tv Documentary RT April 10, 2018 4:30pm-5:01pm EDT
4:30 pm
it should be these soldiers being my depth of knowledge of cocktails explosive devices and people trying to reach the border fields between israel and gaza hamas has admitted to mass of course being the ruling party in gaza has admitted that among those who have been killed in the past more than a week of violence are some of its members. in the latest protests mentioned by paul or a young boy who was killed by israeli soldiers who said to be the youngest among the thirty palestinians who died in the demonstrations the boy's family held a memorial on monday when he would have celebrated his fourteenth birthday. the leader of the lebanese militant group hezbollah has revealed that washington offered to remove it from terror watch lists moreover the u.s. would give it financial aid if the party dropped its resistance to israeli occupation but he said we should set the pics of the story. the u.s. terror list arguably the most dangerous list in the world and if you're on the database you just seem there's no way out of big brown to that international threat
4:31 pm
right wrong if you want your name scratched off for good harry options you could become a friend of a friend the chief of hezbollah that been a share political and military may have meant with links to iran says the united states offered the group the chance to be removed from its national terror watch list but there was a catch jay you believe salim indicates you need a good message from the u.s. was president saying that the u.s. is ready and that will be a part of the lebanese government's billions of dollars and be removed from the ter lists but on the two conditions the first one is that would work for the americans and the second is that will stop resisting the israeli your patience israel's are very firmly strong our say basically as long as you're nice to washington's friends i'm for fair the proof that money talks look no further than the peoples moshe dayan organization of iran doesn't matter that you killed american personnel of
4:32 pm
civilians hiring top notch lobbyists will do the job politicians will back you at rallies if you are islamic but what martin and secular t.v. ads will proclaim your innocence from t.v. screens. any k. is iran's democratic opposition working for a nuclear free iran founded on human rights unjustly listed a terrorist group is the victim of this regime and their lucky allies this next option is simple just sits and waits until the tax for me if the noble peace prize winner nelson mandela waited till days before with ninetieth birthday what a nice present from washington and five years later at his funeral all was forgiven and forgotten to the day said that the world thank you for your notes to go with us. his struggle was yours. but the boat the birds and those that was right the greater the drought is the. same mentality now widely seen as an
4:33 pm
international hey right was branded as an international threat a decade plus even minute ten. to fifteen. i think is just like a red line for you that you would not designate russian journalists as they're going to you know on the battlefield there are groups that mesh together individual fighters or groups of fighters it's not a clean situation all the time so it's a pass that being on the u.s. terror list may have been little to do with that big terrorist however it is using what you might call the carrot and stick approach and rather handy way for a government to achieve its strategic goals if you look and see who has been designated as a foreign terrorist organization by the united states they are always the governments that seek to be independent from the united states or have challenge us
4:34 pm
in germany in their area or in their country thus the label is purely political it doesn't really say anything about terrorism or about the people who are saying under the f t o foreign terrorist organization label it's a form of bullying on a grand scale. it's an emergency meeting of the u.n. security council both americas russia's resolutions on a mechanism to investigate series alleged chemical attack did not get passed washington's resolution was vetoed by moscow russia is short of the required majority let's get details on this now from our correspondent in new york killing more people joining me on the line so talk us through those resolutions what happened i killed it. well as you said both resolutions have been defeated the resolution put forward by russia was defeated overruled by the united states and the resolution put forward by the united states was vetoed by
4:35 pm
russia so at this point no resolution has been passed as the meeting continues in the u.n. security council chamber now before any of the voting in taken place the u.s. representative nikki haley had taken to the floor and urged countries not to vote in favor of russia's resolution this is the representative of the united states before the u.n. security council our resolution guarantees that any investigations will truly be independent russia's resolution gives russia itself the chance to choose the investigators and i and states is not asking to choose the investigators and neither should russia the united states is not asking to review the findings of any investigation before they are final and neither should russia. interpret him just going to let everybody know we're going to listen in i think to events at the u.n. security council this bring the pictures and the sound as well if we can. nobody is
4:36 pm
lacking for lighting mission to without delay meet the site of the supposed to event not who we welcome the decision on who made for the general director of the technical secretariat of office of w. to send them to separate you noted to carry out investigative work in line with its c w c standards and you were taken to county data. and provided by the the state safety access guarantees provide the syrian authorities and the russian military in fifteen days time the secretary general would but would to submit it first that first reports to the security council this is a strictly practical non-problem confrontational and de politicize initiative in support of a p c w which would have helped to the determination by specialists in this area of what took place or rather did not take place in duma yet like of and this is the priority now or you might not derive there then the resolution on uni
4:37 pm
