activist organizations i wonder how well are they selling so far quite well actually i've actually been quite positively surprised at the reaction that it's received because of course i was i was asking myself will this work will this be something that people come out and support and yes indeed i've been sending calendars for me here it was really over the past few weeks so very very well far better than i had hoped now what we see on those calendars essentially some racy photos a few decks the post again some facts about whistleblowers and that activities but you know i fully understand your noble intention but i think the way those calendars are designed are. sort of putting that on your visual rob. because behind them because your body clearly wins over those tiny little lines so i wonder what do you say to those who say that you are trying to solve promote at the expanse of people who are indeed suffering for what they believe well i would

there's a couple of points to be made here why i don't i don't work as a model anymore i'm thirty three which is like ninety in model years so it's not something i'm doing i'm actively pursuing it anymore so to be honest it's probably i don't really view this as helping my career i view this as if anything running the risk of hindering my own career and i mean i don't mean to set myself up as in any way comparable to for example chelsea manning or edward snowden are julian i saw an extreme raft with the work they have done i'm just saying i'm in a position to do this this is what i have because i have been working as a model for all of these years and this is like the contribution that i would like to make i think everyone should really think about the contribution they would like to make to this issue because i do think it's probably the most important issue confronting the world today that encourage everyone to get out and think about what you can do to help out in this regard now you speak very highly. whistleblowers and

i wonder given your higher respect high regard for them i wonder if you had any chance to reach out to our subjects or snowden's people to ask them if they would like dire cost to be presented in such a fashion i haven't been in contact with these people i don't feel that this is something that depends on it depends on whether i approve of them or they approve of me so to speak i think this is my point is that this is an issue which really affects everyone it affects me it affects you it affects all of your viewers and i think everyone has their own way to working towards that and doing the things that they can do forward so i do think it's kind of probably one of the in a way. disadvantages really i think of people who oppose some of the things that has been happening in our government recently to kind of argue about who should be doing what all the time and whether or not everyone is ok with everything that

everyone else does but since you are trying to are all for your own moral support and to raise their awareness about this issue don't you think you know some of those people should be consulted you just said it's not something that you would like to do for self promotion the you're trying to support them so why don't you think their opinion is relevant here i do i do think that of course you know everyone's opinion is is to be respected however i do think that this idea that every action that anyone takes must always be free approved by everyone else isn't really the way forward for anyone who really opposes these government actions i don't think that i mean these are my images. i've chosen to support this cause and it's about the fact that a lot of people who have. engaged in whistle blowing up have a nice in the past have been shunned or jailed or otherwise. for their actions when

they have been exonerated later but what they did now what i think is very interesting about your own case is that you have a very soul ethic adamic background and you have a long history of writing and talking about transparency and accountability western democratic system something that i'm sure is very close to the whistleblowers heart of the fact that you have to turn to nudity to get people's attention does it doesn't mean that people in the west are no longer interested in those issues i think people are interested in these issues i think that of course as an academic you might write an article that's forty five pages are one hundred pages or for example my thesis was something like three hundred pages long it might not be that you can really expect someone who works a full day in a normal related field to come home and want to delve into a three hundred page pieces on any given topic no matter how relevant it is for them so i do think there is interest there i do think people on the whole do

realize the gravity of the situation especially in regards to for example n.s.a. surveillance but also in the fact that our democratic system. isn't functioning as well as it did and there is serious concern for the future so i think people are interested i think however there is and i can say for myself as well just because i'm interested in something doesn't necessarily mean i would like to sit in a dark corner and speak to two people about it for the rest of my life i like to get out and i like to enjoy life i like to have fun i think people like something that's a little bit splashy or a little bit of humor for all those wow now speaking about the gravity of the situation julian assange have spanned more than a year and they are quite aware and amber see chelsea manning is facing thirty five years in prison edward snowden's face is still pretty much up in the air and while there was some initial public discontent following revelations by now it has essentially gone back to. normal people are no longer really excited well at least

from my perspective about that so much. is it likely do you think that we will see anyone else blowing the whistle on the government's wrongdoing given that even when you have such substantial revelations such scandalous revelations as for example. made by adults no then since the even something like dad's is still unable to change the way governments are operating yes i do think i do think there is a lot of lethargy in our system and i do think an issue is that our representative system isn't really necessarily that representative we do you ask people every four years to make these decisions however wealth and campaign finance plays a very large role in the electoral process and of course once elected the those representatives aren't beholden to their constituents to do to act as their constituents would like them i mean we saw that in the united states recently where

