is nato basically sad that turkey isn't buying they tell made weapons i mean this is a market business issue for like turkey's nato allies could this be about that well some of the allies are upset nato has said to have the right to purchase whatever defense system it likes it may not be kept but go back to will with the data systems but let me remind you greece also deployed three hundreds on its soil and they took country nobody who opposed that so why should they do but it raises questions about turkey buying this foreign goods plus the russians are giving us to login for the as for our goods the russians now are speeding up the delivery of the system so we are only happy that this is happening or talking to eleanor chamique present evidence chief advisor discussing the situation in syria and turkey's view of this event that's it for this edition of seven call center

next time. so what we've got to do is identify the threats that we have it's crazy the informed patient let it be an arms race is all off and spearing dramatic development only personally i'm going to resist i don't see how that strategy will be successful very critical of time time to sit down and talk.

because the slowness of the mood of them so moving. to build your local moves before. much of those who heard the preview are most newbies who knew him will. we will forgo. the move. move. move show you the snoopy do with liberal media look very good with. more than just love most of these girls will give you films for good good. good go to shows so look i do the same you belong to show the story to the you should go. to starbucks to. get to meet until it was a little missed dates to look at his roots. from stuff from understand just meet

the mashed old truck stop the president and please introduce martha stewart. as we have producers to toast news for to see. some of them you have because those the girls are with you for your support just your shoes station shouldn't for you should the door for the one who's doing.

the little good the never lie that. the u.s. defense secretary admits he has no concrete evidence of a chemical attack in the syrian city of duma but doesn't rule out a preemptive strike against america. this is a unique exceptional country russia is unique but not exceptional as america's

future top diplomat explaining exactly why washington has the right to pursue regime change and other countries. and british football fans will rise above the political discord to enjoy an european championship match in moscow archibald's one prominent our. fans trip to russia. well i mean talk to mr already and we're worried about coming. back so they say it's all right there's no tension between. us politicians and the politicians get on with. a warm welcome to the program for me and all of the crew here at our to international thanks for tuning in the u.s. defense secretary james mattis says america has the right to carry out

a preemptive strike on the syrian government to defend its troops he also admitted there was no clear evidence that chemical weapons were used in an attack on the city of duma last week and i believe there was a chemical attack and we're looking for the actual evidence the the o.p.c. dead this you're going to station for the chemical weapons convention and we're trying to get those inspectors in if we get them and we will not know who did it they can only say that they found evidence or did not present donald trump initially seem determined to strike to mask this but then backtracked the white house says no final decision has been reached but as it goes down of explains fears are growing over the situation in syria as a lack of evidence didn't prevent the us from starting a full scale war in the past. we're looking very very seriously very closely that whole situation and. we'll see what happens folks will see what happens with the drum of war is beginning to bang in washington and the beat is for syria the u.s.

is again accusing president assad over using chemical weapons on his own people but the basis for this conviction appears to be lacking one crucial aspect we're not engaged on in the ground on the ground there so i cannot tell you that we had evidence well something is better than nothing but right now it's just a feeling behind a possible military attack is it enough to risk ask elating into a war with syria's allies and even a nuclear standoff apparently yes protection of our forces i don't think we have to wait until they are under chemical attack when the weapons are used in the same theater we're operating in the rocky invasion played out along suspiciously similar lines we must take the battle to the enemy we will take every step necessary to make sure our country is secure and we will prevail the iraqi regime has in fact

been very busy in answering its capabilities in the field of chemical and biological agents one difference that jumps out is that with the rug the u.s. had that infamous bottle of anthrax as reason to call on its forces in hindsight it was a completely false pretext and with syria they don't even have that the o.p.c. w the u.n. chemical watchdog the height of judgment when it comes to such cases already vouched two years ago that syria's stockpiles were no more wrong to twenty seeing and their words seems to matter a little for washington there is another similarity with the iraq invasion and one must keep in mind the history of u.n. inspection teams in iraq. even as they were conducting the most. the intrusive system of arms control industry inspectors missed a great deal and in my last attempt to enlarge the membership of all of the organisation was convincing iraq and libya for example to join in and when

