or rather what they've had possibly an opposite effect because we all know that when money is not an issue efficiency is usually not the first concern well i would disagree with you i don't think it's exorbitant spending at all when you look at what happened in the united states on september eleventh to have two of our biggest buildings in new york knocked down the pentagon attacked and another plane that was heading for washington d.c. that was very appropriate spending and i think we've seen the results you mentioned other countries other countries are not the target that the united states is for islamic extremists and so i think the united states citizens have gotten what they've paid for when they because we've been able to for you all and prevent numerous attacks on the continental united states and in europe with some of our allies because we're spending so much more money on intelligence and because we're able to have a more capable intelligence service going after threats to our country well you

just mentioned nine eleven and that was of course twelve years ago but if we consider the. funding that the cia has requested of the intelligence community or rather has requested for the fiscal year of two thousand and thirteen it is still pretty high over fifty two billion dollars and it is expected to stay at that level at least until two thousand and seventeen and just to our viewers to make it clear it is pretty much the same or similar to what the united states was spending on their own intelligence ad they hide all of the cold war and. i'm sure you know that these and zorbas and standing on the part of the soviet union was one of the main reasons for its own collapse these very huge spending disproportionate spending on both military and intelligence so i wonder why aren't the intelligence agencies being. do you cut the fat at that time when everybody

else is subjected to susteren symmachus we have cut intelligence spending as the united states has adjusted to the fiscal realities that we have in the united states but i think it's been money very well spent i don't think it's been exorbitant whatsoever we are a big country like russia where we have a global intelligence service because we have interests all over the world we have more threats you know i think it's interesting it might be interesting for your viewers you know the way the united states sees intelligence is different than when we saw it in the cold war while the soviet union and the united states were sort of pitted against each other in a sense it was an easier intelligence mission because russia is a very large or the soviet union was a very large nation state within embassies and armaments and the rest whereas today's threats are stateless international terrorists they are political writers

of weapons of mass destruction so the intelligence job is a little bit harder here today in the post cold war era than arguably it might have been in the cold war absolutely mr allen this is a good point but you just mentioned russia and russia is also a target for international terrorism so is france so is germany but all those countries combined don't spend as much on intelligence gathering intelligence spending as the united states alone well i don't know exactly how much russia spins on their intelligence it's based on history i imagine it's very very high russia is of course got an aggressive intelligence service that operates all over the globe the way we define intelligence here in the united states is not just the activities of the central intelligence agency it's also the support we give to our soldiers who are we're engaged. in iraq and also engaged in afghanistan they need what we

call signals intelligence they need photography that helps them win a particular battle and so we define intelligence rather broadly and for the challenges that the united states has we think it's been an appropriate level of spending although it has contract it a little bit in recent years not you mentioned earlier that you believe that the americans got what they paid for in terms of their increased security but if we look on the foreign policy if the the u.s. intelligence has totally a job the ball on multiple issues for example they were wrong on the arab spring they totally miscalculated syria they allowed the disaster in bin gaza to take place there is a major instability looming in africa on the domestic front again multiple warnings on the boston marathon bombing run missed and. you know all that domestic spying

revealed by edward snowden only added. an insult to injury so it seems that the least a failure is is so long that claiming that it was a success is a bit premature don't you think so no i don't think so look there have been active terrorist plots in pakistan and yemen and somalia that have come after or intended to come after the continental united states it is true that our intelligence agencies and in this holds for russian intelligence agencies and agencies around the world are not always perfect sometimes they miss a warning sometimes they missed collecting the information that might have foretold of a particular plot but generally i think the intelligence community has improved its game since september eleventh and we're always looking for ways to get better some of the things that you mentioned in the litany of alleged failures it hasn't always been the. case that the intelligence community didn't know what was going on for

example we were able to establish in the congress that the central intelligence agency did provide warnings about the deteriorating security situation in benghazi well mr allen as a former war correspondent i can tell you that i could have predicted that the security situation in gaza was deteriorating free of charge i mean the cia or other intelligence agencies didn't have to spend fifty billion dollars a year to predict something like that there were signs of that all over you know present all over the ground but. i want to switch gears a little bit one surprising conclusion that follows from snowden's revelations is the dominant position still occupied by the cia and in the years following nine eleven the agency took a lot of beating for what happened and many acts prigs backdown predicted that its power its pristine beach may decline as a result of being blamed or being made