me to which was hastily introduced for voting with it obviously a goal to says see how both resolutions both ours and the american will be vetoed shouldn't we expect that members of the security council unanimously will support of this initiative another make sure that the process starts as quickly as possible according to our information to open c.w. expert mission groups are to leave for the syria as early as this week because if experts who want whatever reason are unable to reach the duma because of the actions on the part of those who continue speculating the chemical issue in order to smear syria and russia well this will become yet another piece of evidence showing that what is behind this affair which is flows through and through what's behind there is dirty political games and what is even worse aggressive military plans will through which can turn back the positive trend in syria settlement and
4:38 pm
hit a very hard as the regime which is already lacerated by military adventures of the day and this is something that we are witnessing literally in real time. well you mr president. we ask you that you put this resolution to a vote thank you. thank the representative of the russian federation for his statement and i'll give the floor to the representative of sweden. thank you very much mr president ok we've just been listening in to brazil in the benz here the russian representative to the united nations there let's go back to our correspondent in new york kaleb more pin caleb you were just bring it up to speed with earlier events and how those two resolutions one brought by back by the u.s. one backed by russia they both been vetoed. yes both of the resolutions have been vetoed the resolution from russia being vetoed by the united
4:39 pm
states the resolution of the united states being vetoed by russia and now earlier in the meeting we heard from the representative of the russian fred a federation of benzema and when he spoke he pointed out that essentially the resolution from the united states was simply an effort to recreate the very flawed work of the joint investigative mechanism that earlier did an investigation into conscious the u.s. resolution did not call in and mandate that the chemical experts on inspectors actually visit the site where the inspection took place or that they verify the samples that they were given now benicio he essentially argued that the united states isn't exactly trying to get to the truth about what happened in duma with this alleged chemical attack that they simply are looking to carry out their own agenda this isn't a benzene explaining the real flaws that he sees in the u.s. resolution. to conduct an issue front finding mission
4:40 pm
a new mechanism to attribute blame is not required to be needed to put a mechanism to give a make you why do you need the mechanism when you have already appointed the guilty party you don't want to hear anything you don't want any investigation. ok we're going to just insert we want to get my apologies caleb let's go back to the u.n. security council and listen in again and dark consultations were not against doing that more your questions but i want to say here from the other side to mr president our view is to our intention is to put this to a vote after we conduct our consultations we expect on the consultations we construct of and will not drag out for a long time. because at this stage is not necessary we need to pass this resolution in support of the o.p.c. w. mission in order to determine what the facts on the ground are as quickly as
4:41 pm
possible thank you. i think the representative of the russian federation and if there is no objection on their no you will suspend the meeting and we will continue following consultations the meeting stone suspended. ok which has been dipping in at a vessel in a benz or the russian ambassador to the u.n. and we had previously from our correspondent in new york killam open wrapping up today's earlier events now we've spoken about the situation with former us presidential candidate ron paul he's now chair of the institute for peace and prosperity. tom when a crime is committed in this country the stations when they're not sure they're careful they say this is allegedly but they never do this under these circumstances
4:42 pm
they have zero bits of information it's over and over again they had to the person is guilty and that is the person that is you know the russians and the syrians are guilty of a crime and it goes over and over again you know did cripples and then they finally had to give up here know that nothing came panned out so they had to go on to a new one so as one runs out of steam they create another fake news program. i think the least likely would be sod this whole idea saw it's over and over again ten times a day assad is gassing his own people and i've said it every time i haven't a son in a month or two later they prove that was absolutely wrong so i cannot see any reason why assad would do this there's no reason for russian have done this there's somebody who wants to serve up trouble and the people who want to stay there. ok. do the quick sound check with media analyst lionel he joins me on the logic can
4:43 pm
hear me ok don i think you can they sort of rushing into space so it's a. u.n. security council in syria the british ambassador is claimed russia crossed a red line by vetoing america's resolution that's what they do all the time isn't it veto the security council this rhetoric to really take great offense this this time round. well i'm not much of a mind reader but but what what i am still just nonplussed over is the inability for people to realize that we're talking about something or perhaps maybe this is me as a prosecutor but it's very simple to me when you want to determine what happened what chemicals were used if any who was responsible this is a this is a forensic investigation is very simple that under what it is and it would involve i would think being at a site be able to test that which is alleged to have been used and to do all the
4:44 pm
forensics that normally logically follow whether it's here whether it's salisbury whether it's anywhere maybe i'm missing the point here maybe i don't understand the nuances of this notion of forensic identification of cause and effect of alleged chemical poisoning and by virtue of the agency who is responsible for this. as long as a trained lawyer so fascinated to get your take on this essentially what's going on today in the security council is you've got pressure in the u.s. both proposing ways in which investigations should be conducted to vest to get claims of chemical attacks and nobody can agree on just a simple way of how to go in and establish the facts what you make of the evidence that's been put forward so far there was a video of alleged victims some n.g.o.s making some claims is it convincing enough or do we need more. well you know there was
4:45 pm
