welcome back to well the part that you're seeing is a check a candidate in the two thousand and eighteen russian presidential election and seen just before the break you mentioned the name of alexina volumnia i assume a former friend of yours was precluded from running in this elections his supporters. took to the streets in this series of unsanctioned rallies just the other day apparently you didn't make much of it but i think that it was a no to believe them they defied the government several times in the last it was only two thousand people it's not all this i guess ok well you give and then things are unsanctioned this is what i mean given that you're running a lavish area that you just went out with out of time don't let people go on the streets and then the sake so not so i think you saying that to solve them on no no support of a position thousands of people would go out and you're arguing with yourself now

because i said that people took to the streets and you earlier denied that they were trying to argue the rest of the streets they took two thousand people it's not enough it's not what you said you said but look people went out. they did what small quantity was not even a little small quantity but because of the i never heard try to qualify if you tried to do it but let's still wrangling about it i think the reason why people took to the streets and why i would hold them to go out was he's call for the boycott of those elections and boycott means not participating at all isn't he the real candidate the candidate who is really against old brother. but said yes i think he's a real candidate and i think that he should be let to the elections unfortunately that was not made and here we share different ideas because i don't. think the

court is affected by thing right caught will play only on putin not against putin because of the less number of people would come and vote out of protest the more percentage of those who will be for poutine this is obvious and i am against this idea that's why i decided to participate to unite those who go and vote on those elections to say how many people are against so that you personally would not get any vote a year earlier accuse the current authorities of trying to downplay the opposition support and russia. i know that i mean everybody everybody knows that there have has been a bit of a falling out between your campaign and the only complaint there has been a number of very public spats yesterday election of only published a column and that was not very complimentary of the post of each you were attacked more than me well i think he accused there was

a rumor that you visited him in the detention facility somebody wrote about you visiting him in the detention facility to which he replied that it was a lie anyway it is really why what does it have to do with me i did my best i brought some food i spoke with policeman i never said i saw him first yemeni it shows that there is. not the kind of agreement between various of position forces or you because of where you have problems because this is what i share as democracy you shouldn't be all agreed like this like all the people who work around this and there are a lot lots of personal attacks if you guys are united by the common goal which is personal attacks so this is not a question to me i think about it with. cheese he's campaigning manager on camera but i never do personal attacks i just wanted him to a polish and i certainly wanted to show the opposition in the very. iconic to know look i can only answer for myself i can tell so for all. people yes i think far

more of the rules say deed and other opposition leaders deeds were not really sensible as and sensible in terms of uniting us all but i tried to do everything to. complain manager quite deliberately chasing i just wanted his apologies i didn't get them and they said enjoins you think by doing that you're playing in the hands of those who are actually looking for any pretext to. college as because you said lie i don't think it was ground that's up to you you said that your share a lot of common ideas and i think politically and volley stands on both leftist and nationalist positions he is on record as saying that when he comes to power he is going to expropriate the properties of the current elite and i think in russia that is something that could be very appealing to the people especially the poor the young. would you personally like to see another expropriation redistribution

complain in this country well i think we should be very definite in our terms i don't think that he says about ticks procreation over the elite i think he in his program and if i'm not mistaken speaks about expropriation of the people connected with corruption with this i totally agree you know that he's not just a leftist i think he's a revolutionary leftist he's pretty much about. blowing up the current system and building something new in its place and that is a fundamental question for russia how do you change russia whether you change it from scratch starting to build from a clean slate or whether you work with the current system it's very important for me to get your position on the favor of revolution or evolution our view or future russia is really different because i think that unfortunately the only good way for us is a long way i know that many people want to foster change but change all. we have

this as a revolution i am against a little that you agree with rather than only luke what do you mean i agree i don't agree with putin putin doesn't save the real things about this you know if a person says i am for everything good and against everything bad of course you will agree with. that he prefers an incremental change in russia which will then why he doesn't do it twenty years he knows the troughton steals he knows that made the team. is probably stealing he knows many many governmental people who are still in from the state why he is not punishing them why he is only punishing. who stole from satan and he spun it because he stole from state but because he stole something as you really believe that putin has the same kind of authority to deliberately target any give. no that putin has all the powers in russia and his word is the last word here understand that in such a big country like russia know that every question could be addressed to

a president for sure and that's the problem because all of the people around him sit and think ok what do we think about this or maybe we can treat the already set top as we can do this and then hundreds of intrigue has become the reality of our lives but the problem is that we don't have laws we have in truth what putin will think about this and this is i think a really bad situation because i want to leave in a country where everything is ruled by law not by president well i think many people over the group of young but i think the problem in russia is not what but how and this is actually what. one of the architects of liberal reform in russia said recently at the guy doris forum but the problem is not we all agree that the russian future is doomed democratic but the question is how to change that then from his position it's not just about political will it's about. the energized

