maybe he cursed us. maybe he asked. for forgiveness for. there must be. no civilians will be killed we're. hello and welcome to all things considered on peter lavelle since the end of the

cold war the media environment has transformed almost beyond recognition today there is a global battle for hearts and minds and the west mainstream media is losing that war. to cross-talk alternative in mass media i'm joined by my guest storm samuel in new york he is a senior research fellow at london metropolitan university and author of the new book obama's for peace nato's humanitarian war on yugoslavia in washington we have austin peterson he is the c.e.o. of stone gate and editor of the libertarian republic dot com and in paris we cross to any mush own she is a former british intelligence officer and writer all right cross talk rules in effect that means you can jump in anytime you want and i very much encourage it george if i go to you first here in new york we're calling this program hearts and minds and when i watch the state department briefings with jen psaki i have to wonder if the mainstream narrative is really losing this. to make people believe in

the elite of today. well it's very hard to say it's the mainstream media is obviously taken a upon milling through the emergence of new media. it's certainly taken a pummeling through the emergence of new outlets such as he however i do think that the mainstream media do have very powerful legs. i can watch the sunday morning talk shows and i see the same faces the same cries for american action american bombing american intervention and the alternative media then. shows up a few hours later with very appropriate denunciations criticisms. ridicule but what really counts the people who come out on all those shows and shake their fists at russia or. syria or the people writing

in the year or speaking on the alternative media i wish i could say it was the latter i am fortunately i think that it's the people who are on the mainstream media who set the agenda who dominate the conversation back to very good point asking him i go to you in washington i suppose we do still react to myself in alternative media still do react to what the mainstream dictates as the narrative we do and we don't you know it's interesting that you bring this topic up peter because just this week variety magazine published an article about the diminished credibility of the night time news anchor if you remember during the vietnam war walter cronkite had a great impact on the united states with his reporting on the vietnam war right now over at a.b.c. news it's george stephanopoulos there good morning america host that really has the most credibility over there people now don't look at the mainstream media as their main source. of information anymore now people go to get breaking news to social

media outlets or they go to opinion blogs or people that they trust people like glenn beck for example or people go and read my blog because they're looking for an alternative viewpoint to the mainstream media narrative i feel as if we're in right now sort of the change time the changeover period from the credibility of the mainstream media being the only outlet for resourceful reporting where people are looking for people who are more attached to news stories as they happen on the ground why would i want to read what george stephanopoulos has to say in new york city about the situation in ukraine when i can go and i can read newspaper reports and blogs immediately from the situations as they're happening on the ground or i can subscribe to the twitter account of a reporter that's going on the ground i sort of feel as if right now is the time when the mainstream media is having a big changeover and that's why they're having a loss of revenue that's why they're having to close down bureaus that's why c.n.n. is having to change their reporting style so i feel like right now is a good time for freedom of press and for freedom of expression despite some of the

crackdowns by intelligence agencies on newspapers like the guardian for printing the snowden leaks if you remember when they destroyed their hard drives and things like that any you know what kind of environment are we living in here because you know it was just right the loss of revenue the loss of audiences but i would say the loss of credibility as well. i agree with all those points and they are on to a very nice model from the twenty twentieth century and we have new generations growing up the digital natives who get all their information over the internet so their old model is no longer feasible charging for news is no longer feasible and yes i think credibility is the key problem here and this really threatens the route seventeen in the run up to the war against iraq in two thousand and three where all our corporate media rushed to support the invasion they repeated the lies and the fake intelligence pointing to the mainstream news by our intelligence agencies and that has been found to be absolute fabrication and yet. example in the u.k.

on the very eve of the debate in the houses of parliament about whether to go to war this was the process that happened where the lies were fed into the mainstream media and we had screaming headlines saying things like person forty five minutes from five minutes money get it and that's i think when the the end of the credibility began now of course and as often mentioned you know people do go to twitter they do want to see what's going on on the ground and they just don't trust the corporate media because they can come ration of control of most of the corporate media now it's in the hands of a very very very small number of very powerful media companies who have courts very close to the power to govern it so there's that sort of credibility issue to george i sometimes think this is the age of disbelief because it's really interesting is that we have so many outlets available to us now more than we could have imagined twenty years ago but me myself as a journalist i have to spend a lot of time to get the right frame story here because i know what.

