Skip to main content

tv   [untitled]    December 25, 2013 8:30pm-9:01pm EST

8:30 pm
about these things do you not think that it is an interesting question to see if media around the world will do this and who will and when i'm still working on thing that is an interesting question if you can interesting question no today are too scared to pull the us government's argument on not only what the rest of knowing or even if they say it is there are many other great tears that missoni what walk walk right what criteria are used the argument. interest newsworthiness no no no no no no you can write a script every news organization that has a website it has a website developer who can just go. like that and they get free hits in google. it is very very it is very very profitable to publish cables because you don't have to write cables it's free stories. the point as far as i see it is that. there are boundaries to free speech as
8:31 pm
in the same way as the boundaries to our thoughts into our language and. when you speak when used to speak it is basically words we are dealing with and these boundaries look differently in different countries but they are always exist in one way or another let's call them your sense of or conformism or self-censorship or whatever it may be and we have a very unique opportunity to actually just show where these boundaries are doesn't necessarily mean that these boundary is better than that boundary there remain as showing where i would ask your back pocket but the thing is that people usually are annoyed with people or if you are unaware of where the boundaries are the easiest way of getting a hold of them is by asking about it and it was a well i cannot write about the king kind of write about sex or whatever they are most often they like will not tell you that they are only about the most popular we
8:32 pm
say well we have no boundaries whatsoever yes and this is what you will get when you interview any journalist in the united kingdom or in brazil or in sweden to order it yet so what we have here is the tools in actually catching these boundaries if you push any organization they will have moneys enter into yes what i am what i write all of them including what i lied. existing home. oh you know you. can come with me which doesn't call me. what i'll stuff was yours for pretty. suspicious. from the guardian you got a paper that's been around nearly two hundred years. has completely sold it has for for its international trade it's at the forefront of digital innovation with doing
8:33 pm
something that is almost unique in times and there's no one else that looks kind. very much struck. to establish that you're talking to me for a film which is documented. we're going to do there's a story don't you see how we roll out. there this is not just me with all this is essentially your you don't agee you're right. yeah so here are some big surprise big audience we're going to. react to. the substantial. u.s. tables why did you go for example. next at.
8:34 pm
the u.s. don't. sit next to me carol in the mafia buffy universe. the one last. critics you think he was so why did you go with what but i have to say that many of the top developments up so i can't. speak more tonight i guess i don't know i'm guess. that. the the articles i have seen of the mound of being used extensively by people from. the former soviet rule. do not protect her attention. to the slightest trace looks good to her and so. says some of these people
8:35 pm
on the ground rich can send me millions on on five occasions. also because it's on their little cable bridge sit in on. the telly and if you've. already. told record me. souls' you. see. so this is a case of. now ok she can see if you will drop in. great britain you know what is the loophole and curtains of that company come soon . to jesus and we will see what company. it was that tesco just. two thousand case. in the proof was not something that. could happen here we can all do
8:36 pm
easy easy and. good time cost time to do. that so that the norbert and his company can see we are popping up. all the area they're extremely interested in. an hour ago here. on the creation of every day. i have to. find. some why. would you go you. got. to. get. hold. of a mocking them and it will become. one name remained which was you know roughly . it was the socket. for.
8:37 pm
your the fortune sorry go if you switch from a. russian. wife. was the subject of a. pro memory. we kind of grew pretty good in the series when we said we tropical. we were trying to play. while we. consult. a memory that said there are all of these and hope she will use them. among them in equal consideration. so. if your point is that couldn't. be more explicit and explaining. why we would do things and. some nature in general. were you first of all i. would go. if you people are going to try
8:38 pm
to not. we haven't so it was decided that. the new york times would approach going across the. set really with. two sets of communication with him and one is not the embassy in london a little. to see if you will we will do the very much because we need or is. a channel through to you. and the second channel was a little set up by the state. building of the agency's. primary aim was to just go. and who can use.
8:39 pm
that afternoon you probably have seen either in person or on the t.v. screens the. state partly feel that we just finished i won't repeat everything i said at the start they are but two of the. most significant response to what has happened is. exactly what secretary clinton is doing in a stall or kazakhstan as we speak you know she is there working constructively on cooperation and security in a very important part of the world clearly the release of the unauthorized release of these documents you know. represents risk to the united states and to others with whom we collaborate. in this this is why we condemn what wiki leaks has to basically from kazakstan. right in through here.
