that's what the drug are where there's a boy you're down there you're getting personal you make objects which of course of the person should just go up and say oh this dude's a you know. i don't know what you're but she was a she was no not at all saying frat she was some what love to use these guys campaign she wasn't stating what this guy's a jerk face but why did you say well there's oil company gave x. amount of money to this guy's campaign this oil company gave x. where were the that it's public record it's not there's not i'll do something that's not known these things are facts and the legislation she's talking about benefits they business you know not the little guy and that's this this whole thing in west virginia as they keep pushing this like well if we could just get coal back because you know black lung hasn't been popular in the last couple of decades you know it was the bill that they were trying to vote on that sparked all this so this was a bill forty two sixty eight so what it what it says is that a majority of seventy five percent of the owners who of shares of

a single piece of property could determine whether the property could develop for asked for oil or gas extraction so it amuses someone might have sold or at least off their mineral rights and they own like one percentage or seven eighths of a share which if you have minerals underneath your limb that could be a huge amount of money to a farmer someone who owns land the problem was before if that person with even the tiniest share said no you couldn't do it now what they're saying is we don't care about what that minority person who may be living on that land if the corporation owns a bigger portion they essentially get eminent domain and they control sideways into someone's land even if they decide they won't let you know about way so it's a pretty ugly piece of legislation that was written by the goyim gas lobby that is for the oil and gas lobby and guess who gives them to their money bingo. marks to west virginia a lawyer who specializes in real estate law regarding things like oil coal oil and natural gas wrote about. the west. argues that pursuing your version you get sort

of i just kind of like the late last year in which she claimed that this lucas was ill informed that she warns against exploitation of the servitude of the hillbilly classes she more literally calls them the hell belly classes and you wonder why people think you're in the pockets of big business when you sit and call the poorest people which you know the areas around mining operations tend to be the poorest people not hillbillies those are your constituents little busy with a good fight lisa keep up the good bye get out of the house all right where it was we go to break walk watchers don't forget to let us know what you think of the topics we cover the facebook and twitter see our poll shows at r t v dot com coming up sean stone looks at the future of cryptocurrency the stock market with the publisher of the trends journal gerald so let day and then we've got robert snowflakes in black berries coming your way no it's not a drink it's in the story state to be watching the whole.

hey everybody i'm stephen bob. taft hollywood guy usual suspects every proud american first of all i'm just george bush in our view to say this is my buddy many famous financial gurus well i'm just a little bit different i'm out of a room going to the well you know windows up with all the drama happening in our country i'm shooting the road to have fun meet everyday americans. and hopefully start to bridge the gap this is the great american people.

and in america a college degree requires a great deal. paying a decades long debt. study and so hard it requires trust. to go through humiliation to enter an elite society. and touching the dead sometimes quite literally. wants other true colors of universities in the u.s. led. no

matter how you look at the last year has been a whirl or coaster of a ride for the american economy the dow jones rode wall street records with an unprecedented rally before it lost a shocking and percent and a blink of an eye bit coin made many a clueless millennial a millionaire overnight before crashing down to earth just as rapidly a partisan media. as out war over whether the economy is booming or not all while struggling families wonder what planet their cable news producers are living on all of this is to say it's been quite a turbulent year and nobody really knows what's coming next but one man is literally paid to figure out exactly what's coming max and that's gerald flint a professor publisher of trends journal some found that down with gerald to get his take on the trumpet bombing. twenty seventeen did see a boom in the stock markets the dow now is cooled off a little bit these past few weeks but how much of the overall stock surge can we

associate with trump you could you could associate a lot of it with trump since he got elected because think of the things that he promised wall street i'm going to get rid of those regulations that hold your bags of a give you free rein and amen to cut the taxes so you're going to get more money and that was the initiative to drive the stocks up and he said he would cut the taxes within a year and he did and he said you know what you repatriate that money you got overseas so let's go back to when george bush did that in two thousand and four the money didn't go into capital expenditures it when it's a stock buybacks when you look at the whole stock market boom it's cheap money they did it everybody knows it they denied in the beginning by the way you know they tracking trends is an understanding of where we are how we got

here and where we're going so when i believe that the market's really going to crash in two thousand and twelve i looked at how we got here so they didn't teach me in economics one hundred one about zero interest rates negative interest rates and quantitative easing these cats just made this stuff up and all they did was juice the markets. so trump is giving them a tax break hey how about those corporate earnings haven't been so bad have they why do they need a tax break they didn't put that money into corporate earnings back into capital development it went into stock buybacks that's what's been driving the market's up and the fear that interest rates may go up at the cheap money flow may stop is what's bringing the markets down now. do you think there were basically you

