would they work with these chemicals why would they not work with these mold many of them for money yes and this needs to be said they do this for the money yeah but the why they are why everybody has one thing well known what a liar it's why did you have doing this here on. the first day that i was judging. and the man you are judging no not even

a good thing this movie is judging that it's ok i'm just saying in issue b. we need to be concerned that we are not going around places saying we are better than you are because i've had this situation and i fucked off in years to that this is what i'd like to see this approach to the one where if you seem out of seeing that you you go to two people you know nothing there though as you start out with them this earlier we can exam then when they have or this is a strong reaction you're like strong reaction when they said america was the cables because they didn't know we're going to displace it was no no you action all these who are you have you have quarrelled then you get a slightly different opinion then you don't get that you only get the response they want to get supposed to show in the audience what they will say about these things do you not think that it is an interesting question to see if media around the world will do this and he will and he went on stealing on thing well that is an interesting question if it's an interesting question no to they are too scared to

publish the us government document on the morning of the mall or even if they see it there are many other criteria witness all you want walk walk write what criteria are used to of an. interest newsworthiness know now that you can write a script every news organization that has a website it has a website developer who can just go. like that and they get free hits in google. it is very very it is very very profitable to publish cables because you don't have to write cable it's free stories. the point as far as i see it is there. and there are boundaries to free speech in the same way as their boundaries to our thoughts and to our language and. the new speech when used to speak is basically what we are dealing with and these

boundaries to look differently in different countries but they are always exist in one way or another that is color your senses or conformism or self-censorship or whatever it may be and we have a very unique opportunity to actually just show where these boundaries are but necessarily mean that these boundary is better than that boundary they're really showing where i would ask your back boundary that there is but one thing is that people usually are annoyed with people or if you're unaware of where the boundaries are the easiest way of getting a hold of them is by asking about it and it was a well i cannot write about the king or kind of write about sex or whatever they are most often a lot will not tell you that there are only about most of you know we say well we have no boundaries whatsoever yes and this is what you will get when you interview any journalist in the united kingdom or in brazil or in sweden or it ever is yes so what we have here is the tools in actually catching these boundaries if you push

any organization they will have boundaries and you're going to get what are right and what i write all of them including what i lied. existing home. oh you know you. can come with me and it was just super cool. what was yours for. suspicious. of the guardian you got a paper that's been around nearly two hundred years. has completely sold his or hers for from its international paper it's at the forefront of digital in a patient with doing something that is almost unique in times and there's no one else that looks kind. very much struck. that's just

average that you're talking to me for a film which is documentary. we're going to do there's a story don't you know how we roll out. there this is not just me with all this is essentially your you don't agee you're right. yeah so here are some big surprise big audience we're going to. react to. the substantial. u.s. cables that why did you go for example respects the shape of the u.s. government will sit next to me carol in the mafia but the guardian version. the one to watch. exceeding the

most watched so why did you go by what i say the other night of the got developments up so i can't. speak more tonight i guess i don't know i'm guess. not. to the moment calls i have been called the mound of being used extensively by people from. the former soviet rule. to protect the reputation. of the subtlest place looks good on them so. says some of these people on board rich can send me millions on all five cases. also because it's on the table bridge sit in on.

the telly and if you. are ready. for record me. souls. to see. so this is a place of. now ok she can see you will drop in. great britain you know what is the little goal and curtains of the company town suit. to jeans and we will see what company. it was that tesco just in the two thousand class case. doesn't prove it's not something that. could happen here we go to an easy easy and. good ten cost time to do. that so that if one or britain is a company can see we have

a pop. open area they were extremely interested in. an hour ago here. on the creation of every state. i have to. run. but it was my options would be god. we've got. to. do extremely. well it's already mocking them and it will come. one day remind me it's been a rough. it was the socket. for. you of course it's life if both yours which it may get rough. life. was the subject of a. crow memory. we kind of grew pretty good in the

series when we said we tried to kill. we were trying to play. while we. commemorate that so that you know it was an. option for you so. among them an equal consideration. so. if your point is that couldn't. be more explicit and explaining. why we do things and. some nature you know. were you first of all i. got. you to believe it was not. we so it was decided that. the new york times would approach going across the room go

