[000:00:00;00] from from . welcome back to all the part of the scene is a check of candidates in the two thousand and eighteen russian presidential election and seen just before the break you mentioned the name of alexina volumnia i assume a former friend of yours was precluded from running in this elections his supporters . took to the streets in this series of unsanctioned rallies just the other day apparently you didn't make much of it but i think that it was a no to believe and they defied the government several times in the it's only it was only two thousand people it's not all this goes away well you've given them things are unsanctioned this is what i mean given that you're running the

atmosphere that you just went out and out of time don't let people go on the streets and then the say so not so i think insanely two thousand on no no support of a position styles and some people would go out and you're arguing with yourself now because i said that people took to the streets and you earlier denied that they were trying to argue that most of the streets they took two thousand people it's not enough it's not what you said you said but look people went out. did they did what small quantity was not even a little small quantity but because the right i never heard try to qualify if you tried to do it but let's still wrangling about it i think the reason why people took to the streets and why i would see in a volunteer called them to go out was she's call for the boycott of those elections and boycott means not participating at all isn't he the real candidate the candidate who is really against old brother. but said yes i think he's

a real kind of and i think that he should be let to the elections unfortunately that was not made and we shared. ideas because i don't think the caught is affected by thing right caught will play only on putin not against putin because of the less number of people would come and vote out of protest the more percentage of those who will be for poutine this is obvious and i am against this idea that's why i decided to participate to unite those who go and vote on those elections to say how many people are against so that you personally would not get any vote a year earlier accuse the current authorities of trying to downplay the opposition support and russia. i know that i mean everybody everybody knows that there have has been a bit of a falling out between your campaign and the only complaint there has been

a number of very public spats yesterday election of only published a column and that was not very complimentary of the post of each you were attacked more than me well i think he accused there was a rumor that you visited him in the detention facility somebody wrote about you visiting him in the detention facility to which he replied that it was a lie anyway it is really why what does it have to do with me i did my best i brought some food i spoke with policeman i never said i saw him as yemeni it shows that there is. not the kind of agreement between various a position force or you going to happen is because this is what i share as democracy you shouldn't be all agreed like this like all the people who work around this and there are a lot lots of personal attacks if you guys are united by the common goal which is personal attack so this is not a question to me i think about it with. cheese he's campaigned manager on camera

but i never do personal attacks i just wanted him to a polish and i certainly wanted to show the opposition in the very. little i can all the. for myself i can tell so for all the people yes i think some of the rules i would say dede and other opposition leaders deeds were not really sensible as in sensible in terms of uniting us all but i tried to do everything to. complain a manager quite deliberately chasing i just wanted his apologies i didn't get them and they said enjoins you think by doing that you're playing in the hands of those who are actually looking for any pretext to. college as because you said lie i don't think it was ground that's up to you you said that your share a lot of common ideas and i think politically and vali stands on both leftist and nationalist positions he is on record as saying that when he comes to power he is

going to expropriate the properties of the current elite and i think in russia that is something that could be very appealing to the people especially the poor the young. would you personally like to see another expropriation redistribution complain in this country well i think we should be very definite in our terms i don't think that he says about expropriation over the elite i think he in his program and if i'm not mistaken speaks about expropriation of the people connected with corruption with this i totally agree you know the he's not just the leftist i think he is a revolutionary leftist he's pretty much about. blowing up the current system and building something new in its place and that is a fundamental question for russia how do you change russia whether you change it from scratch starting to build from a clean slate or whether you work with the current system it's very important for me to get your position on the favor of revolution or evolution our view or future

russia is really different because i think that unfortunately the only good way for us is a long way i know that many people want fight to. change but change only have as a revolution i am against to dilute that you agree with putin rather than only look what do you mean i agree i don't agree with putin putin doesn't save the real things about this you know if a person says i am for everything good and against everything bad of course you will agree with. that he prefers an incremental change in russia which will then why he doesn't do it for you too he knows the troughton bird steals he knows that may the. probably stealing he knows many many governmental people hostility from the state why he is not punishing them why he is only punishing prive who stole from satan and he spawn is not because he stole from state but because he stole something as you really believe that putin has the same kind of authority to