citizenry what have you done in your campaign to encourage the citizen muscle i have done a huge tour i've visited more than a thousand regions of russia already and in every cd i gather the. halls where i speak with people i talk about the need for change i talk about the problems we face i educate all around russia and my main goal is education i want to educate people i want to bring them truth and i want together all their problems to make them federal so i go on all the regions of russia and they give those problems and they want. to know what it is i've been following your campaign and sometimes it really looks like a more hip version of putin's annual call in show because you would go to some rundown hospital people will tell you how bad things are and they would be hoping that the publicity will make the local officials pay attention but it's the same

old russian paternalism waiting for the officials to fix the problem rather than being the change you want to see in the world don't you think that you are essentially playing the very same kremlin tactic no i'm not i am the change people want to see because with me comes the light to their problems when they come to those who are using change that you want to see in russia that you want to see in the world somebody who actually not only talks about the problems but who fixes them i think them by doing this this is my way of fixing you know you can join probably city two during the list of course because often joy doesn't solve the problem in a what does it mean i can give you already some examples for example the hospital we matt already there. pronouncing a program of. building works because of my visits and this is the real doing thing because i can take the lose money out of my pocket. they are being spaced by

the same prison system that you criticize so you drew the attention of the romani i am saying luke those guys got money for building a hospital but they never did they never rebuilt it than a car with t.v. and everyone writes about this they know they stole those money and they have to do something because otherwise they will go to prison because the scandal around this becomes really huge so what they're doing be compensated and starting building it this is how i fix things this is my way of doing i go for example and speak about it but if you do understand the reason presidential work is not drawing attention to some problem it's actually of course but i'm doing now what i can do now i was talking loud that you did read that if and when with other very famous people who are also against the charges that it was really a gentle you read this is that he will he was released i take on all of us this credit on all the citizens who were involved in doing something for him to make

this case public and when you say what do you do. if you own all the talking you know talking as you remember in bible first was the words of helping is the most important thing when you stop talking about things that were allowed that all russians are exploiting these species even much they like to talk but they don't like no one likes to talk no one on federal channels talks about the things i talk and people know this and that's why they go and want to support me now i want to scream two more questions if i may and we don't have that much time so i would appreciate a relatively short answer your i think one of the first prominent female candidates in the russian elections after that and a few return interviews she encountered a lot of sexism and not just sexism she encountered a lot of open bigotry and her negatives were very high but not as high as yours i saw some polling ages. is putting them down to eighty percent do you think that's

just the typical prejudice of the russian a lecture the against women or do you put more to your own personality well first the wall i don't believe in those is a kind of polls because those polls. in the same ways of everything they count votes it's like the same kind of organizations and you do not think you have and i know i don't see it around me i see so much support especially when i go out of big cities i see so much support of people who come like but this is a time that i mean in many countries do you encounter more challenges to iran i formerly with i feel it too sometimes but i think we shouldn't pay attention to this we just should do what i think is right because while yes it exists many men don't think that it's a right for one to rule their lives they don't think that in. society

that's a good thing to do but what we can do about this we can just prove that this is not try but i think far less agreeable then the most russian women certainly know how to get your way and i have one last question i don't want you to take it as a personal attack i think it's an important one a few years ago you were taped having a conversation with your neighbors about the repair work on your part and i don't think it's correct to discuss criminal cases because this was a private talk on telephone which was voice it was it is beyond my face so it's a criminal case and it was criminal reported so i don't think it's ethical to discuss my private telephone conversations and i will telephone conversation don't think it's correct to discuss any private conversations all my private analyse you all my older have a need and i think it was a criminal case and you know this it's unconstitutional to do this to discuss it and. and to report it if you would show this on your t.v.

