please see. below and welcome the cross talk with all things considered i'm peter lavelle in the crosshairs as israel appears to be preparing for still another assault on the

gaza strip on this edition of crosstalk we asked how it got to this point and what israel hopes to achieve. to cross out the assault on gaza i'm joined by my guest dan r.l. in washington he's a scholar in residence at the center for israel studies at the american university in new york we have norman finkelstein he's a political analyst and author and in amsterdam we crossed him we'd rabani he is a senior fellow at the institute for palestine studies are gentlemen cross-talk rules in fact that means you can jump in anytime you want my very much encouraged norman if i can go to you first here how did we get to this point israel says it began when hamas kidnapped and murdered three israeli teens what's your take. i think if you don't mind i'd rather move that question because he's closer to the situation there ok due deference when we go ahead. well the fact of the matter is

that so far we still don't know who abducted and killed these three israeli use israel immediately blame thomas and we also now know that these really government suppressed evidence had very early on that these three youths had been killed in order to claim that it was seeking to resolve the hostage situation and use that as a pretext to launch a military rampage throughout the west bank from from the far north to to the far south while hamas which usually almost immediately claims responsibilities claims are sponsibility for its actions and if anything exaggerates its activities has this time stated that it has no involvement in this incident so i think we need to look at what israel's broader objectives or in terms of using this incident as

a pretext ok dan says it's a pretext you're it where your reply to that well first of all. was behind the kidnapping of those three innocent youngsters who were brutally murdered by hamas operatives there's clear evidence point of fact that hamas is behind it and hamas is also driving a reckless policy at the moment israel is fighting a just war hamas initiated this conflict it started this conflict no other country in the world will tolerate can tolerate would tolerate such an attack on its cities towns civilians and israel's doing its utmost to protect its its citizens ok norman would you like to reply to that just war. well first of all there is no evidence at this point that hamas was responsible even the u.s. state department which typically apologizes for any and every israeli action the u.s. state department was asked just two days ago on july ninth do you have evidence that

hamas is behind this and they said as of now we don't have evidence in any event what's clear is that prime minister netanyahu then used to exploit this incident for political purposes and as i'm sure that is aware it was all over the israeli press and it was said candidly it was said with forthrightly that prime minister netanyahu was using the incident in order to destroy hamas and because he wanted to dismantle the unity government and this is fairly typical of the israeli government it's what the israeli political scientist in their yard needs called these relief of palestinian peace offensive in this case hamas formed the unity government with the palestinian authority on the terms that were put forth by the u.s. and the u.a.e. and the e.u. hamas accepted those terms and now netanyahu was cornered he was going to be forced

to negotiate and so he does what israel historically has always done it tries to nip these. peace offensives in the bud in this case by attacking hamas and hoping and praying to evoke some sort of reaction then would you like to reply that. yes please hamas initiated this conflict it started with barrage of rockets and missiles on israeli towns and villages it is constantly it was offered by israel a calm for calm deal that rejected no new didn't reject the offer of a one on an aggressive campaign and again no other country in the. the world would sit idly by and just watch a barrage of rockets into its territory and not respond with blood they were put in sit idly by if moscow and st petersburg would be under the threat of rockets and

missiles are you sure you that he wouldn't and so other other leaders in the western world such as countering merkel holand obama. idly by and the leader of israel the government of israel has a commitment to its people to protect them to insure safety is to build in that's what israel is doing at the moment is all current i want to i want to read i want norman and myleene to react to that movie would you like to react to that because all of the leaders in all of the countries that dan just mentioned i mean they don't have a they don't have under captivity under blockade under siege one point six million people go ahead maureen well although i mean what then is presenting us is just a series of slogans and unsupported assertions this idea that. israel is offering a ceasefire in fact netanyahu is on record today and you can see. this was so it was hitting that he has no interest in a ceasefire at that point well hamas has stated very clearly. that it is prepared

