do this right this is henry the second with thomas back at great when will no one riddle me a read me of this meddlesome priest and then somebody goes and read some of the metal some priests it is odd that all of the scandals of the criminal activity in the obama administration has already ended for the benefit of president obama could we make this case against any persons around us and we're against reagan weapons of mass destruction against bush every administration has had people under them who have lied or done things we give in washington well i'm not sure we couldn't i washington read think that certainly i'm sure something was done that washington is relatively clean but admit it but if you look at you know george w. bush or if you look at bill clinton or if you look at ronald reagan sure i mean the answer would be that you could and people should be wary i mean this is this is sort of the case that i'm making is that we've become so comfortable with the executive branch of the government abusing its citizens and violating our rights and violating what they're structured to do under the law that we've just become used to it and if we start treating them as criminals maybe they'll think twice before they act so criminally in the future or would make certain we had tapes and

there was a possibility of them diving if you remember the right only did impeach but he would have had to be impeached this is the problem under the law then and right because the way that it works is that under american law barack obama could literally strangle somebody on camera today and he would have to be and be impeached and then he would have to be tried in the senate and convicted and only then could you actually bring a criminal indictment against a president that you can't bring a criminal indictment against sitting president so you appoint of the book do so my good statement rather than to bring the case right cases to be filed i would be shocked if there were cases to be found there have to be actual alterations to law which i suggest that would make such things possible briggs and. what's the crime in benghazi the crime in benghazi there are two crimes in benghazi the first is probably the violation of the arms export control act the shipping of guns into libya in the first place right that is actually illegal under the arms export control act any time the president of the united states or anybody in the executive branch if i were to ship weapons into libya to a terrorist group i'd be prosecuted the president of the united states has the ability to waive the arms. for control act in order to ship weapons or money to

terrorist groups he didn't do that in the arms export control act he didn't do that in libya and he shipped the weapons in anyway and with regard to benghazi the solid information is that the annex in benghazi the cia annex in benghazi was actually a weapons grounds is being used as a as a shipping point for weapons in storage and then into syria that's number one in terms of hillary clinton's culpability in benghazi involuntary manslaughter be a pretty easy charge to bring involuntary manslaughter requires three basic elements the first element is that someone is killed the second is that something reckless resulted in the death and the third is that somebody should have known that was reckless that could have been that could have resulted in death in this case you have chris stevens and you have the entire staff in venice knew they needed security in benghazi it was not provided that's the real crime in that of course there are issues of obstruction of justice afterward it which witnesses in benghazi were talked to by the state department and basically were leverage not to speak openly if this is not just political we could make a good case on nine eleven against congolese are right he's got

a warning from the f.b.i. and show that while the warning from connally's rice on before nine eleven was certainly less specific then please provide security in benghazi at this particular embassy right with the question is going to be on the third element if you're drunk only surmise for example the third element would be was something reckless done that they should have known about right i'm not sure that the same case exist with nine eleven there's certainly plenty of that we could talk about nine eleven but i don't think the same case exist for involuntary manslaughter in benghazi as as with nine eleven with a lot of juice to prove the arms this administration israel any of that a crime that is not a crime because there is no terrorist groups in israel that are being supplied with the weapons we are currently however providing four hundred million dollars in funding to unity government that includes hamas right which is a state department terrorist group then just this week the president of the united states did nothing is as hamas kidnapped three people including an american citizen and so the state department continues to say that we will continue funding that unity government which it is in and of itself a crime nest crime if i wish if our ship. and some us as fifteen years in prison

the are are still in the what was the crime of the crime they arrest analysts violation of law anybody who leverage is i.r.s. officials in order to politically target anybody that's a crime under i.r.s. law that comes with penalties obviously that happened with regard to the i.r.s. itself which was according to its own statements violating the law and targeting particular political groups and like any other scandal this one became phony according to the president shortly after he said this is the most important thing ever and he was going to get to the bottom of it within weeks it had become phony it was no big deal and now it's old news of course are you a right winger making a statement against the lovely good administration or are you a lawyer making a criminal charge that you would be making year against george bush or ronald reagan or any of the other previous presidents of washington both i mean i think that there's no question i'm a conservative and i'm open about that i mean anybody who's watched my career would be hard pressed to call me anything five but by the same token the case that i'm making is really want to executive overage because we have a choice as