i one night it all or else can absorb and they will closely because it's a lawful i won't do this but i'm just saying you we can discuss unlawful things uncles it's easy you know it menial to really see how these movies are deemed unconstitutional and you know if you are no hughes movies i discussing corruption i'm going to share only palaces over the people who are you doing this and we discuss please don't kill the people please hold these on my money and when. we're leisure telephone private telephone in which you said that you wouldn't hire outgoing wouldn't care for legal to discuss my time voice calls listening working with phase b. i want to get this calls once again if you're if you're cooperating with them i know you can do it. is certain oleson millions of people in russia listens you know i don't want to listen to any calls i'm not listening to them softballs who was

killed ok let me scholes who are also there so no i won't let me off my private calls which were illegally taped by phase b. as i was not listening and never would listen to me and solve calls that were also distributed through all the internet let me ask you if i think that people don't do it unless they call and my mother. was ill you know it gives you a miser about the whole you have force and the fantastical because it's my private i can say my home whatever i think is right and that my letter is private letters i can write whatever i think is right and my mind i wonder if you would like that i would should never read someone's as a man's someone's letters and if he doesn't show a contingent of moderate tell you have i should denounce it if you talk on the phone i didn't you never doing this and to tomorrow why should i since you my advice to you be ethical enough not saying anything here i am. privately i think i

know why don't you say something and it's important question for me as and as a first this is a legal question again isn't as will be and might because we're running out of time and let me pose it in a way that would not impeach him on that call but i will still have the same message across you know on a somebody who has a very snobbish each other people and i think you've demonstrated that in dr cole can you can you explain apart from this call which was my private life and which will state and now they can give another example of this snobbish attitude i think i just want to give them and i want the journalistic example while i was a legal journalistic example well even though i think you are. as a journalist i think this is you don't want to discuss this problem i understand why so legal is because it's illegal so now we know it all because i mean if we just sort of started to require specific degree all consideration for the people at jannie an accommodation of their concerns do you think you have it in yourself to

show that accommodation to people who live next door to you to people who live across the street or to people who live at the other end of the country of course this is what i'm doing now and this is actually what my complaint is about actually this campaign change will all too because when i go to people when they see how many problems they have and when they see that i cannot solve them all right now i'm trying hard i'm doing my best but i see that sometimes i can only hog them i can only cry with them and that's maximum that i can do of course it touched me very much and it touches manaul and i actually am not a person i used to be when i came to this campaign and now because i saw so many suffering already and i'm now every day with it so of course it gives me. a huge to say a huge burden when you can do only so little things now but you see how many people

are really needing help and support and the fair state and they don't have it now since male radia grossly over time they will have to post a whole version online and make some changes that we will agree but you'll for the air that are sure let's. make any changes over time but i well let's finish it thank you so much i will really don't want you to cop the interview thank you was nice meeting if you're not going to accommodate my last question i just don't want you to cut anything think it thinks they. are.

the currency market itself is still on track to eclipse the global banking. only which is what we need what we want and. it's a bank starkiller that's the primary use of big coin of the purse. i. think. i. was. glad. that.

the court of arbitration for sport overturns the lifetime olympic bans handed down to twenty eight russian athletes accused of doping violations. a libyan man whose family was killed during a nato air raid in two thousand and eleven stepped up his fight for justice and look to take the alliance to europe's top human rights court. now we do need to explain why our house and other houses but show all the military targets i don't understand why nato targeted. plus german intelligence warns that the children of i still fighters in the country could be recruited to carry out terror attacks describing them as a living time bomb. from the whole team here. our teenage human left out thanks for joining us this hour i'm

. first the court of arbitration for sport has overturned the lifetime olympic bans of twenty eight russian athletes accused of doping and up held their results at the sochi winter games because of a treatise unanimously found that the evidence put forward by the you see in relation to this matter did not have the same weight in each individual case this is why in twenty eight cases the evidence collected was found to be insufficient to establish that's an anti-doping rule violation was committed by the athletes concerned. this does not mean that these twenty. innocents but. due to insufficient evidence hailed the sanctions and the. results achieved in such reinstituted for them it went from a lifetime ban completely not in a single olympics where they allowed to compete it went from that to all

allegations and more importantly sanctions against them being dropped so talk about extremes really so for them it is really important because this decision has allowed them to finally clear their names and this is something that they've been fighting for for a while now really also this means that nine medals in these sorts of olympics in two thousand and fourteen are going back to russia's obviously russia is glad with this decision the cash decision on russian athletes confirms many accused of anti doping rule violations are clean also eleven other russian athletes they were partially cleared they had their lifetime ban swapped only for a band to compete in the upcoming olympic games in south korea those people landed in trouble because of the so-called mclaren report a canadian lawyer submitted a lengthy document accusing russia of running a state sponsored doping scheme the international olympic committee they used it as

a stepping stone in their rule an investigation into the issue as a result of russia's whole olympic team was slapped by a blanket ban the whole report was revolving around the eyewitness account of your watch and it is a man who ran a allow been more school and who used russia of swapping dirty doping samples for clean ones the court of appeals heard from and from mclaren and the court of appeals found in their testimony not enough effectively to consider those people guilty so this whole thing really undermines the. you sees investigation into the allegations of doping in russia so no wonder the i.o.c. somewhat embarrassed the i.o.c. will analyze the recent decisions very carefully once they're available and consider the consequences including an appeal to the swiss federal tribunals since the russian olympic committee is suspended russian athletes can participate in

