you have cuomo then you get a slightly different opinion then you don't get that you only get the response they want to get as opposed to show in the audience what they will say about these things do you not think that it is an interesting question to see if media around the world will do this and who will and when i'm still working on thing well that is an interesting question if you can interesting question no two they are too scared to pull the us government's argument in the morning with the resume no more even if they say it is there are many other great tears that missoni what walk walk or what criteria are used to of an. interest newsworthiness know now that you can write a script every news organization that has a website it has a website developer who can just go. like that and they get free hits in google. it is very very it is very very profitable to publish cables because you don't have to write cables it's free stories. the point as far as i see it

is there. there are boundaries to free speech as in the same way as the boundaries to our thoughts and to our language and. the newspaper in use to speak is basically what we are dealing with and these boundaries that look differently in different countries but they are always exist in one way or another let's call them your sense of or compromising or self-censorship or whatever it may be and we have a very unique opportunity to actually just show we're these boundaries are doesn't necessarily mean that these boundary is better than that boundary they're really showing where i would ask your back buddy that there is but the thing is that people usually are annoyed with people or if you're unaware of where the boundaries are the easiest way of getting a hold of them is by asking

a person and they will say well i cannot write about the king or kind of write about sex or whatever they are most often they like well i'll tell you that there are only about most of you know we say well we have no boundaries whatsoever yes and this is what you will get when you interview any journalist in the united kingdom or in brazil or in sweden or order it yet so what we have here is the tools in actually catching these boundaries if you push any identification they'll have moneys entering into yes what are right and what i owe anybody what other side. existing home. oh you know you. can come with me we discuss in court. what you'll see it's all pretty. suspicious. from the guardian you've got

a paper that's been around nearly two hundred years. has completely sold it has for sure it's international trade it's at the forefront of digital innovation with doing something that is almost unique in times and there's no one else that looks. very much struck with that. that's just average that you're talking to me for a film. which is documented. we're going to do there's the story don't you see how we roll out. there so this is not just me with all this is essentially your you don't agee you're right. yeah so here are some big surprise off the gabi we're going to. react to. the substantial. u.s.

tables why did you go for example. that star shaped. the u.s. don't. say nation to me carol when the mafia buck the guy you. want to watch. if you didn't see what was so why did you go with what i say other members of the got development stuff so i can't. speak more tonight i guess i don't know i'm guess . that. the mother calls i have been called the mound of been used extensively by people called. home soviet rule. to protect her attention.

to the slightest trace looks good on them so. some of these people on good rich can send me millions on on five occasions. also because it's on their little cable bridge sit in on. television. all ready. well record me souls you. see. so so this is a case of more now attention and you will regret. it very great britain you know what is good to see the little good ole boy and good riddance of the company sued. to jesus and we will see what company. he did with that test just. two thousand

case. doesn't prove it's not something that. could happen. to you easily and. been taken close counted. to ten so that the norbert and his company can see we are popping up. all the area they were extremely interested in. an hour ago here. on the creation of every state. i have to. find. but why. would they go you. got. to. be. all. over the age mocking them and it will come. one day remind me was the

name rough. it was the socket. for. divorce and sorry if you switch from a. russian. wife. was the subject of a. troll memory. we kind of group it wouldn't. serious what we sit here we try to level we're trying to play. while we. can so. that you're a memory that says you know this is an. option for you so. among them an equal consideration. so. if your point is that couldn't. be more explicit and explaining. why we do things and. some nature in general you know.

were you first of all i. agree. if you actually believe in which it is not. we haven't so it was decided that. the new york times would approach government product of the movement and said we have. two sets of communication with him and one is not the embassy in london a little. to see if you will we will do the very much because we need or is. a channel through to you. and the second channel was a little set up but is that up until the agency's. run rate aim was to do just go. up and who can use.