political opinion certain blogs are of individuals certain institutions and you have to really keep your nose to the grindstone to really understand what's going on my specialisation is the part of the world that i live in and i it's a lot of work you know antiwar dot com is a really good source but it's still a lot harder than i think most people think if you want to find out what's. called the truth though that's absolutely correct that. there is now so much information just simply swamping the internet that it is very hard to sort it all see what is reliable the problem is that the in the you media. rely very much on the traditional media because the traditional media. were able to. use i.d.'s very expensive to run a bureau it's very expensive to have reporters all over the world. so

what goes on in the alternative media the very social media is essential. transmission of stories that have been gathered in the traditional media so it's not like the new media are actually doing a lot of news gathering themselves because it's very hard and so while it's true that the traditional media are losing revenue and they're doing worse but in many ways that isn't a good thing because it means that they're even less able to run the bureaus to run the reporters to do the news gathering and to get more and more reliant on the same wire services and almost the same reporters and so much of what happens is gathered in the traditional media is sounds exactly the same because it's all coming from the same sources so what we have in the social media. a regulation of go ahead and want to go ahead please do and i mean i take the point you're just making

but i think he's missing there is a sort of elephant in the room about the new media here at the moment and that is the model that is that started out with wiki leaks where they did produce the news stories because they got the information wrong and they could put the information out directly to the people who needed to read it to citizens without filtering it through the prism of news gathering organizations so this is sort of radical transparency and sure we had its problems but of course it spawned a whole new generation of leaks type sites things like globally and secured to open a whole range of other bewildering leaks and i think this is this is the new model of media this is the alternative media and that's why the old model i think it's just playing catch up now are sort of one of the. sort of go ahead. i don't know it's got are sort of the whole point of you are going to go ahead i just want to talk about i want to talk about consumption patterns here you know the atlantic published an article that we took a look at the analytics for what kind of news and journalism the people our consumer. and they basically compared it to cotton candy versus broccoli and then

if you look at it people will do it when they're polled like al-jazeera did a poll saying what kind of news and journalism do people want and they found that most people are liars they'll say i want good hard hitting news and journalism but what they really want if you watch their consumption patterns is buzz feed like a list of calls of cat pictures and so if we look at this from an aspersion active of corporate control versus consumption patterns you have to understand that nowadays it's the consumer that has the power in the in the media market and the consumer is deciding by by their clicks exactly what kind of journalism happens around the world so i don't really see any more of a sort of overarching conspiracy by corporate media elites of controlling of the narrative where it's really just a matter of revenue it's where is the money going i actually just created a brand new website that's aimed at that cotton candy market and it's called liberty viral dot com and we don't do any real hard journalism other than to sort of rehash of the argument that have already been made we make buzz feed stylistical

and i mean it explodes consumers want this kind of media and so yeah i'm a curious and i want to sort of you know sort of what you think the role of the what the consumer the brave new world what the consumer wants is not necessarily good for people kate george you know and that really mattered i'm sure you could print media that's is i'm sure it's great people are looking at keep you know let's go with data rather brave. go ahead go hard to now i know but that's where the consumers want the right absolutely absolutely and. it works with yeah but the whole point is that you know where in the news media business and we are trying to create an informed public we are trying to ensure that we have an informed citizenry that can we take good sound decisions of policy i mean if you could just put pictures of kids and cats fighting dogs and little children messing around in the on the beach i made sure i mean we can you know how much can we said. little

zillions to everybody i mean i really always supposed to save people from themselves who would also go ahead. when under saying you can't save people from themselves the media the pebble what they want you have to give them what they want or you're going to be out of business george the last word before the break well no i mean i really don't think that way i really don't think we should be in the business of catering to the lowest common denominator because then i mean the you know let's just have it will just tabloid newspapers every well let's just have you know or you know let's have nothing but scandals i mean that's all right you know i don't know you know saying no we're going to go which they would break it's like after that short break we'll continue our discussion on the media environment stay with us to. leave the legal.

i think. we're going to go did you know the price is the only industry specifically mentioned in the constitution and. that's because a free and open press is critical to our democracy correct albus. role. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and i was proud cynical we've been hijacked by handful of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers one school class i'm talking mark and on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on in the world we go beyond identifying the problem try rational debate real discussion critical issues facing up to find her ready to join the movement then welcome there.

it's technology innovation all the list of elements around russia we've got the future covered. her luck. her. mum. her. flew. her plane. her.

plane her. i'm abby martin the stories we cover here we're not going to hear a new rights separate story the. same time there's a reason they don't want in the world. that we. now let's break the set. right on the sea. first trip. and i think you're. on our reporters would. be. very pleased with.