mentioned past crashes and it's from the two thousand seven eight time period you know led to the great recession do you think that we're now out of the great recession the people aren't out of the great recession the what seventy eight percent of people living paycheck to paycheck three people who are the united states have more dough than sixty percent combined median household incomes below nine hundred ninety nine levels the gap between the richer the poor is the widest in the united states than any of the industrialized nations so yes we're out of the recession in terms of yes there's g.d.p. growth yes the market's going up yes there are more people employed but where they employed it's not the united states of america it's slave led to get so when they talk for instance that the last time you know what brought the market down was wages went up and wages went up but take a look at the numbers wages only went up for about twenty percent of the working

population the managerial levels that's what skewed it eighty percent of the people is still making the lousy wages they were making before. so that's what it is so yes the economy is in much better shape now than it was from the panic of zero eight people yes they have debt the credit card debt sit all time high but they don't have those subprime mortgages now instead they have those a surprise because mortgages rather than the house mortgages but they're not as big as the so did get caught i'm a on the whole is in much better shape than it was back then but not all boats ride side and so when you mentioned before how when bush was patrick had money from the corporations that was put in stock buyback you expect that what trump is done basically with this corporate tax break will bring money back but rather than being

in invested in the companies themselves and into the workers workers in the technology to be more invested at this to the stocks really overheat the economy and create a crash it will put more money back into the stock market standing capital development it to get go by history again it's not as though corporate earnings have been so terrible they've been very good so why did he have to give them a tax break so trip trumps trade policies are much different than you know that will bring jobs back if you bring back manufacturing you know but we're a service sector economy and you look at the jobs i mean you know hospitality sector or you may be a bought tender at a waitress and making beds in a hotel not that i'm demeaning that but those are the jobs that are available they put a fancy name on it so the thing to is to when you want to see where the economy is going it truly is the trump economy look at trump's track record as a businessman and about those of bankruptcies over there that linux city but he

makes things happen on another end so that's what you're going to see you're going to see a lot of ups and downs. at the end of last year the trends journal we forecast a ten percent market correction in two thousand and eighteen it's down ten percent and may go this is the end of the trump economic rally as far as the stock markets go we believe we're at the peak and there's a what nobody can predict the future there are too many wild cards in life absent the wild card we can go back to maybe of a bear market we're in a correction now the market's up over six thousand points since trump got elected so it has a ways to go down before it crashes so because when you're looking at the global economy and you see the numbers coming out of the i.m.f. the positive hey take

a look at that trade data that just came out of china last week oh there ever there are terrible debt yes no kidding everybody is but look at the trade numbers exports increased you know levon percent imports increased. twenty something percent so the people are buying so the global economy is in much better shape than it used to big but again going back to the markets the markets are overvalued they are over leveraged the price earning ratios in the markets today are near the historic high and in the tech sector they're way above it so yes it is going to be a correction it's way over built it's going to come down and what are the signals that you look for in particular before an economy let's say or a market or what not it's going to start collapsing is a key signal that no one seems to be looking at in this is it

when gold prices shine the markets will go red. look what happened over the last week when the markets were going down poof gold was moving down to. if the markets are really in trouble gold is the ultimate safe haven asset that they would have skyrocketed and gold can't break over fourteen hundred dollars an ounce and our forecast is that gold has to go over fourteen fifty an ounce solidify around forty fifty four thousand nine hundred sixty and then it's going to take a big coin bounce this thing's going to go to two thousand plus watch gold and gold is the ultimate safe haven asset so with these markets are going to go down go back to see what happened the last time gold prices spiked and they haven't spiked gold is the one to watch that they're not watching right you mentioned big coin

obviously that's an interesting side of things cryptocurrency many people are excited about the currency is the new tech bubble basically of the late ninety's that you know early two thousand do you think there could be a currency can prove to be more so you know as basically as stable as the internet has proved as far as you know it's a bubble that burst big point has burst a little bit it may burst more but the point is do you think that overall cryptocurrency is here to stay yes i do. go back to bitcoin what board the prices of bitcoin down government interference china south korea the banks now in the united states you can't buy a big you can't buy a crypto zwi the credit cards a number of banks it's regulations it's going to bring it down but the important thing is crypto z here to stay as well as the block chain technology that everyone's fall in love with that's really a whole new way it's a whole new accounting system and so many ways so this is the twenty first century