more than ninety percent of the population was in favor of gun control and yet measures weren't taken in the u.s. congress so i do think that. even if people are interested no one likes to be to be interested and to be frustrated no one likes to put a lot of effort behind something and then see nothing happen so our big problem with our democracy i feel in the way that we exercise it is that there are barriers to participation and when you know that you're going to complain you're going to complain but nothing happened i think a sense of what does creep in there but since you present yourself as such heir a vocal supporter of whistle blowing do you think it makes sense for the whistleblowers to risk everything to risk livelihood possibly even life to you know go public with their revelations like bad and then see that nothing really changes what's the point of blowing the whistle when everything you're going to do is essentially you know ruin your. on live but nothing else well first of all this

isn't over yet and that's why i think it's very important for everyone really to get on board and do whatever you can to help this this cause i mean yes. is in prison but that's under appeal. edward snowden at the moment to has a temporary permission to remain in russia so we have to see how that situation develops so i wouldn't say that things have have been without any effect at all we have seen based for example on chelsea manning's revelations a lot of investigation on the part of the united kingdom into atrocities that were committed in iraq and possible violations of international human rights and humanitarian law committed in iraq the danish government has announced that they're going to investigate their forces actions in iraq we do have some maybe tentative reforms of the way the fisa court operates in the united states based on the n.s.a. surveillance scandal that snowden has revealed we have brazil and germany have put

forward and gotten indeed a general assembly resolution on the issue of of data protection or surveillance of surveillance and we also have the e.u. pushing very very strongly to strengthen their rules on data protection and on surveillance so i don't think that you could say at all that this hasn't had an effect i think it has had some good effects already and i would hope that that would continue we have to take a short break now but when we come back people in the west are proud of their democracy is but is their ability to make decisions about the future of back countries really so much greater than in non democracies that's coming up in a few moments and will depart. lives are a military hard to take

a listen to get along here a plug in that exact place that make their lives let's play. lists. lists lists lives. i've lived.

lives. are led little. little. little. cross talk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want. a little. well you give me seven years ago you committed pedophilia with over four hundred children and he's taken to the court taken the old bailey and his defense is if you prosecute me i'm going to go to switzerland that's what i just do you say if you prosecute me and our scans and scores of hundreds of incidents of fraud we threaten to leave the country and the government says. to you.

welcome back to worlds apart the rear discussing the state of global democracy with a model and academic crossland fuller now since we talked about beautiful bodies earlier i wonder if. you what do you think about an allergy that i long sort of how the in my mind i really think that there is a lot in common between the idea of natural beauty and the idea of democracy because people who are naturally attracted they up until a certain point they sort of take their looks for granted they don't work for that and i think that time later on into complacency and then letting themselves go and i think it's a similar thing with democracy when you're born into

a society when you take your liberties for granted you tend to be much less vigilant and proactive about those rights and liberties and i think the united states is a very good example here because in early years they were they they had a pretty strong genuine democracy is that by now i would argue has degenerated into a system where money and power mattered much more than they did their opinion of the majority what do you thing about this comparison yes i think there's a lot to be said for that i would say that our i did quite a lot of research into the concept of democracy of course. obviously and i looked back i really i really was where i started and i would say that as much as what you said is true i think the way our represent of democracy is kind of internally flawed. because if you look at into dothan is actually their practice democracy in a completely different manner and in fact the founding fathers of the united states

would constantly say that they were not trying to institute a democracy that thought democracy was horrible they wanted to have we institute a republic and they purposely designed the institutions to as they put it exclude the majority of from participation and to exclude collective participation to the greatest degree that they could now in the beginning that wasn't really so so harmful and in the beginning there were many things that militate did in their favor for the system that they set up because of course hundreds of years ago if you want to govern a large area of wind and a large number of people your only choice was really to act representatives and send them somewhere where they could talk to each other and make decisions for themselves right that was just a necessity because of the technology of of the time but it's not necessarily the world that we're living in now where that representative system of having to send people to represent you is as necessary as it was so the world has changed a lot that has of course played into this situation but i mean in the beginning of

