john oliver of arc to you americans do this in your very own way better than. see people you've never heard of low down to the next president of the world bank so very. seriously send us an e-mail. years of talk santa negotiations over iran's nuclear deal could be ruined amid fears president trump could decertify the historic agreement despite the global nuclear watchdog as well as u.s. and european officials saying tauron has been keeping good side of the bargain. u.s. media claim that the global gaming sensation poky longarm has become a tool for russian hackers. and the u.n. says airstrikes in afghanistan have led to an increase in philly and casualties compared to last year.

hello there you are watching r.t. international broadcasting to you live from the russian capital i'm neki aaron good to have you with us. donald trump expected to announce a new strategy on iran on friday and all bets are on the president ripping up the historic nuclear deal trying palin shied away from airing his confrontational views on the agreements. one of the worst deals i've ever seen disasters deal with a rare one of the dumbest deals or one of the weakest contracts the people that negotiated that deal namely kerry and his friends are incompetent one of the worst deals ever negotiated it was a deal that was hammered out by the u.s. russia france the u.k. china germany and a wrong back in two thousand and fifteen it followed nine years of talks and

a decade long standoff which many viewed at the time as one of the world's most pressing crises well the international nuclear watchdog has been monitoring iran's compliance with the dale says to wrong keeping it signed at the bargain that includes shipping and which the rainy into russia most appalling thousands of centrifuges and removing the core from a reactor at a kid nuclear facility some u.s. officials also backs their view iran has been good to its word well they european colleagues think trumps simply wrong on the issue. isn't technical compliance of the agreement they're in is not in material breach of the agreement and i do believe the agreement today has delayed the development of a nuclear capability but. the signals we're getting from the united states are that the president will explain to the senate that in his view the nuclear agreement with iran is not being fulfilled this is contrary to the view of the you number of states they were involved in the agreement it also contributes sorry we certainly

do not want the nuclear agreement to be damaged. i would like to defend the nuclear agreement with iran renouncing it would be a great era we have an interest and the responsibility a duty to preserve the nuclear deal with the u.s. administration has to certify that everyone is in compliance with the agreement every ninety days team trampas already done it twice but now a third time looks in doubt it but trying to take a look at what trunks reasons to break the deal could be. so donald trump's got a problem with what's known as iran's nuclear deal ok his not a fan of iran in the first place he's confident it's still a nest for terrorists but is that a good enough reason to basically throw the compromise agreement that required so much diplomatic effort to the floor i mean when it comes to sticking to the deal terms the world agrees to iran is behaving so why the assumption the deals in

jeopardy because of washington the house foreign affairs committee chairman explains the tehran regime clearly sees itself as a movement one that uses ideology and violence to destabilize its neighbors to threaten others just for the record that was an american official talking about someone else promoting ideology and views using violence in other countries to get what they want isn't that a us thing like the golden rule of their foreign policy that we've seen in action so many times we have to stand united with our allies for peace by acting now we are all polling our values protecting our interests and advancing the cause of peace this nation. and war and cold war has never permitted the brutal and lawless to set history's course. now as before we

will secure our nation protect our freedom and help others to find freedom of the right. my fellow americans for nearly seven decades the united states has been the anchor of global security the burdens of leadership are often heavy but the world's a better place because we have borne them. what a historic background looks like mr royce might as well replace the words to run regime with the names of american presidents they were the ones who loved promoting ideology i.e. democracy elsewhere yeah interventions are exactly what i'm talking about.