now let's go to china. you go to china end up paying for cash or credit cards you're putting your wrap up there the world is going cashless people are an attached to a coin of the realm we're talking about the markets being over that al you'd over leveraged which they just passed that another. you know we're going to keep the government going and put is deeper in debt just hundreds of trillions of dollars in global debt and people that are awake don't want to invest in their see currencies you want to own these digital currencies aren't worth anything oh you mean those digital dollars printed on nothing and backed by nothing are worth more you got a clown out there shooting them out last about a digital currency when you've got all these digital nothing you want zillions euros and dollars so yes stay here to stay but the ones that we're focusing on

particularly are the ones that have an action of purpose a product of a service behind them going back to block chain. transactions a dog like that you can what health care you name the industry they're all going into it it's it's verifying solidifying processes in a way we've never seen it's the twenty first century and so too is digital currency is. having a severe allergy is no laughing matter i know even when it's used as a joke by magical talking rabbits or at least some parents seem to think so the new children's movie reboot peter rabbit based on the classic book by beatrix potter includes a bunny hating tom mcgregor mcgregor is allergic to black berries at one point the rabbit shoot blackberries into the villain's mouth he chokes and must use an epi pen to save him from an awful act of shock liss is when parents of children with allergies felt a trigger warning should have been added

a trigger warning because they felt that the scene specifically shamed kids with our g.'s the worst part sony is apologizing for being insensitive to people with allergies no word on whether the talking body lead will apologize as well but i can . sir my concern is that at this right the list of trigger warnings for your average children's movies have been longer than the movies themselves trying some grim fairy tales sometimes and still trigger warnings that go to our other realistic fairy tales around the world the bag of the body you know the one who killed peter robinson right that's right all right away and we can talk about oh all right everybody that deserves over today remember every one of those world we're not told i'm loved so i tell you all i love you i am i robot that topical keep on watching those hawks great.

apply to many clubs over the years so i know the game inside guides. the ball isn't only about what happens on the pitch to the final school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the shaper money just kill you narrowness and spending stupidity twenty million and one player. it's an experience like nothing else not to because i want to share what i think of what i know about the beautiful guy my great to one more chance with. the next minute. stein is getting international recognition with the help of israel at least in the world of zoos and to listen to me like you know. this is my compass

he is going to study hall maybe. john does. the only palestinians gets the most help from his jerusalem counterparts i don't think there's some of those who in the world under the oak vision not only could do this. and the design. i'm going to compete in the doesn't seem to do more in the middle. don't piss off. the top. i. think you also think of. something but it was. just too busy. did he meet all of you get missteps and.

headlining this hour in an exclusive interview with the head of the court of arbitration for sport tries to defend the olympic committee's decision to exclude russian athletes which the court itself had already cleared of doping allegations the fact that unable to show the guilt of an athlete's doesn't mean that it has nothing to do at all with the case. since. the u.s. admits a part of the local forces it trained in syria is fleeing to join a conflict against washington's ally turkey. and consumer goods giant unilever is. a mission to clean up the internet with threats to pull lucrative ads from facebook and google they don't act on fake news and hate being.

all over me in the news team here with out here q this tuesday the thirteenth of february to eleven am here in moscow five pm in south korea which is where we started day four of the winter olympics and athletes from russia on the medal board two bronze and one silver that's despite a reduced number of competitors from russia following decisions by the international olympic committee and the court of arbitration for sport over doping allegations in twenty eight cases the evidence collected was found to be insufficient to establish that's an anti-doping rule violation it was committed actually it's concerned house a decision is a extremely disappointing. decision of the urgent need. for reform. in the internal structure of the cars today the division of the court of arbitration for sport

dismissed the application filed by thirty two russian athletes against the international olympic committee applicants did not demonstrate that the manner in which two special commission system by the i.o.c. was carried out in a discriminatory. well there are plenty of questions left over those conflicting decisions so our correspondent has been speaking exclusively with the secretary general of the c.i.s. and here's what he found. after the court of arbitration for sport said no to forty seven russian athletes and coaches just as the winter games were getting underway perhaps the number one conclusion that came up on some people's mind was that presumption of innocence doesn't apply to the russian doping scandal well the cast secretary-general didn't literally say that the key law principle didn't work for cas but see for yourself how much it applied to the russians the fact that the

unable to show the guilt of an athlete doesn't mean that it has nothing to do although with the case of the innocence this is a logical consequence and this is nothing bad about it mr reeve maintains that leaving the group of clean russian athletes on paper out of the winter olympics isn't a sanction also i found out that the refusal of the i.o.c. to get the dozens of russian athletes on board the olympics in some cases was a result of pure suspicion and other cases it was a result of some real evidence which however mr reap hasn't seen after all he wasn't a member of the panel but the secretary general promised that this evidence will soon be published so let's wait for now let's have a look at the other highlights of my exclusive interview with never involved in any