8:40 pm
mr did your grocery in between i realize i'm going to be you as much as i really are there and i thought i. pulled the kind of or. from two different countries where the illegal material has been have been published but they're only looking from the outside without actually having any particular knowledge about it you get the impression that all these various. private u.s. institutions. have acted. from being pressured in one way or another by the u.s. government in order to block or flows of money in order that's not true that that is you know in the lizard's rate i mean that is that is absolutely not true. in my time in government. at no time did government tell any private company what to do.
8:41 pm
i mean there's been rumors there's been suggestions of that and to be honest there's been no. evidence by those who question this you know it's what companies protect their own reputation it's not for the government to tell a company what it should or shouldn't do. they've taken actions because. they they see it as as in their interest to do this or that with a one hundred look at their fear for the same thing were to happen through for example in europe time if the new york times were all of a sudden they're. stopped from giving funds and they would out of their offices close down i could hear it because hating a hypothetical that i can't follow being from harvard to go where they are in the exact same position as for example reagan near a parent decides to publish everything that they get no i mean no but that there is a very sharp distinction here. i mean. you have two actors
8:42 pm
who are in the business of communicating with a broader public. one actor made clear the new york times and other publications we are going to report on what we have we want to do it responsibly and we want to do it in a way that. is is it's respectful of. the danger that this might cause to specific individuals and the new york times voluntarily withheld certain documents and certain names because they recognized as we did that the publication of these documents of publication these days to put real life human beings at risk.
8:43 pm
live . cross talk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want. one of the twenty fourteen olympics what's this place like why is is so special as the russian resort prepares to welcome the world power the games shaping the city's present and future life sochi will bring you this is
8:44 pm
a moment there we played you from a very cold snowy windy mountainous tough yet beyond the olympics but the. starting germ of the first on our team. but.
8:45 pm
your post sent a very intricate. porter down there to sleep overnight you spent thursday night in the socratic park i did live to tell about it what was it like. it was a scary place i mean zuccotti park right now is it is it's own country or the city
8:46 pm
you're tough queens right in queens you're not afraid of that stuff you want down there what what's what is to the most about what was going on in zuccotti park what surprised me the most about what was going on there is that it's totally lawless you despise yourself would you try to look like a protester were you going undercover worried you weren't advertising you were supposed to write one on one i spoke to people i told the man i was a post reporter there was no secret and had to be received. well. some people didn't really like that i was a poser of orders to be honest i don't very disturbing here though you write from your column from your article the threat of rape is very real here for men and women i just sleep at night i did it in several hundred. thirty media to be fair to say had so many characters i paint canvas g.o.p. from new york post thank you so much thank you thank you.
8:47 pm
thank. you. so like i said once you start the event is closed the deal is and. it's general assembly. land and we. really are. well coming up. it's the end of the u.n. general assembly opens this week so there's. a lot of presidents and foreign ministers and stuff and some of them trip through here to receive people here is that customer yeah yeah it's pretty typical in there in town with some of them
8:48 pm
invite themselves and some of them we invite to come over and meet with the editorial writers and things. and others that you usually work out. and most in them are pretty predictable but every once in a while one of the makes news but it's you know it's good to just give them a chance to come over and share their views that. we kind of makes you into an embassy or a for their the embassy of the new york times or a basically right. i think you know you may have discovered this yourself or a news organizations don't always get the kind of access they would like to officials in washington and if you want to go ask the military or the white house to respond to classified information. you know. it can be difficult if you're if you're a representative of a foreign news organization i don't think that's a shame but it's just it's
8:49 pm
a reality so i think they felt. we would be in a better position to confront the administration with what we had and solicit some kind of reaction from them which which turned out to be the case and your counterpart was that mainly year p.j. crowley or some other people. over it you know this is. the first couple of meetings i think they went over and had them in person and they were representatives of the state department ice assume the intelligence agencies were there i know the cia was represented. i'm not sure i just don't remember that the military was there. because at that point it was mostly nonmilitary matters. after that after the first couple of conversations they just had a daily phone call basically. they did it all you know there was none of this everybody gathered in a room that was that they would say we really think you should hold back on this
8:50 pm
