tv Watching the Hawks RT June 30, 2017 7:29am-8:01am EDT
7:29 am
news outlets that this is not just a c.n.n. problem but of corporate news media in general in rowling's rolling stone journalist matt taibbi recently observed that instead of seeking out broad audiences by selling the miller coverage i'm tony balance big media companies today are abandoning the hope of being credible in both directions and instead aggressively hunting for demographics but. it can journalism survive demographic hunting in the multitude of characters without character let's find out start watching cogs. get the. real deal with. as it were to pull out of it. what they like you but i got. the complete. with. this.
7:30 am
week's. welcome aboard the watching the hawks i haven't had a row with her and tabitha was to help us find the answers to whether or not c.n.n. and other mainstream news outlets can survive the new normal of ratings and demographics based journalism and just how culpable the new presidents when it hellery clinton's last had on this new trend we turn to one of the few truly independent thinkers in the field of journalism working today reporter and author of the recent book and same clown president dispatches from the twenty sixteen circuit is the one the only mattei. matt always a pleasure having you on a will will will start with this that you touched on this in a recent article rolling stone more and more the news media is kind of shutting any pretense of objectivity and it's pretty much everything is going full partners as you can see this with maddow and olbermann on the left and breitbart man of the in the gang on the right. i think for most of us who you know tragically followed news
7:31 am
media has a good part of our lives we've seen this building you know since since you and most of the c. of fox but barely i think if we're see that this pitch could we really attribute all of this just to donald trump the loss of clinton and you know russia. you know i think this trump and this are both symptoms of the same thing which is that you know we out of the sermon towards polarization in this country you know in the old days somebody like donald trump could never been elected because. candidate one. he's had to conquer the center and that's what both political parties from looking for they were looking for somebody to quote unquote crossover appeal. but now it doesn't work anymore and this mirrored the old media strategy you know some media creation
7:32 am
went out the. standard traditional media method of hearing one republican quote with one democratic vote and having this kind of very structured balance to all political reporting with a distant third party third person that all who read an old commercial strategy which was designed to try to appeal to the widest possible audience but. the strategy is out the window and now companies aren't doing that they're not going why they're hunting for demographics and that's the commercial strategy you're going after liberals over here or conservatives over here libertarians over here and that's how you make your money so it's not it's not really a political thing necessarily it's just us this is just how media companies are approaching the financial aspect of their work and their profession. now to james o'keefe who made this sort of sting video on c.n.n. always seems to run into this issue and some on the left face the same accusations
7:33 am
that you have to decide whether you're a journalist or you're an operative if you're reporting on events with a very clear bias like he is or some other people in the business it might endure you to your base but you're never going to be trusted or heard that same sort of thing with the president it's like you're never going to be trusted or heard outside of your particular political least so isn't it a pretty momentous shift from what we were always taught that good journalism is is at mete out good journalism tried to try to reach as many readers or consumers as possible and that challenging your reader or their the viewer is the right thing to do yeah absolutely i mean i think but i don't i don't agree with. doing the kind of work that i do i'm very opinionated nowhere right and i grew up actively disbelieving in the traditional dust definition of objectivity everybody's always taught in journalism school which is that you know the reason to believe in
7:34 am
it is because you know we're taught. you know we should strive to be even as possible and to see this is a perfect middle but there is no such thing you're always betraying your point of view and you know in terms of where how big you make a headline whether you put it a story mph one piece sixteen. whether you're using you know what alarmists alarmist language or not alarmist language there's always a tauriel choice and also i never really believed in that aspect there was. video. i always thought it was really more of a salesman than anything else but what's happening now is that. even the most traditional mainstream companies are moving away from the model i mean in. my view the media is that it works best when you have a mix of things when you have that kind of catch just the facts ma'am kind of reporting that you used to mark the three major networks on the one hand and then you also have you might have hundreds or territory southern tom wolfe on the other
7:35 am
hand and even there's a place for people like james o'keefe you know i don't love his politics but but i think there is a place for that kind of stuff actually. but what's interesting now is that sort of everybody is becoming opinionated in the end the idea that you shouldn't strive for objectivity that's now becoming mainstream. i think you're exactly right i like that idea of kind of you got to have like all pieces of the pie that's why you know like to me it's like that's the same thing i like in my politics is give me as many different ideas for as many different parties as possible because i think when you put them all together you might have some good stuff there now let's look at c.n.n. is playing clearly from the videos we've seen in all of that at least amongst the rank and file or whatever you want to say they kind of think a lot of what they do is pretty much based on a replay of the ratings so is this play for ratings. you know. i want to get your thoughts on that and your thoughts on c n n is kind of current predicament
7:36 am