separately with. two sets of communication with the american one is not the embassy in london a little. to see if you will we will do the very much because we need or is. a channel through to you. and the second channel was a little set up by the state called the police agencies. run rate aim was to do just go. into going to use. that afternoon you probably have seen either in person or on the t.v. screens the. state partly feel that we just finished i won't repeat everything i

said at the start they are but they are the. most significant response to what has happened is. exactly what secretary clinton is doing in a stall or kazakhstan as we speak she is there working constructively on cooperation and security in a very important part of the world clearly the release of the unauthorized release of these documents you know. represents risk to the united states and to others with whom we collaborate. in this this is why we condemn what wiki leaks has to basically from kazakstan through or right in through here. mr did your grocery in between i realize i'm going to be you as much as i really are there and i thought i. pulled the kind of.

from two different countries where the police material has been have been published but there are only looking from the outside without actually having any particular knowledge about it you get the impression that all these various. private u.s. institutions. have acted. from being pressured in one way or another by the u.s. government in order to block or flows of money in order that's not true that is you know in the lizards where it is that is that is absolutely not true. in my time in government. at no time did government tell any private company what to do. i mean there's been rumors there's been suggestions of that and to be honest there's been no. evidence by those who question this you know it's with companies protect their own reputation it's not for the government to tell

a company what it should or shouldn't do you know they've taken actions because the . they they they see it as as in their interest to do this or that or the one hundred look at the affair the same thing were to have been through for example in new york times if the new york times were all of a sudden they're. stopped from getting funds and they would out of their offices close down i could you hear it because hating hypothetical and i can't fall in from harvard to go where they are in the exact same position as for example wrigley in your time decides to publish everything that they get no i mean no but that there is a very sharp distinction here. i mean. you have two actors who are in the business of communicating with a broader public. one after made clear the new york times and other publications we are going to report on what we have we want to do it responsibly

and we want to do it in a way that. is is is respectful. of the danger that this might cause to specific individuals and the new york times voluntarily withheld certain documents and certain names because they recognized as we did that the publication of these documents a publication these days it put real life human beings at risk. i would rather ask questions to people in positions of power instead of speaking on their behalf and that's why you can find my show larry king now right here on r.t.

question for. the folks just saw.

your post sent

a very intrepid reporter down there to sleep overnight he spent thursday night in the chicago park i did live to tell about it what was it like it it was a scary place i mean zuccotti park right now is it is it's own country person here it's. tough queens right in queens you're not afraid of that stuff you want down there what what's what is to the most about what was going on in zuccotti park what surprised me the most about what was going on there is that it's totally lawless you disguise yourself and you try to look like a protester are you going undercover worried you weren't advertising you were supposed to write one on one i spoke to people i told him i was a post reporter there was no secret that he received. well. some people didn't really like that i was a poster of order to be honest i don't very disturbing here though you write from your column from your article the threat of rape is very real here for men and women i just sleep at night i did it and see. if you could be made to be

characters who had so many characters like. candice g.o.p. from your post thank you so much thank you thank you. i. mean i'm so like i said once she's studying to be is closed the doors and don't come out. of it so it's general assembly at the u.n. and we. really. want to come to.

the u.n. general assembly opens this week so there's. a lot of presidents and foreign ministers and stuff and some of them trip through here it really is a customer yeah. yeah that's pretty typical i mean when they're in town with some of them invite themselves and some of them we invite to come over and meet with the editorial writers and things. and how does it seem to work out. and roasting them are pretty predictable but every once in a while one of the makes news but it's you know it's good to just give them a chance to come over and hear their views now. we kind of makes you into an embassy or a for their the embassy of the new york times or a basically right. and i think you know you may have discovered this yourself or a news organizations don't always get the kind of access they would like to officials in washington and if you want to go ask the military or the white house

