well. science technology innovation all the list of melamine spam around russia we've dumped a few jerks covered. one of the annual shawne merriman alive should be. the face of your life you know. a pleasure to have you with us here on our team today i'm sure.

hello there i'm aaron avis is boom bust and these are some of the stories that we're tracking for you today. first up we're talking about debt in all its forms and glory today the good the bad and the ugly of portugal's the banco spirit

to some to the resolution plan is at the top of the deck and what the rest of the euro zone can learn from it then william white is on the program the former chief economist of the b. i asked and current chairman of the economic development and review committee is joining us live on the show today the answer ontario to discuss ultra easy monetary policy and whether public and private debt is still a problem they pose crisis now also in today's big deal edward harrison and i are going to be sticking with this whole debt will look we'll be looking at public and private forms of it and again how much of it exists post-crisis you want to miss a moment specially the gaps and that it all starts right now. with.

our lead story today debt more specifically debt in the context of portuguese bank a spirit. now. late sunday portugal's central bank unveiled a four point nine billion euro or six point six billion dollars rescue plan for bank of spirits of the central bank revealed the plan to rescue the country's second largest lender by breaking up the bank and pumping billions of euros worth of state money into it as santo provided loans to its parent company euro fin holdings which is a luxembourg based conglomerate which is run into some trouble lately after an auditor accounting irregularities last month and the bank also sold billions of euros worth of debt to its own customers now under the four point nine billion euro plan depositors and senior bondholders will be sparred while the banks non senior creditors and current shareholders will have to absorb the losses now most of the banks deposits branches workers and operations will be transferred to

a new entity or a good bank controlled entirely by the bank of portugal called novo bank now while bank asparagus problems those problems assets they'll remain with the bad bank and losses will be absorbed by shareholders and subordinated creditors like i've mentioned before now basically the banks current customers and senior bondholders will be protected so funding for the bailout comes from the bank of portugal's resolution fund which is a mechanism designed to help control banking sector risks a loan from the state will provide the resolution fun with additional capital which it will likely need now in a statement the bank said quote nothing changes for the customers who will be able to carry out all operations as usual and without disruption the contents of the contractual relationships with the customers remain unchanged now euro zone banks are still far far from perfect but the leaders have given themselves the tools to calm market panic by creating

a permanent bailout fund known as the european stability mechanism and are putting in place the essential elements of a banking union the e.c.b. is reviewing the asset. resilience of the region's most important banks and eurozone states of agreed to rules on how to rescue or wind down banks that do find themselves in some trouble so will the plan in portugal prove successful we'll just have to wait and see. now to get a better feel of what's at stake here we wanted to talk debt with william white so white is chairman of the economic development and review committee of the organization for economic cooperation and development or c. now he's also the former economic advisor of the monetary and economic department

of the the bank of international settlements and just a bulk of his resume a little because it doesn't seem bulky enough white also served as an economist at the bank of england pretty impressive stuff now with monetary authorities engaged in this ultra easy monetary policy the question is whether public and private debt is still a problem so here to answer that question i turn now to you mr bill according to your former employer the bank of international settlements the global economy has shown encouraging signs over the past year now they're worried is that the forces that led up to the great financial crisis are still at work so here's my question do you share these concerns and if so why. so i have to salute you share their concerns. i think at heart this crisis has come with the that started in two thousand and seven came at the end of a long period of time in which debts were allowed sort of cycle after cycle to build up and unfortunately since the crisis began in two thousand and seven whereas

we might have hoped for a kind of deal even to reverse some of that excess debt fact of the matter is the debts i think in the g thirty or g twenty as a proportion of g.d.p. or something like thirty percentage points higher than they were before so if the period prior to the crisis was an accident waiting to happen i have significant fears that things are as bad if not worse today. start of positive thank you bill how on her mind now i know that you're why we've credited with having given a cassandra's warning on private financial fragility well before the great financial crisis so what signal to you pre-crisis that private debt was going to be a problem. i mean this is not rocket science if you go back in history what you see you remember this book by ken rogoff and carmen reinhart if you go back in history you see example after example of these credit fueled gracie's