chasing down the russia gate story is pretty much put them in a very weird place but will it have any effect on them long term. well i worry about it for them i mean you know not that the fate of c.n.n. really keeps me awake at night but. obviously they're shoptalk and that goes on in any big media company and you know. what that producer said is that i'm usually you know people gossip amongst themselves and i've probably said it to you about the motives of my bosses but i think what was interesting about that is you know there's there's. the the dirty little secret of the media right now is that everybody's making an enormous amount of money and it's a dollar trump you know the business that had been in a profound inexorable decline for decades is now suddenly kind of on the rebound and everybody's doing pretty well you know from the biggest media companies
7:37 am
newspapers even to. small independent outlets and in terms of the big television networks the russia story has been very very successful tour a lot of these networks got people thinking you know the way the way that he put it is. the appeal is that people are turning on the television every night and they're the fate of the nation is hanging in the balance the same way you do i'm on election night and this gets people to tune in the problem with that is. enormous downward pressure on reporters to come up with the scoops to keep that up and what happens the reporters i know that you know working in the business if you feel that pressure to come up with something. to keep the audience's interest. you might miss a little you know eventually you might start to overhear things from your sources and i think you know c.n.n. had a couple of minutes recently and that's probably that probably doesn't happen in
7:38 am
a different atmosphere i think. it's kind of a body of a god matter we're going to say that they were like you know whether he resigns or paged or leaves office or whatever happens about all the race really going to be that day we're going to see news rooms and out of arizona producers and c.e.o.'s going why i missed all problems. i mean i wouldn't be surprised true i mean you know you met you remember the answer in this clip from les moonves last year that you know donald trump. terrible for america but great for business. due to the head of c.b.s. i'm sure the executives are sitting there thinking this is the greatest thing ever the whole truth has has achieved something good nobody has ever been able to achieve the news business use he's got. allow the news business to code into the profit margin margins of the entertainment business and this is previously unthinkable especially when you look at the statistics you read all the time the confidence in the news media is that all time low that people believe us less than
7:39 am
they ever have but they're tuning in more than me ever have and so what does that tell you that they're consuming media to the news more than they ever have but they're consuming it in different way they're doing it for entertainment purposes almost in a way and that is it's amazing news because they must be really excited about it yeah it does seem weird it seems very strange to be you know people hate watch they hate wires you know the republican debates they hate watched everything alice and i feel like that's kind of what we're doing now but giving up that objectivity isn't the mainstream media in these mainstream news outlets also shooting themselves in the foot on that put on the public trust because why would the general public trust a c.n.n. or a new york times if they continue to sacrifice this integrity just for pushing ratings or openly for a political narrative i mean we used to lock reversal leslie fox news for the exact kind of reporting that we're seeing now today on c.n.n.
7:40 am
and m s n b c. i mean yes i agree with you i started to say this last year last summer because i started to see things moving in the stir action and i was really worried about it and you're exactly right we picked on fox and me we picked on the daily caller and the washington times and and all that all those outlets for being completely tilted towards this. politicize you and overtly targeting a demographic by feeding them news they know they knew their audience but like. but the the end result of that and we saw this last year with the republican race that you if you do that long and even your own audience after a while because the suspect that you're not really on the level and we saw us again with trump look what happened when the republican media suddenly decided to trump was not appropriate carol because there was a moment last year when remember when the national review published that opus with
7:41 am
the twenty leading conservatives opposing trump including glenn beck. what happened republican audiences tuned out those people because they didn't trust them and why didn't they trust them because they knew that they weren't about anything but but a political fight about business and that's that's what i worry about the media has to be only about one thing and that's about getting stuff right if we start to you know try and other roles whether it this is about politics whether it's about making money then we're good we get out of our comfort zone and bad things always happen to be the only way we retain trust of people is what is if we make difficult choices just kind of stick to the truth of things no matter how painful that. well you know i think i want to finish up and i'll ask you you know where a where do you see this trend heading and before those out there who you know whether journalists or news consumers you know who kind of would rather have what
7:42 am
we were talking about earlier you know kind of like give me a little bit of everything but but keep some honest integrity somewhere in here and don't politicize mean don't try to sell me you know where do you see where we're going now and where can most people you know what can we do to kind of keep the plight and bring news back to work should be. i think it's going to be very very difficult i mean what the problem is the financial incentives don't run in the right way anymore and the companies now see that there's no way they're going to get everybody the same way the politicians understand that there is no message that's going to appeal to both the left and the right now people are so set in their ways that this is this is entirely a competition about turnout you know on the political side and about energizing your base and they don't even try to think about you know conquering the middle that's just out of the picture now and the same thing for media companies they're given up and so the whole thing is about consolidating. their target viewership and just keeping a hold on them for as long as possible and so that i really worry but the only end