deliberately target any given. time i know that putin has all the powers in russia and his word is the last word here understand that in such a big country like russia knows every question could be addressed to a president for sure and that's the problem because all of the people around him sit and think ok what do we think about this or maybe we can treat the already set top as we can do this and then hundreds of intrigue has become the reality of our lives but the problem is that we don't have laws we have in truth what putin will think about this and this is i think a really bad situation because i want to leave in a country where everything is ruled by law not by president well i think many people over the agree with you on that but i think the problem in russia is not what but how and this is actually what. one of the architects of liberal reform in

russia said recently at the guy doris form that the problem is not we all agree that the russian future is doomed democratic but the question is how to change that then from his position it's not just about political. it's about the energized citizenry what have you done in your campaign to encourage the citizen muscle i have done a huge tour i've visited more than eighteen regions of russia already and in every cd i gather the halls where i speak with people i talk about the need for change i talk about the problems we face i educate all around russia and my main goal is education i want to educate people i want to bring them truth and i want together all their problems to make them federal so i go on all the regions of russia and they give those problems and they want. to know what it is i've been following your campaign and sometimes it really looks like

a more version of which is annual call in show because you would go to some rundown hospital people will tell you how bad things are and they would be hoping that the publicity will make the local officials pay attention but it's the same old russian paternalism waiting for the officials to fix the problem rather than being the change you want to see in the world don't you think that you are essentially playing the very same kremlin tactic no i'm not i am the change people want to see because with me comes the light to their problems when they come to the it is that you want to see in russia that you want to see in the world somebody who actually not only talks about the problems but who fixes them i think them by doing this this is my way of fixing you know you can see city two during the list or is because off to drive doesn't solve the problem in a what does it mean i can give you already some examples for example the hospital we matt already there. pronouncing

a program of. building works because of my visits and this is the real doing thing because i can take this. those money out of my pocket and they're being spaced by the same prison system that you criticize so you drew the attention to the romana i am saying luke those guys got money for building a hospital what they never did they never rebuilt it then a college with t.v. and everyone writes about this they know they stole those money and they have to do something because otherwise they will go to prison because the scandal around this becomes really huge so what they're doing the compensated and starting building it this is how i think things this is my way of doing i go for example and speak about it but if you do understand the reason presidential work is not drawing attention to some problem it's actually of course but i'm doing now what i can do now i was talking loud that you did need to if and long with other very famous people who

were also against these charges that it was really a gentle you read this or that he what he was released i take on all of us this credit on all the citizens who were involved in doing something for him to make this case public and when you say what do you do. if you own all the talking you know talking as you remember in bible first was the words being is the most important thing when you stop talking about things that were allowed much all russians are exploiting these fish even much they like to talk but they don't like no one likes to talk no one on federal channels talks about the things i talk and people know this and that's why they go and want to support me now i want to two more questions if i may be don't have that much time so i would appreciate a relatively short answer your i think one of the first prominent female candidate is in the russian elections. and if you return interview she encountered

a lot of sexism and not just sexism she encountered a lot of open bigotry and her negatives were very high but not as high as yours. i saw some polling agencies putting them down to eighty percent do you think that's just the typical prejudice of the russian a lecture the against women or do you more to your own personality well first the wall i don't believe in those is a kind of polls because those polls done in the same ways as everything they count votes it's like the same kind of organizations and you do not think you have and i know i don't see it around me i see so much support especially when i go out of big cities i see so much support of people who come like that this is an interesting time i mean in many countries do you encounter more challenges to iran i formerly with i feel it too sometimes but i think we shouldn't pay attention

to this we just should do what i think is right because while yes it exists many men don't think that it's a right or to rule their lives they don't think that in our society that's a good thing to do but what we can do about this we can just prove that this is not try but i think far less agreeable done the most russian women certainly know how to get your way and i have one last question i don't want you to take it as a personal attack i think it's an important one a few years ago you were taped having a conversation with your neighbors about the repair work on your part and i don't think it's correct to discuss criminal cases because this was a private talk on telephone which was voice it wasn't it was your own by faith so it's a criminal case and it will scream in reported so i don't think it's ethical to discuss my private telephone can respond with telephone conversation don't think it's