to respond to classified information. you know. it can be difficult if you're if you're a representative of a foreign news organization i don't think that's a shame but it's just it's a reality so i think they felt. we would be in a better position to confront the administration with what we had and solicit some kind of reaction from them which which turned out to be the case and your counterpart was that mainly year p.j. crowley or some other people. over it you know this is. the first couple of meetings i think they went over and had them in person and they were representatives of the state department i guess assume the intelligence agencies were there i know the cia was represented. i'm not sure i just don't remember that the military was there. because at that point it was mostly nonmilitary matters. after that after the first couple of conversations

they just had a daily phone call basically. they did it all you know there was none of this everybody gathered in a room it was they would say we really think you. i should hold back on this particular cable and here's why and then we would discuss and decide whether to withhold it or not. and many of the countries where we have been traveling and. talking to be the editors of politicians there has been a concern that. these materials can have a destabilizing effect and that in a particular country when you consider. the consequences of not publishing that we considered it yeah we talked about it a lot i mean yemen is a good example of that because the state department's argument was this this could be destabilizing. but i kind of think it's not our job

to decide what is destabilizing and or for that matter to preserve the stability of . countries elsewhere but if you feel that you would have acted differently had the material been of such character that it would have potentially destabilized your country rather than. syria you've mentioned it it's hard for me to imagine what that would be i mean if you had had an example or a few years ago yes see that wireless what weren't let's wire tapping right yes i mean if you can explain how you reasoned at that point in time when you didn't publish them in a different post that were when i did publish the first one when you didn't at first and then i when i didn't publish them. but the concern with it wasn't whether it would destabilize our government because certainly was whether or not it would be of significant value to people who want to attack us.

had it been your choice. and if you were in the so on there is of this material that you would not have published the whole thing that oh. you know first of all because there are. you know. in the documents that we posted. we redacted many names of people whose would have been put in danger. we didn't have not. studied all of the documents to know how many more people might be put in danger to just post the whole thing would be i think irresponsible. and let's say with every dime to the names of those who would have been in danger and published it on your site would that be something which would be indicted will. probably not . but we had up we had cited how we were going to publish how we were going to have the material you know regardless of legal consequences just on journalistic grounds

. you know we only wanted to publish we only wanted to do you need the room. yeah. you need me here the. home office. i was dense and you hear it right but then i heard you were in here the. house the house i'm glad you liked it oh yes it made the drudge report so i'm getting some so we're getting a lot of traffic to prove it on traffic to support your life though but you know that you got a traffic you got the kind of traffic you necessarily what because a lot of a lot of people who use the word scum bag. books it's a technical term they would think you. were talking about our favorite subject wiki leaks oh. this is arthur sulzberger was the publisher you. know and. we're just great you know going back to the writing

life of my first op that was published this morning which is. a somewhat. half hearted defense of obama against. distant disenchanted liberals and you know what the drudge report is the drudge report is a website. very conservative website. that has for the basically aggregates headlines from all over the place but with a kind of right wing commentary attached that it's got a huge fall so if matt drudge is the guy runs this web site. find something that you've written puts it on his home page with a snarky comment. it drives traffic amazingly i mean driving traffic is nice but the traffic that he drives is mostly you know. you scumbag idiot but traffic is.

from google groups like you were to write this to be a muslim oh. look at the bricks through clear example that you see. on stuff that's got us kind of the writer. or the love this is the significant of death for us he didn't let them assume that it was simply the first. died for it in secret for some of. the appropriate amount of effort into to get rid

of the thief the lead to the gun. or she gets up in the. the both given their announced that for the in the us the open never. got though the push you only got to put us up is that come into it would have been able to cut the close of the gig a little winnable with. this piece to build goodwill with a bullet but look at this possible is there been other google that is visit to dispose of it. in the senate then lot of good things because i'm not some good at that.

well. science technology innovation all the list of elements from

around russia we've got this huge you're covered. today on larry king now one of hollywood's hottest new stars adam scott i'm told to set so all the fun right it's really fun i mean season six and everyone is still friends and happy to be there is a feat in itself he's the biggest flirt rob lowe are you kidding you know what else plus the whole area is mike birbiglia and i'd like to think of my shows as like a meal as opposed to like just serving people chicken wing well you do a whole bit on being opposed to marriage yeah it's a very funny you seem for it i seemed well i said you'll never be back much. that's all ahead on larry king now.