7:43 am
is that there's probably going to be a new generation of reporters you come up and it's probably going to start small turnout media and they're going to be about something different and i'm a bit i'll bit a name that you're going to start to see an exodus of audiences that are going to depart these big networks and they're going to start moving towards these other voices if you are more credible just because they're not about you know politics in there and they're not about just throwing red meat to a demographic. and i hope that that's the case that there's a new generation coming because of politicized media is a characteristic i'm basically everything no no no lived in a couple of them and it's it would be terrible for the united. i couldn't agree with you more really absolutely but matt thank you so much for coming on once again man the turtle is rolling stone magazine always a pleasure of your. very take care. as we go to break don't forget to let us know
7:44 am
what you think of the topics we've covered on our facebook and twitter pages and see our poll shows that r t v dot com coming up we welcome former cia agent and torture whistleblower john kiriakou and former military intelligence officer officer joseph pitman into the hawk's nest to discuss their new book the convenient terrorist you don't want to miss this stay tuned to watch from the hawks. i see you now let's see if i'm still at the same time ask. who's your mole you know. we might need to move to a lot of households yet completed movies. plus the. magnificent. someplace from which is my food food i think they may save us from people really
7:45 am
nice and friendly and i might the foreigners feel welcome in russia it's a very good movie because the food was does think it's not very enjoyable place to be in really very friendly pay poll my son. had a. little bit to be some some basic going through the state punch stage and also they were nice people they were like yeah we're very glad that i'm here which is there still is still we have to learn something in the muslim world you either have dictatorship and therefore i don't think there's any interest in the movie anymore big. bell the other couple. had a bit. of
7:46 am
a lot of. our own sonar calling from his elaborately record today or tomorrow song we're going to be true in every. yahoo tell about. it with. a very new. girl is the dog everybody wants poor and the people here living your creator does lego book. you she's old enough to post the center of things. i'll tell ya i see back home. in
7:47 am
a loop in the both of those telling you that. if you. just. have to leave the last that you can really good barbecue at the bar. i don't know that my final thing before the cell phone was a cell phone so. buddy investigate the police officers behavior as well. l.t. drugs and weapons presence here. all the only people. as you.
7:48 am
know as the war on terror approaches that sixteenth anniversary we sometimes forget just how shocking and unprecedented some of its darkest turns have ben take for example the case of the beta the first so-called high value target captured by the cia following nine eleven was a beta spent years traveling the cia's secret prisons circuit and went through a variety of torture methods including waterboarding sleep deprivation forced hunger and nudity also beatings in two thousand and six he was transferred to a special section of guantanamo where he has then ever sense to take us through these dark twists and turns we're joined earlier by john kerry aco an axiom a officer who led the capture of abu zubaida and just of hickman an ex military
7:49 am
intelligence officer who took custody of him and guantanamo working together kiriakou and hickman recently published the convenient terrorist an all encompassing account of the abos a beta affair. thank you very much for joining us talking about your new book let's start i want to commit terrorist as a book because i don't rarely do we get this chance where we can kind of see both the capture of. a war on terror suspect especially a controversial publicized one like. jon what about his capture of anything in his capture wells with you and the events surrounding his capture typical for the war on terror frankly they were not typical what was typical was we would break down the door of a place that we thought was an al qaeda safe house there would be one or two people inside they would give up immediately we would come for them take them outside and eventually get around to interviewing them. i mean it was completely totally
7:50 am
different we could not narrow his locations down to any fewer than fourteen possible sites and so we had to fly in a huge team half f.b.i. half cia we worked with pakistani military authorities and we hit all fourteen sites simultaneously at two o'clock in the morning we ended up capturing we weren't allowed to say in the book the cia would allow us to say exactly how many people were captured but it was many dozens of people so that was highly unusual what was even more unusual though is you know we were very specific with our pakistani friends that we had to take him alive and as soon as he climbed to the roof of his safe house to try to jump to the roof of the neighboring house to escape the pakistanis just opened fire on him and shot him three times with an a k forty seven they shot him in the fi the growing in the stomach and the doctor that night who saved his life told me that he had never seen wounds so severe where the patient
7:51 am
lived but he was a strong young man and he pulled through world is incredible. just so while while stationed at the guantanamo bay prison you thought for a stand the imprisoned man abs that bedo with his. what is his treatment there typical far for prisoners at guantanamo bay at and at the time as a former marine as an army and army sergeant did did the treatment of the beta bother you at all well the treatment of detainees in guantanamo but bothered me as a baby was treated very different in the case where he was sent to air to report them up. from the airport it one time to the deal and he actually took custody of him we took him into a classified ok she was classified base most people in the media and called camp seven now. camp seven is totally.
