invasion. it is a fact or it is a fact that the russian forces have removed themselves from the area that is actually or but it was a response to what do the united states claim that they are going to create the huge so called border security consulting the turks without even consulting the. sporty can a national can interview from the former you can better to syria peter ford who said the forwarding which i think is pretty exact the united states has been trying to prevent syria from stabilizing itself as huge interest over in state now they see and way of partially implemented by encouraging the formation of a kurdish state and so their response to it was of the turkish. sense i think we have to explain to our viewers this is a partitioning syria permanently. shootout and an american at the same end to be has would say that the saudis and the

israelis here there is again we our viewers have to understand it's very clear that the united states has no geopolitical national interest in syria and the american forces are there or are there illegally under international law there was no united nations security council authorization of you has really done it and turkey is violating the sovereignty also. understand that the us making things was because they reported that we will provide economic aid only to the areas which are not on the control of the syrian government that border ship or picture the brandons of refugees in the countries like germany france so next time well merkel will be telling to you all there was simply no way i couldn't accept that if you geez i hope the german voters will tell her about the e.u. policy of not financing the parts of the country that are under control of the seas over it turkey is invading in attacking the kurdish canton of african which african which is actually. in russian protect it well that's ok with

a lot of us will get we haven't got the can still we have to go to a short break and after that short break we'll continue our discussion on real news stay with us. prescribe medication is widespread on the u.s. market and a frequent cause of death at that point in my life i just felt like everything was ashes my family was literally coming unglued i had actually planned. to commit some sight was all who has made antidepressants so commonly used we were doing what the doctors told us to do you know we were being responsible and what the real side effects. was is generally all to what i did was done on

a cocktail of legal drugs. just because something's legal doesn't mean it's sent. back kaiser what more my guide to financial survival this is on a device used by professional scallywags to earn money. that's right these has flaws are completely not accountable and we're just adding more and more to them. totally destabilize the global economy you need to protect yourself and get informed watch guys record. exists is hotter than kentucky. people were going to agree. to. a coma any city with almost no coal mine. slabbed. the jobs are gone all the

programs if. there was a lot of. people the survivors of disappearing before their eyes. i remember thinking when i was younger that if anything ever happened to the coal mines here that it would become a ghost town but i never thought in a million years i would see that and it's happening it's happened. welcome back to cross like or all things considered i'm peter lavelle to remind you we're discussing some real news. ok marc you want to finish up on the syria has a basically what we've got with this turkish attack on our friend is we've got a mexican standoff a three way mexican standoff between russia and the syrian government on one side between turkey and its proxies which are al-qaeda and the thirty one flavors of

jihad its support of the whole war including the formerly u.s. backed free syrian army on the other and the u.s. and its kurdish proxies on the other and they're in a three way face off russia would like turkey of the united states to fight to drive a wedge between turkey and nato the united states would like the turks to fight russia over african canton because that would help destroy this very fragile essentially falling apart agreement for the stabilization of syria with the austin aughrim and and it further destabilize syria and this is where we're at it's an extremely tense situation the writing was on the wall long time we've long argued it was going to happen and the hours and days ahead what erdogan actually does and how much damage he does in syria and whether he will then turned on the american backed kurds is is is up in the air you know the interesting. i think this

is it one has to wonder where turkish soldiers go do they stay or do they you know do they have you know it's like the russians went in had a mission said mission accomplished very limited. did what they wanted to do and basically with true will the turks stay again we're looking for their part we say well the turks are more likely to be. my impression is the quietest of the fact that there will be turkish influence in the north of syria russia agrees that there is a turkish minority there so they have their interest we cannot say for syria a little right let's be realistic about it and i'm not sure russia really wants to grab a wedge between turkey and need to i think we would like to be in peace with their well i know where they want to go i mean. maybe they want to but they don't really have to worry about it because it's already happening anyway. so the question i think another question to ask is who sanctions the u.s.

