since then has been working very hard to allow more arsenic unknown dangerous toxin in the drinking water of his constituents and guess why it's not because he's necessarily an evil villain it's because it's expensive to build water filtration facilities he'll trade places a big financial burden on small towns with lots of arsenic it's a budget nightmare for them to meet the standards so in st louis he's helping his constituents by fighting to allow them to drink more arsenic and that is the kind of weird logic that is a direct result of the fact that we live on planet money that's what we get for worshipping money and if we keep putting money above everything else it won't be known until our government figures out that the cheapest constituent to care for is a dead constituent i wouldn't be surprised if they already have tonight let's talk

about that by following me on twitter at the resident. technology innovation all the developments around russia we go to the future covered. we never saw that coming. we had no idea or children were gay. i would actually just. pray to. be normal. they said you're a homo you're a homo and from that day in first grade i swear my life changed forever i became like the ridicule to get stopped still to this day. well

a bad blood texas instructs school teachers to tell young people that homosexuality is not an acceptable lifestyle and also instructs them to say that homosexual sex in private is a crime and those that. if the church was going to fire me that's what they had to do but i was going to do this with. glowing welcome the crosstalk were all things considered i'm peter lavelle in the crosshairs as israel appears to be preparing for still another assault on the gaza strip on this edition of cross talk we asked how it got to this point and what israel hopes to achieve.

to cross-talk the assault on gaza i'm joined by my guest dan r.l. in washington he's a scholar in residence at the center for israel studies at the american university in new york we have norman finkelstein he's a political analyst and author and in amsterdam we crossed him when rabbani he is a senior fellow at the institute for palestine studies are gentlemen cross-talk rules in fact that means you can jump in anytime you want my very much encourage it norman if i can go to you first here how did we get to this point israel says it began when hamas kidnapped and murdered three israeli teens what's your take. i think if you don't mind i'd rather move when answers that question because he's closer to the situation there ok due deference moeen go ahead. well the fact of the matter is that so far we still don't know who abducted and killed these three israeli use israel immediately blame thomas and we also now know

that these really government suppressed evidence had very early on that these three youths had been killed in order to claim that it was seeking to resolve a hostage situation and use that as a pretext to launch a military rampage throughout the west bank from from the far north to to the far south while hamas which usually almost immediately claims responsibilities claims are sponsibility for its actions and if anything exaggerates its activities has this time stated that it has no involvement in this incident so i think we need to look at what israel's broader objectives or in terms of using this incident as a pretext ok dan says it's a pretext you're it where your reply to that well first of all. was behind the kidnapping of those three innocent youngsters who were brutally murdered by hamas

operatives there's clear evidence point of fact that hamas is behind it and hamas is also driving a reckless policy at the moment israel is fighting a just war hamas initiated this conflict it started this conflict no other country in the world will tolerate can tolerate would tolerate such an attack on its cities towns civilians and israel's doing its utmost to protect its its citizens ok norman would you like to reply to that just war. well first of all there is no evidence at this point that hamas was responsible even the u.s. state department which typically apologizes for any and every israeli action the u.s. state department was asked just two days ago on july ninth do you have evidence that hamas is behind this and they said as of now we don't have evidence and any of that what's clear is that prime minister netanyahu then used to exploit this incident

for political purposes and as i'm sure that is aware it was all over the israeli press and it was said candidly it was said with forthrightly that prime minister netanyahu was using the incident in order to destroy hamas and because he wanted to dismantle the unity government and this is fairly typical of the israeli government it's what the israeli political scientist in their yard needs called these relief of palestinian peace offensive in this case hamas formed the unity government with the palestinian authority on the terms that were put forth by the u.s. and the u.a.e. and the e.u. hamas accepted those terms and now netanyahu was cornered he was going to be forced to negotiate and so he does what israel historically has always done it tries to nip these. powers does come us initiated this conflict it started with barrage of