that afternoon you probably have seen either in person or on the t.v. screen is the. state party thing that we just finished i won't repeat everything i said at the start they are but for the. most significant response to what has happened is exactly what secretary clinton is doing in a stall or kazakhstan as we speak you know she is there working constructively on cooperation and security in a very important part of the world clearly the release of the authorized release of these documents you know. represents risk to the united states and to others with whom we collaborate. in this this is why we condemn what

wiki leaks has taught basically from kazakstan. right through here. most of the geography in between i realize i'm going to be you as much as i really are there and i got out of there we. pulled the kind of. from two different countries where the police material has been have been published but they're only looking from the outside without actually having any particular knowledge about it you get the impression that all these various. private u.s. institutions. have acted. from being pressured them one way or another by the u.s. government in order to block or flows of money in order that's not true that is you know in this there are three times that is that is absolutely not true. in my time

in government. at no time did government tell any private company what to do. i mean there's been rumors there's been suggestions of that and to be honest there's been no real. evidence by those who question this you know it's with companies protect their own reputation it's not for the government to tell a company what it should or shouldn't do. you know they've taken actions because they they they see it as as in their interest to do this or that with a one hundred look at their dinner for the same thing were to have been through for example the new york times if in europe times were all of a sudden. stopped from giving funds and they without their offices closed i could you do it because hating a hypothetical that i can't follow being from harvard to go where they are in the exact same position as for example recruiting near a parent decides to publish everything that they get no i mean no but that there is

a very sharp distinction here. i mean. you have two actors who are in the business of communicating with a broader public. one actor made clear the new york times and other publications we are going to report on what we have we want to do it responsibly and we want to do it in a way that. is is it respectful of. the danger that this might cause to specific individuals and the new york times voluntarily withheld certain documents and certain names because they recognized as we did that the publication of these documents of publication these days would put real life human beings at risk.

berland social science center just published a study suggesting that two thirds of muslims in western europe hold their religious roles of all the laws of the countries that believe that if you read the bible if you get if you go into christianity you find the sentence that you should obey god more than caesar. that means religious schools more important and higher and more convincing those of the students of the very same thing that is now referred to the muslims. he survived war atrocities. to make a final decision. has changed his life and the world

around him. by giving up. hope. and love to so many children. nikolai the american worker on ati. the beginning of the loan of techno moxley fades from island life. in sin now and up temptation. the darkness last for six months. more polar bears than people. and it's as easy to hire a rifle as a scooter. because the island is so in a special for a new indigenous people but there are all those things. to choose desperation like

. this is where i could be right about if you're lucky.

your post sent a very intrepid reporter down there to sleep overnight you spent thursday night in the chicago park i did live to tell about it what was it like it it was a scary place i mean zuccotti park right now is it is it's own country part of your top queens girl right. in queens you're not afraid of that stuff you went down

there what what's what is to the most about what was going on in zuccotti park what surprised me the most about what was going on there is that it's totally lawless you despise yourself and you try to look like a protester are you going undercover worried you were in advertising you were supposed to write one on one i spoke to people i told him i was a post reporter there was no secret and had to be received. well. some people didn't really like that i was a poser of orders to be honest i don't very disturbing here though you write from your column from your article the threat of rape is very real here for men and women i just sleep at night i did it and see. if you could see maybe to be fair to say i had too many characters i paint canvas she'll be from your post thank you so much thank you thank you.

i you know that. you know i'm also like i said once she's studying to be is closed the doors and. it's general assembly at the u.n. and we had. one coming to. the u.n. general assembly opens this week so there's. a lot of presidents and foreign ministers and stuff and some of them trip through here it really is the customer yeah yeah it's pretty good. but only when they're in town with some of them invite themselves

and some of them we invite to come over and meet with the editorial writers and things. and others that you usually work out. and roasting them are pretty predictable but every once in a while one of the makes news but it's you know it's good to just give them a chance to come over and hear their views yeah. we kind of makes you into an embassy or. they're the embassy of the new york times or a basically right. and i think you know you may have discovered this yourself foreign news organizations don't always get the kind of access they would like to officials in washington and if you want to go ask the military or the white house to respond to classified information. you know. it can be difficult if you're if you're a representative of a foreign news organization i don't think that's a shame but it's just it's a reality so i think they felt. we would be in

a better position to confront the administration with what we had and solicit some kind of reaction from them which which turned out to be the case and your counterpart was that mainly year p.j. crowley or some other people. over it you know this is. the first couple of meetings i think they went over and had them in person and there were representatives of the state department is assume the intelligence agencies were there i know the cia was represented. i'm not sure i just don't remember the military was there. because at that point it was mostly nonmilitary matters. after that after the first couple of conversations they just had a daily phone call basically. they did it all you know there was none of this everybody gathered in a room it was that they would say we really think you should hold back on this pretty. killer cable and here's why and then we would discuss and decide whether to