welcome back to cross talk we're all things are considered i'm peter lavelle remind you we're discussing mainstream and alternative media. and i might go back to you in paris it seems to me another trend here is that news outlets that claim to be jet give are being more and more often punished by the consumer because i think most people believe that this whole theory of objectivity is really gone that's why they go to fox and all even admit it that's why they come to our t.v. they want they want something much more edgy ok beyond cats and dogs and going to the beach but this objectivity thing i think is it's a car wreck now it doesn't work anymore that's why c.n.n. is being punished so much. well i know that the american press is traditionally

prided itself on its objectivity but i think that's a long gone from the u.k. media should we say yes and where it's been well known for decades that the spin and the political slant of newspapers is always dictated by the by the. state outlet so for example rupert murdoch and his news international group running newspapers like the sun and the old news of the world. could legitimately say that he could actually pick governments because by throwing the weight of media outlets behind chosen politicians he could sway the faces and i think this is very dangerous path to go down for democracy where these relatively anonymous corporate parent can have such an impact on the democratic direction of the country and it's not conspiratorial to say this is being laid bare through the phone hacking scandal in the u.k. the degree of interconnectivity between top politicians and between media baron so this goes on time and time again plus of course there's a whole battery of other dogs which can be used to control and coerce the media

into reporting what the government or the military or the spice want them to report up to make leading. vanity fair if asked in washington go ahead media media barons have free speech too i mean come on why can't they use their money and power to try and influence people all they're doing is engaging in free speech that's what the media is you talk about you use the word control and certainly i agree with many of your points but you know free speech doesn't exert control people still have the option to choose what sort of media they consume and again rupert murdoch certainly is a free citizen and gets to decide what he wants to print publishing people get to choose what they consume so i don't really like the idea that people get to say oh well you're controlling the media because no one really has a monopoly on the media you know russia today exists fox news exists and i never really believed in the concept of objectivity when it came to reporting i mean you're not objective when you choose what story you want to report very good choosing a story that you want to report your if that's your deciding what the narrative is going to be for the day and i think that this whole idea that there was never any

sort of objectivity has sort of been like a wall over there are over the eyes the conservatives have never in the united states have never made any bones about the fact that they are not being objective they're biased but they're fair and the reality is that this is the liberals in our country who have said you know a.b.c. news all were objective in the media the republican party just came out with an announcement in the last month saying that they are going to start picking and choosing which debates which networks are going to be allowed in the whole presidential debates because they know. that it's a force that the liberal media in the united states has any semblance of objectivity they never have they only convinced people that they were george but it seems to be because of going to become you know hey i mean because of what i needed and what i asked and so one of the things that i think that's happening and i find it bothersome in some ways is that we have parallel universes you could have murdoch in his little universe there and then you have people people on twitter on facebook and they're getting more and more divorced and then i think this could be very dangerous because people feel a sense of just not being enfranchise in society they have their own small

communities believe me i know that from facebook personally. yes that's exactly right and so what we now have is these news. new news shows in which a standard narrative is presented i mean most recently we had the standard narrative of russia and the ukraine and the standard narrative what is putin up to it is putin want to revive a soviet empire and that's the standard narrative now of course if you don't want to hear that and if you want to hear a much much better and a much more balanced account of what was going on in the ukraine there were other sources however what was important was what was happening in those mainstream outlets because they were shaping policy they were the ones that were getting their message across to the policymakers on the policy makers were listening to them the policymakers were not listening to the alternative universe of the alternative it's

ok asif it seems to me they're beginning to go i think ok go ahead any job in paris go ahead. just just a very quick point on that for example although the mainstream narrative about the need to intervene in syria over the last few years was being pushed to go towards intervention and for example the u.k. politicians were keen to follow that narrative however there was so much distrust in the mainstream media is next year around syria after. what happened in iraq and after what had happened in libya that the pressure came from below and in order to stop the cameron from actually going into meaning so it can you know that this distrust. between the consumers of the media and the mainstream media is growing and i think it is beginning to influence some of the political decision. and i go ahead with degree there because george well i'll just say that i think that the issue of the pressure from below is yes it's up to a point true but there was pressure from below before the invasion of iraq i mean

there was an enormous amount of number of protests throughout the world millions of people demonstrated on the eve of the iraq invasion it didn't make one bit of difference syria there was a there was a vote in parliament and there was a change we don't know the exact mechanics of why obama backed away the last minute but obama was clearly planning on bombing i mean we were i was away i know why the exotic initials are going on as i said i have a pretty good because of the rise of the power go ahead of it and i know why obama backed away it was because he had he had no support from neither the republican party or the democratic party because the difference between the war in iraq and the war in syria is that the anti-war activists didn't have a half a million to a million fans on facebook back in two thousand and one because the social media power didn't exist you see things have changed in the last decade people like myself we now have huge audiences which we can use real demo democratic power against our legislators our elected officials when you talk about democracy i mean

