the emergence of new media. is certainly taking a pummeling through the emergence of new outlets such as he however i do think that the mainstream media do have very powerful legs. i can watch the sunday morning talk shows and i see the same faces the same cries for american action american bombing american intervention and the alternative media then. shows up a few hours later with very appropriate denunciations criticisms. ridicule but what really counts the people who come on all those shows and shake their fists at russia. syria or the people who are writing in the year or speaking on the alternative media i wish i could say it was the latter i unfortunately i still think that it's leave people who are on the mainstream media who set the

agenda who dominate the conversation that's a very good point i asked to go to you in washington i suppose we do still react to it myself in alternative media still do react to what the mainstream dictates as the narrative we do and we don't you know it's interesting that you bring this topic up peter because just this week variety magazine published an article about the diminished credibility of the night time news anchor if you remember during the vietnam war walter cronkite had a great impact on the united states with his reporting on the vietnam war right now over at a.b.c. news it's george stephanopoulos there good morning america host that really has the most credibility over there people now don't look at the mainstream media as their main source of information anymore now people go to get breaking news to social media outlets or they go to opinion blogs or people that they trust people like glenn beck for example or people go and read my blog because they're looking for an alternative viewpoint to the mainstream me. a narrative i feel as if we're in right

now sort of the change time the change over a period from the credibility of the mainstream media being the only outlet for resourceful reporting where people are looking for people who are more attached to news stories as they happen on the ground why would i want to read what george stephanopoulos has to say in new york city about the situation in ukraine when i can go and i can read newspaper reports and blogs immediately from the situations as they're happening on the ground or i can subscribe to the twitter account of a reporter that's going on the ground i sort of feel as if right now is the time when the mainstream media is having a big changeover and that's why they're having a loss of revenue that's why they're having to close down bureaus that's why c.n.n. is having to change their reporting style so i feel like right now is a good time for freedom of press and for freedom of expression despite some of the crackdowns by intelligence agencies or newspapers like the guardian for printing the snowden leaks if you remember when they destroyed their hard drives and things like that any you know what kind of environment are we living in here because you

know acid which is right the loss of revenue the loss of audiences but i would say the loss of credibility as well. i agree with all those points and they are working into a very can dismiss model from the twenty twentieth century and we have new generations growing up the digital natives who get all their information over the internet so they will model is no longer feasible charging for news is no longer feasible but yes i think credibility is the key problem here and this really set in the right setting in the run up to the war against iraq in two thousand and three where all our corporate media rushed to support the invasion they repeated the lies in the fake intelligence pointing to the mainstream news by our intelligence agencies and that has been found to be absolute fabrication and yet for example in the u.k. on the very eve of the debate in the houses of parliament about whether to go to war this was the process that happened where the lies were fed into the mainstream media we had screaming headlines saying things like person forty five minutes from forty five minutes. i get it and that's i think when the the end of the credibility

began now of course and as often mentioned you know people do go to twitter they do want to see what's going on on the ground and they just don't trust the corporate media because they can come ration of control of most of the corporate media now it's in the hands of a very very very small number of very powerful media companies who have cost very close to the power to govern it so there's that sort of credibility issue to george i sometimes think this is the age of disbelief because it's really interesting is that we have so many outlets available to us now more than we could have imagined twenty years ago but media myself as a journalist i have to spend a lot of time to get the right frame story here because i know what the political opinion certain blogs out of individuals certain institutions and you have to really keep your nose to the grindstone to really understand what's going on. specialization is the part of the world that i live in and i it's

a lot of work you know antiwar dot com is a really good source but it's still a lot harder than i think most people think if you want to find out what's. called the truth that's absolutely correct. there is now so much information just simply swamping the internet that it is very hard to sift through it all see what is reliable the problem is that the in the you media. rely very much on the traditional media because the traditional media. were able to gather news i.d.'s very expensive to run a bureau it's very expensive to have reporters all over the world so what goes on in the alternative media the very social media is essential. transmission of stories that have been gathered in the. traditional media