donald trump is an unpredictable man when it comes to iran and the deal maybe doubt so much anyway we're just about to find out. how when our pleas to be joined by case boy fail and a fellow at the institute of economic a fact as i welcome to the program mr bush felt good to see you now one criticism that donald trump has of the enron nuclear deal is the fact that iran benefits too much from the sanctions really do you think that's a valid point. i'm not too sure about that certainly the european powers britain france germany are keen to advance their commercial interests in for example

renault and votes wagon reestablished in iran and in the united kingdom we're building a solar power station worth about five hundred million in iran. i think that mr trump has been listening to his generals he's not talking this afternoon i think about scrapping the agreement or imposing sanctions congress will have sixty days to actually introduce sanctions if they feel the rain ians are not abiding by the agreement up till now they have enough. on the topic of whether trump will. find the deal we've already heard the e.u. leaders say it would be a mistake not to every ratify this said this particular deal if trunk does scrap it what consequences do you envisage for u.s. relations how it be impacted. world there's a clear split i suspect that the president has been listening to his son in law

a lot and there's a clear israeli and saudi arabian interested in trying to make life difficult for around it's all to do with a power battle over the gulf who has preeminence in the gulf. if the u.s.d. thirty five it would be able to impose more sanctions on iran do you expect that to happen. well it all depends really on what iran does i think at the moment they're not going to actually impose sanctions and i suspect that the reigning in leadership will be quite canny and will continue to comply with the agreement. that's my view do you think that iran and the economy right now would be able to withstand more pressure. well certainly the iranian currency is being really coming down for living against the u.s.

dollar but on the other hand they're all exports of more than doubled in the last year so the sanctions were relaxed and that's very good news for the iranian economy. ok on that note here boy field fellow at institute of economic affairs thank you for your time thank you. allegedly targeting u.s. facilities are once again in the spotlight but this time it's north korea that's being accused of cyber attacks and harboring hackers whose abilities are quote beyond imagination artie's my girlfriends the santiago takes a closer look at the new media birth. these days americans are well aware that north korea is enemy number one the media certainly the great job there and now the enemy's image is complete all you got to do is bring out the hacking card kim jong un has targeted the u.s. power grid in north korea hackers were behind the cyber attack north korea may have

hacked a military network north korean hackers north korean hackers the north korean hackers could soon target the u.s. and guess what they have the power grid an essential item on the to do list of any bonafide enemy of america these days just take russia china and iran if you believe the media hype they've all been at it at some time or another in russia skase this turned out to be fake news and the story was retracted another must have been any hackers hit the power grid story the disclaimer there is no certainty the state actor was behind it it's based on unnamed sources and there's no evidence the alleged attack actually had any impact the tax was allegedly from china russian group of chinese believed to be state sponsored hackers why can't we see the evidence that was by alleged chinese hackers first reported the attack citing anonymous sources the systems were not breached let's look at enemy number two iran

yes we'll soon be hearing headlines about hackers from iran gearing up for an attack oh wait wait a minute we already did there is a template. there's a story line and you say either put in north korea or china russia just put it in nobody's going to ask you the why should north korean hackers russian hackers did this no damage and then at the end bring in the kim jong. missiles and that sort of thing as that will pass you just say our country russia and we just react we don't think anymore and we don't sit there and even suspect that maybe these these articles these stories aren't necessarily just false they're just poorly written this is horrible besides north korea it's

generally russians who are blamed for alleged into ferentz and us domestic affairs but the insinuations are becoming increasingly farfetched now global gaming sensation poky globe is being named as one of the meddling tools to used during the u.s. election ok mom ok mine broke far beyond if it did it went far beyond broke twitter you tube the elaborate claim is that a supposedly russian linked web signed post as part of the black lines not a means men's and used this game to intensify us racial tensions however no attempt was made to explain how that might have influenced the u.s. election the implausible claim was looks both online and off.

percy and to be targeting art or highlighting something like this i think is breaking news specifically highlighting any elements from poking mind go with an investigation without providing any evidence is actually kind of indicative of how little facts they've had and how much they're trying to continue to paint this election as just one big russian conspiracy no concerns are being raised over a fresh nato buildup on russia's border we've got more on that off this short break . in case you're new to the game this is how it works now the economy is built around corporations corporations from washington to washington post media the media. voters elected businessman to run this country business

equals. boom bust it's not business as usual it's business like it's never been done before. what else seems wrong. but i. just don't. let me. get to shape our disdain active. and in detroit equals betrayal. when so many find themselves worlds apart we choose to look for common ground.

