the point as far as i see it is there. and there are boundaries to free speech as in the same way as there are boundaries to our thoughts into our language and. a new speaker in use to speak is basically what we are dealing with and these boundaries that look differently in different countries but they are always exist in one way or another that's color your sense of or conformism or self-censorship or whatever it may be and we have a very unique opportunity to actually just show where these boundaries are doesn't necessarily mean that these boundary is better than that boundary everything after showing where there are a spirit by family that there is but one thing is that people usually are annoyed with people or if you're unaware of where these boundaries are the easiest way of getting a hold of them is by asking about it and it was

a well i cannot write about making a kind of write about sex or whatever they are most often they like well i'll tell you that there are only about most of you know we say well we have no boundaries whatsoever yes and this is what you will get when you interview any journalist in the united kingdom or in brazil or in sweden or it ever yet so what we have here is the tools in actually catching these boundaries if you push any eigenstates and they will have boundaries and you're going to get qualified and why all of them including the one i lied. existing home. oh you know you. can come with me because just because. what you'll see it for pretty. suspicious. that the guardian you got a paper that's been around nearly two hundred years. has completely sold it has for

for its international trade it's at the forefront of digital in a knife with doing something that is almost anything from us no one else that looks kind. very much struck. that's just average that you're talking to me for a film which is documentary. we're going to do there's the story don't you see how we roll out. there so this is not just me that would do this is essentially your you know a.g. you're right. yeah so here are some big surprise off big audience we're going to. react to. the substantial. u.s.

cable why did you go for example. next came. the u.s. government will sit next to me carol in the mafia buffy universe. one last. critics you think he was so why did you go with what i say they're going to go up the documents up so i can't. speak more tonight i guess you know i'm guess. that. the the mother calls i have been called the mound of being used extensively by people called. home so you go. to protect her attention.

to the slightest trace looks good. and so. some of these people on the very rich can stand millions on all five cases. also because it's on the table which sit in on. the television. ready. for the record for me. souls. to see. so this is a case of. now ok she can see you will drop in. great britain you know what is good to see there's a little good ole and good riddance of the company sued. to jesus and we will see what company. he did with that

test just. two thousand case. doesn't prove it's not something that. could happen. to you he's decent. in ten cars trying to do. that so that if the north are missing companies can see we have a partner. on the area they were extremely interested in. an hour ago here. on the ferry from o'hare and stay off. i have to. find. that it was some i wasn't. the guy. who got. to. do extremely. well. all of a mocking them and it will become. one name which was the name

rough. it was the socket. or. give a horse and so i flipped all of this which meant that this rough. life. was the socket it will. throw memory. we kind of grew pretty good in the series when we said we tried to kill. we were trying to play. while we. were married that said you know there is an. option for you so. among them an equal consideration. so. if your point is that couldn't. be more explicit and explaining. why we would do things and.

some nature in general. were you first of all i. got it right. if you actually do believe in which it is not. we heard so it was decided that. the new york times would approach government programs the memorandum separated we had. two sets of communication with him and one saw the embassy in london and little. to see if you will we will do the very much because we need or is. a channel through to you. and the second channel was a little set up but is that up until the agency's. run rate aim was to do just go. up and you can use.

that afternoon you probably have seen either in person or on the t.v. screens the. state partly feel that we just finished i won't repeat everything i said at the start there but two of the. most significant response to what has happened is. exactly what secretary clinton is doing in a stall or kazakhstan as we speak she is there working constructively on cooperation and security in a very important part of the world clearly the release of the authorized release of these documents you know. represents risk to the united states and to others with whom we collaborate. i missed this is why we condemned what

wiki leaks has done basically from kazakstan. right in through here. mr did your very in between i realize i'm going to be you as much as i really wanted to. pull the kind of. from two different countries where the police material has been have been published but they're only looking from the outside without actually having any particular knowledge about it you get the impression that all these various. private u.s. institutions. have acted. from being pressured in one way or another by the u.s. government in order to block or flows of money in order that's not true that that is you know i mean lizards really have is that is that is absolutely not true. in

