around rush hour we've got the future of. the us i think the christmas. people might eat me she didn't think christmas for us on the trees this is the right place to propose that they quoted her at the end it was just these particular people we're working with who the fuck all that you know why why why do they do anything. why would they work with these chemicals why would they not work with these kind of mold many of them for money yes and this needs to be said they do this for the money yeah but the why they are why everybody is doing things well known what a liar it's why did you have to do this your own having said that i was judging. and the man you are judging no not even a good thing these movies judging that it's ok i'm just saying in issue b. we need to be concerned that we're not going around places saying we're better than you are because i've had this situation and i fucked off in years to that this is

what i'd like to see this approach to the one where if you seem out of seeing that you you go to two people you know nothing there as you start talking to them this earlier we can extend then when they have or this is a strong reaction you're like strong reaction when the sediment comes the cables because they didn't only get to the first place it was no no you have to know all before you have you have water then you get a slightly different opinion then you don't get that you only get the response they want to get as opposed to show in the audience what they will say about these things but do you not think that it is an interesting question to see if media around the world will do this and who will and when i'm still working on thing that is an interesting question if you can interesting question no two they are too scared to put the u.s. government's argument in the morning with the rest of knowing or even if they see it there are many other great theory is that missoni what walk walk right what criteria are used the argument. interest newsworthiness know now that you can

write a script every news organization that has a website it has a website developer who can just go. like that and they get free hits in google. is very very it is very very profitable to publish cables because you don't have to write cable it's free stories. the point as far as i see it is that. there are boundaries to free speech as in the same way as there are boundaries to our thoughts into our language and. when you speak when used to speak it is basically what we are dealing with and these boundaries that look differently in different countries but they are always exist in one way or another that is color your sense of or conformism or self-censorship or whatever it may be and we have

a very unique opportunity to actually just show where these boundaries are doesn't necessarily mean that these boundary is better than that boundary they remain showing where i would have to look back down to that area but the thing is that people usually are annoyed with people or if you're unaware of where the boundaries are the easiest way of getting a hold of them is by asking a person and it was a well i cannot write about looking for a kind of write about sex or whatever they are most often they like it when i tell you that there are only about most of you know we say well we have no boundaries whatsoever yes and this is what you will get when you interview any journalist in the united kingdom or in brazil or in sweden or it ever yet so what we have here is the tools in actually catching these boundaries if you push any eigenstate and they will have monies and you're going to get one are right and why all of them including the one i lied. existing home. oh

you know you. can come with me and it was just simple. walk out stuff was yours for pretty. suspicious. of the guardian you got a paper that's been around nearly two hundred years. has completely sold this is for sure it's international trade it's at the forefront of digital innovation with doing something that is almost unique in times and has no one else that looks kind . very much. to establish that you're talking to me for a film which is documented. we're going to do there's a story don't you know how we roll out. there this is not

just me that would do this is essentially your you don't agee you're right. yeah so here are some big surprise because we're going to. react to. the substantial. u.s. cables that while to figure out for example. that star has changed. the u.s. don't. sit next to me carol in the mafia but the guy you. want to watch. predicts you think he won't waltz so why did you go with what i say good bye to the got development stuff so i hope he can speak more tonight i guess and you know i'm

guess. that. the the monocles have been called the mound of being used extensively by people from. the pool most of it will go to protect her dish. on the slightest trace looks good on them so. that's some of these people on board rich can send me millions on buying cases. also waiting to fix on the cable bridge sit in on. the telly and if you. are ready. for record me. souls' you. see. so so this is

a case of more now ok she can see you will regret. it very great britain you know what is the little goal and curtains of the company can suit. two g.'s and we will see not something. you did with that tesco just. two thousand case. doesn't prove it's not something that. could happen here we go to an easy easy and. good time cost time to do. that so that if one or britain is a company. we have a pop. open area they're extremely interested in. an hour ago we're. on the ferry over here and stay off.