a scapegoat for those failures but now it seems that the agency is is more powerful than the average both in terms of the funding that it receives and in terms of the . you know the scope of its operations does it mean that the the overhaul that you describe in your book and it up strengthening rather than weakening the cia no i think that's a fair point look we were asked and the country was put in an awkward situation after nine eleven where we were going to have to be more aggressive against some of the threats against the united states and the central intelligence agency stepped up and did the job and we as i recognize in my book blinking red the cia does a lot of things in the national security interest at the behest of the president after nine eleven the president president bush and even president obama have naturally called upon the central intelligence agency to help keep. the country

safe to help keep our allies safe you know what we actually share information on occasion with our russian counterparts because we feel like that we have a common interest in promoting. or at least fighting against international terrorism i think the boston marathon bombing is a prime example of how. problematic that call peroration could be because numerous . tips that the russian intelligence provided to the cia were missed but if we look at some of the operations that the cia has been in charge of over the recent decades. their scope is very very wide i mean it's running secret prisons it's a controversial interrogation program deployment of drones a huge expansion of its counterterrorism activities and there is a just the things that we know about and many experts have suggested that over this

last decade that you describe in your book the cia has essentially turned into these huge paramilitary force that is still operating under the cover of a spy agency so in other words it has ever increasing authority an ever increasing funds without having to be transparent as some of the other institutions of the american government have to be for example the department of the defense would you agree with that oh no no i wouldn't agree with that at all look the central intelligence agency is overseen very closely by the u.s. congress our congress parliaments around the world have complete insights into what the central intelligence agency is doing that's unique in the united states we have a level of transparency that exceeds anyone in the world and so we have a very careful system constructed here of checks and balances and yet mr allen despite that extensive congressional over. alluded to it's not

a secret that the cia is often referred to as the presidents agency and many american presidents in the past have used covered operations as this sort of gray middle ground tactic between diplomacy on one hand and military operations on the other hand given how substantially the scope of the cia operations has widened in these past decades do you think that the tools available to barack obama compared to his predecessors have expanded as well well no i think it's not just to president obama look i worked for president bush for eight years president bush asked more of the central intelligence agency we're after direct threats to the united states we're primarily concerned with a variety of countries in the middle east and islamic terrorists who would do harm to the united states in different regions and countries around the world so the funding the authority has been geared towards these new threats that have popped up

since the end of the cold war and that's mostly terrorism well i think mr allen the cia's probably keeping close tabs on all the possible threats but we now have to take a very short break when we come back the extent of domestic and i say spying revealed by edward snowden upset many remaining calls for yet another reform of intelligence operations is a change likely this time around that's coming up in a few moments on well the part. largest consumer of the easies in i.t. it will be in the country is the federal government simplicities property going it is the is going to. be this the. public has to realize it can't just by. you know just threw it away. the president for instance

belongs to the united states environmental protection agency and i found this on a dump site here. or in some ways. the producers of these left when i should be able to collect these i believe that they should be responsible for their products from cradle to grave. the mexico department of mental health property of south america and copper it also belongs to the washington metro area transit authority properties of a dentist aids page and trademark office. but . they're going to do it you know the price is the only industry specifically mention in the constitution and. that's because a free and open press is critical to our democracy but albus. role. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of

our government and approximately we've been hijacked right handful of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers once i don't trust my job market it on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on in the world we go beyond identifying the problem. rational debate real discussion critical issues facing them go ready to join the movement then welcome big. welcome back to worlds apart from rio discussing the reform of us intelligence operations with white house security veteran michael allen and mr allen a couple of months ago president barack obama appointed a committee to look into the and i say controversial surveillance tactics revealed

by edward snowden and. the task force is supposed to come up with its own saddle for accommodations for what may be another swiftboating overhaul of u.s. intelligence operations given your experience do you think there is enough momentum for yet another transformation or is it all just political talk no i think that there are a lot of members of congress and a lot of people in washington who want to study more closely what the national security agency is doing and whether u.s. privacy and civil liberties have been infringed upon since nine eleven on many of the activities that we did. so the president's review group is apparently going to release its report today and congress which who has already been considering legislation all year i think will take a close look at the report and then we'll propose legislation next year from now just to let our viewers know we are recording this show on wednesday and the