to be in syria for so long i mean go back to what mark said this goes against everything that we're up for and it's also just i don't know if you know you just in time if you just tell us what you know this is a first a series that actually an interesting precedent for regime change this is the first time that the united states has sent in troops illegally to a country and then decided. it's a nuance and regime change so who wants and what happens to the u.s. forces there once turkey does go away and set up a permanent camp in the north where does the u.s. go where the troops go what are they doing there what's their purpose what's their goal what words although they look at it all the hell you what it is why is that even when i say i always have. that report it's always about a grand idea and it's point. they've lost they know that military presence there isn't going there and hit iran in any way shape or form and they're simply acting out of spite and hatred at this point they want to play they can't do anything. i can't play the spoiler so that's what they're going to ok well i. just

do know from a russian point of view we have a conflict with the states with the e.u. so it may be our last transit country probably for the oil and gas to be sold to europe so i think russia would try to maintain good relations with turkey despite all the music and they have shot down a russian plane every russian soldier that has died in syria has died because the turks are jihad it's arab. but they couldn't do it without turkey's border and everyone's going to pay a high price for this i just want to touch real quickly gentlemen there was a new national defense strategy i think it's the first one since two thousand and eleven. and its focus is the greatest security threats for the united states is china and russia i mean an interesting chain change because it before it was trans . transnational threats like terrorism even the environment

and now we're going back to a very kind of simplistic manichean world where it's the russians the chinese it's like the nineteenth century again absolutely right i think it's much worse than the cold war and the funny thing is that trump accused russia of not being active enough on isolate north korea economic and while they're not just states congress put russia in the same group of north korea and iran so you have to do we have to we have to point out here is that russia was saying and then they asked the u.s. as the russians the saying north korea i mean that's a really rich gentleman and the recent talks you know there is some discussion in the u.s. congress on each one is threat russia and north korea that the russian propaganda that sounded to me like a rag tag and we're going to discuss this with this thread north korea and russia ok you go in the direction i want to go to let's talk about what's going on. social

media i suppose all of us got that little note from twitter i did get one you didn't get one i didn't get one more. wow this one they probably gave up on me i didn't get that while i was on the ground. under snow but you know what it was you know what i would suggest to our viewers anyone they got that i think almost seven hundred thousand seven hundred thousand people got all they want i suggest to our viewers as all of them just go to the internet look up the u.s. constitution and copy the first amendment pasted and send it right back to twitter thank you very much i know what my first amendment my freedom of speech rights are i don't need a company like twitter to tell me what free speech is what i should read and what i shouldn't read twitter and facebook are no working in unison and i think we know the forces behind twitter and facebook that are pushing them to do this and so twitter is basically saying look we know that there is we know from all the evidence that there are russian trolls and russian influence tell initially

professionally so they're their best it was a warning to people that was it was very creepy very big brother actually very creepy you know it's like we know that you're following certain russian troops you were watching you be careful you may have liked something that a russian or potentially russian line person face may how do you know their heads facebook on the other hand is going to do this they're going to write that they're going to rate reputable quote reputable news sources and they're going to make sure that our readers get to these reputable news sources while the other reputable news sources the ones they don't want you to read just kind of how wait away just to disappear they tell us how this is this process is going to be done i mean is there any transparency here or is it just trust me algorithms. this is. kind of the fact that an internal investigation into the russian influence on the u.k. and fallen down to spend oh jesus. point blank you seven cents on that

adverts targeting the u.k. to frown down so russia mandel twelve just when you rule and that was terrible meddling barrack obama went to london spoken for a vote of the state board and it was not meant he was just there well obviously all western media and i look at europe and i look at the united states canada all of them supported hillary clinton but that wasn't meddling that wasn't meddling foreign media were going to support the. c.e.o. it all came out it said she supported hillary clinton burke said it multiple times twitter ok fair enough to send out a letter to everyone you may have liked something that a russian posted on the internet that's fair enough jack. what i want to know jack is will i get an e-mail that will tell me that i may have potentially liked something that an american propaganda agent of influence posted maybe an israeli the e.u.

saudi i really you know sort of maybe george soros pierre omidyar the other technical jeff bezos jeff bezos influence did he get anything on my twitter feed that may have influenced me i want to know this you know already just branch of the u.s. government we are concerned about this because we are in media here what is the impact is it just impacting people like us that are very rigid in constitutionalist when it comes to freedom of speech or because my concern i've mentioned this a number times in this program is that they're damaging their own business model and i'm right am i wrong or does it really matter you know i think there's a debate there how much damage going to do to their business because if you take twitter not even so much twitter i would say facebook and google we have a metric google is doing a lot of the same practices that facebook is doing they're actually much more advanced that facebook is to be honest and they and they own instagram the own whatsapp your facebook and google lots of the writing of properties and they control eighty percent of the advertising. facebook and google alone. globally now

