what are the most important trends affecting the middle east because there's so much going on right now unfortunately particularly the united states it's overshadowed by what i call freak news i want to do real news on this program here joe your thoughts what how is the middle east changing go ahead it's very easy to get lost in all the details and there's so frankly complex particularly in syria i think the overall if you're looking for a really big picture you have to look at u.s. iranian relations and in that in the subtext of that saudi iranian relations and below that the standoff between saudi arabia bahrain egypt and against qatar which i think could be a prelude to a conflict with iran trying to bring qatar into their own capital the g.c.c. camp they've been too close to iran so i think that conflict again between syria and iran it's a sushi is in between saudi arabia and iran overshadows the entire region their sectarian proxy wars their conflict has to be brought to an end and some kind of an

accommodation between these two regional powers they're not going anywhere there has to be a balance of power there the united states if it wanted to be a great power they're the only ones that have the leverage on both parties to bring them together to end their their their conflict because that spreads all over from back grain to afghanistan certainly lebannon syria and in iraq the iranian saudi conflict is the overall issue right now and it has so many complex local localized conflicts that has to be dealt with and it doesn't look that way at all the trump administration is not doing that they are lowering themselves united states to the level of the sectarian combatants they are just taking sides are taking a sunni side in a frighteningly complex sectarian war that goes across the region this is the major issue in the issue in the region and the major problem that washington is is is committing right now ok let me go to sammy and be right we can talk. american

influence in a second here but can i ask you the same question that i asked joe in your mind what are the main confines of what's going on in the middle east because as joe has pointed out it's a long long laundry list ok go ahead sami. yes i think what this at stake today is the new order in the east because. that. one hundred years ago has definitely gone now that is. but to a different players with different regional powers that opening them up and for instance you have russia. and syria especially in the last two years iran united states of america and. to lesser extent saudi arabia so this is a new order. by the. powers and of course i forgot turkey that is a compact of the regional powers on the. road and

the name of the game today is fighting the. core issue is who will be policing. this the areas of influence that will be controlled by each of the. we have already mentioned so what's at stake today. you. define the balance of power for years. to come in joe it's very interesting in looking at syria here with the end of dash eisel islamic state it seems to me that there's a lot of jockeying position for what could possibly be could be some kind of peace settlement. in your mind here is you know we had tillerson the secretary of state saying if i can quote foreign policy tillerson ready to let russia decide assad's

feat i mean that is a remarkable statement considering the flip flop flip flop flip flop that we keep hearing from washington on syria i mean do you take taylor since words at face value because i mean i thought it was interesting but i mean what's what are these guys going to say tomorrow go ahead joe. no i do not his words at face value i don't think they know what the hell they're doing it's clear that look at the during the campaign trump said he would not announce what his plans are you know military plans or does want to give the enemy the heads up now obviously tactically in a battle that's you don't do that but the strict strategy of the united states for the middle larger middle east or in syria has to be explained to the american people whether we agree with it or not at least the obama administration you know pretty much stuck to regime change which we you know most of us on the show have agreed that that's a mistake but trump we don't know what exactly they're trying to do there except iran iran seems to be the underlying theme in everything you do everything they say

. they've this seems to be shaping up some conflict with iran which is an enormously dangerous and even closer relationship with saudi arabia their religion but israel is taken for granted it's the same with every administration pretty much but the there are even closer to saudi arabia now in particular in this conflict with what they're having with qatar and i think that this is the only thing that we can discern coming out of washington is that they are shaping up to some kind of conflict or confrontation with iran which is an enormous mistake other than that on the day to day politics of whether they want to sod in or not whether russia will decide this or not whether the u.s. is cooperating with russia and syria not or whether they're going to shoot us shooting down syrian aircraft piloted aircraft this is just a complete model for a region that's normally a model but this states is not providing any clarity at least what the hell. they want to see done in the region and this makes it even harder as an analyst to try to figure out what exactly is going on and what the u.s. motives are sammie i get the impression that there's been

a devolution of responsibility here. so taking what joe just said about saudi arabia do you think the big ministration is kind of allocating saudi arabia to be its point man in the region of course it has its israeli we have the saudis and the israelis very close together but there's one problem with all that and that is turkey and now a nato ally here i mean what's going to happen there because there is an enormous amount of friction here and it's all summed up in one word kurds go ahead sami. i think at the end in mind when it comes to the united states of america has been said to clearly by their chief of the pentagon general davis and he's kind of sitting there. for. interests in iran so the goal is facing iran now the problem is. america does not have the tools. to face to iran iraq and

