do they do anything why would they work with these chemicals why would they not work with these kind of mold many of them for money yes and this needs to be said they do this for the money yeah but the i am why everybody has one thing oh no not a lover it's a why did you do this yeah this is the first day that i was talking about it and the man you are judging no no no no i deal with the ending this movie is charging that it's ok i'm just saying any should be we need to be concerned that we're not going around places saying we're better than you are because i've had this situation and i fucked off in years to there this is what i don't like seeing this is approaching the one where if you seem out of seeing that you you go to two people we're not going there as you start talking to them this earlier we can extend then when they have or this is a strong reaction you're like strong reaction when they said in one case the cables because they didn't know me going to the best place it was no no you have to know these who are you have you have quiet then you get

a slightly different opinion then you don't get that you only get the response they want to get supposed to show in the audience what they will say about these things do you not think that it is an interesting question to see if media around the world will do this and who will and when i'm still working on thing well that is an interesting question if it's an interesting question you know today or too scared to publish the way the government document in the morning was being written now or even if they say it is there are many other great tears witnesses tell you what walk walk or what criteria are used to of an. interest newsworthiness know now that you can write a script every news organization that has a website it has a website developer who can just go. like that and they get free hits in google. it is very very it is very very profitable to publish cables because you don't have to write cable. it's a pretty story. the point as far as i see it is that.

there are boundaries to free speech as in the same way as there are boundaries to our thoughts into our language and. when you speak when used to speak it is basically what we are dealing with and did these boundaries did look differently in different countries but they are always exist in one way or another that is color sensors or conformism or self-censorship or whatever it may be and we have a very unique opportunity to actually just show we are these boundaries are those necessarily mean that these boundary is better than that boundary they're really showing where i would ask your back boundary that there is but the thing is that people usually are annoyed with people or if you're unaware of where the boundaries are the easiest way of getting a hold of them is by asking about it and it was

a well i cannot write about the king or a kind of write about sex or whatever they are most often they were like well i'll tell you that there are only about most of you know we say well we have no boundaries whatsoever yes and this is what you will get when you interview any journalist in the united kingdom or in brazil or in sweden or order it yet so what we have here is the tools in actually catching these boundaries if you push any organization they will have monies and you're going to get qualified and why all of them including why not outside. just think. oh are you coming up. with discussing court. what you'll see it will be. suspicious. that the guardian you got

a paper that's been around nearly two hundred years. has completely sold the traditions of its international paper it's at the forefront of digital innovation with doing something that is almost unique in times and there's no one else that looks. very much. to establish that you're talking to me for a film which is documentary. we're going to do there's the story don't you see how we roll out. there this is not just me with all this is essentially your you don't agee you're right. yeah there are some big surprise off the gobby we're going to. react to. the substantial. u.s.

cables that why did you go for example as fixed to. the u.s. don't. sit there with an issue this week carol in the mafia but the guardian version. the one last. critics you didn't see what was so why did god tell you what i have to say other members of the got developments upsidedown who can speak more tonight i guess i mean you know i'm guess. that. the the articles i have seen book no longer being used extensively by people who hold. the former soviet rule. to protect her attention.

on the slightest place looks good on them so. some of these people on the ground rich can send me millions on all five cases. also we can fix on the cable bridge sit in on. the telly and if you. are ready. for record me. souls' you. see i was correct. so this is a case of more now ok she can see you will regret it in. great britain you know what is the little goal and curtains of the company can see . two g.'s and we will see her enough company.

it was a six and tesco just. the two thousand cut case. doesn't prove it was not something that. could happen here we go to easy easy and. good time cost time to do. that so that if the norbert misses company. we're a part. of the area they're extremely interested in. an hour ago we're. on the creation of every step. i have to. follow. but it was some options would be god. we've got. to. review. all the rage mocking them and it will become.

one name remained which was the name rough. it was the stop it. or. give the fortune sorry go is which you may get this rush. life. was the subject of a. crawl memory. we had kind of rubric getting serious when we said we tried to kill. we were trying to play. while we. were married that said you know it was an. option for you so. among them an equal consideration. so. if your point is that couldn't. be more explicit in explaining. why we would do things and. some neutral you.

were were you first of all i. got it right. if you actually believe them which i did not but. we heard so it was decided that. the new york times would approach government bryant the memorandum said we have. two sets of communication with your and one is not the embassy in london a little. to see if you will we will do the very much because we need or is. a channel through to you. and the second channel was a little set up but us that all the agencies. primary aim was to just go. and do you know use.