the united states i mean they had slavery women of course couldn't vote or have any rights so looking back into the past and saying that you know everything was better back then and things have degenerated also isn't really true people have spent a lot of common a lot of the twentieth century fighting in fact the civil liberties. and now we have to fight again i mean that's the nature of politics really i think also in there was there is a tendency to equate democracy with elections and the popular idea is that as long as you go to the polls every so often then the locked one of the guys that he's seeing you know on television democracy is served. if you look at the studies of how much time people invest into studying candidates proposals or whether those candidates indeed leave off to the election promises i think the big picture really really disheartening and i wonder if you think that democracy in the west is really too trivialized to reach our lives through you know elections debates compare

what have you to the extend of losing its most substantive part which is active participation active engagement of the people almost on a daily basis in the affairs of the country and people actually making decisions about the fate of their country yes that that's true i mean i'm not i'm not the first person to set and i probably won't be the last i mean the kind of democracy we have in western countries is what we call a thin democracy mean a democracy that kind of fulfills the bare essentials. politicians were voted in so people have asked in government. almost always not by a substantial majority almost always because they felt that while they disagree with something of that party's platform and of course have no remains of control in the party once that the elected they're not as bad as the other guy is sort of thing and then after four years we kind of forget about it maybe we saw one or two petitions but those petitions don't necessarily have results it is true that

a democracy a true democracy should depend on active participation of citizens almost on a daily basis that's what was the case in athens i mean people did participate almost on a daily basis and they made decisions for themselves it's very hard to ask people to participate when they don't become decision maker you know it's very hard to ask someone please sign another petition you can submit that but then someone else will make that decision or vote for someone else who's going to make decisions for you for the next four or five years are however on it's not very exciting because there is no responsibility really at the end of the day right and of course it's very easy to complain and it's. very easy to criticize from a situation where we know that we're never going to have to make those decisions ourselves so it's also true that recruiters are politicians quite a lot for decisions but we don't know have a clear idea what decision we would have made in that particular situation but i think it kind of breeds a generally responsibility and yes why should people inform themselves when they won't be called upon to make those decisions for themselves so it is something that

kind of leads to more and more and more. as opposed to being really democracy meant people power and i think this issue of participation is really crucial for distinguishing democracies from known democracies because you know into telling tearing authoritarian societies people are expressly denied participation but in democracies participation is. but i wonder if in your research you came across any studies that tried to match about not just participation the i mean how many people turn up at the polls but the quality of the participation i guess my main point is were there what we call democracy is simply an appearance of control without having real levers of power yes i think there is a lot of truth about it is a sort of semblance of control and yes i've come across many many studies in the course of writing my thesis some of which measure and participatory levels which

are quite low most of the things that are passed off as participation and really vaunted in our society such as you know protesters something don't often lead to any results at all and that's why people become lafarge because it gets boring after a while to do something that you know doesn't have any result i'm not saying protest can never lead to a result but i think it has to be something you know on the level of a million man march there needs to be a lot of public backing before and if that's our our fault and of course the problem with that is that it's extremely inefficient you have people going through years and years and years of hardship to try to influence. ange because there's really is no direct mechanism in our democracies to allow for that in fact they're all constructed in a way that kind of actually inhibits change it's interesting that you say that especially because the claim that the number of democracies keeps on growing is constantly being made by a petition and if you look at the democracy index for two thousand and twelve.

purports to say that substantial gains were made around the world with advancement of democracy especially with the arab spring and what was particularly curious even funny to me is the economist intelligence unit beach is responsible for compiling these. democratic index particularly noted. as the country that made the greatest democratic advancements in two thousand and twelve which is a real joke to anyone who is even faintly familiar with the station in this country going back to that metaphor of beauty that we. discussed previously don't you think that democracy has become a bit a kid to beauty standards there's sort of a pressure on countries to look democratic to. look a certain way regardless of what their political how of our political system may be

yes i think so i think where we're living in an age where despite the wealth of information we have like never before we live in a in an age of very narrow narrow expectations be that you know standards of beauty like you're saying or what democracy is it all has to do with measuring a very narrow set of data did you have elections have you centered the press things like that which are easily measurable perhaps but don't give a clear picture of the reality of the situation and that's true we live in a society of excessively narrow ideas and narrow ways of measuring things that don't necessarily. resent reality and indeed are unsuited to do so and there is also a very significant push on the part of the if you are a band the united states to improve the quality of democracies abroad but despite that i think those country is a very resistant to any domestic changes especially the united states where the system is recognised by everyone to be outdated would be electoral colleges and