a country here and the choice of the country is pretty simple the executive branch has grown so much there are two million people who work for the executive branch all the branches of government are now armed i mean literally every branch of the of the executive branch every regulatory agency has its own swat team because of that we have to make a choice is someone ever going to be held accountable in the executive branch or are they not and so we have really we have to decide do we want executive branch this large number one and number two if we do an executive branch this large how exactly are we going to be helping them accountable no matter who's running the show because the truth is that half the stuff that i and president obama for in this in this case against obama is impeachable or indict a blunder under bush i mean what what was done with regard to the n.s.a. obviously started under george w. bush it was double down under under president obama snowden would be a chief witness for you absolutely right what about the obstruction of justice against the submission oh it was always have obstructed justice that they've done that multiple ways i mean that that that the obstruction of justice charge basically applies to. not only jury tampering but witness tampering trying to stop

federal officials or state officials from engaging in in. the execution of the law one of the easiest ways to cite that would be for example the president's immigration policy you know simply saying we're not going to prosecute anybody between the ages of sixteen and thirty who's in the country illegally that's not a prosecutorial discretion issue that's a blanket statement it's a blanket political statement that the president is not empowered to make under the constitution if in fact i were to say if i were to go to the eye and sore eyes and i were to stop them from deporting anybody i'd be carted off to prison if the president of the united states gives that order then his champion is a champion of the people so this is a. blanket statement against the structure of government told against that we were instructed were not a democracy right or not at this point i mean what we have is an executive tyranny essential way the president can do whatever he wants and you know what he's out of and what i said at any and this is something i think that the left and right should unite on honest to god because when it was bush then i think the media did a much better job of covering bush than they have covering obama mainly because

they're motivated against bush justin in the same way that i've probably done a better job of covering president obama that covering president bush hopefully we can all i think at this point learn that all presidents should be covered with a with a certain fair level of skepticism but the executive branch itself no matter who runs it you grab this much power to any one body of government and you've got a problem and i think we should avoid being our first lesson juror who when it was richard nixon was writing the imperial presidency and then when it was jimmy carter was talking about how the executive didn't have enough authority i think we should recognize this point the executive has plenty of authority and no matter who is in charge we are all going to feel the brunt of that and there's no answerability why own the right is there so much hostility in the series you know should this president because he's the most extreme president we've ever had most liberals think he's too conservative paul krugman did not agree to the in the new york times policy and use it. with his if he had a certain way it was a bunch of barrow you know i'm sure he does. and what he made

a gays. to kick him in more insurance companies on board what you said people wouldn't sign up there so i mean up we're getting at the core of it why it's such us though is it racist absolutely not absolutely not why in the world would it why why in the world would it be racist well what exactly is racist about calling out his policies there's no there is well what it's done was such for example there's a part of the right some in the tea party that make him think that he's sitting there deliberately against the united states' life ok i'm opposed to my own country as idiotic so i think that he has interests that are opposed to certain aspects of america just like any with the definition or use any president know that i know i think that he's different in this way i think that his ideology motivates him to do to scale back on america's role in the world by the way i say i think the same thing about hillary clinton i think there are plenty of people on the left who feel that america has had a much too muscular role in the world and would like to see america cut down to size and whittle down to size and they'd like to see it as one member of the family

