economically is now much better what we see today is kind of a political challenge to the decision of the british electorate one year ago to vote with a slight majority in favor of leaving the european union this is something which concerns us and this is of course something which will be an enormous problem for the brits themselves producer for europe but do you support the idea of two speed europe to support what michael owen is proposing right now that those who want to move faster should move faster and have different type of economic zone and then those who want to stay where they are you know then stay in a different kind of this is the present situation of the treaties that you came up for more cooperation or you can be a normal member and i'm sure that in some areas there will be much more engagement for instance in energy policy or indeed to do corporations or could be much more

either we do it would to go were some moving faster than the race but i think if some are really trying to go ahead i'm sure most of the countries will fold so the idea of mark always not so much to divided to split europe but to give a wake up call to those who are a little bit more reluctant and at the end most of the member states will come along. i want to hear your opinion on what the polish president under. said recently actually said that e.u. is turning into a class society with some countries becoming second class members do you think this is a process that has started i take this critics very serious because i think it's a little bit unfair but also something which we should really consider we should not be that way to be very serious and my vision but i was for him it is that we started with a large amount of poland for instance. republican slovak republic and when i was

prime minister we finished and concluded all these negotiations with the new member states and i was really always very pushy for enlargement of the european union to give really these eastern european and central used and south are used to european countries for to speak to be. in full fledged member of the union so if they have the impression they are not treated in a respectful and equal footing way then the makes me a little bit concerned that should not be the way they should think maybe they have different feelings and they are not engaged enough on the other hand we should really think about our position so maybe we should be much more open minded actually we're going to talk about how their views differ from their use of the core of central europe but if i'm just going to give you a little example you know there's been like this between east and the west in here

up broke out recently it was a food scandal supposedly west exports or imports to the eastern europe food that's made of war stuff that what is sold in the west why is there such approach that everything that goes to the east could be a quality less or that whatever is there will still be acceptable to be very frank of the him except people think the same quality at the same price of course it's cheaper than it's a different case but it is same price as same quality must be. distributed everywhere and in my opinion the commission is the institution who is responsible to money toward the functioning of the cd market if this is part of the cd market they must guarantee they they must look it's the quality of these for this little mission the commission is now really working on that they are fully aware this is not acceptable and we never. the famed. company is offering something

of a second quality and higher price to the eastern countries is impossible so let's talk more about the outlook of the eastern european countries as opposed to a core bloc for instance division which is poland hungary slovakia's czechia. they have a different outlook on questions on core value questions. mostly on the refugee policy and that really differs from their fellows in the west should they be brought in line with the rest of europe forces forcefully or should their outlook actually balance western now what do you think. first of all the division that country. is this sometimes seem from the form of an outside the have different opinions to the czech republic music completely different opinion that poland slovakia is it will be in between is also very much of the side of poland so in my opinion.

some decisions of the european council. the council of european ministers who were wise enough for this is the european council the prime ministers decided on a voluntary basis to take in researchers from syria three weeks later the ministers for interior with the foreign ministers were the minister of interior things so decided on it good to rebase is equal to each country and this was by and by may joy. and this was not accepted by those who voted against because they felt that there is nor there is no basis for to for such a decision in the treaties. it was a big dispute going up to the european council or to the european court of justice and defacto decided in favor of the original decision but this is something which was not very wise in my opinion the proposal i'm not alone in politics is my per.

of opinion you can do this but only leave voluntarily places who can look for somebody in such scenes if you should because this is really part of who has to control to take in someone by the way. i don't know him quite well took him to really a lot of thousands of syrian refugees but not decoding to decode but on the station some christians who were threatened by the. islamic fundamentalist were taken in and he was in contact with the bishop in syria so i think it was good decision so this is the way. this is the way to work but it's not exactly they were it's working right now because right now brazil is threatening fines and penalties of history european countries there with which she got countries done taking their share of refuge arrivals how far can you push states on this or do you think no there's no fines in the moment discussions on the threatening

just discussions that it would require a huge majority for get it this is. not the real way and we are the family we have to talk to each other we have to negotiate sometimes defeat very difficult discussions during night time or in the morning. but there is a need to discuss and to negotiate in those two to force somebody over to punish somebody did not work on those also european commissioner commission presidential kerosine he's saying that it must be expanded in essence suggesting that making the year a compulsory for all members is a good think he actually believes that this would unite the union instead of divide it what do you think this is the treated and to be fair i. just mentioned what is the treaty of the european union so the fact that everybody with the exception of those who have been opened out. detains the brits would be racist.