credit fueled booms that end in boston and in crisis you know my own personal experience i think was i started following japan very very closely prior to the japanese crisis and when i moved to the b. i asked what i saw almost immediately was a build up of symptoms of things going wrong in southeast asia and in the united states that just reminded me a lot of japan and then of course we started reading some of the history and realize that there was a long history here so it really it's not complicated mathematics it was just having an open mind and a willingness to look at history and i think essentially that's all i'm trying to do today though you know as i understand it the fed introduced the first round of quantitative easing for entirely and i mean entirely different reasons and it introduced subsequent rounds of q.e. now q.e. one was all about being the lender of last resort but the other curious were about boosting the economy so is that how you see it as well and do you think you re is

problematic. and i absolutely agree with you. the certainly the fed the motivation for what they were doing in q e one was a very very different from q e two and subsequent activities and the first thing really had to do about the central banks role lender of last resort and trying to restore financial stability the second round and the subsequent rounds in the forward guidance and all the rest of it is really designed to increase aggregate demand and one of the principal ways that they're trying to do it is by boosting asset prices in the hope that the perception of increased wealth will result in more consumption and more investment and whatever it's a very very different purpose and i think there's lots of reasons to doubt that it's actually going to work now many would say that there's a certain trickle down feel to cure we do you think that's correct. well one of the

worries is the i think there is an element of trickle down. but only an element the fact of the matter is that if the gains particularly on the stock market in and the narrowing of spreads in financial markets if the gains are going particularly to the rich as they are because they're the people that tend to own most of these things whereas the middle class people are mostly orany earning who can i say have assets that yield a rate of interest which at the moment is very very low if the richer people basically are not going to spend this in part because they realize that it's only a temporary gain then it's going to trickle down a little bit but i think the. the the full implications for aggregate demand will be significantly less and indeed have been significantly less than the fed has hasn't dissipated. built many of the people that i speak to use the word

secular a lot because they think the long term matters more than the short term so do you think policy makers are geared to long term at all i think the real problem aaron has being that policymakers bankers regulators politicians vs anybody you want virtually anybody you want to think about who has been a party to what has happened up until now i think if you accuse them of short termism it would be an accusation that i think the judge would say is a is an appropriate one. i think there is far too little thinking about the longer term implications of what's happening and that's one of the reasons why i'm sort of sympathetic to the b.o.'s as arguments about is it time to pull the pull the plug on quantitative easing and all the rest of this stuff because my sense and i think the b.o.'s a sense is that the positive benefits being derived for aggregate demand are going

down over time whereas the unexpected in undesired consequences medium term consequences are going up over time and these two functions cross of a certain point in time they which point you have to conclude that the policies are doing more harm than good and we should we should think seriously about stopping them now on our show we've had a number of economists who have come on and referenced hyman minsky and that's the way to qana mr coined the phrase the instability of stability so to what degree has the work of hyman minsky informed your view on debt cycles. well i think i'm in minsk is is is a very important figure in the history of economic thought and certainly i've read a number of his things although i'm not an academic you know like when you're at the b. i-s. you're preparing one hundred meetings a year and you've got so much to do you don't really have time to sit down and read a lot of economic history but certainly high minsky and the idea that the banks

could really get you into trouble that instability could breeds to sawrey stability could breed instability. in the medium term effects of ponzi schemes and the rest of it all of that really resonated with us but in addition i mean you have to go back to other thinkers to like vic's illinois high and. richard coo for that matter there's a lot of people who saw that there are a lot of different ways in which things can go wrong and. i think in a sense what people find it hard to. no magic bullet in all of this stuff if you call the me that's really a very complex adaptive system it can break down in a lot of different ways which has now been well hell i'm so sorry to cut you off but i'm being told that we have to go to break but please don't go anywhere because we want to continue this and i'm glad that you bring up ponzi because i want to talk about that when we return but like i said it's time now for

a quick break but stick around because william white isn't going anywhere he's coming back with us to continue our debt discussion however will be hopping the atlantic to focus a bit more on euro bland debt then in today's big deal edward harris and i are sticking with the whole debt theme and we'll be looking at public and private debt and how much more of it exists post crisis and remember you can see all segments featured in today's show on you tube at youtube dot com slash boom bust our t.v. and on hulu at hulu dot com slash boom dash bust now before we go here are a look at some your closing numbers the bell rang.

for you like me who want your comedy news from t one to comedy news to be a bare fisted no holds barred fight to the dad. like a true vampire winding into the next record for the lead the billionaire freaks well they're going. well that's what you get with my new show projected tonight. your friends post a photo from a vacation you can't. call it different. the boss repeats the same old joke of course you like. your ex-girlfriend still paints tear jerking poetry. nora. we posed. to your facebook you street.