rockets and missiles on israeli towns and villages it is constantly it was offered by israel a calm for calm deal that rejected the noni didn't reject the offer of a one on an aggressive campaign and again no other country in the world would sit idly by and just watch a barrage of rockets into its territory and not respond with blood they were put in sit idly by if moscow and st petersburg good. be under the threat of rockets and missiles sure you that he wouldn't and so other other leaders in the western world such as countering merkel holand obama. idly by and the leader of israel the government of israel has a commitment to its people to protect them to insure safety and stability and that's what israel is doing at the moment is ok all right i want to i want to read i want norman and myleene to react to that movie would you like to react to that

because all of the leaders in all of the countries that dan just mentioned i mean they don't have a they don't have under captivity under blockade under siege one point six million people go ahead mean well. i mean what then is presenting us is just a series of slogans and unsupported assertions this idea that. israel is offering a ceasefire in fact netanyahu is on record today and you can do. this with our always having that he has no interest in a ceasefire at that point well hamas has stated very clearly. that it is prepared but that israel is unprepared to go so we can either base our positions in analysis and conclusions on on reality or we can just throw around meaningless slogans and unsupported assertions which isn't going to get us anywhere really ok norman jump

in you want to jump in please do. well. dan says that israel's doing with any other country in the world would do first of all as he mentioned among the leaders who would do something he mentioned prime minister cameron david cameron in the u.k. cameron himself who is a great friend of israel a great supporter of israel he himself has described gaza as a prison camp and then you have to ask yourself what rights do people under occupation have to resist the occupation and here the international law is very clear the international law says number one and i hope down will respond specifically to the point i'm making now international law says number one occupier has no right under international law to suppress a struggle for self-determination that is to say that israel has no right whatsoever if the palestinians are resisting the occupation israel has no right

whatsoever whatsoever under international law to use force in order to suppress the palestinian struggle for self-determination the international law is a little bit more ambiguous on the rights of people on the occupation to use force but most scholars agree that they do have that right so as a broad general statement the palestinians are exercising their right under gaza's done under israeli occupation power gaza is not under occupation gaza since two thousand and five. in two thousand five. hundred has not returned uprooted soldiers from gaza israel is not in does that i'm very sorry to clarify that you forgot ok don't mean to say nothing against i want to clarify exactly here moving israel is not in gaza please react to that statement . gaza scuse me israel removed its military bases and its settlements from within

the gaza strip that's true but i believe it's the position of even the international committee of the red cross that gaza remains occupied territory for among other reasons that israel still controls the airspace. the territorial waters most of the boundaries of the gaza strip israel has been imposing a punishing seven year blockade of the gaza strip and so it's quite possible and i presume there are other examples of as well that you can control and occupy a territory without being physically within it it's a form of indirect rule if you will and perhaps even more importantly israel almost will launches these kinds of armed assaults. on the gaza strip as well which is you know and in that sense the legitimacy of israel's actions is

also. very much open to question particularly in terms of international law as as norman just explained. ok dan do you want to react to a security council yes because because the u.n. security council adopted the palmer commission report back in september twentieth levon which clearly states that the israeli naval blockade on gaza is legal and so . norman can argue from today until tomorrow that does not the case but the naval blockade of gaza by israel is legal and has been. recognized as such by the united nations ok norman do you want to react to that. you know really a completely different issue i'm not going to get into the facts i'm i'm not going to get into the factual details now but for those who are interested in a small window. and she has said is for some two counts number one as he did

correctly say the palmer commission only dealt with the naval blockade it did not deal with the land blockade number two the un security council never approved the palmer commission report that a report was commissioned by banking moon it had nothing to do with the other branches of the united nations but let's get to the bigger issue then says two things dan says first of all he says gaza is none not under occupation well i have a question for you then you mention prime minister cameron not me you mentioned prime minister david cameron so when david cameron referred to gaza as a prison who are the prison guards who is he referring to when you refer to god so as a giant prison camp who are the guards of that person can israel senior somehow civilians are nationalists sure you know is your arm didn't. place is keeping citizens originals you're on tell you're on your mind so then you're on television don't

make a full of yourself before the whole world you know i'm not taking a family so i'm certain you lose the printing of this gentleman here we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on gaza stay with r.t. . we've received. plenty .