i have to. run. but it was some i wasn't. the guy. who got. to. do extremely. well. all of a mocking them and it will become. one thing remained which was in a rush. it was the socket. for. the fourth and sorry if it go if you switch it may get rough. life. was the subject of a. troll memory. we kind of grew pretty good in the series when we said we tried to play. what we were doing was trying to claim. why we. commemorate that so that you know it was

an. option for you so. among them an equal consideration. so. if your point is that couldn't. be more explicit and explaining. why we would do things and. some neutral. were you first of all i. got. you to believe implicitly not. we so it was decided that. the new york times would approach government bryant the memorandum said we have. two sets of communication with humor and one is not the embassy in london

a little. to see if you will we will do the very much because we need or is. a channel through to you. and the second channel was a full set up by the state caught up in the agency's. run rate aim was to do just go. into a news. good afternoon you probably have seen either in person or on the t.v. screens the. state partly feel that we just finished i won't repeat everything i said at the start they are but two of the. most significant response to what has happened is. exactly what secretary clinton is doing in a stall or kazakhstan as we speak you know she is there working constructively

on cooperation and security in a very important part of the world clearly the release of the authorized release of these documents you know. represents risk to the united states and to others with whom we collaborate. i missed this is why we condemn what wiki leaks has done basically from kazakstan through. through right in through here . mr did your graffiti in between i realize i'm going to be you as much as i really are there and i thought i. pulled the kind of or. from two different countries where the police material has been have been published but they're only looking from the outside without actually having any particular

knowledge about it you get the impression that all these various. private u.s. institutions. have acted. from being pressured in one way or another by the u.s. government in order to block or flows of money in order that's not true that that is you know in the lizard's rate i mean that is that is absolutely not true. in my time in government. at no time did government tell any private company what to do. i mean there's been rumors there's been suggestions of that and to be honest there's been no. evidence by those who question this you know. it's with companies protect their own reputation it's not for the government to tell a company what it should or shouldn't do. they've taken actions because the. they may see it as as in their interest to do this or that with

a one hundred look at their fear for the same thing were to have been through for example the new york times if in your times you were all of a sudden they're. stopped from getting funds and they would have their offices closed i could hear you guys hating hypothetical and i can't follow your brain from harvard to go where they are in the exact same position as for example we could be near a time decides to publish everything that they get no i mean no but that there is a very sharp distinction here. i mean. you have two actors who are in the business of communicating with a broader public. one after made clear the new york times and other publications we are going to report on what we have you want to do it responsibly and we want to do it in a way that. is is is respectful. of

the danger that this might cause to specific individuals and the new york times voluntarily withheld certain documents and certain names because they recognized as we did that the publication of these documents of publication these days would put real life human beings at risk. i've got a quote for you. it's pretty tough to. say wait stop story. let's get this guy like you would smear that guy stead of working for the people most titian's the mainstream media for each other bribes digital. copy. of the dead rather.

i think. they would like to do the job did you know the price is the only industry specifically mentioned in the constitution and. that's because a free and open press is critical to our democracy albus. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and our trust of a girl we've been a hydrogen lying handful of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers once will just my job market and on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on in the world and we go beyond identifying the problem to try and rational debate and a real discussion critical issues facing us if i ever feel ready to join the movement then walk a little bit. about

. not. letting up.

your coach sent a very intrepid reporter down there to sleep overnight he spent thursday night in the park i did live to tell about it what was it like. it was a scary place i mean zuccotti park right now is it is it's own country part of your tough queensboro right in queens you're not afraid of this stuff you want down there what what's what is to the most about what was going on and just copy. what surprised me the most about what was going on there is that it's totally lawless you despise yourself and you try to look like

a protester were you going undercover you weren't advertising your posts right one on one i spoke to people i told him i was a post reporter so it's no secret that he received. well. some people who didn't really like that i was a poster of orders to be honest i'm very disturbed here though you write from your column from your article the threat of rape is very real here for men and women i just sleep at night i didn't see. it you could. see had so many characters i paint canvas she'll be from your post thank you so much thank you you thank .

well i think you know that. they are so like i said once you start the interview is closed the door isn't coming. it's out it's general assembly at the u.n. and we have. one coming from. the u.n. general assembly opens this week so there's. a lot of presidents and foreign ministers and stuff and some of them trip through here it really is that customary yeah yeah it's pretty typical in there in town with some of them invite themselves and some of them we invite to come over and meet with the. editorial writers and things. and how does it seem to work out. and rest in the pretty predictable that every once in a while one of the makes news but it's you know it's good to just give them

a chance to come over and hear their views yeah. you kind of makes you into an embassy or. they're the embassy of the new york times or a basically right. i think you know you may have discovered this yourself or a news organizations don't always get the kind of access they would like to officials in washington and if you want to go ask the military or the white house to respond to classified information. and you know. it can be difficult if you're if you're represented for foreign news organization i don't think that's a shame but it's just it's a reality so i think they felt. we would be in a better position to confront the administration with what we had and solicit some kind of reaction from them which could. turned out to be the case and your counterpart was that mainly you p.j.

