follow me on twitter at liz that wall will be back here at eight pm. it's technology innovation all the developments around russia. that's huge you're covered. lisa.

hello and welcome to all things considered on people the interim agreement with iran is now in effect what are its prospects are all sides honestly committed to resolving the whole spectrum of issues that have separated washington around for decades can't israel and its congressional allies specifically the senate kill the deal and if for some miraculous reason all sides agree to keep to the agreement what can we expect next. to cross the interim agreement with iran i'm joined by my guest richard whites in washington he is a senior fellow and director of the center for political military analysis at the hudson institute and in new york we cross to urban abrahamian he is an author and a distinguished professor of history at the city university of new york all right gentlemen cross talk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it richard if i go to you first the interim agreement with the international community in iran is in effect of this week here there was

a lot of discussion coming out of the u.s. senate and we're there obviously lobbyist groups in washington that we're putting casting aspersions that say on the interim agreement but it's in effect and the i.a.e.a. is said already that iran is committed to this it's already done what it's what most of what it's committed to do in the initial phases how do you see this panning out. i think that the interim agreement well probably be implemented as specified all the parties have an incentive to do that. he does not appear to be any development that we four see that would cause the process to be disrupted there's of course always as we know in the whole history of this negotiation there are always and still are a developments that can cause complications like the syria geneva talks but i think it's because there will be implemented the big challenge is whether the parties will be able to take advantage of the interim agreement and transform it into

a more enduring settlement and there i'm less optimistic pretty optimistic about the interim agreement and not very optimistic about the region a comprehensive deal ok event if i go to you in new york county you see this because it leaves at this point both sides iran in the international community with under this interim agreement seem committed what's the stumbling blocks going down as we go forward with the six month period so it's going to be smooth sailing or are they going to be elements on both sides that want to derail this. i'm actually more optimistic than richard i think boat parked his boat the rouhani administration the bush and obama administration are actually determined to settle the nuclear issue is part of going to be their legacy of their administrations so they have their eyes fixed the fixed on the prize of getting this nuclear issue is

resolved so they will go all the way they can to get it so there will be opposition from both sides the iranian right wing will often obviously object but i think they're marginalize they'll be obviously some opposition in congress but they'll be mostly grandstanding i think when it comes to the crunch most of the democratic congressman will not dare to read to go against their own democratic president and i call it the views of israel about this i think on the whole because they were the obama administration is very determined to get this through they will get it through richard i read your piece on the in these talks in the interim agreement i find it really quite fascinating and i must admit you went into a lot of technical details is it really more political will on both sides unless the technical issues or do you find them more germane and again it gets down to what the west perceives as transparency coming out of to iran. well i think

that the the technical details are important because they downed on the political dialogue and vice versa if there are political complications it's going to be more spin and see demand in the technical i mean there are just some key issues that are need to be resolved and there's no easy answer to them i mean how much and richmond if any and probably be some can iran conduct what kind of verification how extensive the korean seem to be and so on and i concur with your previous speaker that they bomb ministration on the ministration would like to achieve an agreement but the problem is i think they still in vision in a different and stayed there and we also have to deal with all the other parties we saw the french proved. basically i was he's trying disruptive that's really the

wrong term but basically they they complicated the initial negotiations because of some concern about the one the plutonium reactor rack and i could see that happening in other cases with the british the french and others objecting to certain features so it's at least multiple i don't got here with a very complicated richard if i can say with you i mean that you bring up really good points there in but you think that they will be brought up because you're absolutely right if you go on both sides if you want to find a reason not to talk and not to agree both sides have a whole panoply of things that they can throw out there do you think that's going to happen. well if they don't others will so the if there's no discussion about for example the iraq reactor which the west wants to be discontinued because it can be used to make bombs directly it's plutonium producing reactor whereas the iranian ministration

says they see this as an essential component in their nuclear structure and if there's even that's really a fundamental disagreement and so if they do they have to has to be addressed somewhere in the comprehensive agreement and if the even if the u.s. and the iranians which i don't believe would cry and keep it out other parties will try and bring it in either those at the negotiating table or outside commentators senators and so on but if i go back to you in new york one of the interesting things and it's a big picture thing that i think a lot of people don't really focus in on the united states and iran are actually speaking to each other again after so many decades i mean can you see that the process of negotiating can actually start lowering these tensions here they're not going to find complete agreement on everything we both know that all three of us know about but the very fact that they're negotiating is that have an extra effect on these talks here. yes and i think i mean we should keep an eye