is they will they fulfill all the criteria of they should join the euro on the other hand i think time is now a little bit changing we have our own experiences with a large movie use only the past as much more. reluctant see it will be much more in line with conventional wisdom with negotiations they say to those who i think is to treaties who was right about that but in practical terms we could time it will take time and nobody would be forced against the so here we in into the euro zone so yeah because like a very precise example nowadays of course paul has fulfilled all the criteria is it can actually adopt euro but it's kind of reluctant because you know euro zone has troubles seem to take a corner we've why it will. in europe they can actually do your weight as much as

they want i think this is not a treaty but. european union is famous for flexibility and. we did the freedom to interpret some rules and i think to do it i want to talk to you about the reshuffle of the political scene all over europe in general so in france you have man and then there's this super traditionalist politician to say the least just might second round presidential election beating in the beginning traditional parties you also have the fire rattle turned in for germany a party that came parliamentary election. five star movement the northern league they're all gaining ground how do you explain this political shuffle this tendency what's going on but these are just votes. this is a kind of the wake-up call. people are protesting against the war in favor of

something and if you look to the real results for instance in the frame election. what really counts is the national election for the parliament the pain to gain the flue seats nothing more the fact that it is different the disappeared in the parliament you keep the same in in great britain. not a single member of you keep today in the british parliament the i have stated alternative for germany made twelve point five percent that means. eighty seven point five did not vote for or for these for these personalities if you look to the are not leading. the freedom party in us to twenty six k. mean third party i mean this is legitimacy this is voices of

concern and hopefully a wake up call for the other parties needs to be more competitive to be more to the ear to the mouth and the hearts of the people what exactly what precisely are they protesting what you say it's different from to determine the election was killed dominated to do so the last election clearly dominated by migration that's for sure as a migration refugees this was the major issue and i think we are no exactly listening what the concerns of the people are in changing our policy this is what democracies are about they are they are not with the we don't have elites flying in the orbit in space in space but we are down to earth and to listen what are the real problems of cities so to change same in germany and. change completely the politics it is much more now controlling the flow of the.

no doubt about it and this is do. you have. time because you have. at the table. dictatorship. everybody bows. to fight. to listen to the people.

so. the ball isn't. in the ph school it's about the passion from the. great. but. it was suggested. a strong. the study done by

a well respected scientists. do chemicals that down at the appetizing. really increase the risk of cancer and i chose a means of known to use them in the last test is it a sham skepticism they do not believe that this is is true by independent scientists need industry for this i received some compensation for my time as well as the others why is that the meat lobby definitely didn't like what we've been doing and if you want to learn more you'll get a definite on see fluffy. back. is it big business against health. this is starting to show us. all. how does it feel to be a share of the greatest job in the world it's as close to being

a king as any job there is what business model helps to run a prison now we just do or don't like video visitation i don't know why we don't have a sergeant. at that moment. to put it back into. the louisiana incarceration rate is twice as high as the usa breach what she is behind such success. and we're back with former chancellor. i want to talk a bit about u.k. leaving the uni and. things aren't going to be the same it's happening right now do

you feel like a powerful member leaving the union it's going to weaken on the contrary strengthen it because now you're not going to have skeptical brits who are going to be part of the pan every decision making process and that they found the answer is maybe both it weakens us of course economically because the british economy is a strong economy in and out of world looking economy do we can because it's a fake cylinder internation made good contacts all over diverted asia in latin america in america. so this weakens so the other hand it strained since those who are really interested to go much more forward in a way to strengthen our foreign policy to strengthen our defense capability not in . competition with nato but for instance in in peacekeeping operations were when we

did in enough or in the balkans or any other car in other parts of the world mostly with an un mandate or within the mandate or we see who we see even in day to this is something care where the brits were always very reluctant so this is something where the rest of the european union could go deeper in to better integrated union but to both is probably true and the same for a great great i think economically it's it will be a disaster for great britain because a lot of companies will move to the continent if we if we create a lot of tensions and problems we have to establish new bureaucracies controlling the environment the consumer protection the atomic security issues or do these trade issues very complicated areas it will not be easy for the brits on the other hand they have been a little bit more room to maneuver the day in the. we decided we'll have to decide

are we now bit of a little bit. and i want to quote once again john claudine care who said recently that britain will have to pay for it leaving the european union sometimes it feels like brussels is being very hostile to brits because it wants to scare other members from following london's example where living so harsh on the question of the bill the so-called to exceed bill i mean the brits know quiet skilled negotiators they know you're in there is part of the european union. on something which the responsible is way. way way to order something can go away without paying the bill to the question is how big is the belief is it really hundred billion dollars or sixty billion or is it twenty billion but there is a may or for this is has to be negotiated but i think it should be negotiated only

on the fake based way so not so to say to punish somebody over. when i think at the end he will find a compromise on that question could just. action in the country has actually blamed brussels particularly the e.u. refugee policy for breakfast and that's actually very. that's contrary to the official european here does have a point here it was not so much a blame game it was more. the concern that if we don't change our rules to do. to limits no borders and so on. but in excellent efficient control of the external border and this one is they feel like if brussels had been that harsh with their refugee policy. specially when britain britain could have still