of nations as opposed to the leading member on the world stage so in that way president obama is significantly more extreme even than bill clinton when obama made his statement we have the biggest hammer and every problem isn't the nail i have if you agree with that and i don't think i don't think there's i don't think there's anything alan has anybody on earth who would suggest that every problem isn't what president obama so great at he's a terrific politician what he's really and truly great at is creating false dichotomies and then saying well my way is the middle way there's no there's no there's nobody in the world two things that we should use the military to solve every problem on earth just like i don't think there's anybody in the world who believes that we should never use the military president obama likes to create these kind of straw man and then he has a field day burning them but it seems there's someone give an example john mccain wish alive a lot one day he says never never send the troop again to iraq then the struggle happens in iraq why don't we send troops in other words you know complaints don't have solutions why. that no matter what he does he can't do

anything right i don't remember anybody on the right suggesting that the president of the united states had done the right thing by precipitously withdrawing troops from iraq i really don't remember anybody on the right saying maybe there were i don't remember that in two thousand and eleven as we were pulling troops out of iraq virtually everybody on the right was unanimously saying that we are now pulling out of a winning situation and that is going to lead to a new you know as the saying there were weapons of mass destruction and they were all wrong for that was also had members left i mean those those bill clinton hillary clinton you see their information given to them by the right and given that's not true give based on information given them by bill clinton oakland was giving the exact same information when he was bombing iraq in the late ninety's exact same information when obama does things like sell more arms to israel than any other all presidents combined when he's ruled florida because he's not the one who's making that this year is no he's not the congress passed the bill he's executive he sees sold more than anybody he just has he's also see he's also given more aid to the palestinian authorities also get more aid to various countries around the region he's contrary he has made a deal with iran

a country that is openly developing nuclear weapons and that deal is going to result in them going to clear he's basically now talking about handing over iraq to iran he has turned syria into a hot mess so republican senator said yesterday we should talk to iran well those republican senators are wrong to have he's the president he makes foreign policy is any that you like about president obama i think is a beautiful speaker i think the beautiful speaker the book is the people versus barack obama and i knew but when he was twelve years old he was a great violinist and wouldn't come back we'll take we'll get the latest from iraq that the united states should be what's happening there let's talk about the growing humanitarian crisis all of them are there some of them border states.

join me. for in-depth impartial and financial commentary contributed and much much. only on us and. a genuine appeal for peace negotiations or gambit to intensify the conflict these are only some of the questions surrounding the ukrainian president's call for a cease fire pushing both options are narrowing. the way it should be a problem for any country to diversify its sources of supply or demand. a size at the beginning. of policy. sigrid laboratory. was able to build

a new most sophisticated. fortunately. the mound anything tunes mission to teach me creation why it should care about humans and. this is why you should care only. but the politicking the best selling author and editor at large of broad broad tommies ben shapiro he remains with us and by the way he's also the author of the new book the people versus barack obama which is right now joining us now is richard followed political commentator host of the online news program the rich and probably joe rigid you've heard what ben has had to say on the on the legal questions to your response to his critique of the whole obama administration. thanks larry i appreciate being here and good to see you you know where i got to tell you i think this this criticism of the president is a little far reaching for me because i think if you're going to criticize president

obama the question i have is where were they when george w. bush was having a ridiculous government overreach and that's fair and i think that's totally fair i think that it but now is the time when why don't we all get together and figure out ok how do we prevent this in the future because we can all do this retain it why why are people who do who didn't back george w. bush back then when president bush was going into afghanistan back in president obama's plans for a troop surge in afghanistan now turns out there's two sides to the political debate i'm what i'm calling for at this point whether we're wrong then or wrong now let's get together and figure out exactly how we fix the problem of executive overreach of bush's overreaching so as obama and i say that in the book i absolutely do. well i mean listen i hear that if we're going to come together i think that what needs to happen is that folks on the right you know who part of the city and run half the united states congress should want to come together to deal with the government overreach and we haven't seen that yet republicans have sat on their hands on most issues besides having a multiple of multiple witch trial hearings or kooky feeder like i like to call it you know i'd rather see them say let's find