it's really between iran and united states the others are a basically a side issue a show you can bring in saudi arabia the gulf states and so on but they're not crucial to the negotiations as long as u.s. and iran are willing to can negotiate and come to an agreement the others can make noises and i think in fact the french could call west cause problems but the british and germans are of course the russians and the chinese are more than eager to get some sort of agreement i think those technical issues again are minor and once there is the sation their determination to come to a. agreement then those technical issues could be aren't so i don't think the plutonium issue is really serious because even that plan doesn't actually produce could to produce weaponized or weaponized saying you raney and it's more to do

would have to go through another process which iran doesn't yet have so are these things there i think the issues that could be complicate the issue is only if you want to. sabotage the negotiations and both sides at the moment are more than eager to actually come to an agreement richard it seems that i'm again going back to the paper you wrote which was quite fascinating is it at the end of the day is the west going to allow. iran to enrich uranium i mean under the nonproliferation treaty it has that right to do that but this seems to be really the crux of it no one you know we're going to go through the next six months is that question going to be addressed because obviously the iranians will say they have the right to do it and they will walk away most likely from the negotiating table if they're denied it. i think what you're going to see is the west will not explicitly acknowledge that iran has the right to enrich their name or am i mean the n.p.t.

and other agreements they don't say you have a right they don't say you don't have a right they don't it's just not something that's it's not described in those terms . but iran has the capacity to enrich uranium and it's not clear how you can get them to dismantle that. difference is the is going to be really about the scale and that's where the technicalities come in the geneva agreement says that they be they're going to agree on a what kind of richmond can occur in accord with iran's practical means and at the moment it doesn't need any enriched uranium because it only has one nuclear reactor and the russians have a very helpfully range deliver that fuel and then take it back so it can't be used to make it turn to bomb and so the west might say well you can have you know do have some enrich uranium for you know if you need it just in case there's an interruption supplies or so on the iranians say well we've got all these plans we

want to build you know ten reactors next decade and do all this and that's what we need to have a very extensive. program and then that's where the problem is going to be they have different visions of the end state of where rand will be and what's capable of what's permissible. since as you know we had said a bit it's obvious that if you have a very comprehensive richmond capacity very extensive civilian commercial nuclear industry that is not too difficult to use to start producing the material you need for a nuclear weapon the fissile material in there enrich uranium to a very higher state and one renaissance so far or separated plutonium. which is what the arioch reactor might present as a problem all right gentlemen i'm going to jump in here we're going to go to a short break and after that show break we'll continue our discussion on the iran state authority. they are legal. purposes or.

are led. i'm the president and a society that i'm big corporation kind of can. do i'm the banker i get all that money all about money and i'm fascinated that for a politician writing the laws and regulations that. somehow. there's just too much. today's society. that. sublunary a problem very hard to take a look at. a long letter back with governor rick

perry a little. slow i'm. slowly pulling. the plug. plug suburban. we welcome aaron nathan to. work. it's going to give you a different perspective. never i'll give you the information you make the decision . breaking the work of the mind it's

a revolution of ideas and consciousness. extremely. would be described as angry i think in a strong. under single. time as a new alert and. scare me a little. there is breaking news tonight and we are continuing to follow the breaking news. alexander's family cry tears of joy and a great thing that has the ever read in a court of law found. there's a story. playing out in real life. welcome

back to cross talk we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing the interim agreement with iran. ok i'm going to go back to you in new york in the first part of the program we ended on talking about iran's rights and and i think that this is you know this is the crux of the matter here whatever demands and needs they have for nuclear energy is anyone's guess. but at the end of the day they have they believe they have the right to have that kind of energy capacity and this is what it is it's going to get down to i mean we have intelligence report after another one after another there is no intentionality to build a bomb i mean lots of intelligence communities say but for domestic consumption for