and we're back now with william white of the organisation for economic cooperation and development mr right thank you for sticking around now we just learned that the portuguese bank banco asparagus ontario is splitting into a good bank and a bad bank and the equity and debt holders will take some losses there now it brings up the question it's a pretty good question in what way does the banking system transmit or amplify the financial distress of ponzi borrowers to the rest of the credit system. well i think this is. a very good question and entirely pertinent to what's going on in portugal the fundamental problem is that have banks have made bad loans if you want to put it sort of you know ponzi loans in the end but they made bad loans and the loans are going sour there's a tremendous tendency for the bank particularly if it's worried about its own

survival to simply pretend that the bad loans are good loans until evergreen the loans by providing more money to pay the interest etc etc while all that's going on of course it is completely preoccupying for the management and the question of newer and particularly new rooms for innovative purposes the banks are not prepared to do that and that has real implications for the rest of your call. me because the credit is then not getting through to the people that really need it in order to get the economy moving again. bill i want to ask you under what conditions do you worry about inflation. what conditions do i worry about inflation. a number of conditions i mean i want to be perfectly clear i have not been surprised up until now that there has been so little inflation because essentially up until now there's been an awful lot of excess capacity in most economies. and

people's inflationary expectations have been maintained fairly fairly fairly robustly around sort of target level so i'm not surprised up until now it's not been so bad but there are risks going forward i mean one of the risks is that people just simply make a mistake ok so that if you're conducting monetary policy in terms of the gap between aggregate demand aggregate supply the honest truth is we've got very little understanding of what what the level of potential put in the economy is it is all very much a black box subject to enormous uncertainty because of what the crisis is done to potential so it is not. but will make mistakes in an inflationary direction the second thing that is worrisome and we've seen this a number of times in history is that if the fiscal situation is essentially out of control the government's got a big deficit the government's also got

a very high debt level it's it we've seen before a situation in which people's people start to worry that the government is going to force the central bank to print the money the so-called fiscal dominance and once that sort of sensed starts to creep in you could you could see inflationary expectations start to move pretty quickly we've seen it before in history. now that this is not a prediction i'm saying it is possible. thank you for that clarification i want to talk about this the middle class in the u.s. in europe is still very very indebted but hasn't enough do you leveraging occurred to rule out another large scale financial crisis. i'm sorry i missed that erin please so you know the middle class in the u.s. and the u.k. mean europe not just the u.k. it's still very indebted but has enough do leveraging occurred to rule out completely another financial crisis a large scale financial crisis i should say. no i don't believe so i don't believe

so the the honest truth is that the only place as far as i know where there's been a significant degree of household duty verging. is in the united states and that really has to do with the rather peculiar character of the you know jingle mail and whatever but virtually everywhere else there's been very little progress that's being made overall if you add in the government it's in addition to the household debts debts are higher now not lower and there are a number of countries where they haven't really had the crisis because their banking system continued to make more. the drones throughout the crisis and i'm thinking about my own country canada all the nordiques and a number of others and in those countries household debt levels are absolutely at record levels household prices are absolutely at record levels and this is another

source of vulnerability going forward so do i think this thing is over no i don't how much is public debt a factor here particularly in the eurozone. well public debt can i say this martin wolf and many other people are quite right in suggesting that if you have a situation in which private sector debt is too high they must cut back on their spending in order to save more and reduce the host or debt it is the government's job to step in and as it were absorb ok the or to mitigate the downward tendency in overall spending and that's a good thing but it is got to be. done in the context of some kind of plan of getting the whole thing under control over time and one of the worries that i have is particularly in the united states with the way your

political system works what we know is that there isn't a plan and therefore there is a vulnerability in europe my own personal view is that there's been too much upfront austerity but there's no question that there's a general commitment to keeping everything under control on the fiscal side over time and that's a good thing. now the euro zone is operating under a different institutional structure i think one country u.s. or the u.k. in where the national governments have sovereign currency supported by unlimited financial resources of the national banks of those countries so do you think this limits fiscal space in the eurozone and if so is that a good thing. well i think it i think it does limit the fiscal space. in the sense that you recall these the historical in the same sort of way is the historical defining event in the us was the great depression i think the a story

called defining event in europe was the big government deficit in germany and in central europe that then morphed into hyperinflation and that's really sort of what the germans in particular are concerned about and right from the start any efforts either to increase fiscal spending and or to allow the e.c.b. to support fiscal spending elsewhere has been very very firmly resisted by by the germans and by the central europeans. short. i think it's bad. you're only going to get good and that's that's the challenge that we all face is trading off the short run versus the long run it is hard but you know what mr what you have enlightened us thank you so much is such a pleasure talking to you and i have to have you back on very soon that was the chairman of the economic development and review committee at the organization for economic cooperation and development time now for today's.