correct to discuss any private conversations all my private and now we'll see you all my old i haven't read it and i think it was a criminal case and you know this it's unconstitutional to do. this to discuss it and even to report it if you would show this on your t.v. i was knighted dolorosa zoar and they will closely because it's a lawful i won't do this but i'm just saying you we can discuss unlawful things uncle's evasion or menial truly see how these movies are deemed unconstitutional and you know if you are no hughes movies i discussing corruption i'm going to share only palaces over the people who are you doing this and we discuss please don't kill the people please hold these on my money and when any of your leisure allophone private telephone in which you said that you wouldn't hire outgoing wouldn't care more legal to discuss my time voice calls listening working with phase b. i want to get this calls once again if you're if you're cooperating with them i

know you can do it. as certain oleson millions of people in russia listen as you know i don't want to listen to any calls i'm not listening to an unsolved calls who was killed ok let me ask goals were also there so no i won't see us my private calls which were illegally taped by phase b. as i was not listening and never would listen to an insult calls that were also distributed through all the internet let me ask you if i think that people don't do it's unethical and my mother. was ill you know it gives you a miser about the whole you have force and that's going to have to go because it's my private i can say my home whatever i think is right and in my letters private letters i can write whatever i think is right and my mind i wonder if you don't mind that i should never read someone's as a man's someone's letters and if he doesn't show contentious moderate tell you have

i should denounce it if you talk on the phone i didn't remember doing this and to tomorrow why should i say to you my advice to you and be ethical enough. not saying anything here i drive a thing and i don't know so why don't you say something and it's important question for me as and as a person a legal question again is not is not as will be and might because we're running out of time and let me pose it in a way that would not impeach him on that call but i will still have the same message across you know on a somebody who has a very snobbish each other people and i think you've demonstrated that cole how can you explain apart from this call which was my private life and which will state and now they can give another example of this snobbish attitude i think i just want to give him and i want the journalistic example well i want a legal journalistic example well even though i think you are. as a journalist i think this is you don't want to discuss this problem i understand

why so legal is because it's illegal so now we are all based on the i mean if we just sort of start to require specific degree all consideration for the people at jannie an accommodation of their concerns do you think you have it in yourself to show that accommodation to people who live next door to you to people who live across the street or to people who live at the other end of the country of course this is what i'm doing now and this is actually what my complaint is about actually this campaign changed too because when i go to people when they see how many problems they have and when they see that i cannot solve them all right now i'm trying hard i'm doing my best but i see that sometimes i can only hog them i can only cry with them and that's maximum but i come to of course it touched me very much and the touch is manaul and i actually am not a person i used to be when i came to this campaign and now because i saw so many

suffering already and i am now every day with it so of course it gives me a future how to say a huge burden when you can do only so little things now but you see how many people are really needing help and support and the fair state and they don't have it now since male radia grossly over time they will have to post a whole version online and make some changes that we will agree but you'll for the area that are insured let's start with i make and it would be already over time but i was well let's finish it thank you so much i will really don't want you to cop the interview thank you was nice meeting if you're not going to accommodate my last question i just don't want you to cut anything think it thinks they.

are. the currency market itself is still on track to eclipse the global banking. only which is what we need what we want and i've always said it's a bank starkiller that's the primary use of bitcoin. i think i. was that was i. was.

was. that was. because of all the trade. overturns lifetime bans on sanctions. eleven will have to be lifted but it will not be able to compete at this month and thanks in south korea. a libyan man fight for justice against nato could go to europe's top human rights for. the alliance killed his family during a raid. now we do that means you explain why you are here. i don't understand why nato targeted. drug deals one of the biggest u.s. police corruption scandals reveals an abuse of power within and then leap tall in

the city of. my. it's one o'clock here in moscow and you're watching r.t. international life from last india with main india today welcome to the program we start this hour with breaking news the court of arbitration for sport has fully up to twenty eight appeals of russian athletes that were banned for life from the olympics begats arbitrators unanimously found that the evidence would forward by the i.o.c. in relation to this matter did not have the same weight in each individual case this is why in twenty eight cases the evidence collected was found to be insufficient to establish that's an anti-doping rule violation was committed by the

athletes concerned. this does not mean that these twenty. innocents but. due to insufficient evidence if you so held the sanctions. their individual results achieved in such reinstituted but to discuss this further we're joined in the studio by our correspondent igor should are now off big news here can you firstly outline the decision for us well of course so these twenty eight out of the to that we've mentioned it means that for them it went all the way from a lifetime ban from ever taking part in from ever competing in any olympics to a complete drop of all allegations and more importantly as you've just heard sanctions what this means for them is that they have finally managed to clear their names at least for now although the arbitration court has said that it doesn't mean that they are innocent although what does that really mean if they are saying that