i announced just a member states it was a shock to the americans i believe. because the plans already to take some action military action against iraq the bottom line is that the pentagon is hardly keeping its lack of evidence on whether the attack even happened a big secret never mind the perpetrator behind it all that matters is sticking to the tried and trusted path the problem is that the united states believes an act it would be. of any any lol they believe that they have their own rules and it is not the case to use force units or action the goals against the united nations charter and also we are concerned about the possibility of this coalition that this could go out of control and we might end up with why there

a conflict that done the one that's already been suffer in syria it will not be an attack against syria but also an attack against the whole united nations system u.k. prime minister tourism may and her advisors have been contemplating possible military strikes against the syrian government however at despite the expectations the u.k. prime minister didn't announce any decision on military action that's after polls revealed how little appetite the british public has for war. do you think military strikes in syria will help solve anything no i don't know so hopeless at the moment one of this area and she said any kind of military intervention what would you she really disagree with military action against anything happening in this syria there's already enough fighting going on there as it is and there's a real danger of war escalating way beyond what we expect the scenario to where the

target is to send any more than six. push up to basic military intervention develops i think i think we have that and five attitude where these countries have these problems have these civil wars and we try and go and fix it but we had our civil war when the americans had their civil war nobody went to bomb us we got this side we have now they need to go through this on their oh the last time britain was considering getting involved in syria there was a debate in parliament and parliament voted against it back was very bad news for the then prime minister cameron but the idea that we should be getting involved in wars in the middle east without parliament behaved by issue and make a decision is absolutely outrageous and i think it's because she knows there is very little public support for getting involved in the middle east again we all remember everyone in britain unless we were lied to by our government and the

american government when we're told the iraq had weapons of mass destruction the result was hundreds of thousands i think nearly a million dead many of our own troops lost their lives as well and they all turned down to be based on a lawyer. donald trump's new pick for america's top diplomat mike pump aoe has made it clear why it's ok for washington to interfere in other country's affairs the future secretary of state was grilled by the senate on his porn policy views and he pointed out the difference between russia and the us and that's apparently american exceptionalism. and you would agree with me if we embrace the regime change in other nations we can hardly say but this is something that only the us gets to do if we see that's an acceptable foreign policy goal for us other nations concluded setting acceptable foreign policy goal for them this is a unique exceptional country russia is unique but not exceptional regime change was discussed at my pompei as confirmation hearing for the position of secretary of

state and he also said that soft policy on russia will end once he becomes secretary of state but it's not clear what this all policy is exactly considering a trump tweets and recent sanctions imposed on moscow just last week and pump ale seems to be proud of this as saying that the u.s. has expelled the most diplomats at any time since the cold war and he also said that he would make sure that the administration continues its policy i take a backseat to no one with my views of the threat that is presented to america from russia and if i am confirmed as the secretary of state i can assure you this administration will continue as it has for the past fifteen months to take real actions to push back to re set the deterrence relationship with respect to russia. and you still agree that far from being a great public service wiki leaks is more like

a non-state actor hostile to the interests of the national interest and security of the united states senate really i do believe that. and i think you still agree that a lot of your putin's government actively interfered in our presidential elections and the reflections at large in two thousand and sixteen if yes that's correct. tony democracy is in the vital national interests of the united states yes and the center and effect of this doing that is an important tool of american foreign policy. that same mind that we're hearing from puppet we've been hearing from american leaders this is nothing new for madeleine albright secretary of state she said that if we use force it's because we're the united states were the indispensable nation you had obama talking about us being the indestructible nation

hillary clinton so this is really the air that americans breed and we're now in a multi polar world the united states and russia still have a couple thousand nuclear weapons pointed at each other on hair trigger alert china's economy is booming and this is no longer the world of the early one nine hundred ninety s. now putin is standing up and asserting russia's national security interests and there is some people in the united states who just don't like that. israeli gaza border is braced for another day of violence this friday palestinians launched anti occupation protests at the end of march demanding the return of land they claim israel has taken the israeli defense force has deployed tanks and have been using live ammunition and tear gas to break up the demonstrations palestinians meanwhile have come up with some inventive ways to count.