my time in government. at no time did government tell any private company what to do. i mean there's been rumors there's been suggestions of that and to be honest there's been no. evidence by those who question this you know it's with companies protect their own reputation it's not for the government to tell a company what it should or shouldn't do. they've taken actions because they. they they see it as as in their interest to do this or that with a one hundred look at their fear the same thing were to happen through for example the new york times of the year of times who were all of a sudden. stopped from giving funds and they without their offices closed i could hear it because hating a hypothetical that i can't follow being from harvard to go where they are in the exact same position as for example recordings in europe time decides to publish everything that they get no i mean no but that there is

a very sharp distinction here. i mean. you have two actors who are in the business of communicating with a broader public. one after made clear the new york times and other publications we are going to report on what we have you want to do it responsibly and we want to do it in a way that. is is it respectful. of the danger that this might cause to specific individuals and the new york times voluntarily withheld certain documents and certain names because they recognized as we did that the publication of these documents of publication these days would put real life human beings at risk.

we've reported on this ratio before debt to g.d.p. growth going back to the one nine hundred fifty s. it was almost want to once america would issue some debt and they'd get some some kind of g.d.p. kick as a result of it but it requires more and more debt to. equivalent same g.d.p. dollar of growth what we now have is clearly a case of zombie banks and zombie corporations that would not survive if they weren't being transfused with more debt continuously which means that good businesses are being crowded out by zombies and it also means that you've got a. total loss of competitiveness this is the worst thing really that quantitative easing has done to america. will. technology innovation all the developments from

around russia. to the future covered. right promising. first rate. and i think the church. on our reporters twitter. and instagram. today in the gulf. coast.

your post sent a very intrepid reporters. down there to sleep over night you spent thursday night in the crowded park i did live to tell about it what was it like. it was a scary place i mean zuccotti park right now is it is it's own country part of your tough queensboro right in queens you're not afraid of this stuff you want to be out there what what's up what is to the most about what was going on in zuccotti park what surprised me the most about what was going on there is that it's totally lawless you disguise yourself did you try to look like a protester were you going undercover worried you weren't advertising your posts right one on one i spoke to people i told man i was a post reporter there was no secret and had to be received. well. some people didn't really like that i was a poster of orders to be honest i don't very disturbing here though you write from your column from your article the threat of rape is very real here for men and

women i just sleep at night i did it and see. if you could have made it to the characters who had so many characters i paint canvas she'll be from your post thank you so much thank you thank you. thank you. very much so like i said once you start the interviews close the doors and. it's general assembly. the

u.n. and we. really are. when we come. it's the end of the u.n. general assembly opens this week so there's. a lot of presidents and foreign ministers and stuff and some of them trip through here to really people here is that customer yeah yeah it's pretty typical i mean when they're in town with some of them invite themselves and some of them we invite to come over and meet with the editorial writers and things. and how does it seem to work out. and rest in the pretty predictable every once in a while one of the makes news but it's you know it's good to just give them a chance to come over and share their views that. we kind of makes you into an embassy or. they're the embassy of the new york times or a basically right. i think you know you may have discovered this yourself or a news organizations don't always get the kind of access they would like to

officials in washington and if you want to go ask the military or the white house to respond to classified information. you know. it can be difficult if you're if you're a representative of a foreign news organization i don't think that's a shame but it's just it's a reality so i think they felt. we would be in a better position to confront the administration with what we had and solicit some kind of reaction from them which which turned out to be the case and your counterpart was that mainly year p.j. crowley or some other people. over it you know this is. the first couple of meetings i think they went over and had them in person and they were representatives of the state department i guess assume the intelligence agencies were there i know the cia was represented. i'm not sure i just don't remember whether the military was there. because at that point it was mostly

nonmilitary matters. after that after the first couple of conversations they just had a daily phone call basically. they did it all you know there was none of this everybody gathered in a room it was they would say we really think you should hold back on this particular cable have here's why and then we would discuss and decide whether to withhold it or not. and many of the countries where we've been traveling and. talking to be the editors are politicians there has been a concern that. these materials can have a destabilizing effect and that in a particular country when you consider. the consequences of not publishing them we considered it yeah we talked about it a lot i mean yemen is a good example of that because the state department's argument was this this could be destabilizing. but i kind of think it's not our job

to decide what is destabilizing and or for that matter to preserve the stability of . countries elsewhere but if you feel that you would have acted differently had the material been of such character that it would have potentially destabilized your country rather than. because you've mentioned it it's hard for me to imagine what that would be i mean you had to have an example or a few years ago you have to see that wireless what weren't less wire tapping right yes i mean can you explain how you reasoned at that point in time when you didn't publish the material for helps them or when i did publish the first one when you didn't at first and then i when i didn't publish them. or the concern with it wasn't whether it would destabilize our government because certain was whether or not it would be of significant value to people who want to attack us.