so it's not like the new media are actually doing a lot of news gathering themselves because it's very hard so while it's true that the traditional media are losing revenue and they're doing worse but in many ways that isn't a good thing because it means that they are even less able to run the bureaus to run the reporters to do the news gathering and they got more and more reliant on the same wire services of almost same reporters and so much of what happens is gathered in the traditional media is sounds exactly the same because it's all coming from the same sources so what we have in the social media. i'm going to acknowledge and i'll go ahead anyway you want to jump in go ahead please do and i mean i take the point you're just making but i think he's missing there is a sort of elephant in the room about the new media here at the moment and that is the model that is that started out with leaks where they did produce the news stories because they they got the information wrong and they could put the

information out directly to the people who needed to read it the citizens without filtering it through the prism of news gathering organizations so this is sort of radical transparency and sure we can mix it has its problems but of course it spawned a whole new generation of leaks type sites things like globally and secured to open a whole range of other bewildering leaks and i think this is this is the new model of media this is the alternative media and that's why the old model i think it's just playing catch up now are sort of one of the. sort of go ahead. i don't know it's got are sort of the whole point is you are going to go ahead i just want to talk about i want to talk about consumption patterns here you know the atlantic published an article that's week that took a look at the analytics for what kind of news and journalism that people are consuming and they basically compared it to cotton candy versus broccoli and then if you look at it people will be when they're appalled like al-jazeera do a poll saying what kind of news and journalism do people watch and they found that most people are liars. they'll say i want good hard hitting news and journalism but

what they really want if you watch their consumption patterns is buzz feed like a list of calls of cat pictures and so if we look at this from an isp person active of corporate control versus consumption patterns you have to understand that nowadays it's the consumer that has the power in the in the media market and the consumer is deciding by by their clicks exactly what kind of journalism happens around the world so i don't really see any more of a sort of overarching conspiracy by corporate media elites of controlling of the narrative where it's really just a matter of revenue it's where is the money going i actually just created a brand new website that's aimed at that cotton candy market and it's called liberty viral dot com and we don't do any real hard journalism other than to sort of rehash of the argument that have already been made we make buzz feed stylistical and i mean it explodes consumers want this kind of media and so yeah i'm a curious and i want to sort of you know a sort of what do you think the role of the what do you consider the brave new world what the consumer wants is not necessarily good for people kate george you

know and that i joined a matter of print media on us is i'm sure it's great people are looking at. you know let's go invade iraq if you get the break we're going to leave. go ahead go hard and i know that's where the consumers want to laugh at absolutely absolutely i think. it's yeah but the whole point is that you know where in the news media business and we are trying to create an informed public we are trying to show that we have an informed citizenry that can we take good sound decisions of policy i mean if you could just put pictures of kids and cats fighting dogs and little children messing around in the on the beach i made sure i mean we can you know how much can we say people to everybody i mean i really are we supposed to save people from themselves good aussie go ahead. well i'm just saying you can't save people from themselves the media the public eye what they want you have to give them what they want or you're going to be out of a. yes george last word before the break well no i mean i really don't think that

we i really don't think we should be in the business of catering to the lowest common denominator because then i mean the you know let's just have it will just tabloid newspapers every well let's just have you know all you know let's nothing but sex and scandals i mean that's all right you know i don't know you know saying no we're going to go that was going break it's like after that short break we'll continue our discussion on the media environment stay with us to. leave the room.

lisa try to clear up the polling going to be good news for you. for sure taking every minute. of the time no no law no well. my old life but. let's say you know trying. this case is going to lead to. sometimes from nothing which. is so mean and. it's not just you still can still be just if you see the state take a look to be. the teacher was. the buddha.