7:52 am
you know off limits to any other person known to detainees separates him from the other detainees and one of the strangest one of the things that really caught me in a briefing was they told us that they had to keep these fourteen high value detainees that arrived on september ninth two thousand and six one of them being observation of they had to keep them separate from the rest of seanie population because if they were in with the other detainees population the other sunni population want to kill them and i brought up the question in the briefing they said well. if we have the worst of the year already litter litter these guys the worst the worst worst none of this makes sense of course i wasn't i was overlooked and they just went on with their briefing but none of it made sense he was treated very differently this acted he was put in place. though it's interesting because.
7:53 am
as you know labeled as the number three man. trainee in kind of his ilk i'm in that side of the equation on the converse lee a lot of activists and humanitarian rights people say that it is completely not a terrorist and he's never been there is not a crow it never done anything wrong in his life. i want to ask it in your opinion john where does a beta actually fall on the spectrum of what the one side says is number three man is the completely clean lead where where where where there's a joe and i really really struggled to to make sure that the readers understood that was a beta situation and position was far more complicated than dick cheney or the opposite way to defense attorneys would have you have you believe i was a bit it was not the number three and that was just simply not true i don't think that cia officers and white house policy makers were lying at the time that they
7:54 am
said he was number three i think the intelligence was so bad that they just didn't know and they made an assumption that turned out to not be true on the other hand the defense attorneys would have you believe that this poor poor man was mistakenly captured that the intelligence was so faulty that. his life was essentially ruined for something that he didn't do and that's just not true either it's something down the middle i was a beatle was the largest station for al qaeda even though he did not ever formally join the group and never pledged fealty to osama bin laden he was the group's largest he ran the house of martyr safe house and push our he opened and ran the. al qaeda training camp in southern afghanistan if you were an al qaeda fighter and you wanted to go home you needed a passport maybe a ticket it was the guy so he was certain involved but he was not the monster that
7:55 am
the white house wanted to merican to believe the crime never matched the polish never have a graphic we can all agree on that well let me ask this you know so who is this guy who who is a bad why why why do you guys think that the cia the administration and the powers that be at the time just became so obsessed with him what was the value. i was a bit is a palestinian that was raised from saudi arabia he has a child here he even as a as a young teenager he started questioning the status quo he started questioning you know the how he was treated as a palestinian living in saudi arabia he started questioning how the palestinians were treated by the israelis he was always he was a good kid he was a smart kid but he was he was rebellious and had a lot of beliefs he was always looking for for his place in life and i think when
7:56 am
he went to afghanistan for johnny training. many many he went to india for college and the meant someone who was going for a job any training in afghanistan which is not uncommon in in the middle east. for someone to do this he really thought he found his niche and thought he felt were saudis down where he was supposed to be was. it was a mujahideen. and so baby is. i think one of the biggest things in the government why the day's things the government really want to preserve beta at once they realize he wasn't a number three guy wasn't al qaida was he was. even as a rule judge that was good was. is very variable emerging to government really really warrant is ruled out. as we all learned from watching traffic parklife finds a way and now it appears that nature has found
7:57 am
a way to recycle old cigarette butts in a recent published study researchers at the national autonomous university of mexico have discovered the birds in particular house finches are using cigarette butts to line their nests in response to ticks and other eco parasites while birds living in close contact with humans have long been known to use our trash for nasty building it wasn't until recently that when it comes to cigarettes there may indeed be a math ed to the madness nicotine has always been a battle fresh breath an insect repellant and in an experiment on thirty two house finch nests research discovered that the nests where ticks were introduced the birds were more likely to add cigarette butts to the lining as opposed to the nest that were clean of tickets no word yet of course if big tobacco executives are looking to replace joe camel with tweety bird. or the i know it will be the other but all right that is our show earlier today remember everyone in this world were not told beloved enough or to tell you all about you i am i rolled into it and on
7:58 am
top of the wall if you watch it all those hawks out there are never great but. in a revealing video c.n.n. is shown as many critics of claim the network is more interested in the bottom line and a political agenda rather than reporting on real news we still see an inside evidence free war against donald trump is really at the expense of real journalism. travel destinations so it must be nice to live. crowds of tourists disrupt the city's economic and social life in them and hopefully for us on the scene.
7:59 am
8:00 am
31 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on