particular cable. and here's why and then we would discuss and decide whether to withhold it or not. and many of the countries where we've been traveling and they're. talking to be the editors or politicians there has been a concern that. these materials can have a destabilizing effect and that in a particular country when you consider. the consequences of not publishing that we considered it yeah we talked about it a lot i mean yemen is a good example of that because the state department argument was this this could be destabilizing. but i kind of think it's not our job to decide what is destabilizing and or for that matter to preserve the stability of. countries elsewhere and if you feel that you would have acted differently had the material been of such character that it would have potentially destabilized your
8:51 pm
country rather than. you can imagine that it's hard for me to imagine what that would be i mean would you have to have an example or a few years ago yes see that wireless what weren't let's wire tapping right yes i mean can you explain how you reason at that point in time when you didn't publish the materials for helps them or when i did publish the first one when they did didn't at first and then i when i didn't publish them. but the concern with it wasn't whether it would destabilize our government because certainly was whether or not it would be of significant value to people who want to attack us. and it been. your choice. and if you were in the zone on there is of this material you would not have published. the whole thing that. you know first of all because there are. you know. in the documents that we posted.
8:52 pm
we redacted many names of people whose would have been put in danger. we did have not. studied all of the documents to know how many more people might be put in danger to just post the whole thing would be i think you're responsible and let's say with every dime that the names of those who would have been in danger and published it on your site would that be something which would be indicted will. probably not. but we had up we had cited how we were going to publish how we were going to have the material you know regardless of legal consequences just on journalistic grounds. you know we only wanted to publish we only wanted to do you need the room. yeah. you need me or the. oh well. i was dense and you hear
8:53 pm
a gram but then i heard you were in here but. i just had the highest pledge like that oh yes it made the drudge report so i'm getting some so i'm getting a lot of traffic and prove it i drafted this of course but you know they got a traffic you got the kind of traffic you necessarily what because a lot of a lot of people who use the word scumbag. but it's a technical term anyway thank you. well we're talking about our favorite subject wiki leaks oh are you this is are their souls were is the publisher are you. good. and you. were for i just never got back to the writing life for my first. it was published this morning which is. a somewhat. half hearted defense of obama against. distant disenchanted liberals and you know what the drudge report
8:54 pm
is the drudge report is a website. very conservative website. that has for the basically aggregates headlines from all over the place but with a kind of right wing commentary attached that it's got a huge fall so if matt drudge is the guy runs this web site. find something that you've written puts it on his home page with a snarky comment. it drives traffic amazingly i mean driving traffic is nice but the traffic he drives is mostly you know. you scumbag idiot but traffic is.
8:55 pm
going to book a slightly larger right just to be a muslim oh. look at the bricks through. example that you see. on stuff that's got us kind of the writer. for the letters is this significant a death threat he didn't let them assume that it was him of course. you are. different in secret the symbol. of a group modest effort indifferent to of all that he for they just need a gun. or she gets up and. in the us seven there announces according to the us the i'm a member. of
8:56 pm
the minute the personally talk to put i should come into it would enable us to cut the cost of. this distributed movement to put a good book it is possible to be another google it is music to discuss with. him the same delirium what good things because some going to take the.
8:57 pm
these locals been turned sour here braving the elements in order to stand up to u.s. oil giants chevron. this comes after a massive hunger strike that returned the world's attention to the place that some have dubbed the gulag of our times.
8:58 pm
is an undeclared global battlefield in which yemen is just one of the front lines. that is at. the beginning of the old take no most of the phases for island life. in the. enough temptation. the dog was lost for six months. there are more polar bears than people. and it's as easy to hire a rifle as a scooter. because the island is so in a special there are no indigenous people but there are those who do choose this frozen life. of this era as could be right about. if you are in the conductor.
8:59 pm
right from the sea. on the first trip to the sea and i would think the church. on a reformist twitter. and instagram. would be in the know. on.
9:00 pm
a child born today will grow up with no conception of privacy at all edward snowden then there was a christmas speech a warning that too much spying could damage the way the next generation of things that's still time for six point zero. for any strike is taken there must be near certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured while the white house. braises drug is trying to as a pain point out cures on to terrorist weapon also he lives has been stumbling number of civilian casualties be on the mind at times every day. and on those hard hit by a large exit leaves people there wondering whether the end justifies the means. i just couldn't sleep not so i could think both to get a good school run.

24 Views

info Stream Only

Uploaded by TV Archive on