had it been your choice. and if you were the sole on there as of this material you would not have published the whole thing that. you know first of all because there are. you know. in the documents that we posted. we redacted many names of people who would have been put in danger. we did have not . study all the documents to know how many more people might be put in danger to just post the whole thing would be i think irresponsible. and let's say with every dime to the names of those who would have been in danger and published it on your site would that be something which would be indicted. probably not. but we had up we had cited how we were going to publish how we were going to have

the material you know regardless of legal consequences just on journalistic grounds . you know we only wanted to publish we only wanted to do you need the room. yep. you need me or the group. oh well. i was dense and you hear a gram but then i heard you were in here. i was at the house i'm glad you liked it oh yes it made the drudge report so i'm getting some so i'm getting a lot of traffic to prove it on traffic supporting my children but you know they got a traffic you got the kind of traffic you necessarily what because a lot of a lot of people who use the word scumbag. but it's a technical term they would think you. were talking about our favorite subject wiki leaks oh. this is arthur sulzberger was the publisher. pleasure.

and. we're just great you know going back to the writing life of my first op that was published this morning which is. a somewhat. half hearted defense of obama against. distant disenchanted liberals and you know what the drudge report is the drudge report is a website. very conservative website. that has for that basically aggregates headlines from all over the place but with a kind of right wing commentary attached that it's got a huge problem so if matt drudge is the guy runs this website. find something that you've written puts it on his home page with a snarky comment. it drives traffic amazingly i mean driving traffic is nice but the traffic that he drives is mostly you know. you

scumbag idiot but traffic just. looks. like you are surviving just to be a muslim or. look at the bricks through clear example that you see. on stuff that's got us kind of the side of. the law this is the significant of death for us he didn't let them assume that it will simulate forces.

are different in secret the symbol. modest effort indifferent to them or the city for they just need a gun. or she's going to get up and. the us sitting them down so what we're doing is we're going to hear from a number of. tough talk about the push really cock to put i shall come into it will enable us to cut the course of. this to simply look at the movement to put a good book it is possible. to be another google it is music to displace but. in the same delirium what good things because some did it take you.

am.

daffy wasn't like the easiest person to negotiate ways i mean many people who've met him or even those who knew him briefly all say that he wasn't completely sane what was he like when you were talking to him and negotiating with him about the lives of these people you know he was very he was very you know how can i say maybe i'm the drugs or medicines but he was listening maybe it wasn't the right place side the right moment. largest consumer of the lazy and i'd see women in the country is the federal government has to be saved from what do you mean it is these global. it is the united states number diligent it was in ghana probably has to realize you can't just buy. your own just throw it away this is a problem for reasons the launch of the unit is leaves a moment to produce an agency and i found as a dumb play here. it's not always. produces of these left when i should be

able to collect these i believe that this should be responsible. for a little too great. for mexico department of mental health proper tool south america incorporated but also belongs to the washington metro area transit authority properties of a dentist aids page and trademark office. did you know the price is the only industry specifically mentioned in the constitution and. that's because a free and open process is critical to our democracy albus. role. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and our crust cynical we've been a hydrogen lying handful of transnational corporations that will profit by

destroying what our founding fathers once it's all just my job market and on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on in the world we go beyond identifying the problem try rational debate in a real discussion of critical issues facing america to find a job ready to join the movement then welcome to the big picture. please please. please. please. please.

read united a day after being released from a russian prison of the form of oil tycoon it may help you cope skate to meet his son in the german capital and hopes to see the rest of his family. washington it's almost a rainy and unaccountable defense spending at the pentagon amounting to any. point five trillion dollars since nineteen lying to six. new charges are thrown at him bottled former ruler home made more see a prison break in two thousand and eleven as the latest descend on the streets is stifled by police. or saddam in my life that the child is locked up in the military prison for having a ruler while the ongoing political witch hunt in the sopranos and no.