syria it's true that they could do on a proxy which is. in iraq but this has limit because supporting the kurds. and here i mean you can understand the position of secretary of state who try to. set the bridges with russia because washington needs russia to pressure on iran or to limit or or on iran at least in syria so because of obama administration policy or do it was that all were from. lack of clarity. washington lost a lot of tools. a lot of leverage it's true that now it's increasing its presence in terms of. presence on the ground and there are

investing more but it's not easy to get back. to the situation where they were the major force revealing today their primary focus to face up to iran but they need partners saudi arabia is deafening partner but they need other partners to this is where their son is trying to engage with the russian. it's very interesting is because i absolutely agree with sami i think it's the there are fewer and fewer tools of influence but there are more and more troops and troops are not a very good instrument of politics at the end of the day look at the number of troops that are in qatar and what in all of these saber rattling we have from saudi arabia and other gulf countries and the united states is right in the middle of that you have a turkey a nato ally the united states is on the other side in the conflict in syria i mean if this is too much military involvement it actually limits their options in

a way go ahead joe. i'm not sure i agree i think ok but the other way around that the u.s. is now looking for proxies the saudis and israel if they want to attack iran which they've said repeatedly they basically do. mamma but salmond in a pretty calm princes talked about bringing the war inside iran they need the united states this is their long standing goal is to control the united states to back their plans they don't have the military might to fight iran they might have the might to back. to back three months throughout the region particularly in syria but they can't take on iran without the united states coming on board i think that's what we saw on trump went to saudi arabia and to israel that they were lobbying him to do this eventually and it's very scary because trump might be someone who. all along and you do it he seems reckless and as far as qatar goes you know i mean and the qatar situation to get it shows again this enormous split and

really a factor we have to consider is incompetence in washington right now because you've got to listen and not to some one side saying they want to negotiate selman and drops going out on twitter you know back in saudi arabia to saudi arabia to the hill to calling qatar the largest purveyor of terrorism in the world so you've got they've got to get together on the same page somehow or we don't know what's going to happen but they certainly are not. they are being lobbied to be the force for a war against iran and in southeast syria right now and out time for they are backing state their own rebels this is clearly an attempt to cut off the baghdad damascus highway which the iranians used to supply hezbollah this is israel's main concern is that the iranians continue to supply what they've been doing it by air but this is a land route that the americans i think are trying to cut off that seems to be what their aim is although that's also a guessing game right here like that jonah let me just because i says not that i have to hear that we have to go to a hard break and after that hard break we'll continue our discussion on the changing middle east a productive. welcome

to the wonderful world of blood donation i come here every three weeks to get my transfusion to be specific i receive immunoglobulin that my body gets and support is that it's not. produced itself around the world giving blood is seen as a symbol of generosity and does this because it helps people it's just that one of the side effects is that it helped this applies more burning people put their money

on your car immediately after you get done half of all plasma based drugs today come from private companies and are produced from paid plasma small conference in rome or from. one of the risks of a donation in it and then it is proved that the frequency of pathologies is much higher in paid donations in it. if i was lying when i. moved over two years old he will go get the money from the federal and who runs the blood business. with coal make this manufacture come sentenced to public wealth. when the

running closest protect themselves. with the final merry go round be the one percent. we can all middle of the room six. million more you don't need. here's what people have been saying about rejected in the us is a full on awesome the only show i go out of my way to punch you know what it is that really packs a punch. yeah it is the john oliver of r t america is doing the same we are apparently better than blue. see never heard of love back to the. president of the world bank they. were. seriously send us an e-mail.

welcome back to crossfire all things considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing the shifting sands in the middle east. ok let me go back to sami and beirut one of the most important changes that's been going on is the change in leadership in saudi arabia in the sort of giddy about it it looks like washington is given a green light is this really smart to embolden this young crown prince i mean you know the recent foreign policy of saudi arabia has been nothing but an utter disaster in that you know we can look at syria and we can look to yemen but it looks like the saudis are being prodded along early and given the green light from their allies does this worry you for the region and for saudi arabia itself go ahead sami. definitely that is in