release of that report is indeed expected in a few hours time but some chunks of it have already been released to the media but the question is of course not only of whether those the accommodations will be acted upon but in what way they will be implemented because one message i took from your book is that the power of bureaucratic forces within the intelligence community is so strong that it can override pretty much any political or public pressure so i guess what it shows is that sometimes intelligence reforms produce quite the opposite result from from the one intended well i think that's a fair point when you have a bureaucratic struggle it is true is in every country that for example here the defense department doesn't want to lose out to the cia but i don't agree with what you said at first which is that the cia can pretty much do whatever it wants wants

it cannot so if the u.s. congress passes a new law that seeks to cut back upon some of the things the national security agency is doing the n.s.a. is going to abate a wall and do as the congress and the president direct and they're not going to be able to do what they want to do but on their own accord a bit but mr allen if the oversight is indeed so strict and so strong why do you think there is such an uproar. with regards to all these revelations not only among the general public but also among the members of congress and the white house itself president obama. sad that he had no idea that german chancellor's phone was tapped so i think that shows that the control may not be as as strong as you you're suggesting no we'll look we've got to do and we're always striving to have better oversight in the united states to have better control of what we're doing but i

think the people in the white house knew exactly what the national security agency was doing the reason there has been some public anger about what the n.s.a. was doing is because it's been distorted in many cases by responsible media organizations and others seeking to exploit. a situation here in the united states where they may be able to make poll little advances but i mean i would be careful about overstating what u.s. public opinion is because i think generally u.s. public opinion is supportive of what the intelligence agencies have been doing because they see a direct relationship between intelligence and national security while just a couple of days ago a year's federal judge ruled that this program the program of collecting phone metadata was unconstitutional and you don't want me to overstate the use public

opinion but the judge actually cited a couple of public opinion polls and one of them suggest that fifty seven percent of americans strongly disapproved of that phone records being collected for that purpose. how valuable do you think that program of collecting phone records is also included as one of the scrapping of each is one of the recommendations by these presidential task force how valuable do you think that program was for the u.s. intelligence is it seen as important yes i think it is seen as important you've seen congressional to. boni all summer where the head of the national security agency and our director of national intelligence have testified before the congress that it has been a valuable tool in helping link international terrorists to those who may be in the united states and the subject of what's in the review group report

which is what we called the national security agency's eavesdropping program and its phone records program was one of those tools that i think helped us in at least to several occasions for war a terrorist attack on new on the new york city subway system to name just one i think well it's interesting that you say that because they died who ruled that particular program was unconstitutional sat in his legal opinion that he hasn't been presented with a single example of the full metal program revealing something valuable for preventing a terrorist attack and i wonder if this resistance to. you know scrapping these phone program reflects the intelligence community effort to defend what it sees as not perhaps pretty but necessary methods of operation or rather just a show of institutional resentment at that winks being claimed no i think look look

let's address the court decision that's one u.s. district court judge who issued that opinion this week it is going to be appealed there are going to be other judges that look at it in many scholars are looking at this to opinion today and saying that the judge misapplied what the supreme court has already held with regard to the law governing this program so let's put that aside and wait for the courts to sort through it and i don't think the national security agency feels like that the court has clipped its wings in that it's trying to fight back in some way so the n.s.a. has been doing what the cause. entry asked and i think that's what they're going to continue to try and do and make their case to american congressman and to the president now according to polls americans usually don't really care about what their intelligence services are doing abroad they have primarily concerned with what is happening within that own borders and to those of us in other countries

that's already a bit hypocritical but i think the committee's recommendations take it even a step further because one of the proposals that they put forth is. introducing additional safeguards for the data off european citizens and the only way i can interpret that is essentially dividing the world's population into the first class citizens whose privacy is worthy of special protection and you know the rest of us do you think something like that could be accepted in washington i don't i don't think that's right i will be really surprised if the president's review group comes out and says the europeans to deserve more privacy and civil liberties protections than other foreign countries but i mean you mentioned hypocrisy here let's talk about this a little bit every intelligence service in the world is specially the big giant intelligence services in china and russia and some of those in europe are