just two parties alternating in the white house but at the same time. the chance the chances for any substantial reform seem to be very very low why do you think is that is there a sense in the west in terms of your democratic development do you i don't know the end of history yes i think i think that's true i think i think there's not much of an awareness of the fact we do we do have that certainly that sense of we have achieved the most in this in this regard other states should seek to emulate this this is as good as it gets that's really the message that it's put across again and again and again and it's very very misleading it can it can get better than this this isn't as good as it gets it would be possible to have a society where people have more of a say are indeed even complete say in a decision making process so i think that's definitely the case with kind of how the ourselves up as the you know the pinnacle of development it will never this will never change and of course that's wrong i mean ever everything has changed you

know the roman empire once thought they would last forever too right i mean everything changes and everything has to change but dr fuller do you think that people really want that change because in industrial societies at least technologically real ready have a capacity for direct democracy so you can you know ask people if they have unions digitally on pretty much any issue but i wonder if waters really want that you know that responsibility of making the decision which would require you to be engaged to all the time which would require you to make those decisions which could be quite exhausting sometimes which would require you to take responsibility for your actions and. superior from a very convenient and psychologically sometimes constant comforting pretext of blaming the politicians you know it's all their fault do you really think that people want that to happen. whether they really want to have these fully functioning democracy in back countries or maybe it's just more convenient for them

to leave in their current circumstances run essential the blame is shifted to somebody else yeah that's that's a valid point i mean we are we are living in the sort of comfort zone where it's nice to complain but not really have to put yourself out there putting yourself out there is quite scary and making those decisions is of course very scary because you might be wrong right so of course the kind of natural tendency is why don't we stay here where we are that's comfortable we know we know this so i think people have to really will have to make a choice at a certain point but i think that the idea that things will stay as they are or we have to kind of jump you know to jump forward and to take more responsibility ourselves is a false one i don't think we can stay where we are it's kind of like the choice between privacy and security it's a false choice really things are getting worse we do live in a society where the rich are getting immensely richer the poor are getting poorer

we're not staying static nothing stays static and i think at a certain point we have to take the chances that this new technology offered us and goes for go forward because at a certain point staying where we are is going to be untenable we're not going are where we are we're always moving either bop words or forwards you don't have a choice and fortune unfortunately that is unfortunately it is it is a big responsibility it is a scary thing to have to take charge of your life it is exhausting in some ways but you know in a way the price of freedom and the price of self-determination it is an exhausting business it's not easy and that's i think one big message i would have about democracy real democracy isn't easy real democracy is really hard. well dr fuller we have to leave it there but thank you very much for your time and charlie or think you like the show please join us again same place same time here on the part .

as a new physician i swear to abide by the hippocratic oath. to the best of my ability and judgment. i will prescribe for the good of my patients. i will not give deadly doses to anybody. or advise others to do so. i will never do harm to the. doctors of the dogs on on to. come in the future. is here so we fix the roads focus on new technology.

on this show no posses complete with old school shootings. and we learn about the next in the still suv revolution there's also the potential to save lives. knowledge beyond age. we've got the future covered. tanya the lady well tell me how you are my little grandson. i don't like i don't like. was being cut off. except it as an ecovillage that the spiritual side is destructive. i tried to convince her to try to preach that it was a sect but it's dangerous and she had to leave it was a story she had lost her mind all. you know you she will

come back i know it was and i will wait but even if it means i must wait until my dying day. for the on june sixteenth one thousand forty one we had a graduation party at school and the war broke out. the shops were always full of goods we. were in september leningrad was blocked. one day mom went and saw that all the shoals were empty. in the embers of the bombed warehouses it was the main storage place for

all the food in the city people eating the earth because it had small traces of sugar in it i tried to eat it as well but i couldn't. the third night it was incredibly heavy bombing. it was a direct hit on that very shelter and everyone was buried underneath. all of them would do.

john in the ukrainian capital as the city split by burning barricades with two confirmed killed and the turmoil these are live pictures coming out of the ukrainian capital. if the president does not comply with. richard's there will be and will start and if. the opposition gives a twenty four hour deadline for the country's leadership to announce the election. rival positions clash of the geneva two conference in syria even before the warring sides of the conflict sit down for direct talks. and it's a whistleblower edward snowden is reportedly asking russian authorities for more protection amid mounting death threats.