well. science technology innovation all the list of elements from around russia we've got the future covered. on mariner in the financial world. talked to goldman it's not me not stop it is it actually takes no demand to credit. and life there are absolutely and there are but. i restrain. in december as he has in town and. more likely to be raped in college than in the real world. i didn't think people did that to each other when they knew each other i thought rape was a stranger in the precious. girl complaining about the son of an alumni use gives millions of dollars to the school why listen to somebody who's going to lose money

at the school if schools that make money based decisions are much more common than they would ever admit publicly. it's just that nixon decided to close the gold window and turn the monetary system into a painting on a dollar bill in exchange for this deal with a fee out devil the us economy would never aid we were told we could lead lives to balance currency without cost. i've got news for you the portrait of one call center has been hit in the basement of fort knox by the barbarous relic old gold and that portrait of old girl said my dear people chose attire haggard and ugly old dude from monetary to power tree to school murder empires of dead and banking immorality.

did you know the price is the only industry specifically mentioned in the constitution and. that's because a free and open process is critical to our democracy albers. in fact the single biggest threat facing our nation today is the corporate takeover of our government and our crusted like oh we've been to hydrogen why a handful. transnational corporations that will profit by destroying what our founding fathers. are and on this show we reveal the big picture of what's actually going on while we go beyond identifying problems. rational debate and real discussion critical issues facing the book ready to join the movement well they.

want to underline the moment like these policies i think you know. the pleasure to have you with us here on t.v. today i'm sure. we. welcome back to cross talk where all things are considered i'm peter lavelle we're

discussing mainstream and alternative media. and i might go back to you in paris it seems to me another trend here is that news outlets that claim to be jack of are being more and more often punished by the consumer because i think most people believe that this whole theory of objectivity is really gone that's why they go to fox and all even. that's why they come to our t.v. they want they want something much more edgy ok beyond cats and dogs and going to the beach but this objectivity thing i think is it's a car wreck now it doesn't work anymore that's why c.n.n. is being punished so much. well i know that the american press has traditionally prided itself on its objectivity but i think that the long gone from the u.k. media should we say yes and where it's been well known for decades that the spin and the political slant of newspapers is always dictated by the owner by the the

owner of the outlet so for example. and his news international group running newspapers like the sun and the old news of the world could legitimately say that he could actually pick governments because by throwing the weight of his media outlets behind chosen politicians he could sway the voters and i think this is very dangerous path to go down for democracy where these relatively anonymous corporate parent can have such an impact on the democratic direction of a country and it's not conspiratorial to say this it's been laid bare through the phone hacking scandal in the u.k. the degree of interconnectivity between top politicians and between media barons so this goes on time and time again plus of course there's a whole battery of other laws which can be used to control and coerce the media into reporting what the government or the military or the spies want them to report up to an include in secrecy i just. asked in washington go ahead you know really really get media barons have free speech true i mean come on use their money and

power to try and influence people or they're doing is engaging in free speech that's what the media is you talk about you use the word control and certainly i agree with many of your points but you know free speech doesn't exert control people still have the option to choose what sort of media they consume and again rupert murdoch certainly is a free citizen and gets to decide what he wants to print publish and people get to choose what they consume so i don't really like the idea that people get to say oh well you're controlling the media because no one really has a monopoly on the media you know russia today exists fox news exists and i never really big. leaved in the concept of objectivity when it came to reporting i mean you're not objective when you choose what story you want to report vary by choosing a story that you want to report your that you're deciding what the narrative is going to be for the day and i think that this whole idea that there was never any sort of objectivity has sort of been like a wall over there are over the eyes the conservatives have never in the united states have never made any bones about the fact that they are not being objective they're biased but they're fair and the reality is that this is the liberals in our country who have said you know a.b.c.