a there was an idea that was proposed recently by of all people a fox news presenter analyst tucker carlson and he talked about investigating this through viral videos and it was a phrase which i thought was so apt so perfect look there's a couple of concepts here number one and this goes back this is just common sense you know of the notion of of bono and protest who benefits and who profits from something but then again there's a subsidiary to this and that is. why would somebody do something now because why would somebody what possibly would be the motivation especially during important important times when the united states is leaving or russia is leaving when it will be an opportune time especially when you've made advances what a lot of people are asking is what possibly and this this goes more to when and this goes more to the practicality of this but it's one of those considerations
4:46 pm
that i think a lot of people are asking who what why would this ever happen especially a year ago the same said there seems to a played out as well when right before when whenever there is any mention of people leaving of any kind of stability you can almost set your watch to something happening now does this mean that i'm a conspiracy theorist. the word which is bandied about left or right or my conspiracy add a list as gore vidal would say i mean none of this makes any sense and what is the most frustrating is that for anyone that any time to put limitations either way on anything short of the absolute. complete and total verifiable trust but verify as president reagan would say. verification of something of this import of this importance right now it is it is it is mind
4:47 pm
bogglingly frustrating to say the least so let's stick with this legal discussion because everybody knows on a national level an individual will be judged on motive they'll be judged on hard evidence but it's bizarre when it gets to the international arena it seems sickly in this case no hard evidence motive is completely ignored what happened to international law doesn't exist because it seems as though all the major countries ignore it. well international law by committee is a different story the first thing i want to do is i would say being just looking at forensic evidence i would say number one was there be any in anybody's interest to mimic something like this yes or no i would never chose you how difficult is it to determine what types of poisons and toxins are used once number three if they were to be used. and you see just the forensics when you bring in people who are and
4:48 pm
you know and i know there have been because when it comes a viral videos that you bought in the internet and people who have used the wrong photos even if you've got somebody who is watching for example and i'm not saying that's the case here but if you have somebody who's watching this and says that's very odd they're not wearing the proper hazmat suits or or my god if that really was it i'm talking about recently in the script all cases where when they said that if if this is what they said it was there should be nobody anywhere near these people these are forensic truths that have to be looked at as well and and there's just i mean not only that but the ability to determine the players who's who you see in our american media we use the word. rebels rebels and i don't know what that means people who rebel what rebel
4:49 pm
who are we talking about so very manichean black and white apple do you think left or right good versus evil these guys good guys bad guys there is no such thing so what i am the most. sincere about and i think most people is first of all nobody i am not i can't be for anybody but me nobody suggesting that nobody was hurt or killed or injured or that this is that this did not happen or nothing like this because there's a very simple conclusion when people show suspicion when people show suspicion as to how and a vent is investigated. that is not the biggest route as you question whether the event occurred in the first place your question in causation your question he called the ability attribution the parties who did it has this ever happened before who are the people how are people reacting who is who is impeding what these are all just natural consequences but this is in no way to suggest that things don't
4:50 pm
happen but then again we the consuming public are not privy to un councils all we have sometimes is some internet rendition of something and we have been lied to by so many people not governments per se but just people of every stripe that frankly i can only speak for me i am not sure what i believe or what it takes for me to traverse the incredulity stage if that makes any sense here because now the organization for the prohibition of chemical weapons they are going to investigate one would think maybe the prudent thing to do in this situation would be let them investigate find out what the conclusions are donald trump's already calling to preempted this though he said he's going to take action we could hear from him any moment now and of course his popularity seems to go up when he launches military strikes do you think you'll be able to hold back only just go straight into action
4:51 pm
you know there is something that is it that that is the obvious thing especially here in this particular framework people who historically were considered the left who historically were the sort of the antiwar anti gun anti death anti military historically now laud any time we see it no matter what in fact last time when there was i believe it was general mattis who said well you might have been a little premature last time in that particular response but it doesn't it seems like the the thrust the focus is being tough. well how about being certain being accurate this goes for anybody any country be certain you know what you're talking about they're funny time to be up but also does anybody read history there's anybody look at what's happening now does anybody know about this particular part of the world and how many times there have been claims and why now
4:52 pm
the notion of gas i mean just get i have to ask this very this isn't even a scientific question is that a legal question who in their right mind nalle what leader when one could arguably suggest you know when you're doing it you're clearing this area out you've succeeded who in their right mind would stop and say wait a minute i've got an idea i'm going to thwart everything by right now attacking these people using this particular methodology when i'm winning and i'm not the only one who is asking that tucker carlson of all people i said for example of fox news a lot of people are asking the very same question you talked about certainty the law and all somebody who is certain is the u.s. ambassador to the u.n. nikki haley she's certain that the u.s. is going to act regardless of what the u.n. decides and she was rather unflattering about the actual usefulness of the u.n.