but that israel is unprepared to go see a so we can either base our positions and analysis and conclusions on on reality or we can just throw around meaningless slogans and unsupported assertions which isn't going to get us anywhere really ok norman jump in you want to jump in please do. well. dan says that israel is doing what any other country in the world would do first of all as he mentioned among the leaders who would do something he mentioned prime minister cameron david cameron in the u.k. cameron himself who is a great friend of israel a great supporter of israel he himself has described gaza as a prison camp and then you have to ask yourself what rights do people under occupation have to resist occupation and here the international law is very clear

the international law says number one and i hope down will respond specifically to the point i'm making now international law says number one occupier has no right there international law to suppress a struggle for self-determination that is to say that israel has no right whatsoever if the palestinians are resisting the occupation israel has no right whatsoever whatsoever under international law to use force in order to suppress the palestinian struggle for self-determination the international laws a little bit more ambiguous on the rights of people on the occupation to use force but most scholars agree that they do have that right so as a broad general statement the palestinians are exercising their right under gaza's not under israeli occupation power gaza is not under occupation gaza since two thousand and five of course it is not. in two thousand five.

hundred it has not returned it uprooted soldiers from gaza israel is not in does that i'm very sorry to clarify that ok don't mean to say nothing james but i want to clarify exactly here. israel is not in gaza please react to that statement. gaza israel removed its military bases and its settlements from within the gaza strip that's true but i believe it's the position of even the international committee of the red cross that gaza remains occupied territory for among other reasons that israel still controls the airspace. the territorial waters most of the boundaries of the gaza strip israel has been imposing a punishing seven year blockade of the gaza strip and so it's quite possible and i presume there are other examples of as well that you can control and

occupy a territory without being physically within it it's a form of indirect rule if you will and perhaps even more importantly israel almost will launches these kinds of armed assaults. on the gaza strip as well which is you know and in that sense the legitimacy of israel's actions is also. very much open to question particularly in terms of international law as norman just explained. ok dan do you want to react to a security council yes because because the u.n. security council adopted the palmer commission report back in september twentieth levon which clearly states that the israeli naval blockade on gaza is legal and so . norman can argue from today until tomorrow that does not the case but the naval blockade of gaza by israel is legal and has been. recognized as such

by the united nations ok norman do you want to react to that. you know really a completely different issue i'm not going to get into the facts i'm i'm not going to get into the factual details now but for those who are interested in a small window. and she has said is false on two counts number one as he did correctly say the palmer commission only dealt with the naval blockade it did not deal with the land blockade number two the un security council never approved the palmer commission report now a report was commissioned by banking moon it had nothing to do with the other branches of the united nations but let's get to the bigger issue then says two things dan says first of all he says gaza is none not under occupation well i have a question for you then you mention prime minister cameron not me you mention prime minister david cameron so when david cameron referred to gaza as

a prison who are the prison guards who is he referring to when you refer to god so as a giant prison camp whoever guards of that prison camp is will senior somehow solutions and not just because they're sure you know is your arm didn't. place is keeping out citizens originals you're on terror you're on your mind so then you're on television don't make a full of yourself before the whole world you know i'm not taking a family so it certainly was the putting on this point gentlemen we're going to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on gaza stay with arkie.

external.

iran like syria has been george very harshly and it leaves under the constant. isn't it justified the game is not pursued in say a weapon and raising the spectrum of person or a government leader one young who same time you see was developing nuclear weapons . very explicitly did they want to see the number being made in full makeup and form the story. we would be stupid not to take it.