they have not been found guilty of doping but still they have managed to clear their name and moreover nine medals will be going back into russia's coffers so to speak nine medals from these sorties twenty for fourteen games obviously you for athletes and for the russian sports ministry this is good news have a listen the cash decision on russian athletes confirms many accused of anti doping rule violations are clean i am counting on the international olympic committee to accept cash decision and to allow the athletes to participate at the upcoming limpy games. so this is of course the this is the good news what is not the good news for them is that the international olympic committee can still appeal this decision and obviously they're hoping to do that yeah i mean we need to understand what the significance of cassis decision is don't really yes of course well first and foremost as i mentioned for the athletes it's clearing their name i would another

thing here is that this whole ruling kind undermines the whole investigation into the russian doping allegations into the whole russian doping scandal because in this hearing by the court of appeals court of appeal is heard from both richard mclaren who submitted who filed the initial report accusing russia of state sponsored doping and his key witness he's key witness who used to run the school the moscow anti doping the board made all the allegations against russia. mentioned before just earlier that the i.o.c. can obviously appeal the appeal this is as it were what does that mean well this means that the i.o.c. they have already issued an official statement about the decision and they are saying that while they are content that eleven people have been found guilty of

doping that but they are also saying that those twenty eight people who have been cleared they are saying that this could have an impact on the whole issue of doping and the whole struggle on the whole fight against doping in russia they also saying that apparently the court of appeals did not take into consideration the allegations of the state sponsored doping scheme taking place in russia so obviously this leaves them embarrassed this whole decision because it can completely undermines their findings and it undermines their ruling their decision to ban those twenty eight leads from ever competing in any olympics or. as always highly controversial every step of the way and we're going to see some more controversy i'm sure from people starting to speak out ecologist donna franks very much for the overview there. the initial decision to enforce the bans was made by the international olympic committee and

a handful of russian athletes thought their dreams and careers were over. israel more as we go towards those marble things probably was to appear to be just plain to be on you now believe is going to be a very long one. almost a. good business to your. list of do it just for the reason. of that is to choose the. good national board which typically try to. put the most of things in the organ if you want your absolute joy. to be pushing all of them up in your leadership in your work because he really would

be rushing towards. it all which in. order. to get that right it's fair to do. it. now libyan man who lost his whole family during a nato bombardment in the country is planning to take his fight for justice to the european court for human rights the international alliance reportedly dropped two bombs on his house during a campaign back in twenty eleven. now we demand they don't need to explain why or how. the military targets i don't understand why nato targeted our house sadly my dear wife died as well as my cousin my innocent children our neighbors our friends were there with. it was a monstrous crime but the nato has the latest equipment and technology which allows them to argue that term and the targets of the nato cross drugs specifically

annoyed when people. intentionally hit civilian targets hospitals schools gas stations they destroyed all the infrastructure they were killing civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure apparently knowing there were no weapons there. you can see here on this map where the shelling took place by nato forces as kelli described thirteen people were killed in the attack including three children he admits his house may have been targeted because his father was a general who served under libya's former leader moammar gadhafi but says it was just a family home with no weapons or threat the lawsuit was filed almost seven years ago but he's faced an uphill struggle since to actually get his case into a course nato argues that it had no evidence suggesting civilians were in the house at the time of the bombing however callid says his lawyers have now found a way to overcome the alliance's immunity in such incidents and he hopes his case will set

a precedent for those who also lost their families. we gathered our families in different parts of libya we found a man whose wife daughter and son as well as his mother died during the shelling there were other families in other cities a lot of families we are empowered to report all identified victims after having documented in photograph the material so that this case could become a historical precedent. let air raids in the u.s. city of baltimore skyrocketed in twenty seventeen with fifty six killings per hundred thousand people a new record for the city that already has a reputation for being dangerous and crime writer. few cities in body america never been a more depressing leaving the city of baltimore baltimore struggles with a record high murder rate. murder that

will. yes baltimore there is a robust active crime strategy. for. those baltimore has been wronged by the ongoing trials in one of america's biggest police corruption scandals the gun trace tossed force and the group of playing close to offices was supposed to be reducing violence and crime however it now

seems they've actually been adding to it six to eight members of the group of