social media is the real democracy now if there is a new initiative that's going on such as the push for a war in syria people like myself an antiwar dot com can go out and we can now tap our wide array of resources that we have in order to put pressure on our legislators and the pressure from the american public came in the form of democracy it came in the form of electronic mails and that came in the form of social media i mean no one wants to have a. a negative social media campaign aimed at them and no one even knew what that was back during the war in iraq but now nobody wants their facebook page assaulted by you know the tea party anymore so i think that things have really changed in the last decade and i'd like radio you think so i read it and i really don't think george jumping george jump in and i you know i really don't think so i think that was a clear case that the ground fell from under under the feet oh i i'm under the there was a great deal of collapse in the government's case i mean it was clear that i mean

it didn't hersh has written about this extensively the intelligence agencies had pulled the rug from under obama's feet he really didn't have any backing for his claims and obama was looking for a way out and president putin provided him with a way out obama doesn't care and the good ministration doesn't care about people on facebook of public opinion it's public opinion does not change foreign policy now but the i didn't do care years ago price and i was never going to get to an authorization of military force the president was never going to get an authorization of military force from this congress because the elected officials our country our presidents network presidents never get authorization i did only in the judiciary had already been hearing as i was going to go to paris annie oakley one of the interesting thing i agree with what our senses we have the advent of facebook and we have you tube very important twitter etc etc but one of the things the broader picture understand ok we have but very importantly it has been mentioned on this program was the illegal war in two thousand and three against

iraq in the subsequent occupation which is disastrous but we also have the financial crisis of two thousand and eight two thousand and nine which i think a lot of people looked at the establishment and the media as they were they were betrayed by that you know the one percent were saved and bailed out within a matter of months everybody else was left in the gutter and i think when we get these new tools. again going back to my analogy of parallel universes in the brokerage business model as you mention but we are going in different directions here there is empowerment from below i don't know if it's ever ever works out very well in the end but people do feel empowered. and they are beginning to yes people are finding their individual voices and they're losing their deference through authority and i think they're more willing and more able to challenge that broken or forty and that's what we're seeing now one of the pushback from that in my view it's almost like an arms race between we the people trying to hold onto our rights

and protest against some of these inequalities in injustices and illegal wars and then what i suppose is now the military security state gathering more power is that they can watch us and survey us and push back against our fight for our freedoms more effectively as we saw when they crushed occupy in two thousand and eleven and just started putting c.c.t.v. cameras up all over the place to spy on them where they were putting people in prison just for being demonstrations on the streets where they deemed occupy london to be domestic extremist terrorists these are people exercising their democratic rights and so people can see this threat so people are moving lighting and i think it's a shot in the arm for a right here george you know they're just saying that the because of the times it goes to values that gives those tyrants ok we're almost out of time here george i always start the others but. those are looking for terrorists but no they're not they're looking at people like us on this program to make sure we stay in line.

so that that's exactly right i mean that's the point about the internet is that yes i mean there were people can write their own blogs it also means that governments can monitor exactly what everybody is up to just to go back to what point about the occupy movement i mean you'd have thought that this movement which captured people's imaginations now with all the social media occupy should have had a huge impact i mean you know because you can do so many more things now with the social media than you could a few years ago. and yet it was a repressed and it also fizzled out but you know i remember you know the strikes of the mind of strikes of the one nine hundred seventy s. in britain it was just one guy with a payphone and yet they were able to mobilize the masses of people moving from one coca plant to another copeland it in the is a sophisticated technology you need a movement you need all the organization so social media are all one part of the jigsaw but they you know by itself is just not going to do all that model fair amount point thank you very much fascinating program many thanks and i get to new

york washington and paris and thanks to our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time and remember profit off. the facebook. is. for revenue should to go straight from being a violent side of the existing order to being a well run democracy is impossible it just won't happen because the act of the revolution is so violent that there are the off the shocks a so great that there is a period of chaos. do we speak your language i mean some of the will not advance. your muse program some documentary some spanish what matters to you breaking news

a little too negative angles stories. for you here. detroit altie spanish to find out more visit. tito it's combe. as a new physician are you sick. i have to abide by the hippocratic oath. to the best of my ability and judgment. i will prescribe for the good of my patients. i will not give deadly doses to anybody. or advise of those to do so. i will never do harm to and why are. doctors of the docs on onto.

this is what we do we kill people and break things. we can see something if simple as people playing a soccer game we can see individual players and a few feet of all. i can only see is facial expression you can see is a mouth open and crying out. maybe cursed us or maybe even asked. for forgiveness for us. there must be near certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured.

as. breaking news here on r.t. international a russian cameraman is killed in eastern ukraine is the military opens fire on a bus carrying journalists and civilians hours before a ceasefire expires. jihadists in syria and iraq declare the creation of an islamist state spanning across the border of both nations by washington's middle east policies. and as the extremists continue their advance on baghdad we report on the plight of iraq's many minorities left unprotected in the collapsing country.