i'm abby martin the stories we cover here you're not going to hear any right other big story at the same time there's a reason they don't want you to now point. out now let's break the set. welcome back across the uk where all things considered i'm peter lavelle two minute we're discussing the israel palestine conflict. ok when i go back to you in amsterdam of the obama administration says quote it

supports israel's right to defend itself against these rockets how do you reply to that. well i think very much along the lines the normand has already replied which is that this is not about the right of a sovereign state to defend itself it's really about whether a state has the right so occupied colonize and dispossess another people i mean the idea that entire families are being blown to smithereens by the israeli air force in the gaza strip and the best that the obama administration can come up with is that israel has an absolute and unconditional right to self-defense which washington will defend uncritically. morally obscene is really the first in all the term that comes to mind here ok dan israel says it always is it being mindful of civilians when it attacks in gaza and it let's face it historically it happens quite often if every few years but the death toll the

civilian death toll is always quite high so what kind of precision is that you know let me it's a great question peter and i think that it's important to remember in the last three days more than four hundred fifty rockets and missiles were launched into israel into cities towns villages and thank god for the arran don't miss our system that was able to intercept them if not it would be that how do you answer the question that israel do and so israel during this time has to respond to this barrage of rockets and missiles and during this entire conflict first of all israel has been continuing humanitarian assistance into the gaza strip israel when it attacks it attacks surgically strikes the targets which are clearly connected to hamas tries to avoid targeting the civilian population actually warns civilians by dispersing leaflets by calling the homes by initiating announcements to stay away

from harm from harm's way so israel is doing its utmost to. keep this attack on hamas and not on the citizens of gaza ok but norman no matter how you cut it i mean if you get a leaflet or not this is collective punishment this is collective punishment and that is illegal under international law norman go ahead. let's look at the picture on the israeli side how many people have been killed zero there hasn't even been a single reported injury from these so-called barrages of period of gaza rocket attacks on israel there has been zero casualties and apparently so far no reported injuries as a matter of fact i haven't even read a report of a building being damaged yet in fact i face more danger this past weekend when i went to the coney island fireworks no israelis have felt experience

suffered from the gaza attacks now let's look at the gaza side site so far sixty nine people have been killed of those sixty nine sixty have been civilians so you have approximately a total ratio of seventy the see a row civilians sixty to zero does that sound like a war. now he says it's because of the higher you don't like when you first of all you have a neighbor who look and how we doesn't have a. right we don't have a city or yes we don't have a single gun many of these it is. for human she has to become human shields for its operation and it's a launching rockets and those are some schools. proposed homes so there is one when you hit one run fight such as one innocent people are in harm's way unfortunately regretfully sometimes or hurt israel is doing its utmost not to allow this. and

as all rights of the law alright alright alright alright i was gentle they don't talk over each other go ahead norman and i want to go to move mean ok go ahead and arm and then you're ok one sector then you're reading from the wrong script you're reading from the script from the two thousand and eight to nine war israel hasn't even killing children not enough is enough are going to come to you little hoss where those that's that's your that's the old script now you're using the human shield script so let's all go see how this is very common israel has freely admit is fresh over the yes ok then. a fresh evidence sure you just pulled it out of your pocket let's look at the evidence. will show that it's targeting ok. israel has freely admitted it's targeting the homes of hamas militants civilian homes that's not legal under international law even if you give

a warning even if you tap on the roof how would you like it than if i tapped on your roof or tower ballroom gave you of warning on a cell phone i'm going to blow up you know how if you dismiss such as we need a month until i get it right it was wrong i. mean again amsterdam. it's very interesting this time around because. go ahead go ahead ahead jumping. yeah i mean dan is again just presenting us with a series of meaningless slogans and on support a disservice ins including ones that is normal as pointed out even israel is not making and this idea that it's somehow legitimate to blow up someone's house simply because you've indicated you're going to do it and if the person's wife and children are murdered well that means they're human shields by the same logic has

announced that it's going to seek to lob missiles at all of israel isn't that considered fair warning considering that virtually every israeli family has a member who serves in the israeli military i mean you know the civilian noncombatants are either legitimate or illegitimate targets but to take a tribal approach to this which which is to say that it's legitimate to murder palestinian civilians but it's illegitimate for israeli civilians to be targeted well that has absolutely no moral and no political standing one either takes a clear position on. the protection for civilian noncombatants in conflict or one doesn't and if one doesn't i think dan should have the decency to admit that he values different human life differently according to his political preferences ok dan would you like to reply to that. to remind us where we are