that afternoon you probably have seen either in person or on the t.v. screens the. state party thing that we just finished i won't repeat everything i said at the start they are but two of the. most significant response to what has happened is. exactly what secretary clinton is doing in a stall or kazakhstan as we speak you know she is there working constructively on cooperation and security in a very important part of the world clearly the release of the authorized release of these documents you know. represents risk to the united states and to others with whom we collaborate. this this is why we condemn what

wiki leaks has done basically from kazakstan. right in through here. most as you did your very free in between i realize i'm going to be you as much as i really are there and i thought i. pulled the kind of or. from two different countries where the police material has been have been published but they're only looking from the outside without actually having any particular knowledge about it you get the impression that all these various. private u.s. institutions. have acted. from being pressured in one way or another by the u.s. government in order to block or flows of money in order that's not true that that is you know in the list of three that is that is that is absolutely not true. in my

time in government. at no time did government tell any private company what to do. i mean there's been rumors there's been suggestions of that and to be honest there's been no. evidence by those who question this you know it's what companies protect their own reputation it's not for the government to tell a company what it should or shouldn't do. they've taken actions because the. they they see it as as in their interest to do this or that or the one who would give up after dinner for the same thing were to have been through for example the new york times if the new york times were all of a sudden. stopped from getting funds and they would have their offices closed down i get you to go skating a hypothetical but i can't follow your brain from harvard to go where they are in the exact same position as for example we could near a parent decides to publish everything that they get no i mean no but that there is

a very sharp distinction here. i mean. you have two actors who are in the business of communicating with a broader public. one after made clear the new york times and other publications we are going to report on what we have we want to do it responsibly and we want to do it in a way that. is is it respectful of. the danger that this might cause to specific individuals and the new york times voluntarily withheld certain documents and certain names because they recognized as we did that the publication of these documents of publication these days would put real life human beings at risk.

unexplored and talk to go what is it in this icy expanse that attracts the people who come here. but you know now i only go to the duchesse. and antarctica. a new generation of polar explorers is coming. lists here now all of them are young women how are they going to get along with each other i don't know. who. i used to be a bureaucrat. seriously. what adventures await in this mysterious way. where they live what to eat and want to be actually doing it and talk to. so much more of the twenty fourteen olympics what's this place like and why is this

so special as the russian resort prepares to local the world power the games should be the city's present and future of what sochi will bring you this is the moment everybody from a very cold snowy windy mountain is still beyond the olympics what to say. the fifty's the. economic ups and downs in the final months day the london deal sank i and the rest because i meet a kill babies every week call me. just

. but.

i think. your coach sent a very intrepid reporter down there to sleep overnight he spent thursday night in the chicago park i did live to tell about it what was it like. it was a scary place i mean zuccotti park right now is it is it's own country person you're tough queensboro right in queens you're not afraid of the stuff you want to down there what what's up what is you the most about what was going on it's a party. what surprised me the most about what was going on there is that it's totally lawless you despise yourself and you try to look like a protester are you going undercover were you weren't advertising you must post

right one on one i spoke to people i told him i was a post reporter so it was no secret and it had to be received. well by. some people who didn't really like that i was a poser borders to be honest i'm very disturbed here though you write from your column from your article the threat of rape is very real here for men and women i just sleep at night i did it and see. if you could do to me. so you had so many hats as i. can see all the from your post thank you so much thank you thank you.

i you know that. i would also like i said once you start the interview is closed until it isn't. it's out it's general assembly at the u.n. and we had. one coming from. the un general assembly opens this week so there's. a lot of presidents and foreign ministers and stuff and some of them trip through here to people is that customary yeah yeah it's pretty typical in there in town with some of them invite themselves and some of them we invite to come over and meet with the. editorial writers and things. and how does it seem to work out. and rest in the pretty predictable that every once in a while one of the next news but it's you know it's good to just give them

a chance to come over and hear their views that. kind of makes you into an embassy or. they're the embassy of the new york times or a basically a right. i think you know you may have discovered this yourself or a news organizations don't always get the kind of access they would like to officials in washington and if you want to go ask the military or the white house to to respond. asked if i had information. you know. it can be difficult if you're if you're a representative of a foreign news organization i don't think that's a shame but it's just it's a reality so i think they felt. we would be in a better position to confront the administration with what we had and solicit some kind of reaction from them which which turned out to be the case and your counterpart was that mainly year p.j. crowley or some other people. over it you know this is. the