a new era in saudi arabia i mean some put it this is that of of appeasement that is definitely in change and. it's more. it's better for the young prince given what's going on was in yemen given the challenge of facing up to iran which is not an easy challenge given that it line in oil prices i mean the conditions of his leadership are not easy told but however one has to keep in mind that it has been directly hit by. inside saudi arabia so that was very close to a yard and maybe this pushed the leadership to this new change in leadership and getting the fact that for the last decade iran's influence in that

region has been increasing by the day let's not forget that in two thousand and three iran was trying to find a deed was the united states of america to be the second in line after the war in iraq today in iraq controlled largely by iran or iran proxies and that each and this road from damascus to baghdad what has been called the shiite crescent is now a reality and this is giving iran a high leverage. and the ultimate test to day one with regard to syria is to see and to check if iran will be to establishment to establish definitely bridge that will link the military in iraq. well

joe we go back to iran i mean it kind of goes to my point in talking about saudi arabia let's go all the way back to the illegal invasion of iraq in two thousand and three and let's go all the way up to two thousand and seventeen i mean iran's in influence is growing in the region well i wonder why it's because one failure in a venture after another i mean all iran has to do more or less stand there and it can influence increase its influence i mean this is i find it just really amazing when there's no learning curve coming out of western countries if you don't like iran why are you helping them indirectly over and over and over again it's i mean it's this is foreign policy internationally leighton's one o one go ahead joe there's no doubt that the american invasion here in iraq in two thousand and three helped iran's position regionally but it also led directly to the existence of islamic state in iraq many of the bath party officials that were kicked out of power joined that group and are trying to get back to power they're almost defeated now in mosul but they'll continue as an asymmetrical warfare

throughout iraq so that they're not going to go away but if you look from a western point of view if you're in brussels or paris or san bernardino or very land or any of the places that have been hit by either orchestrated or inspired attacks by the islamic state are you looking at iran as being a danger to western cities what is the last remaining and back terrorist group that attacked a western city this is a sunni backed saudi inspired and paid for in many ways groups i'm not saying this direct relationship between saudi arabia and those attacks they've certainly been supporting isis we know that from hillary clinton's e-mails so these are the groups that are threatening the west why is the west so obsessed about iran and when it's the threat comes from the saudis back groups and as far as yemen goes you know they was a deal you want to have a deal where the who these were going to withdraw from sanaa and that's when saudi arabia bombed the day that that deal is about to come into into force the only thing that had settled was the presidency and saudi arabia. did not want to see any

kind of democracy within their borders this is been a reckless war with yemen yes they've attacked now it's saudi territory it's become absolutely out of control and mama good soundman as a corrupt deputy crown prince the effective king of saudi arabia has got no democratic control on what he does if any country with any with democracy would have been a lot of trouble politically after which the disaster in yemen but he continues on with this bellicose speech against iran with this possibility even of an invasion of qatar by saudi arabia and its allies this is just getting more and more dangerous and he has a reckless foresee that united states is backing to the hilt we now doubt that that saddam or of trump is great friends with in my column but solomon so i don't know what to say about that now where we're headed with that sami is sticking with. sami this thing with saudi arabia hear it i'm going to agree with joe here it it seems that it wants a gemini in the region and it wants other countries in the region the gulf countries to mirror its domestic politics and foreign policy which means no human

rights no democracy no civil society. al-jazeera comes to mind out of qatar i mean is this what the gulf countries are signing up to and at the same time the more they put pressure on qatar qatar just moves into the arms of the ran again i don't understand the logic of how this supports the national interest of saudi arabia and the security of the entire region it seems are doing everything backwards in brawn go ahead sami. what it comes to democracy or countries and they mean including iran have faith that this. put including including iran on the side including iran including iran course include including of course including iran when you have i mean can set off experts that all of that would be allowed to participate in that action. we cannot talk about democracy it's not about to go

into the ballot it's about free campaigning it's about creating the condemn the checks and balances inside the system and the human rights that are respected but this site i would like to focus on one made sure i mean problem was that tension between sunnis and shia and we cannot jump over to the reality the problem is not only between iran and between the saudi arabia the problem inside the house inside the other board itself you have this big divide between two sick did in groups and this is at the core of what the war happening in syria and this is opposed to could inflame at any point in their been on in kuwait and behind and this. problem i don't think that i mean putting the blame on one side would help definitely between iran and saudi arabia and that killing the real issue would