a way to solve immigration or the president doesn't have to act or let's find a way to reform our tax code so the president have to act or let's find a way to fix it give more money in funding to our embassy so the president have to act all what seems to be happening here miro larry is kind of duty when it comes to the right and so now they're playing the blame game when they really haven't put forth any solutions well richard when it comes to the solutions i think the bigger problem here is not the question of particular issues honestly i think the question is the one that you've stated which is you're using the president's action as a threat why don't why doesn't congress do x. or the president doesn't have to do it why doesn't congress do why so the president doesn't have to do it the problem is the president is not given the power to do these things when the president goes ahead and does it wait a minute now i think the president does have the power to stop deportations and i think we saw just a couple of days right inviolate as an adult who has the power to the president also has the power to make sure that federal contractors don't fire l.g.b. t.q. folks these are all part of the present executive power being that he's the administer of the executive branch i'm not sure what it what what is administrative

about ignoring basic facts of american law such as that it is a crime to cross the border illegally and believe me i'm somebody who actually is for immigration reform but this is not a question of whether immigration reform is a good idea or a bad one it's do you really want to give the president this ability because richard if you really want to give the president this much power then you can't be surprised if the president turns around here somebody on the other side he turns right says ok let's deport everyone i'm going to get in this much discretion i don't know wait a second let's be very clear that i think you're mixing apples and oranges here and let's be very clear about the president's brother deported more individuals than any other presidents not in history it's not true but what is true that is not. it was a change that the importations change the city sixty it's used to be measured that if you came to the border and you were rejected that's not going to deportation is now the change that more stations and build a life after it and what he what he has done now the folks who are being deported are those individual came to the country at no fault of their own who pledge allegiance to our flag they go to our schools and they want to pursue the american dream so i'm going to serve in our military and the president has the power to

instruct his secretaries to do whatever he chooses to see for them to do and there are that's a federal law and they he can he can instruct his secretaries to do whatever he sees fit to do and this is the problem on every issue there is a lot of the sunday that i had is not of the illusion of federal law let me interrupt guys use a moment or less well but there is a very personal issue going on now in iraq what are your thoughts on it richard. well listen i think this is the president lose any on any situation here and i think people like our friend there from breitbart will attack this president or matter what he does the truth of the matter is this we should have gone to war in iraq to begin with and now it is time for the people of iraq and the government of iraq to finally stand up and do with their own mess and i think with that we're going to provide support of the country that the poor can only come after iraq figures out exactly what it's going to do then well ok here there are really three separate questions when it comes to iraq should we've gotten in should we've gotten out and what do we do now right and the first two questions are actually sort of irrelevant to the third meaning i can actually i can i hear the argument should we

gotten into the first place certainly getting out looks like a mistake now that there's massive chaotic situation over there in terms of the third solution doing nothing and saying that oh well throwing up our hands well i guess what happens there happens there that's a pretty nine eleven mentality that suggests the whatever happens there is a regional problem it will never have any blowback what it should you do what we should do is put military advisors on the ground particularly in kurdistan where we help out some of the folks who actually want to defend the country and look if we actually care about the status of the country the last thing we should be doing is helping the iranians invade the southern half of the country and then helping the sunni's invade the northern half of the country this is exactly what the left wanted with regard to iraq way back in the middle of last decade they wanted this to turn into vietnam and vietnam was a war that was one it's been about finding and to hold down over terrorism is also a way that we wanted to we cut funding and pulled out good. larry that's utterly utterly utterly completely not true and if you listen to folks like john mccain who always believes we should on the rebels which is his solution to everything and putting our men and women in harm's way once again to solve a quagmire of

a situation that we've created let's be very clear about this it was created under george w. bush this president what are our men and women back home in the safety of america and now we've got to figure out a solution and to be honest with you this government the iraqi government has got to stand up this cannot always be america's nightmare the iraqi government has to stand up and say we're going to take control what this president what the president of iraq need to do is reach out to the sunni's reach of the shias make concessions and find a way to run his government we do it here in america they do it in india they do it in pakistan they do it all across the world people come together different factions come together to rule the country equally and this president the president iraq has them able to do that and we have held accountable for his action before we put our minimum back in what is it it was it's our problem because to a certain it was we invaded them well yes because we invaded them but also beyond that because once you're there and you make promises to people who are now being mowed down in the streets by the way if you feel no obligation about that but you feel a moral obligation that two hundred seventy girls get kidnapped by boko haram in nigeria then i question where exactly your moral feelings lie because the fact is