been part of the european union made out a little bit because the main issue in great britain was to take back control order he said nothing to do with migration because it is not a member of the schengen so on they controlled their borders they have not the same currency they are not part of the european prosecutor of the jury system so this is not they're not the real problem the real problem was take control over my opinion the brits made a big mistake they opened from the very first moment the labor market for the east european migrants and they expected fifty thousand people to come from the tame new member states and did in one billion pose alone ok this was an absolute mistake a miscalculation now austria. itself the country that has first welcomed refugees with open arms and now it's passing serious measures such as a ban on face they also how has it come to that first will go over the different

thing to do with the refugees i think what kind of does because most of the refugees are from muslim origins but we didn't have many refugees with the book and only the poor countries putative each of who is who we choose to leave daily in your face that this is this is a different case i think this is a principle issue what our values in our in our european system we want to see the faces of our people is for sure they don't feel like austria is turning labor right politically not at all not at all everybody has the same rights but if we have an instance if if you woman and austin woman goes to saudi arabia she has to do with to wear a veil and the saudi arabian gulf. the woman who wants to travel to us we came not to wear a suit to rule i think this is quite easy to handle these no did not illiberal this

is a cultural norm and i think this is something everybody understands and by the way to a ninety percent of the people are of the same opinion the same in france as he would be in big chain other countries but courts is going to be actually works the world's youngest leader he has won a lot on the issues raised by for instance your far right freedom party. and i feel like maybe it's there because you're a to a little bit no no i think they want israel but lace. one. plus seven point five percent in the election last sunday the fifteenth of october and the freedom party won five. sand and he was so slow to see the real that he was the one who closed all can route he was the one really defeating the

protection of external borders sometimes it was not very much. capable and today it's the common position of the european union member states of the same opinion that we have to protect the external border phone text leads to better mandate we have to help put those countries outside the european union image to arabian countries libya tunisia. roll call or the taliban these are the jordan people turkey we are absolutely ready for that and we have to pay more for the u.n. refugee camps was a big mistake to cut down the assistance to the u.n. world food program so this is absolutely necessary for accretion democrat to help and to support but it's also needed we have to control the flow of migrants coming to europe and this is now the by my opinion the common opinion so you are the first one actually to welcome the freedom party into the government back in the day and

we immediately got a diplomatic boycott from all of your european neighbors do you feel that this a criticism for the same experience right now no i think so because i don't think so because. they learned their lesson the sanctions work for you need back simoom seven eight months and then they gave it up with no gain at all and you know the people live. where united behind my government and the we proved that this government from the people's but the freedom party was absolutely full european we decided nearly unanimous on you enlargement and on the e.u. treaties the european constitutional treaty was defunct unanimously decided. in the parliament. today would be impossible by the way the austin parliament which are two huge majority so we prove that we can we form a country we are still pro european country but with our own priorities and

i'm sure the bust in which we do the same he's pro european music proved for him it is that we could credential and i'm sure the freedom party of today's who's who really where did their part of the pain i. keep or someone else but to those who are interested in the way functioning europe it was some critical elements to centralization subsidiarity more ok but pro european so current austrian later shape is a less anti russian than its predecessors do you think we'll see a shift in our streets policy maybe movement towards is in the sanctions interactions with me almost we never knew it was never the russian this is so thats for sure to read it we had we see our country is a kind of a breach of our cultures of people and we are never. until russia was we were

not happy with the annexation of the cream because. if then you should do it even be called into international law has the possibility for safe determinations you know what. i already know that it's going to cost over and that's for sure that. in my opinion there is the need for a better regulation on the international law for these things by the way also for the qatari creations then this is not this is rude to do with it this is decided in the very ambiguous way that. you find the right for safety to me nation or the other hand the intake of countries this is borders who i think we see here is we see our country as a breach. if

you and other friends. i think everybody's interested because. in a moment. of people who are looking for a creative way to get better results. but

. do chemicals that. really increase the risk. by independent scientists. my time is. see others why is that the meat lobby. didn't like what we were doing and if you want to learn more you'll get a definite on tough love you. back.

is it big business against tells. this started. all. we're here in southern russia in solitary attending the ball by discussion club and our topic is us russian relations and the state of the world. give me no. i'm not to run. it would be theo i. am just.

yeah he was in the school for the. most part the a lot of the behind of. she just for the ground she didn't need the militia and got very little. more than to get his b. food out of his guts of the beat but i mean. he. gets to live it up with. here's what people have been saying about it jack. only show i go out of my way to . the really. hard to be americans do

this and we are apparently better than. to see a herd of. jack the. president of the world bank. send us an e-mail. all rival protests over the future of the spanish region is left in limbo decision to impose direct rule. on exclusive access to the syrian town of mines in the free from islamic state by government forces. and a document released under the freedom of information act reveals that the pentagon has simulated a middle east style war game invasion of west africa.