political reasons at home ran can't give that up they just simply can't. well i mean my understanding of the project preparation treaty is that once you saw and you have the right to actually do some enrichment not to the point of actually weaponized thing and when iran says it has the right to enrich that's what they're arguing and that's doesn't contradict the obama administration if you obama has constantly said that he has no objection to iran having a nuclear program he objects to any nuclear program that would become a nuclear weapons program so that's where i think there is good grounds for having a settlement how much enrichment can be done at what level these are i think tactical issues that could be settled once both sides are actually willing to come to an agreement and you know years ago juran was willing to come to sort of

settlement it was the bush administration that vetoed it and the same peapod now at the two year making decisions in iran rouhani are in fact arguing the same thing they did two years ago and the u.s. position has changed and u.s. is now willing to actually come to an agreement richard is this a window of opportunity because we do have a new administration in iran and i think it's already been mentioned on this program that obama would like some kind of foreign policy achievement in its second term because he didn't do too well to date so far you know how does this play into it because a lot of that you know when you think about ten years ago when all of the sanctions started coming on there was no enrichment now there's a lot of enrichment going on in iran and now we're at the table is this an opportunity in your mind. it may be an opportunity we're still i mean we're still i think that the administration if this thing is it could be and so we're going to try and see if we can make this into an opportunity it's

still a bit uncertain i mean there are some uncertainty over for example how much power president and his team has versus the. frame leader and if there's going to be a difference in the revolutionary guards and and so on. and so i also would not accept without a little challenge to your earlier statement about there is no evidence that iran has any intention to seek a nuclear weapon and there's there's evidence that some rain ians in the past at least ok thought about that ok fair enough and there are enough. room in the right in the future you could see some new iranians think about that that's the problem ok ok i agree before two thousand and two there is evidence that yes there were thinking about it. even if i go back to you in new york i want to look at some of the other players here because it was the senate it looked like it was you know in revolt here when a number of us senators were backing a bill that could impose more sanctions here i mean it's this is extremely

unhelpful to an administration it's trying to do something big and very different than and i think we all would agree for the agreement a permanent agreement came into play it would be good for the united states would be good for the world and be good for the average iranian as well but what about these other players here are they going to keep a low for the next few months are we going to see more trouble. well there i think there are people obviously very much who reflect the israeli point of view and they're going to continue objecting but when it comes to the crunch that it's hard for them to the stand up against the u.s. president president who says this is in the u.s. interest to do this continent agreement and to and then to argue no it's not it's in israel's interests not to have an agreement at the american public is not going to accept that i think the the most congressman realize that they might make noises but they are contrary to sabotage this thing and you have to keep in mind another

issue is that if the u.s. president agrees to a deal which iran excepts and the senate that says says no what does the rest of the wall going to do is the rest of the world going to listen to the senators are they going to listen to the u.s. president i think the whole sanctions system will unravel if there is an agreement and even if the senate doesn't approve of it it's interesting richard the unraveling of sanctions in any you know in there's so many different ways you can look at disney's negotiations of course iran would like to see the end of those saying sions and there are those voices in washington that say once you start going down that path it's a slippery slope once you are start undoing saying sions it turns into a self-fulfilling prophecy. i agree with that we've already see same some of the sanctions begin to unravel we know there's these rumors about this russian iran deal the chinese appear to be more interested i mean what has happened

last five or six years under both the bush administration that the treasury and state department go around intel or countries you've got to stop doing that their brand if you do you want access to the us financial system and so on and it's been very effective and the momentum has been driving to tighter and tighter sanctions now i think that's reverse and i agree with it with our colleague that if if there was a deal announced in the senate blocked it that would just encourage further countries to to end their sanctions so you're going to see sanctions relief and i think that's something though it has one minor positive fact in that the there's been some discussion about whether if we reach a deal the senate will really approve the you know with roy ending of sanctions by the u.s. and so on i think that the iranian shouldn't be thinking that they should be thinking about how useful it would be if they could come to an agreement to limit their nuclear program and not have the u.s. treasury in the state department go around all these countries and say don't deal

with iran or just not to stay home because i think that will give them a lot more benefit than they can ever realistically hope to get from dealing with the u.s. economically in new york how can this change the region this is this is big stuff i mean i'm i look at your face look at richard face we're all children of the cold war and you know we've been living with this very difficult relationship with the run for decades now this is a real window of opportunity how could it change the region and i'm thinking about israel and i'm thinking of saudi arabia i we've mentioned them before but they do not like this idea and they're going to push and they will continue to push. yes i don't i mean i think the nuclear issue is the most important issue because it's so dangerous and you know it could do to these lead to a u.s. iran war but if it's resolved it doesn't mean that basically the whole scene is going to change there will be still a lot of friction between the u.s.