first couple meetings i think they went over and had them in person and they were representatives of the state department is assume the intelligence agencies were there i know the cia was represented. i'm not sure i just don't remember that the military was there. because at that point it was mostly nonmilitary matters. after that after the first couple of conversations they just had a daily phone call basically. they did it all you know there was none of this everybody gathered in a room it was they would say we really think you should hold back on this particular cable and here's why and then we would discuss and decide whether to withhold it or not. many of the countries where we've been traveling and they're. talking to be the editors of politicians there has been a concern that. these materials can have a destabilizing effect and that in

a particular country when you consider. the consequences of not publishing that we considered it yeah we talked about it a lot i mean yemen is a good example of that because the state department's argument was this this these could be destabilizing. but i kind of think it's not our job to decide what is destabilizing and do. or for that matter to preserve the stability of. countries elsewhere but do you feel that you would have acted differently had the material been of such character that it would have potentially destabilized your country rather than. this you've mentioned it it's hard for me to imagine what that would be i mean you had to have an example or a few years ago yes see that wireless what weren't let's wire tapping right yes i mean can you explain how you reasoned at that point in time when you didn't publish

the material for helps them or when i did publish the first one when you did didn't at first and then i would i didn't publish them. but the concern with it wasn't whether it would destabilize our government because certain was whether or not it would be of significant value to people who want to attack us. had been your choice. and if you were in the so on there is of this material that you would not have published the whole thing that oh. you know first of all because there are. you know. in the documents that we posted. we redacted many names of people whose would have been put in danger. we have not. studied all the documents to know how many more people might be put in danger to just post the whole thing would be i think irresponsible and let's say with every

dime that the names of those who would have been in danger and published it all on your side would that be something which would be indicted will. probably not. but we had up we had cited how we were going to publish how we were going to have the material you know regardless of legal consequences just on journalistic grounds . you know we only wanted to publish. really want to do you need the room. yeah. you need me or the group. oh well. i was dense and you hear him but then i heard you were in here. i was at the house i'm glad you liked it oh yes it made the drudge report so i'm getting some so i'm getting a lot of traffic to prove it on traffic to supporting my job but now that you've got a traffic you've got the kind of traffic you necessarily what because of a lot of a lot of people who use the word scumbag. it's

a technical term yeah they would think you. were talking about our favorite subject wiki leaks oh. this is are their souls vs the publisher you. know and. were for i'd just go back to the writing life of my first. it was published this morning which is. a somewhat. half hearted defense of obama against. distant disenchanted liberals and you know what the drudge report is the drudge report is a website. very conservative website. that has for the basically aggregates headlines from all over the place but with a kind of right wing commentary attached that it's got a huge fall so if matt drudge is the guy runs this web site.

find something that you've written puts it on his home page with a snarky comment. it drives traffic amazingly i mean driving traffic is nice but the traffic that he drives is mostly you know. you scumbag idiot but traffic. from google groups like you are surviving just to be a muslim or. look at the bricks through prayer to him for when you see.

nothing else that's got us kind of the side of. the law this is the significance of the death threat he didn't let them assume that it was similar forces. are different in secret the symbol. of a group modest effort indifferent to their father he for they just need a gun. or she gets up and. if the both given their announced that would be the was never ever. all. that good though the first really got to put us up is that come into it would have been able to cut the close of the gig a little winnable with. this to feel good movement about it but look at this

possible is there been other google that is music to dismiss the. kinda sentiment then what good things because i'm not some good at that.

do we speak your language as anybody will not advance the. news programs and documentaries in spanish what matters to you breaking news a little turn into bangles keaton's stories. you hear. detroit altie spanish find out more visit i to allahabad tito's comb. the beginning of the long cultic night moxon the fateful island life. in sanaa enough temptations. to darkness last for six months.

there are more polar bears than people. and it's as easy to hire a rifle as a scooter. because the island is so in a special there are no indigenous people but there are others who do choose this frozen life. this is this could be right and. if you are. he survived war atrocities. to make a final decision. he has changed his life and the world around him. by giving up. hope. and love to so many children.

nikolai the miracle worker on ati. turkish police fired tear gas and rubber bullets in east on bold dispersing protesters angry with a high level corruption scandal scandal and demanding the government's resignation . right to spy a new york judge says. it is illegal for the n.s.a. to gather drone phone data and bald the verdict contradicts the ruling in a different case which found it surveillance to be unconstitutional. the year winds down we look back at some of the most significant stories of two thousand and thirteen among them the force feeding of hunger striking detainees in guantanamo protesting against indefinite detention.