very very active in trying to collect intelligence in the united states in so when we hear certain politicians to cry what american intelligence is up to we think they're sort of doing it with a wink and a nod knowing that they do the exact same thing mr allen and i just stood with all due respect and neither russia nor china go around the world preaching civil liberties and respect for privacy of privacy and you know all that sort of thing so i think what is hypocritical here is that. americans are preaching one thing and doing something else entirely this is why they hold wall this so taken aback by all those revelations by edward snowden but. one of the top concerns of the intelligence community here now is to prevent people like edward snowden with come you know prevent them from doing that ever again releasing sites valuable such

secret to such sensitive information in the future and this is where i think the reform has started even before it was publicly discussed or even before it was approved by the white house as far as i understand ever since the we can leaks revelations the intelligence community is now much more serious about security clearances and as far as i understand it has also stepped up. spying on its own person now is it really the case i think that well first of all let me say respond to what you said if if russia isn't worried about privacy and civil liberties and doesn't preach about it in there are around the world i don't think they are to worry then the about what the national security agency has been up to so that's point one of point two is that it is true that i think a many people in washington who understand that we need to be able to protect certain classes of information for national security purposes or offended that

someone took many of our classified documents and went abroad with them and gave them to people who may not always have the united states best interests at heart so it is true that one of the things the review group is supposed to be studying and something that american politicians are interested in is creating a system where it's not so easy for someone to download thousands or maybe hundreds of thousands of documents and run away with them on the stand your correctly that you don't believe that edward snowden performed their public service maybe in the best. interest of the united states but at least in the best interest of humanity and no i don't think edward snowden performed a public service generally countries don't want to turn over their playbook to the other side and that's essentially what's happened here it is true that it is heard a big debate about the role of our intelligence services in the united states i

think that debate was coming anyway after nine eleven but i don't think we've had sort of anything in the interest of humanity served by this episode well i think many people would disagree with you but very very quickly as some policymakers have likened the impact of this no then revelations to the to not a scandal back in the nineteen seventies when the church committee. also disclosed extensive domestic spying in commuting by the ana say and back down at last to the creation of special congressional committees it also led to the creation of a special secret court to monitor aspire peroration so the overside was always there but apparently it is never enough well no i think in this case the united states congress and the court knew exactly about the two main programs that were revealed over the summer and i think that's the chief distinction between the episodes you cite in the one nine hundred seventy s. and today which is that i think the review group is likely going to conclude that

no u.s. laws were broken but isn't it curious that as you say many experts also predicted that the review board would say that no laws were broken and yet they're calling for such a sweeping ad reform in the future but mr allen unfortunately we have to leave it here thank you very much for being on the show and to our viewers please join us again same place same time here on worlds apart. if you. know opportunity. to start to construct your own. want to be

a bit give don't want to be gangstas you don't want to be drug dealers they don't want to blow a window of time that a kid came be we can see. you just means the boat is ours and i hope i was in the hood. with thirty round clips. but i said. i don't want to die i just really do not want to die young young age. right from the scene. first straight shooters and i were being put. on a reporter's twitter. and instagram. to

be in the know. on. me speak your language. programs and documentaries in arabic it's all here on. the team from the world talks about seventy ip interviews intriguing stories for you to. see then try. to find out more visit our big dog called. the taxi wasn't like the easiest. to negotiate i mean many people who've met him or even those who knew him briefly all say that he wasn't completely sane what was he like when you were talking. with him about the lives of these people very he was very. maybe drugs. but he was

maybe it wasn't the right place at the right. one hundred twenty three days. through to. really. people. in a record setting trip. on the. good luck. to build. anything mission to teach me. this

is why you should care only. the former russian tycoon. is getting ready to me the press after finally being reunited with his family in berlin following his surprise release from prison. also this week ages civilians are executed by islamist rebels in syria while western nations signal upcoming peace talks might not need assad's removal after all. and a big boned deal for ukraine russia agrees to buy fifteen billion dollars of its debt and slash the price of gas which kiev hails as its rescue from bankruptcy.