crowley or some other people. over it you know this is. the first couple of meetings i think they went over and had them in person and they were representatives of the state department i guess assume the intelligence agencies were there i know the cia was represented. i'm not sure i just don't remember that the military was there. because at that point it was mostly nonmilitary matters. after that after the first couple of conversations they just had a daily phone call basically. they did it all you know there was none of this everybody gathered in a room it was they would say we really think you should hold back on this particular cable and here's why and then we would discuss and decide whether to withhold it or not. and many of the countries where we've been traveling and. talking to be the editors or politicians there has been

a concern that. these materials can have a destabilizing effect and that in a particular country when you consider. the consequences of a mission that we consider it yeah we talked about it a lot i mean yemen is a good example of that because the state department's argument was this this these could be destabilizing. but i kind of think it's not our job to decide what is destabilizing and or for that matter to preserve the stability of. countries elsewhere and if you feel that you would have acted differently had the material been of such character that it would have potentially be stabilized your country rather than. because you've mentioned it it's hard for me to imagine what that would be i mean if you had had an example or a few years ago you have to see that wireless what weren't those wired. having rights yes i mean can you explain how you reason at that point in time when you

didn't publish the materials for most of them or when i did publish the first one when you did didn't at first and then i when i didn't publish them. but the concern with it wasn't whether it would destabilize our government because certain was whether or not it would be of significant value to people who want to attack us. had been your choice. and if you were the sole owners of this material that you would not have published them the whole thing that oh. you know first of all because there are. you know. in the documents that we posted. we redacted many names of people whose would have been put in danger. we did have not. study all the documents to know how many more people might be put in danger to

just post the whole thing would be i think irresponsible and let's say with every dime to the names of those who would have been in danger and published it on your site would that be something which would be indicted will. probably not. but we had up we had cited how we were going to publish how we were going to have the material you know regardless of legal consequences just on journalistic grounds . you know we only wanted to publish we only wanted to do you need the room. yep. you need me or the group. oh well. i was going send you here and then i heard you were in here. i just have to say i'm glad you liked it oh yes it made the drudge report so i'm getting some so i'm getting a lot of traffic to prove it i drafted supporting my children but you know that you got a traffic you got the kind of traffic you necessarily what because a lot of

a lot of people who use the word scum bag. books it's a technical term anyway thank you. for talking about our favorite subject wiki leaks oh. this is arthur sulzberger was the publisher. pleasure. and. we're just going back to the writing life of my first. that was published this morning which is. a somewhat. half hearted defense of obama against. distant disenchanted liberals and you know what the drudge report is the drudge report is a web site. very conservative website. that has from the basic we aggregates headlines from all over the place but with a kind of right wing commentary attached it's got

a huge fall so if matt drudge is the guy runs this web site. find something that you've written puts it on his home page with a snarky comment. it drives traffic amazingly i mean driving traffic is nice but the traffic that he drives is mostly you know. you scumbag idiot but traffic just. looks. like you are surviving just to beat the muscle no. look at the bricks

through clear example that you see. on stuff that's got us kind of the side of. the law this is the significant of death for us he didn't let them assume that it was him but it was. different in the secret service. difficult modest effort indifferent to share of all the city for they just need a gun. or she gets up and. if they're both seven then down since that would be in the us there been a governor. though the first one he got to put us up is that come into it would have been able to cut the close of the little winnable with. this to feel good movement to put

a good look at this post but is there been other google that is the zick going to split with. him the seventh then lot of good things because of the some good at the .

well. science technology innovation all the list of elements from around russia we've got this huge you're covered. i've got a quote for you. it's pretty tough. if they were it's about story. but if this guy like me would smear about guys instead of working for the people oh titian's the mainstream media are working for each other right now i'm just vision by. the dead run it well.

we're. i think. over by the if you go did you know the price is the only industry specifically mentioning the constitution because it's hot that's because a free and open prize is critical to our democracy attract all books. i'm going to go i'm sorry and i'm a show we reveal the picture of what's actually going how i am on it we go beyond identifying to try to fix a rational debate a real discussion critical issues facing america have bought the book ready and join the movement then welcome aboard.