knows all we're objective in the media the republican party just came out with an announcement in the last month saying that they are going to start picking and choosing which debates which networks are going to be allowed in the whole presidential debates because they know that it's a farce that the liberal media in the united states has any semblance of objectivity they never have they only convinced people that they were george but it seems to be because of what i've become you know hey i have any anger because of what any did say and what austin said one of the things that i think that's happening and i find it bothersome in some ways is that we have parallel universes you could have murdoch in his little universe there and then you have people people on twitter on facebook and they're getting more and more divorced and then i think this could be very dangerous because people feel a sense of just not being enfranchise in society they have their own small communities believe me i know that from facebook personally. yes that's exactly right and so what we now have is these news new news shows in

which a standard narrative is presented i mean most recently we had the standard narrative of russia and the ukraine and the standard narrative what is putin up today's putin want to revive a soviet empire and that's the standard narrative now of course if you don't want to hear that and if you want to hear a much much better and a much more balanced account of what was going on in the ukraine there were other sources however what was important was what was happening in those mainstream outlets because they were shape. they were the ones that were getting the message across to the policymakers on the policy makers were listening to them the policy makers were not listening to the alternative universe in the alternative it's ok so it seems to me they're beginning to go i think ok going to any job in paris. is just just a very quick point on that for example although the mainstream narrative about the need to intervene in syria over the last few years was being pushed to go towards

intervention and for example the u.k. politicians were keen to follow that narrative however there was so much distrust in the mainstream media's message around syria after what happened in iraq and after what had happened in libya that the pressure came from below in order to stop cameron from actually going in intervening so it can you know if this distrust. between the consumers of the media and the mainstream media is growing and i think it is beginning to influence some of the political decisions are soon. going to head with a degree there because george well i'll just say that i think that the issue of the pressure from below is yes it's up to a point true but there was pressure from below before the invasion of iraq i mean there was an enormous amount of number of protests throughout the world millions of people demonstrated on the eve of the iraq invasion it didn't make one bit of difference syria there was a there was a vote in parliament and there was

a change we don't know the exact mechanics of why obama backed away the last minute but obama was clearly planning on bombing i mean we were hours away i know why the exotic initial are going to have a pretty good because of the rise of the power go ahead of it and i know why obama backed away it was because he had he had no support from either the republican party or the democratic party because the difference between the war in iraq and the war in syria is that they anti-war activists didn't have a half a million to a million fans on facebook back in two thousand and one because. the social media power didn't exist you see things have changed in the last decade people like myself we now have huge audiences which we can use real democrat democratic power against our legislators our elected officials when you talk about democracy i mean social media is the real democracy now if there is a new initiative that's going on such as the push for a war in syria people like myself an antiwar dot com can go out and we can now tap our wide array of resources that we have in order to put pressure on our

legislators and the pressure from the american public came in the form of democracy it came in the form of electronic mails and that came in the form of social media i mean no one wants to have a negative social media campaign aimed at them and no one even knew what that was back during the war in iraq but now nobody wants their facebook page assaulted by you know the tea party anymore so i think that things have really changed in the last decade in how you talk radio you think i read it and i really don't think george. george jump in and i you know i really don't think so i think that was a clear case that the ground fell from under the feet oh i i'm on the there was a great deal of collapse in the government's case i mean it was clear that i mean it. was written about this extensively the intelligence agencies had pulled the rug from under obama's feet he really didn't have any backing for his claims and obama was looking for a way out and president putin provided him with

a way out obama doesn't care and the good ministration doesn't care about people on facebook of public opinion and the sputnik opinion does not change foreign policy now but the idea of machines do care is a good price and i was never going to get to an authorization of military force the president was never going to get an authorization of military force from this congress because the elected officials our country our presidents name our presidents never get all the rights that you and i get on to the judiciary had already begun as i was going to go to paris annie and one of the interesting thing i agree with. and so as we have the advent of facebook and we have you tube very important twitter etc etc but one of the things the broader picture understand. very importantly it has been mentioned on this program was the war in two thousand and three against iraq in the subsequent occupation which is disastrous but we also have the financial crisis of two thousand and eight two thousand and nine which i think got a lot of people looked at the establishment in the media if they were betrayed by