what they what they do to a website an alternative website a website that's just getting started is not as big as say the new york times or the washington post facebook and google have the means to either make your site grow very large very large or they have the means to completely shut you down and no one's going to be able to find you if you can't find the website via google or facebook you're writing in the dark you're lost you're lost so this is a very serious issue of course you can say they're private companies and they have the right to do whatever they want to have become you to look exactly i was going i was going but they've got gotten to the point where they become utilities and if they continue this they need to undergo some sort of regulation because alex you know we had standard oil and there was a whole populist progressive movement to break up this very damaging monopoly i don't mark to maybe i'm missing it where is the talk about breaking up these non-police eighteen t. that that was

a concerted effort this google and some of the most powerful entities that if they ever existed before company on the planet google why would they want to pick them up when they're right now operating as u.s. government schools i mean the idea that you would break them up why they're fully cooperating hand in hand with the u.s. deep state there's no reason for them to. and i think this brings us. to the very good point of what the end goal here the end goal here isn't even not letting you hear what our t.v. or chinese media has to say that the goal is suppress internal internal dissent it is to strangle the ultimatum both well to right all right far left either way the progressives write anything outside the mainstream anything you know but what like the new york times in the washington post which is by the way also owned by jeff bezos the washington post what they want you to know right i mean the very slogan question more. offends them because it really means question them

question there are thirty seconds there it's like i can call it the american officials when they can use to argue would be big it was also they sat there so when dolled same bad things these amazing country but wasn't. a european thing seems that times are so critical it's called the in life and that's what tao that's what the whole of it was about gentlemen we're going to jump in here i want to thank my guests here in moscow and thanks to our viewers for watching us here this is the end of our broadcast segments stay with us for the extended version on our you tube channel see you next time and remember cross talk rules. stand. up for what.

i know that i'm right but rather tough it out for. only you. and. i don't. think it's whole full. time in syria this is. a model for the well for mr hates it for jim and then i hope that our.

in order to overthrow a regime it does take popular discontent and popular mobilization but it also requires actors with in the leadership of the regime who feel that the regime is no longer serving the national interest you need people in the military or the bureaucracy or both who are willing to see the regime change otherwise they would be able to put down a popular revolt but did not have support at higher level. yes that was pretty hard with a large couple of you know. helping them all but also mention i believe will move forward so will most of the young and we will also you will find you know one of the of them stood up and we will push it out so

. many times you've had time enough to do the you know on the list you scouts more even who cooks police nancy g.t.d. easy show treating the judge. you almost know the old bench. the prosecutor though i machine you can you get other cronies up on you the mob boss maybe you did to us all but you're using my suspicion of us.

with the turkish army rolling into syria the u.s. insists the operation is being carried out after consultation with the pentagon doesn't play if either by washington's latest move in the region. america do not encroach on our borders or not provoke strong will run out of patience. plus able to identify you by just your voice the classified documents to claim the n.s.a. has been using recognition software to spy on people. and after the longest coalition troops in germany since world war two chancellor angela merkel does look set to reform the same government that ruled since twenty thirteen the move could make the anti migrant alternative for germany the country's biggest opposition party.

a low they welcome you watching r.t. international this monday morning which just going to call in moscow. now turkey's military operation against kurdish forces in syria is entering its third day with anchorages tanks moving into syrian territory it comes after the usa announced its planned and trying to form a patrol on the turkish syrian border i. want the us has acknowledged that its closest allies in the middle east are in conflict in the us defense secretary said that washington had been consulted about turkish operations elaborate ranker looks now into america has reacted to some

strong anti-american comments from ankara. unbelievable is this real a nato member telling daddy you know i mean i mean to come in behave yourself oral point a gun and am i exaggerating a bit mr aired on didn't say that these exact words but turkey's got a prime minister who pretty much did anyone who gives logistical support to the white b.g. is turkey's target for the record the white b.g. equals the kurdish army and for all these years who's been giving the kurds all kinds of support right. over the weekend the kurds were extended in all of branch that's what ankara calls its military op the kurds say they repelled an attack on sunday but where does that wipe e.g. get its guns. tapered on couldn't care less why washington's been helping the kurds to destroy eisel for this man the kurdish militias are no better than terrorists

that explains his latest messages to america because u.s. is in the process of creating a terror army on our border what we have to do is nip this terror army in the bud america do not encroach on our borders do not provoke us we will run out of patience does anyone from the us government have anything to say we urge turkey to exercise restraint and ensure that its military operations remain limited in scope and duration and scrupulous to avoid civilian casualties some very restrained council there to be restrained think about it mr aired on rants that america u.s. officials don't hit back turkey rolls up the tanks flies out the more play sends soldiers over the border washington basically keeps after all this isn't about kim who's sly the squeak makes donald trump for one war so perhaps the turks and the kurds have succeeded in one thing together reducing america to baffled silence.