political discussions or debates we are lawyers a tribunal we render decisions cas secretary-general obviously referring to you insisted that the court of arbitration for sport decision does not mean that these twenty eight athletes are declared innocent does that mean that presumption of innocence doesn't work with cas the duty of the i.o.c. was to show. so that the athletes involved in this case were guilty of and i don't be rude violation the fact that you cannot establish the give evidence of the. doesn't mean that you have established the innocence of the athlete you see what i mean if you have an athlete's or anyone committing a dope infraction if you have a classic doping case you have a positive test then you have a presumption of guilt of the athlete this is the other way around with the sochi

case because the i.o.c. had to show that the athletes were guilty the athletes from the groups that your court had to deal with haven't been explained their wrongdoings by the i.o.c. but did the international olympic committee at least provide cas with proof of their guilt is difficult for me to go into details because this case we only have the decisions without the reasons so we know the result we know the media release that i have pronounced but we don't know the full reasons for each of these thirty nine cases so the only thing i can imagine as a lawyer is that there were some evidence brought by the you see which shows some suspicion about some wrongdoing in this situation as you heard a couple of minutes ago when you cast initially overturned the i.o.c. bans of the soul she asked leads the international olympic committee was very

critical of the court thomas back demanded reforms and i asked the secretary general if anyone returned to these ideas after the final decision of the russian athletes was made and the answer was no so it turns out when the court of arbitration for sport came up with a verdict that fully satisfied the i.o.c. nobody wants to reform cas anymore. washington's admitted that some of the kurdish forces it. in syria shifting to fight against one of america's allies turkey is currently on the offensive in northern syria against groups that it deems as terrorists cullom opens more on the tensions currently playing out in syria u.s. secretary of defense james mattis has confirmed that u.s. armed kurdish forces in the s.d.f. have been relocating to the northern parts of syria to protect territory from turkey. the destruction of was going on up enough and right now which is drawing

off some of the syrian democratic forces to see the snuff and on the run so the schools and the police there are tensions to shift. now the kurds and turkey are both key u.s. allies in the region however there's been tension between all three of them in recent months now we've heard of how the usa has been arming the kurdish forces and providing them with weapons now and carra has been quite upset by this action they consider this to be the arming of terrorists now at this point we do have a statement from james mattis confirming that he believes there are legitimate security concerns on turkey's part about these kurdish forces that have been armed by the united states that we can seem to work with and there is of disagreements which is how do we take them on as who was right at least possible they have a legitimate security concern and we do not dismiss one bits of them now there has been escalating tension between the united states and turkey especially in the

aftermath of an announcement from the united states that it intended to create a thirty thousand strong border force to protect syria's border with turkey now u.s. leaders backtracked from those comments but that hasn't stopped turkey from being quite upset by these remarks now we've recently seen the beginning of operation olive branch and this is turkish forces moving into syria to fight against the kurds two allies of the united states clashing with each other in syria as the tensions escalate we're even hearing calls to rename the street on which the u.s. embassy in turkey is capital is located there are calls to rename the street olive branch after operation olive branch the turkish operation to go into syria and fight against the kurdish forces armed by the united states there seems to be quite a bit of contradiction in the words and statements of u.s. leaders and there seems. to be rising tension between all three parties the usa

turkey and the kurdish forces. picking up on what caliber saying that the rift between turkey and the us could deepen over that region in northern syria you saw which turkey is targeting in the next part of it military operation currently u.s. troops are stationed there and it's opening up the possibility of a direct confrontation we asked middle east expert where this might lead. now the big elephant in the room is members and that's why they invited states is still on the ground they do have troops and in that case if they do not withdraw the troops and advisers from this region then ankara says that repeatedly the president here threatens that he's going to go ahead with this operation in member in case this happens i think there will be a kind of militaristic and that could lead to more tension if not a military standoff between the united states and our own career that could lead to

a major escalation to more wars on the ground that would lead to more alinea ating and more isolating of the united states. facebook and google are at risk of losing one of the world's biggest advertisers if they fail to improve news transparency and tackle extremism on their platforms consumer products giant unilever which makes some of the biggest brands in food and cleaning products made the threat at a tech conference on monday but the anglo dutch firms being caught out in the past itself with its own misjudged marketing as daniel hawking to explained. same news different day facebook is again in the firing line having faced pressure from governments and activists over failing to root out hate speech racism fake news divisive comments and whatnot this time it's global giant leading the charge even threatening to reduce and withdraw advertising from the social media platform if things don't improve unilever.