have a lot but they're going to ising or defeat or develop one part. of the other is not it's not definitely going to how to that is nor. good cop bad cop game here we have a deep divide inside. that putting or putting. the stability of the whole four years and decades to come so if diplomacy has to play at all to push the major players to that each. day yemen case and the syria case can be a good start for this kind of man because the problem is not once more it was a cell. what jordan egypt. we have seen during the last day

of this crisis there arises around qatar qatar is directly i mean. to be poor to. a group. to where fueling terrorism and this crisis is not between qatar and start with. third and fourth major countries in the east including egypt which is a center of gravity of the award in that each and ok kill i mean how carrying divine how how real is it in how is it being used as a political tool i mean if you look at syria for example a secular society. certainly ruled by iron hand but they did did not have that kind of sectarian divide and now it is important to them i mean it

seems to me that washington is pick the sunni's israel is overjoyed because it wants to see the sunni and shia fight and it gives them a breathing room and actually to expand and then you have golan heights it seems to me it's a political tool the sectarianism it is it it isn't innate in the populations of the country because we always began with these are royal families these are dictatorships in there are people here not necessarily states go ahead joe that's a good question first i agree with sam about iran not being full democracy it has more democracy at the saudi arabia and while we're actually sectarian issue the sectarian issue is here i've been now here more than a year and a half in iraq i've spent well more than two years all over the region and it's a real thing on the ground people really do i mean people i know guys here were very friendly with a really good guy the mention the well the moment you mention iran or she isn't they turn into monsters i mean it's just an amazing crowd. however that has come

from the top in a lot of ways there's no question about that it is being used by the rulers of saudi arabia and iran i guess to. push their geo political interests in the region by using religious differences so that you're absolutely right peter in saying that but there are real theological differences you get down and speak with people and they really i'll get upset by things that shia believe that they some many of them believe they're not even muslims so to me theology becomes if there are all of history has been just a way to divide people and not to unite them in any way and that people could believe whatever they want to how they behave that that counts and unfortunately with behavior does bleed into a belief leads into behavior so we see this division is absolutely on the ground as sammy said this is a huge huge problem and again as i said at the beginning only the united states is in a position to do something about that they have to bring the major it's the sunni and iranian powers and i think it's saudi arabia's more of the gravity a center of gravity in egypt it used to be i think egypt they have to bring saudis

on the egyptians who are all can't really stay here so i'm going to turn back here to get them in to we bring those things we together we don't run out of time those were pearls of wisdom many thanks to my guests and herbal and in beirut and thanks to our viewers for watching us here r.t. see you next time and remember crosstalk. there's a saying. that the chief but then he went to the country so let's idea is right to go there was come he said if he was to pass. this country he said. this is what we don't understand how we are poor in such

a country. a. similar. one. if the middle of on board not that got. the food without the plane. would come back to the three story you have to see. to. move. to the bustle of the dubrovnik in venice are all fixed travel destinations so it must be nice to live there or is it. crowds of tourists disrupt the city's economic and social life and i'm

a little bit before this on the celestial get out of the traditional story son now as i am sometime soon as we don't find the needs of a school. while the city's tried desperately not to collapse. the profit of. the couple who proudly globe on the dole coffee cup at home in the bushes up the on saabs knock up the supposed to me of a. mind. is a tourist phobia all fear phone tone identity. is still exist. or rico is treated as one. calls on the hind limb alito

and then will confront him only on the port-o. three cool. little come on you a lot of seats and they can be seen on the island is controlled by the us government and some puerto rican screwy of independents will see it only gonna. do it either way but i mean to sort of right i mean we're digging again with their audience who. still many do wish to join the us hundreds more leave every day. but i'm a long way from india. beings. with the country at a crossroads anger on the island is on the rise. when we see on television left wing say advocates left wingers out there and they're shutting down professors from speaking at colleges so the shutting down colleges. this is an example of them being or acting in an offer terry terry and passé become little

dictators yes and this is the link to the fact that as children they were completely shielded from any of the so-called dangers of life kept in a bubble and so when they become young adults anything that disrupts that bubble a loud sound like a professor saying something that doesn't agree with them they go into shock they go into stuff like meltdown. oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh oh. oh oh oh oh oh oh you know. live up to give it a little bit of that shit. i thought. that.

headlines on the international protests against the g twenty summit. before world leaders even. an independent report said the british people muslims are integrated into society while the governments are failing to fight islamophobia in the media. and c.n.n. . responsible for creating the president. threatening to reveal his identity. thing again.