and to think that when we did speak with the former ambassador to the u.s. he believes america best responsibility for the military standoff in northern syria i don't think the u.s. will interfere but the u.s. is responsible that is the reason why turkey felt compelled to intervene and to start this opposition in the first place because. the u.s. even though they backtracked. to the initial announcement and the day said they want first time bush an army of course parable force. in all countries off the world that it's only one pull out one army but the u.s. says i'm going to create another force to. control and secure syria's border with turkey what does this mean turkey is not on an annual syria turkey is not on

a number of to us turkey is a member of nato so it doesn't make sense and i think turkey was quite correct in percy having this step as a direct threat to its national security. meanwhile protest is a nice time bull had been rallying against the operation in europe and syria they were met by heavy police presence with imports suggesting the authority to use force to disperse the demonstration at least twelve page were said to be detained after discussing sprite cat between the police right. now the n.s.a. is using voice recognition technology to spy on people and also detect their locations that is according to de classified documents that have been detained by the media. picks up the story. so we based on the sound of my voice there isn't much you can gather about my identity sure you can tell that i'm female and based

on my accent you can assume that i'm american and that's more or less it the n.s.a. however could do a lot more easily using my voice to identify who i am what language i'm speaking my gender and my dialect according to classified documents from the snowden archive the n.s.a. has been developing technology to identify a speaker using just their voice for years when sigyn to transcribers work the same target set for a long time they sometimes can identify a certain individual in recorded conversations just by the sound of his voice and by his unique way of speaking this process was traditionally known as voice identification now rapidly improving technology is available that can do the same job mathematically the technology works by analyzing your voice is unique features to create an individual voice print and once the n.s.a. has that a single speaker can be almost instantaneously pinpointed even among massive databases turn every cell phone have got to a microphone frequency generators this is wrong.

now in two thousand and sixteen alone the n.s.a. hoarded more than one hundred fifty one million records of americans phone calls and that was after their bulk collection abilities were limited by congress so there's no telling how many boyfriends they could have at their disposal and theoretically a person could be instantly located and tracked down as long as a microphone is somewhere nearby and as edward snowden pointed out there's almost no escaping mike these days i don't think anybody would dog the police. chase terrorists paedophiles who we don't talk about so it's just because he says i what we're talking about is everybody everything piece of data value people being collected and scanned by software thinking that look steve you and you could stop talking see people involved in. with things like demonstrations straw eeks even people who vote for the wrong way this was the american government is

concerned another fear is that speaker recognition could end up discouraging people from speaking out it has the potential to unmask anonymous sources or tracking journalists or whistleblowers and according to the intercept this technology isn't only in american hands either it looks like interpol the european union and china have their own version as well among others so you can run but you definitely cannot hide and it doesn't just end there for the n.s.a. because the u.s. federal court has revealed the agency has deleted information connected with illegal wiretapping carried out by the george bush administration the n.s.a. responded saying that the data was removed to simply free up space on its hard drives the presidential surveillance program. most criteria that were broadly used to delete data for certain type in response to mission requirements to free up space and improve performance of the backup system. well the data in question was unlawfully collected from just after the nine eleven tragedy until two

thousand and seven it was initially ordered by the court to be preserved for further examination but has now been erased along with the backup takes the information is deemed important to a number of pending lawsuits turning a former n.s.a. director on whistleblower we spoke today says this sort of data tends to disappear fast you often. but it's a way of covering your backside so that when the investigation started we get they just get looked at data be exposed that's all it's more evidence of their criminal activity the department of defense inspector general did the same thing with material against was even though when the whistleblowers were in a court under under criminal accusation of criminal trial they destroyed evidence and it was only because was exculpatory and they didn't want that out so now this is all deliberate even when they lie in front of congress or to the people the united states or even to the president or any of their cabinet it doesn't seem to matter there's no accountability here to be intelligence community is so much power

i mean even senator schumer told the president throughout that he shouldn't be attacking the intelligence community because they've got six ways to sunday to get back at you and these are the ways they do it. now it seems at the moment that money doesn't talk when it comes to the u.s. congress which remains shut for a third day as congressman failed to come to a mutual decision on the u.s. budget and while republicans and democrats still struggle to compromise perhaps the american public could take advantage.