you know the two other participants norman and when the sound i think came from mars not from planet earth and what we're facing here is a situation which israel is under a barrage of rockets initiated by hamas which refused to sue spider which continues to use homeschools to fire at israelis which is cynically trying to raise the casualty not number of the seas if there is a person or a few who are its own for on one of her own purposes last week would know it's last week when israel offered calm for calm hamas only rejected it but went on aggressively to launch continued rocket turks so this is what i'm talking about so let's be let's all play along and see what we're talking well not pretend but. that's what i thought it's legally here reading are they going play along ok that's the problem ok when we knew wanted to say something go ahead ok. go ahead. you know

why should i play along with pure fantasy. the fact of the matter is you want only us to consult it is israeli press where netanyahu states explicitly that israel has no interest in a cease fire and that a cease fire is not on the agenda and how massa stating that there is no one to negotiate a cease fire with now one can either accept that and in dan's case seek to justify it because apparently his political principle is out with it anything and everything israel does is right or you know one can start making things up and putting forth these these increasingly bald assertions and bringing in mars and earth and what not but you know facts are facts and at some point people have to deal with them ok norman it's slightly change gears here this time around hamas doesn't have a lot. particularly when we look at egypt and its other arab donors say they're

alone standing alone right now and you know it looks like tel aviv sees this is an opportunity hamas is isolated the entire middle east is aflame right now it's an opportunity for tel of eve to get rid of their greatest nemesis. right but you have to understand why hamas is their greatest nemesis a moss' their greatest number says because they formed a unity government with the palestinian authority hamas is their greatest nemesis because hamas agreed to the conditions set forth by the e.u. and the us for negotiations hamas is their greatest enemy because the us and the e.u. agreed to negotiate with the new unity government hamas is their greatest enemy because hamas was so weak as you correctly put it hamas was so weak that it

was now being forced in a position where together with the palestinian authority it would negotiate a reasonable settlement of the conflict and that's the thing that netanyahu like israel's leaderships in the past have always dreaded that's why they coined the phrase these palestinian peace offensives israel doesn't know what to do when the palestinians are ready to negotiate so it does what it always does hamas pounds then it is going on this is a target you know unsatiated engage in so now you are going to get on and i want to give the last word to dan dan twenty seconds i want to be fair go ahead. hamas is a terrorist organization branded as such by us law in other countries around the world hamas is recklessly causing the situation hamas will has to pay a dear price for what it's doing israel cannot stand idly by in the face of the cynical policy conducted by hamas it will continue until brings precent peace and

tranquility to the land of israel ok do you think that's going to happen norman ten seconds will be peace and tranquility in the land of israel when israel negotiates a settlement of the conflict according to international law everybody's ready for the conflict to end except the lunatics in tel aviv ok gentlemen we've run out of time many thanks i guess in a minute mr new york in amsterdam and thanks to our viewers for watching us here darkie see you next time and remember propped up. please.

luck. good. luck. government system is to help poor people poor women but to change their life and nobody is trying to make money out of them those who want to make money out of them

by. this time the whole thing and too long shot can do that shit and we're all forced to move from. the most schools the try to kill. people are going to be. more. problems for them for sure taking every minute. cut me nolasco a. mile wide. plus think the society most times squeezes the most elite moments to move sometimes from nothing. just leave it simple. it's

not just keep up the story you'll be shocked if you see the play station eight will be. but speech was. played. by marinate join me on in-depth impartial and financial reporting commentary cancer news and much much. only on the bus and on.

international investigators say they can't reach the malaysian airliner crash site in ukraine due to heavy fighting and a turning back is intensifying assault despite declaring the area a no conflict zone. russia's foreign minister says the groundless allegations against moscow over ukraine needs to stop but it says there will be no tit for tat response to any western sanctions. a mother and child shelled in a park the latest graphic images to come out of the region at least thirteen people were killed when the streets of call of became the new target for kids artillery. and the u.n. security.