pyongyang only on invitation by the i.o.c. the result of the caste decision does not mean that athletes from the group of twenty eight will be invited to the games those twenty eight athletes they've had all allegations all sanctions against them dropped still the i.o.c. maintains their ground saying well you're not you're still not invited. we've spoken to several russian athletes to get their reactions to the court's decision you're done with chaz what if it's such a relief for us because we're really are innocent the public is now aware of that but many people believe that we don't but our close ones of course knew it wasn't true i'm really disappointed with the olympic movement it's a complete mess. there's a lot of uncertainty the bans were justified in some cases in others not i'm happy that the athletes in my sport. have been partially acquitted and i'm sure we'll be promoting our movement further. but it'll be the legal mechanisms exist and we hope

we'll still have the time to fight for our rights if not at caste then in the civil court switzerland has a long history of considering cases if they're urgent i've always said that the truth and justice always prevail in the end when the world believes one man mclaren who comes up with more in more allegations is just nonsense. we've also discussed the issue with a number of experts including sports lawyer are part of he welcomed the ruling. by the it's a victory for common sense and the fundamental principle of the olympics over political whims we've always stuck to the principles journey i.o.c. inquiry and with cas as well charteris based on them that's what pedicle bitin left us when he created the olympic movement whole report this whole situation was based on a criminal informant which is a doctor or a turncoat so he'd get the information. you know when he escaped from russia and

sort of was helping an american filmmaker point for go to dope to win an armature race part of this whole crux of a car with more was was how these bottles were being tampered with these two men who were involved in exposing all of this mess basically gave cus enough evidence to say listen mcclaren what i.o.c. we don't believe you guys the i.o.c. will oversee do everything in his power doesn't want to compete but i don't think they can do to earn and the reason. the reason is basically. in the decision was that the level of ineligible cation resets once you will be eligible for one change and the i.o.c. then sanction them again by excluding them. with doping even though it's been proved like not types you know that relates to me don't punish when you're punishing an athlete was something i haven't done in the first. a libyan man who

lost his whole family in a nato air raid is planning to take his fight for justice to the european court of human rights he says the alliance dropped two bombs on his house during its military intervention in the country in two thousand and eleven. now we do need to explain why our house and houses were showing all the military targets i don't understand why nato targeted our house sadly my dear wife died as well as my cousin my innocent children and on neighbors our friends were there with this it was a monstrous crime and nato has the latest equipment and technology which allows them to argue with the term and the target of the nato cross drugs specifically annoyed when people were in their home they intentionally hit civilian targets hospitals schools gas stations they destroyed all the infrastructure while they were killing civilians and destroying civilian infrastructure apparently knowing there were no weapons there. you can see here on the map where the nato attack took

place as kelly had mentioned thirteen people were killed in the bombardment including three children he says his house may have been targeted because his father was a general who served under libya's former leader moammar gadhafi but says it was just a family home and not a legitimate target he began his battle for justice back in two thousand and twelve but his face an uphill struggle to actually get his case heard in court nato which enjoys legal immunity in such cases argues that it had no evidence suggesting civilians were in the house at the time of the strike however cleaved says his lawyers have now found a way of challenging the protections afforded to the alliance and he hopes his case will set a precedent for others who have also lost their families. we gathered our families in different parts of libya we found a man whose wife daughter and son as well as his mother died during the shelling there were other families in other cities a lot of families we compiled a report from all identified victims after having documented in photographs the

material so that this case could become a historical precedent. murder rates in the u.s. city of baltimore skyrocketed in two thousand and seventeen with fifty six killings per one hundred thousand people a new record for the city that already has a reputation for being dangerous and crime ridden. you cities your body american urban decay more depressingly than the city of baltimore baltimore struggles with a record high murder rate. murder is out of control. yes baltimore there is a robust active crime strategy.

we're. talking. about all comes as baltimore has been rocked by the ongoing trials and one of america's biggest police corruption scandals the gun trace task force an elite group of plainclothes officers were supposed to be reducing violence and crime in the city however it now seems they have actually been adding to it six out of eight members of the group have pled guilty to charges of organized crime including extortion and drug dealing artists american is across the story. the baltimore police department is now involved in one of the biggest scandals in u.s. law enforcement history for months now the court system has been trying to.