welcome back washington is building up its troops near russia's western border a move that according to most go violates a key agreement the country has with nato jacqueline very good joined me earlier to explain on thursday the u.s. announced the presence of a second regiment in the are already very tense baltic region and that's a move which moscow claims violates a fundamental peace treaty signed between russia and nato years ago and that was designed to and decades of cold war tensions which of course right now are again on the rise and the russian defense ministry spokesperson believes the additional deployment undermines russia's own security by surrounding it with hostile forces. in country to the claims of nato and the us only in significance of the troops approaching the russian border in fact now it's not a brigade but a u.s. mechanized military division so what's the pentagon's explanation for moving these forces what washington has of course repeatedly referred to russia as a threat that they must protect themselves and their european allies against but

the pentagon itself or their spokesperson insists that this division has not there's nothing sinister about it that it's a purely defensive attitude we are in in those places to as a defense and defensive posture and we're very clear about that and anyone who sees think anything differently. would be wrong now they also went on to say that it's simply a matter of between a new and old regiment but it's worth noting that the route wouldn't take them back to the u.s. wouldn't take them out of the region altogether it would just move them to another eastern european country romania and at this point russia has expressed that they reserve the right of course to also strengthen its defense in the region as well now what is the opinion of poland on all of this while the polish defense minister recently called for more u.s. troops to be deployed to his country in order to quote protect it from external threats and those comments specifically came on the heels of the recent zoppot

drills that were conducted with russia and belarus and that came out what those happened last month last month and they caused an unprecedented just absolute opera or in the media with the routines being the routine maneuvers being attacked as nontransparent was speculation swirling that the russian troops that were brought in for those were there to stay there about to do an exercise in russia. it's going to up to one hundred thousand russian troops moving into into the country the great concern is they're not going to leave now that claim is of course completely untrue upon the completion of the drills the russian units returned from belarus to their permanent bases so that was completely unfounded but so far it looks like it's the u.s. troops that are there to stay. besides the latest deployments of troops the pentagon's budget requests for operations in europe have also been steadily growing as you can see from this graph their request for next year is nearly eight times higher

compared with what they spent last year. civilian casualties from strikes in afghanistan are up by more than fifty percent compared with last year that's according to a report by the united nations assistance mission which also says many women and children are having to live in makeshift shelters more than two hundred sixty six thousand people from thirty provinces in the country have left their homes due to the ongoing war. you know the. u.s. forces bombarded everyone including children men and women in the houses have been destroyed on to the children and women were wounded and killed there are no houses left. some homes with islamic state militants and others were hit by u.s. drone strikes politically calico looking.

for junk food or from the fight that is ongoing it's not like state militants came in started the clashes they would stick cars ahead self and u.s. troops bombed the area so we left and came to our houses were destroyed and now we're leaving town for shelter here. but it was some of the just the day the. moment she met here their problems with water supply will fetch water from very far away. from there much. harder to hide and i would. like. to notify later the ongoing fight between islamic state militants and afghan and u.s. forces means we can't go back to our home. we

talked to whistleblower daniel ellsberg who released the pentagon papers detailing america's real motives behind the one nine hundred seventy s. vietnam war he believes that in the current digital age there will be more prosecutions against journalists who leak classified information. the kind of electronic surveillance that exists now in remote cheesier than in the past to know who is leaked anything and to know who the reporters sources are and it's very likely. lawyers who are close to this believe that there will be prosecutions against journalists for the first time. it's allowed under the wording of the espionage act it doesn't distinguish between journalists and sources that just anyone who has an authorised position or who passes on to fight information as they interpret the espionage act which was never intended initially to apply to