and iran their historical reasons for it their course u.s. run line says in the region so it's not going to be a brave new world just because the nuclear issue is resolved but i think the nuclear issue is so important that it should be resolved before other issues are even addressed so i don't i don't see is somehow a return to the good old days of the shah being pals you would whoever is in the white house those days are gone but the nuclear issue is such a dangerous and it's in the interests of both to us and iran to the road need to resolve that richard doesn't it if they were determined position of milan ministration go ahead richard jump in go ahead yeah it is if there's been a bomb inspirational they phrase it a little differently it's that that if you can't trust iran to agree to comply with its nuclear obligations you can't really trust them for anything syria afghanistan

ever and so therefore we have to settle the nuclear issue before we can achieve extensive cooperation with other areas although i think you're going to see a little de facto cooperation maybe in afghanistan and well i'm glad i'm glad you brought it up richard because we're running out of time richard i want to stay with you what's your reaction to the united states having the united nations disinvited round to the talks and on syria in geneva i mean this is getting to what you're saying trust well. go ahead right and it's not i mean the way that it's come out of the u.n. is the iranians said they would agree to do something and then they didn't and that's why they're being disinvited i mean u.s. pressure played a part i have to think there was just some miscommunication. somewhere along the line either president general don thought the bomb a stray from was going to be the one thing and misinterpreted that or he thought our the syrian opposition didn't make clear their own kind of calm or there was some confusion over what they thought the iranians said they were going to do and

so on so i wouldn't i think the russian government was correct in saying this is a disappointing development but it's not a tragic or fundamental one i think i really agree with the russians on this analysis that this appears to have been. an error perhaps to the weekend like in timing or something but it's not something that with this is necessary that affect the outcome of the negotiation ok in a mall in new york you want to get thirty seconds here to react to that story. i agreed that i don't think it's going to do it because. the rouhani administration is very eager to get a resolution to the nuclear issue so that for them the syrian issue is second but going to the point about trust and if you contrast iran on the nuclear you contrast a very the fact is most governments don't trust other governments and while after all why so the obama administration eavesdropping on birth could be more friendly

all right that's a different job big gentleman they did a great job because he thinks of my guests today in washington and in new york and thanks to our viewers for watching us here at r.t. see you next time and remember crosstalk. i've got a quote for you. it's pretty tough. if they were it's about story. but if this guy like you would smear about guys stead of working for the people polled titian's the mainstream media are working for each other bridegrooms didn't know what. they did rather it was.

that i think. we're going to do is go did you know the price is the only industry specifically mention in the constitution and the concept that's because a free and open process is critical to our democracy right albus. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and the trust of a girl we've been a hydrogen lying handful of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers one school class i'm job market and on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on on the world we go beyond identifying the problem trying to fix rational debate and a real discussion critical issues facing up to five different feel ready to join

the movement then welcome to the big picture. i marinate join me. for in-depth impartial and financial reporting commentary contribute and much. only on the bus and.

as a new physician i swear to abide by the hippocratic oath. to the best of my ability and judgment. i will prescribe for the good of my patients. i will not give deadly doses to anybody. or advise others to do so. i will never do harm to the. doctors of the dogs onto.

a. pretty of yet everyone i'm abby martin and this is great in the set so if you haven't noticed every country in the world seems to be wrapped up in revolt right now and you reign over a million protesters about in the streets for weeks first in response to their president's acquiescence to russia over an e.u. trade deal now the protests have grown and the ukrainian government has stepped up its crackdown on dissent just today at least two people have already been killed by police during clashes and the government has gone as far as an act in a new law which bans protests altogether restricts public assembly and just in case that doesn't send a clear enough message they're also doing little things to remind demonstrator.