4:53 pm
let's have a listen to what she said yesterday i said that history will record this moment when we either lived up to our responsibility as a security council or showed our complete failure to protect the syrian people today we have our answer the record will not be kind to one permanent member of this council unfortunately russia has chosen the assad regime again over the unity of this council we have said it before that russia will stop at nothing to shield the assad regime. so nikki haley that really she's pointing the finger at russia although i think it was bolivia also voted against the china abstain so she's insulting several of her u.n. colleagues is that a wise move is that the act of a deployment well you know there are certain circles and there are certain factions who find the u.n.
4:54 pm
to be a complete and total waste of time and there are certain aspects certain circles in this country certain thirteen groups who applaud anybody who says that the u.n. has and i would be less than candid if i would tell you that personally i've agreed with everything the u.n. has ever done and every search in every circumstance however i think the critical word here and what should should be spoken and what should be reiterated is accuracy that's all accuracy and it is and i see what your question is it's a tad ironic for an ambassador to basically say that that which is the particular body that the ambassador is is in is less than. functional as it were that notwithstanding final this is this is in so many circumstances to so many areas this is lauded by people that this notion of getting tough and i think
4:55 pm
getting tough is terrific but many people say get accurate then get tough well i would say there's no better way to end it now than with the legal and media analyst on a lot of money thanks for your time sir. and of course the but no point is doing it if you were watching it i'm pretty sure you cheating in the saving hope you stick around a bit back where the very latest headlines and the top stories in just under five minutes. the swarms of them so moving. and good news was before. much of those who heard the preview. you should see him we will. we will we're going to. move. move.
4:56 pm
move show you this look beautiful i mean you since you looked good. just like most of these girls did you film for good good good. good good or szell so look i do the same you want me to show you stories to actually go. to starbucks to. get to me to do it with the little mist they say look it is it's. just testing understand just need to mash to try to stop the president and please control his product until. we have produced a ghost whisperer to snoop to come up with a new a because that is the cousin with you for your supporters to your shoe station shouldn't for you should put door for the one who's doing.
4:57 pm
the same downstream you now thank you for all that he lived up straight and he had it better off than him because of all the garbage that i think love to. downstream and in the financial world if you live in proximity to where the money's being printed the cotillion effect is meaning that you get first use of that money and then compounds are a unique team you get a compound rate of return based on the first years time is on your side your downstream time is running against you because you end up with a savings account paying zero percent or you have no wages or year behind the inflation current.
4:58 pm
for all will go up twenty eighteen coverage we've signed one of the greatest goalkeepers of all time but there was one more question and by the way who's going to be our coach. guys i know you are nervous he's a huge star among us and a huge amount of pressure to come out you have to go meet the center of the beach football with you and we will show you all the great game. you are the rock at the back nobody gets past you we need you to get the ball going let's go. alone. and i'm really happy to join for the two thousand in the world cup in russia
4:59 pm
meet the special one come on top of. me to just read the review bianchi team's latest edition may go up as we go. to look. zia's says harlan kentucky. boys you go three families leave. a co money city it was almost no coal mines left. the jobs are gone all the coal miners the said i'd. love to see these people the survivors of a world disappearing before their eyes. i remember thinking when i was younger that if anything ever happened to the coal mines here that it would become a ghost town but i never thought in the million years i would see that and it's how
5:00 pm
it's happened. but emergency u.n. security council meeting russia's resolution on the investigation of syria's alleged chemical attack falls short of the required majority america's counter proposal is in turn veto by moscow which accuses washington of pretty look since to conduct an independent probe. you have already appointed the guilty party you don't want to hear anything you don't want any investigation. of a load of. violent standoff continues between police and environmentalists for a second day in france barricades have been burned while officers fired tear gas. discharged from hospital following last month from the.
38 Views
Uploaded by TV Archive on
![](http://athena.archive.org/0.gif?kind=track_js&track_js_case=control&cache_bust=312929933)