withhold it or not. in many of the countries where we have been traveling and. talking to be the editors or politicians there has been a concern that. these materials can have a destabilizing effect and that in a particular country when you consider. the consequences of not publishing that we considered it yeah we talked about it a lot i mean yemen is a good example of that because the state department's argument was this this these could be destabilizing. but i kind of think it's not our job to decide what is destabilizing and or for that matter to preserve the stability of. countries elsewhere but do you feel that you would have acted differently had the material been of such character that it would have potentially destabilized your country rather than. this you've mentioned it it's hard for me to

imagine what that would be i mean would you have had an example or a few years ago yes see that wireless what weren't let's wire tapping right yes and if you can explain how you reasoned at that point in time when you didn't publish the material for most of them or when i did publish the first one when you did didn't at first and then i did when i didn't publish them. but the concern with it wasn't whether it would destabilize our government because certainly was whether or not it would be of significant value to people who want to attack us. had it been your choice. and if you were in the so on there is of this material that you would not have published them the whole thing that oh. you know first of all because there are. you know a. in the documents that we posted. we redacted many names of

people whose would have been put in danger. we did have not. studied all of the documents to know how many more people might be put in danger to just post the whole thing would be i think irresponsible. let's say you would every dime to the names of those who would have been in danger and published it on your site would that be something which would be indicted will. probably not. but we had up we had cited how we were going to publish how we're going to have the material you know regardless of legal consequences just on journalistic grounds. you know we only want to publish we only want to do you need the room. yep. you need me or the rip. off. i was then sent you here but then i heard you were in here. house the house i'm glad you liked it oh

yes it made the drudge report so i'm getting some so we're getting a lot of traffic and prove it on traffic it's of course very much so but you know they've got a traffic you've got the kind of traffic you necessarily what because a lot of a lot of people who use the word scum bag. books it's a technical term they would think you. were talking about our favorite subject wiki leaks oh. this is arthur sulzberger was the publisher you. know and. we're just you know going back to the writing life for my first op that was published this morning which is. a somewhat. half hearted defense of obama against. distant disenchanted liberals and you know what the drudge report is the drudge

report is a website. very conservative website. that has for that basically aggregates headlines from all over the place but with a kind of right wing commentary attached that it's got a huge fall so if matt drudge is the guy runs this web site. find something that you've written puts it on his home page with a snarky comment. it drives traffic amazingly i mean driving traffic is nice but the traffic that he drives is mostly you know. you scumbag idiot but traffic is.

rupert's like you are surviving just to be a muslim or. look at the groups to recruit them for what you see. on stuff that's got us kind of the writer. or the love this is the significant of death for us he didn't let them see him with him but of course it. is. different in the deceiver the symbol. of a group modest effort indifferent to their father he for they just need a gun. or she gets up and. if the us sitting there announces what we're doing is we're going to be i'm a member. of

the let the personally attack to put i felt is that come into it would enable us to cut the course of. this to simply look at the movement to put a good book it is possible to be another google it is music to discuss with. him the seven delirium what good things because some going to take the.

unexplored antarctica what is it in this icy expanse that attracts the people who come here. yes the form of what you know now i only go to the duchess. and enter into. a new generation of polar explorers is coming. yes we have a new group of specialists here now all of them are young you know how are they going to get along with each other and i don't know. of a. book i used to be

a bureaucrat. from seriously. what adventures await in this mysterious land where they live what do they eat and what are they actually doing in antarctica. when the approximately sixteen percent of means you imports came from illegal fishing. the european union is ironically taking fish from some of the poorest nations on earth so this is a very serious and very urgent problem that needs immediate international action. on the. waters if they fish they load the fish into the ships and leave for. illegal fishing just taking the bread out of our mouths.

wealthy british style. markets. find out what's really happening to the global economy for a no holds barred look at the global financial headlines to name two kinds of reports. i.

breaking news on r t it's now thought a terror attack in the russian city of volgograd was in fact carried out by a man fifteen were killed by a suicide bomber targeting the city's main railway station. it's ten pm in moscow you're watching archie international with me and he said no way let's get straight to our breaking news this hour it's now thought that a man and a woman carried out a suicide bomb attack in the southern russian city of volgograd it's been confirmed fifteen people were killed in the attack which targeted the.