tens of thousands of people are going to get killed there possibly certainly hundreds of thousands have already been moved into exile essentially you want to send advisors and i certainly want to do on their advise and airstrikes on isis airstrikes and we can i can air strike khadafi forces in libya and a country we have nothing to do with but we want air strike i said what's wrong with that richard why not i think i would like for him to define what military advisors mean won because we've already trained iraqi military and it's not our fault the iraqi military surrendering as fast as possible that's not our issue that's not our problem now where i do agree with them is i think that's i don't i have no problem i think this president the problem with some sort of drone warfare setting some drones over there to strike isis but with that being said we need. a solution where all the parties are at the table and on. fortunately that can only happen when the iraqi government stands up here know that that also happens actually and was happening when the american military was there i mean if you read the pieces in the new yorker by the great reporter who is it was actually on the

left he was talking in detail about the fact that when the u.s. military was there they were speaking every day every day with that with with maliki they were telling him want the u.s. military to be there is the question if the u.s. military there is for it is there for decades we can't go on do you want our men sit with holland you want our men and women be put in harm's way let me ask you this how many american men and women were you willing to let die for no reason now because now that now the country is gone right so you got forty five hundred american men and women who died there and their blood is worth nothing because the country is gone and veterans are saying they're going to move where it will first what we should a bit of the first place and i or you can argue that the bottom line is once the war was won why if it were our how much more american blood do you want to shed for us for a conflict that is not our not our conflict government that is literally irresponsible you would do it do you think the american public will not support troops on the ground i think i think at this point you're probably right the american public will not what is on the ground by a wide margin because this is a this has become a country that is now slipped into a pretty nine eleven mentality which is why we are now going to surrender afghanistan back to the taliban in iraq to

a combined force of al qaeda slash isis in the north and iran in the in the south some of the political blogs your reaction to the defeat of mr cantor is very interesting i think that it has a couple of ramifications that it once again shows kind of the difference between the establishment republican party and the grassroots that election really had nothing to do with the tea party the tea party and spend any money and in the tea party really didn't do much in that race was much more about cantor not being in his district a lot and being a little bit out of touch as far as the immigration issue i think it's a great thing for democrats because now you're going to see president obama do what he's wanted to do all along he's going to claim he has no partners on the republican side of the aisle an immigration reform and then he's going to move toward executive action he's going to threaten the american people if they don't elect democrats who are allies of sort of the for november he's going to he's going to have a steal of the democrats absolutely the whole time what do you think richard white . immigration reform was a threat but hey who is that who the ask the questions here what larry listen i think where you where i do agree is i think the reason why your cantor lost his race is because once again that we all know the truth of the line that all politics

are local and eric cantor just didn't play the local ground game this guy outspent this guy on ads also other stuff but when it came to talking to people of his district he just didn't get it done now but what i think this does say for the broader republican party on immigration and on other issues on raising minimum wage is that what you're going to find is a more divided government in washington eric cantor who is as conservative as conservative can be who sort of took his foot in the water on immigration reform could lose his seat but all republicans feel as though they're vulnerable they're going go all the way to the right and we're going to have a dysfunctional government because republicans refuse to come to the table and work with this president once again we have immigration reform and the reason that george bush led the parade i mean listen i would be fine with immigration reform i think most americans actually agree on immigration reform on the always agree and so on this exactly on this basic count right you can't have this at a very basic level you can't have a welfare state with open borders right because people come across the border and take advantage of the welfare state so what you have to do first is you have to