plenty. plenty. the big shots are forced to

play her. mother and her finish line out. on. the because of all. the bumper cars. per. player in baseball i'm. as a player or lead. welcome back across the uk where all things considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing the israel palestine conflict. ok when i go back to you in amsterdam and the obama administration says quote it

supports israel's right to defend itself against these rockets how do you reply to that. well i think very much along the lines the normand has already replied which is that this is not about the right of a sovereign state to defend itself it's really about whether a state has the right to occupy colonize and dispossess another people i mean the idea that entire families are being blown to smithereens by the israeli air force in the gaza strip and the best that the obama administration can come up with is that israel has an absolute and unconditional right to self-defense which washington will defend uncritically. morally obscene is really the first in all the term that comes to mind here ok dan israel says it always is it being mindful of civilians when it attacks in gaza and it let's face

it historically it happens quite often if every few years but the death toll the civilian death toll is always quite high so what kind of precision is that you know let me it's a great question peter and i think that it's important to remember in the last three days more than four hundred fifty rockets and missiles were launched into israel into cities towns villages and thank god for that are in don't miss our system that was able to intercept them if not who have been how do you answer the question that israel do and so israel during this time has to respond to this barrage of rockets and missiles and during this entire conflict first of all israel has been continuing humanitarian assistance into the gaza strip israel when it attacks it attacks surgically strikes the targets which are clearly connected to hamas tries to avoid targeting the civilian population actually warns civilians by dispersing leaflets by calling the homes by initiating announcements to stay away

from harm from harm's way so israel is doing its utmost to. keep this attack on hamas and not on the citizens of gaza ok norman no matter how you cut it i mean if you get a leaflet or not this is collective punishment this is collective punishment and that is illegal under international law norman go ahead. let's look at the picture on the israeli side how many people have been killed zero there hasn't even been a single reported injury from these so-called barrages of theory of gaza rocket attacks on israel there has been zero casualties and apparently so far no reported injuries as a matter of fact i haven't even read a report of a building being damaged yet in fact i face more danger this past weekend when i went to the coney island fireworks israelis have felt experience

suffered from the gaza attacks now let's look at the gaza side site so far sixty nine people have been killed of those sixty nine sixty have been civilians so you have approximately a total ratio of seventy to see a row civilians sixty to zero does that sound like a war now he says it's because the higher you don't fight when you first of all we have been there who look and how we also have a. right we don't have a city we don't have it as a logo how many of these there's a catering for human she has to become human shields for its operation and it's a launching rockets alongside some schools. and proposed homes so there is when you when run fight such as their one innocent people are in harm's way unfortunately

regretfully they sometimes are heard israel is doing its utmost not to allow this day and as far israel hasn't even calling children to not have sense enough are going to continue living in house with those that's that's your that's the old square now using the human shield script so let's go see how this is very common israel has freely admit is fresh over the us ok then. a fresh evidence sure you just pulled it out of your pocket let's look at the evidence. shows that it's targeting ok. israel has freely admitted it's targeting the homes of hamas militants the civilian homes that's not legal under international law even if you give a warning even if you tap on the roof how would you like it than if i tapped on your roof or tower ballroom gave you of warning on a cell phone i'm going to blow up hear how he dismisses it as you need a mind to do i get it wrong kind of like you go through meaning in amsterdam.

it's very interesting this time around because. go ahead go ahead ahead jumping. yeah i mean dan is again just presenting us with a series of meaningless slogans and on support a disservice ins including ones that is normal as pointed out even israel is not making and this idea that it's somehow legitimate to blow up someone's house simply because you've indicated you're going to do it and if the person's wife and children are murdered well that means they're human shields by the same logic has announced that it's going to seek to lob missiles at all of israel isn't that considered fair warning considering that virtually every israeli family has a member who serves in the israeli military i mean you know the civilian

noncombatants are either legitimate or illegitimate targets but to take a tribal approach to this which which is to say that it's legitimate to murder palestinian civilians but it's illegitimate for israeli civilians to be targeted well that has absolutely no moral and no political standing one either takes a clear position on. the protection for civilian noncombatants in conflict or one doesn't and if one doesn't i think down should have the decency to admit that he values different human life differently according to his political preferences ok dan would you like to reply to that. yes. to remind us so where we are you know the two other participants norman and when the sound i think came from mars not from planet earth and what we're facing here is a situation which israel is under a barrage of rockets initiated by hamas which refused to cease fire which continues