big deal time with the wonderful edward harris and today we're discussing that public and private. person defending the average person's debt on credit cards utilities and other unsecured loans is five times larger than it was at the beginning of the recession in two thousand and eight. there has also been an increased amount of people declare bankruptcy for awesome stuff so edward what's going on in ireland talking about this so i think that's a good little country to segue into this whole thing because ireland supposed to be the country that is doing the best in the periphery so if you think about you know there were the core countries in europe germany austria those countries the netherlands and they had the periphery which was ireland spain and

a bunch of other countries and ireland has done the supposedly but here's a country that still has a lebanon. unemployment you have a quintupling unsecured credit in the in the country and house prices are still forty percent below where they wore at the peak so we're still in a world of her in ireland and the debt is still there because they haven't been able to restructure that minimum the private and then the public debt has gone from twenty four percent of g.d.p. two hundred twenty three percent of g.d.p. so one hundred percent increase now and we know that the whole world was hit hard by the great financial financial crisis but ireland particularly hard so i want to ask you you know how does this compare to debt consumer debt here in the u.s. consumer has gone down somewhat but if you look at the trend over the last fifty to sixty years we're much in the higher. when we were in say the fifty's the sixty's

or the seventy's we're probably on par with where we were at some point during the one nine hundred ninety s. so in terms of did love or gene. if we had a recession the potential for massive d. leverage is definitely still there and i think that you know what william white was saying about the fact that you know in aggregate if you look at the g twenty thirty percent more public and private debt together than we were before in terms of the plans that were trying to work out how to get out of this hole there hasn't been enough credit right there haven't been enough you know there's not been enough. wiping the slate clean and then people started it would just actually trying to increase aggregate demand by increasing the amount of credit and that was the problem to begin with and eventually you know the fifty's and the sixty's and it how come you just go back to wages where we just borrowing to buy now and before we want what what does this really come down to your. view is that we've seen

a stagnation in wages over a larger period of time and the forces that are behind that are difficult and it could be the fact that you have a whole group of people whole swath of people in asia coming online that weren't there before that are very well educated they're competing for wages with people in the west in the united states and in europe and so middle class wages have stagnated and while they have stagnated at the same time interest rates have gone so what do you do in order to make up the shortfall a lot of people taking on debt and i think that's where we are and. you can't get interest rates to get out any further so really that game is sort of played out and that's why we're getting this huge mass of the love which is it's pretty scary stuff but you know i saw something by joseph stiglitz on debt restructuring basically and what does this have to do with what william white was talking about earlier was think you know we're looking at potentially i think the stiglitz the

one you're talking about is in argentina so argentina defaulted and i think that we are looking. within the euro zone we already had one with greece right greece was actually upgraded by moody's very recently but nonetheless they still have a debt to g.d.p. government debt to g.d.p. of one hundred eighty percent this is higher than it was in argentina so the question is how are they going to be able to support this without some sort of backstop from the e.c.b. so i think that what stiglitz was pointed out is that when it comes to sovereign debt restructuring is a messy thing the whole thing that happened with regard to the culture of getting it all in argentina makes it much more difficult to have these restructurings because you're always going to have these holdouts how do you get rid of that public debt so the concept that you can go from private debt and then he put on to the public balance sheet the way that irene has done and i'm sorry we got to go i'm sure this will be the last time we talk about that thank you so much that's all

from now please check out our facebook page facebook dot com slash boom bust our t. please tweet us at erin aid at edward and h. from all of us here at the best thank you for watching we'll see you next time. well. it's technology innovation all the developments from around russia. the future of coverage. ali. you know.

pleasure to have you with us here on our t.v. today i'm rollers to show. i'm abby martin the stories we cover here we're not going to hear any rights other big story extra headlines and talking as a reason they don't want you to now that are important that we should be completely out now let's break the set.

elyria hamas agreed to a another three day ceasefire the last joint humanitarian. effort just a few hours. a city outside the eastern ukrainian city of donetsk reportedly under rocket attack we look at how civilians are trying to survive. the. american officials. usa idea. of a harmless health program through. the .