leakers to people who inform the public but intended to apply to spies who were secretly trying to help the interests of a foreign power because obviously not the case with manning and snowden or me and but the wording is there and it's clearly unconstitutional the question is if applied in that way to a journalist and really. to others but for instance there's nothing in that activity that the defendant to argue that he or she was trying to help the interest the united states and that no harm was expected or resulted as i've said in chelsea manning to trial they weren't able to bring out a single instance of actual harm of the kind that had been predicted from her revelations. or watching a whole kind of the full interview with daniel ellsberg later here on our international. woman wounded in the las vegas months

sitting on october the first has filed a notice through taking the hotel from where the gunman fired me while the shooter's house has been broken into despite the ongoing police investigation stephen products home with gold a week off of the shooting which left fifty eight people. it was the robbers didn't even have to try that hard going strange through the front door police found the property had been used by the gunman as an arms warehouse but it's not the only failure and merging from this investigation it's also been revealed this security staff is didn't call police immediately after receiving a shooting warning from a hotel employee a maintenance engineer raised the alarm saying he'd heard a rifle shot that was right before the massacre started. call the police it works where they go to appear so inspired to write on the thirty second pour down the hallway. to be under the whole. idea of i can tell you what room he looked like you

know you don't know we're going to go through the door well the timing of the shooting is also being modified with police now saying a hotel security guard was killed by the attacker before the mass shooting and not off as was earlier claims. the armed security guard who was the first to find the shooter's room has been identified his name is campos his bravery also likely saved countless lives. personally. what with the current. what we were told last week was gone are you came to the room during the massacre we were told that was why shooter stop shooting and kill them so. what we have learned is mr campos was a counter by the suspect prior to. his shooting to the outside world.

painted a new timeline of events showing he says campos was shot perhaps six minutes before the initial barrage of bullets rained down on concert goers. who just can't quite. get a clear understanding exactly what time he called when he called. while police struggle to investigate the atrocity mainstream media jumping in with various conspiracy theories. but do we know more about motive in short you know investigators still have no answers about why last big issues are stephen paddick did what he did. what i do know is this is not just one guy here have to be someone else involved it

was a politically selective college at the perception was there's going to be a lot of pro-gun folks there trump supporters at this concert this reflects some some very deliberate action on his part. because i still have a clear motive or reason why this is how conspiracy securities all rise you won't tell us this so off you go back to nine eleven the early news reports were all over the man and that is exactly where the conspiracies started they started because they read those news articles and things weren't in one article said this thing another article said something else and so it's a natural thing i think a lot of the problem comes in right now because the police are making this big effort to find a motive and in fact you know mash there are suicidal slash homicidal are not going to have logical motives that the public can easily comprehend you're

going to need a psychologist or psychiatrist on to explain this. and don't forget to follow us on facebook and twitter to follow the latest stories and updates and join me again at the top of the hour here on c.n.n. and. places like africa and india will be some of the most exciting areas to to see that growth over the coming decades as any forty fifty. in places like dubai in the middle east themselves very impoverished communities but through energy they become some of the richest places in the world i'm what i would hope to see now over the coming decades is that places which have been without power through cheap almost limitless solar power in particular would have the chance to share in its benefits .

to. people. most people think to stand out in this business you need to be the first one on top of the story or the person with the loudest voice of the biggest raid in truth to stand out of the lose business you just need to ask the right questions and demand the right answer. question.

themselves some are saying i've built tiny houses for the homeless. see is back and they are here why do these guys down for me a tiny house is not a solution it will be a free for. my safe conditions to live in. the city of los angeles. always get nervous. nobody should be homeless anywhere but especially in one of the richest countries in the world.

i build everything with screws because i make a lot of mistakes. and it's easy to back out your mistakes in compton south central l.a. a pint sized idea as well this summer has been a battle with city author already so when you have nothing in order to go. you know having something like this may as well be a castle. the mayor of los angeles has declared the city is in the midst of a homelessness crisis. is trying to solve it one tiny house at a time the tiny house idea is very simple it's shelter. food water and shelter are not optional they're required for human survival so it's a. temporary solution and like the first stone a foundation if you.