to use homeschools to fire at israelis which is cynically trying to raise the casualty not number of this is if there is a curse or a few more it's own for on one of her own purposes last week would know it's last week when israel offered calm for calm hamas only rejected it but went on aggressively to launch continued rocket attacks so this is what i'm talking about so let's be let's all play along and see what we're talking well not pretend. that it's legally here reading are they going to lay along ok that's the problem ok when we knew wanted to say something go ahead ok. go ahead. you know why should i play along with with pure fantasy. the fact of the matter is you want only us to consult it is israeli press where netanyahu states explicitly that israel has no interest

in a cease fire and that a cease fire is not on the agenda and how massa stating that there is no one to negotiate a ceasefire with now one can either accept that and in dan's case seek to justify it because apparently his political principle is that what it anything and everything israel does is right or you know one can start making things up and putting forth these these increasingly bald assertions and bringing in mars and earth and what not but you know facts are facts and at some point people have to deal with them ok norman it's slightly change gears here this time around hamas doesn't have a lot. particularly when we look at egypt and its other arab donors say they're alone standing alone right now and you know it looks like tel aviv sees this is an opportunity hamas is isolated the entire middle east is aflame right now it's an

opportunity for tel of eve to get rid of their greatest nemesis. right but you have to understand why hamas is their greatest nemesis moss' their great it's not mrs because they formed a unity government with the palestinian authority hamas is their greatest nemesis because hamas agreed to the conditions set forth by the e.u. and the us for negotiations hamas is their greatest enemy because the u.s. and the e.u. agreed to negotiate with the new unity government hamas is their greatest enemy because hamas was so weak as you correctly put it hamas was so weak that it was now being forced in a position where together with the palestinian authority it would negotiate a reasonable settlement of the conflict and that's the thing that netanyahu like israel's leaderships in the past have always dreaded that's why they coined the

phrase these palestinian peace offensives israel doesn't know what to do when the palestinians are ready to negotiate so it does what it always does hamas pounds them on this is a term that you know is a shade of gauges so now you are going to get i mean i want to get the last word dan dan twenty seconds i want to be fair go ahead. hamas is a terrorist organization branded as such by us law in other countries around the world hamas is recklessly causing the situation hamas will has to pay a dear price for what it's doing israel cannot stand idly by in the face of the cynical policy conducted by hamas it will continue until brings precent peace and tranquility to the land of israel ok do you think that's going to happen norman ten seconds will be peace and tranquility in the land of israel when israel negotiates

a settlement of the conflict according to international law everybody's ready for the conflict to end except the lunatics in tel aviv ok gentlemen we've run out of time many thanks i guess in washington new york in amsterdam and thanks to our viewers for watching us here darkie see you next time and remember prosper. i think. the really. good you know the price is the only industry specifically mentioned in the constitution and. that's because

a free and open press is critical to our democracy correct albus. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and oppressive like oh we've been a hydrogen lying handful of transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers but once i'm job market and on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on in the world we go beyond identifying the problem to try and rational debate in a real discussion critical issues facing america if i ever feel ready to join the movement then walk a little bit but. we never saw that coming. we had no idea or children were gay. i

would actually just at night pray to god you know me normal. they said you're a homo you're a homo and from that day in first grade i swear my life changed forever i became like to ridicule my own to get stopped still to this day. while alabama and texas instruct school teachers to tell pupils young people that homosexuality is not an acceptable lifestyle and also instructs them to say that homosexual sex in private is a crime in those states if the church was going to fire me that's what they had to do but i was going to do this with. it's out again folks i'm having martin and this is breaking the set so between speaker of the house john boehner so you know obama over obamacare and the design

of herion on the i.r.s. scandal to say that congress is getting nothing done would be a severe understatement but yesterday the senate actually managed to take a big step forward and one of the most important reasons why our current representative system is so toxic and corrupt campaign finance seen a ten to eight vote the senate judiciary committee voted to approve a constitutional amendment that would overturn a notorious two thousand and ten supreme court citizens united decision of course this rolling solidify the notion of corporate.