secure the border and then you figure out what to do with the people here whether that means pathway to citizenship or that means just legal residency and i think that pretty much everybody agrees on that the problem is that the president has been so lax on border security the people don't trust his unfortunate of border security so this is been these. wait a second here now first i don't think that border security and a pathway to the super mutually exclusive those two things can happen simultaneously at the same time that is the compromise that is the place of confirmation democrats and republican larry they can happen at the same time we can build a fence we can build a wall we can build electric fence of that's what they want but at the same time we need to provide a pathway to citizenship for those eleven million that are in the shadows the republican party's problem is if they cannot get a pathway to citizenship out of the united states house of representatives whether they like it or not whether we beefed up the border or not whether we put. six on the border they would still not be able to pass a pathway to citizenship that's simply not true if you secured the border people it is traveling sex and the vote so i promise you i know the republican party pretty well and if you if you were to secure the border then you'd be able to pass

a pathway to citizenship you would have those happen we why are those who think we should explain why are they connected. because we're dealing with immigration we're dealing with immigration is a total issue they're not separate issues of course they're separate issues because the fact is that you know it's not ok fight about your right to our border and have immigration control so so so you so you're right let's assume you're right and we'll completely will completely connect them ok but they will connect them as well but we don't have any border security amnesty for everybody is their problem or no that's not what we see there with this is this is this were this is exactly where they go to larry every time we have this is where we go to when we look at the way you know why they have to be that is not what wait a second wait a second that is not what's in the senate bill in the senate bill which is the democratic solution has been endorsed by the president and all the democrats in the united states senate that bill strengthens our border it increases border security and at the same time vies a very very very long pathway to citizenship it takes almost ten years it is completely and totally bipartisan yet still republicans in the house won't even bring the bill to the floor for

a vote richard i just tell you i care larry they don't agree with the pathway to citizenship and i have honestly i have one question and all of this seriously just one question why not just secure the border and then put a pathway to citizenship and i can those happen at the same time why don't you answer my question instead of asking you to just explain why they here's why they can't happen at the same time as you secure the border the border remains somewhat open people cross the border because they feel that if they get in before the deadline if they get in before the border is secure then they are somehow included the pathway to citizenship of course i've read the bill and not only if i read the bill i've been watching what's happening on the border tens of thousands of children harassing with border anticipation we have a city where because we have many things happening a lot right now but you know we all right we talk about we talk about the law against crossing the line legally we in this bill we talk about who qualifies for a pathway to citizenship and those deadlines do not will not apply to those items off the border and how are you going to magically determine every day do they have a magical like today even though they haven't read it i know i've read the bill

richard can you explain to me what you have read of where when you determine when you determine who has crossed the border when i was under. that everybody across the board has you know our codes are in when they came across you know what i'm going to do i'm going to read the bill and have you both back to the banks but i'm sorry to say pressure i look forward to having you both back soon ben's book the people versus morag obama the criminal case against the obama administration is available now and you didn't catch which is our ad for our show dot com for my viewers a bill want to hear from you on that conversation on my face full page and share your thoughts on twitter. eugenics but eugenics vulgarize ation of darwin science punishment for an

uncommitted crying i was never based on the belief in eighty feebleminded still today for the few i don't know why. but i still don't know why genetic improvement through forced sterilization the basis for nazi ideology don't stop at just sterilizing and now go to the point of death. for years rarely discussed. until now really rather not talk about that right. some people say that when it happens to someone in time not a very nice one the curtain falls down. at some point and i could no longer stand it i decided to kill myself. even though i was scared of what i'd done i'd punched her but i didn't understand where i didn't want

a man raising his head and the woman should. run from him. everyone who sees this video to also speak to the children's father. my has then became a controllable that he will do anything. crying don't cry i know i'm tired of crying too don't cry. serious i'm going to try to kill. the airport going to experience what i'm going to hire a lawyer to for sure each and every minute. in the last hour where. my our last wife.

was sick so. is it still sometimes for nothing to. disorient and it's still it's. just all still can still be just if it is safe in the states it looked to be. but it's the other cell it's. the lead.

we will be prepared to take targeted. action if we determine that the situation on the ground requires the white house. to help. through the. volunteers from the west.