that you know the one percent were saved and bailed out within a matter of months everybody else was left in the gutter and i think when we get these new tools again going back to my analogy of parallel universes in the brokerage business model as you mentioned but we are going in different directions here there is an empowerment from below i don't know if it's ever ever works out very well in the end but people do feel empowered. and they are beginning to yes people are finding their individual voices and they're losing their deference for authority and i think they're more willing and more able to challenge that broken poverty and that's what we're seeing now one of the pushback from that in my view it's almost like an arms race between we do people trying to hold onto our rights and protest against some of these inequalities and injustices and illegal wars and then what i suppose is now the military security state gathering more power is that they can watch us and survey us and push back against our fight for our freedoms

more effectively as we saw when they crushed occupy in two thousand and eleven and . just started putting c.c.t.v. cameras up all over the place to spy on them where they are putting people in prison just for being demonstrations on the streets where they deemed occupy london to be domestic extremists or terrorists these are people exercising their democratic rights so people can see this threat so people are moving lighting and i think it's a shot in the arm for our rights here george you know they're just saying that the because of the time there is no civil used against those tyrants ok we're almost out of. george i always thought the n.s.a. is but if you think they claim that it's a censor looking for terrorists but no they're not they're looking at people like us on this program to make sure we stay in line. so that that's exactly right i mean that's the point about the internet is just that yes i mean there was it has been people can write their own blogs but it also means that governments can monitor exactly what everybody is up to just to go back to what annie's point about the occupy movement i mean you'd have thought that this

movement which captured people's imaginations now with all the social media occupy should have had a huge impact i mean you know because you can do so many more things now with the social media than you could a few years ago and yet it was repressed and it also fizzled els you know i remember you know the strikes of the mind of strikes of the one nine hundred seventy s. in britain it was just one guy with a payphone and yet they were able to mobilize the masses of people moving from one . place to another copeland it in the is a sophisticated technology you need a movement you need a lot of organization so social media are one part of the jigsaw but they know by itself it's just not going to do all that mud ok on that point thank you very much fascinating program many thanks and i guess in new york washington and paris and thanks to our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time and remember prostate.

on marriage in the financial world. act. cannot stop is the only techno demand. in life there are and there are fucked. you've got a lot of sneering and negative press for your engagements here in russia especially for your public appearances with food and even though they weren't explicitly political you were just supporting sports one of the scenes that certain people regime has become very adept at is controlling the media for example right here c.n.n. do i think c.n.n. is you know completely telling it like it is no i c c have an agenda i think

through jim is is bought and paid for. i asked ray. in december two thousand and ten. more likely to be raped in college than in the real world. and unthinkable did that to each other when they knew each other i thought rape was a stranger in the bushes. girl complaining about the son of an alumni whose gives millions of dollars to the school why listen to somebody who's going to lose money at the school of schools that make money based decisions are much more common than they would ever admit publicly.

to you in reality radiation is still there it's weak and it is killing our children they aren't dying also hard conditions asked no leukaemia but the authorities are still hiding the truth for most still and i don't know why don't they have children of their own because you heard so much to know the two counts protect our children from this. image and it's it's huge and it's vulgarized darwin science and punishment for an uncommitted crying i was there a lot is to learn to be. innately feeble minded still today for the few i don't know why. but i still don't know why genetic improvement through forced sterilization the basis for nazi ideology they don't stop at just sterilizing yet not going to go to the point of death. for years rarely discussed.

till now really rather not talk about that right. heavy artillery attacks killed at least three people in the outskirts of town yet east ukraine with residential areas pounded by shells as the army tries to retake the city from local militia. fast food is leaving a sour taste for russian regulators who are suing mcdonald's today over quality against the backdrop of escalating tit for tat sanctions between moscow and the west. and washington considers evacuating iraqi refugees blockaded by jihadist fighters it's also sending over a hundred additional military advisors to help cut its troops may concern the u.s. is getting too deeply involved.