these emotions and your neighbors for example israel is making a good the use of that i know that the iranian diplomacy has a very very good tradition of being very very skillful negotiators don't you think that a meeting between mr trump or let's say mr rouhani could be useful not a new way of renegotiating the terms but simply. trying to establish some report while first of all as you mentioned how diplomacy is basic feature is consistency your not absolute around different issues and time we have a vision and we can follow that vision which is corporation and peace in the vision consistently yes we are capable to negotiate to negotiate hard stuff on hard matters but the point is who is the other side the other side is a country which does not have any credibility you cannot you cannot put your

finger through any promises. they commit to so we are think there is no need to this there is no fruit to this negotiation now it is well known that other signatories to the j.c.b. away including russia are eager to preserve these deal in the in its current form is there anything that they can do to encourage iran to respect it even if the americans under the current leadership walk away while one if americans walk away this pact is dead but out is that if you can truce with the russia and china no number of other countries definitely we will have our own solution for the problems that we face this cooperation want to stop with the parent or without the pact it will continue but mr larijani i think there are lots of people in moscow who would share your disdain for the way the americans conduct their foreign policy but i

think that does know that solve russian or ranee and responsibility to being committed to both regional and hopefully global peace should we give it so easily to the americans to rag the result of you know several years of negotiations should we allow mr trump to kill this deal no different than flu. we should prove to mr frum that he will be a loser and they won't gain too much why walking away from this pact we have well known a strategy we have very much calculated the strategy we can come from the situation very powerful and i think the russian policy both in the region and international community especially reserve you the nuclear project is very rational we support the position we have various close collaboration with the government of russia now speaking about the russian regional

a policy there is some concern in moscow that the trumpet ministration may choose to try and turn the course of the syrian war by launching yet another unilateral strike on damascus and the russians have already sad would meet a retaliation i'm sure of that will see a unilateral strike by the united states as an act of a russian but i'm also sure that you have little interest in seeing a major clash between nuclear powers in your on your own borders or what is your understanding of what a proportional reaction to american aggression in syria could be i think americans are not the european allies of united states very much watching observing that. you totally failed their cynical a strategy of this integrating a sovereign country like syria has faced totally i think the collaboration between

iran and russia definitely proved both internationally acceptable more or less support the will and very successful one we are we won't be afraid of this type of activity diffidently will want to see that as much as possible the number of involvement of americans in soon. should be decreased also should bestow american. presence in syria northern part of syria is illegal it is against international law he scored different from the russian collaboration with the syrian government which is based on mutual acceptance of reliance. americans one one good and the thing by bombardment selective targets. is better to money. rather than to advance. but mr larijani what i'm asking you about is not so much about the american actions but about what actions should russia take

in response to this potential act of aggression you you mentioned that you believe and i think again this assessment is shared by many in moscow that the american strategy in syria has failed but an argument could be made that that would make the united states even more predisposed to desperate actions or. actions that could attract the attention of the world because i think we would both agree that donald trump has a propensity towards showing off so if indeed he proceeds with delivering and not a strike on syria how do you think russia should respond why. none of us knew iran or russia they have interest in expanding the military conflict but i was very determined is supporting the russian people and the russian government to defend their land the russian position especially has been warded by president putin this very acceptable and russian all they say that to defend their they won't

tolerate any threat to the years russian presence in this syria i think this is quite rational position america should not gamble on that they should not under under the skin of the there's a result in defense of his personality and this is the artistic presence but anyhow what is the term mental is not some selective strikes what is the term mental is the determination of the people and those who are on the ground fighting to liberate the syria from the reminiscences you will part of the terrorist group supported created lead armed by the americans and british and others well mr larijani we have to take a short break now but we will be back in just a few moments stay tuned.

it's. a little late to the victim as out of step with the full force that i see today my height. when i left that i sat next to the markets i'm hearing a lot and i'm like. i want to show the world that i believe we've got somebody he's slow. and. he's. the. country i'm going to be mum and i will make you think second

to none of them and they're going to have a difficult moment. and these years i'm a ballpark in that i don't. know how shamal think. it's going to be done it will be if admission i'm going to. join me every thursday on the alex salmond chill and i'll be speaking to guests of the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then. in the heart of the swiss alps this is a place probably more secretive than the pentagon more mysterious than the cia and better guarded than for knox swiss customs are here permanently all the site is

controlled by them and they impose the opening times. opposite it is from is all plus the procedures in place of the strictest in all europe masterpieces by artists like pecan so and modigliani i can't boards and sold inside this warehouse that's where the report comes in it covers up deals which are naturally discreet commercially discreet felt but also discreet because they concern fraud of some of those paintings a link to dark secrets nobody knows how many of these secrets a kept inside the geneva freeport system you'll never obtain an inventory of all the works in the freeport who knows how many there are three hundred three thousand three hundred thousand is it a matter of confidentiality only is it the world's black box of the art business.

welcome back to worlds apart with muhammad to have had let it johnny had it for bronze high council for human rights mr larijani you're joining us from geneva where where you took part in the thirty seven session of the united nations human rights council which once again chose to focus its attention on the human rights situation in iran meetings like these are fairly regular the critics of your country are all the same their grievances and complains are well rehearsed i wonder though if you found this meeting any different from all the previous ones. you mentioned. we participated in the vis sanction to speak of use aboard human rights i'm also the critics which is learned against us and also the behavior of united as there's a number of european gangs while human drivers regardless of american or. european

support. by itself is a valuable barometer of civilities so regardless of their position we are going to promote human values in no country and or democracy but american type of human rights. is a corrupt notion in which a human could we swapped with petro dollars in the region could we swapped with political influence take the example of yemen you see the genocide there were going on with larger scale of millions of people live and then just look who is supporting who american and british and the number of other european countries they are very generously lend their support to the aggressor even directly they participate in the us aside so what kind of human rights is in which to live of

million children a woman does not count well let me ask you a specifically about that because when the issue of human rights in iran is raised you never for a fail to mention what you just said that the united states and europe i'm not qualified to pontificate on human rights because of their own record of murder in a number of countries but you know very well that they easily dismiss your argument as briskly as you dismiss theirs do you think there is still any of room any space any for much laughter within the international system for a genuine and open discussion on how various governments around the world trade their citizens rather than this nonstop circle of condemnations and recriminations the united nation is not. an institution. belonging to neither state is the institution for whole nations of the word

secondly yes this is one right now the u.p.a. our mechanism of united nations security council here my advice is rather acceptable method of monitoring every country with a selective method without using double standard to every country should be. unsellable to the situation you may arise in zone country you're not under the stairs britain and europe are boarding in racism and in violence this record own citizens they don't own citizens are very dire unmissable the list of the crimes they are committing them so yes then all of mankind is in right now and could be present mechanism we should join hand to hand to stop this corrupt notion of human drives which is pursued by you know this that europe's and the strive for free human rights there is one issue of human rights that is particular

close to my heart and this is the issue of veils that has long been of symbolic significance both to iran's religious leaders and their harshest critics in the west and in this debate. where men who have to wear this cards usually have a much lesser say that the man who advance their religious or ideological positions i mean i know that there have been a number of. individual projects in iran in support of the woman's right to choose how she she wants to dress do you see that as a foreign plot or do you see that as a genuine movement both of them are the issue is the limits of nudity is not in forcing his job. whether nudity should have a limit in the public places or not so definite according go law for men and women they should abide by the limits of nudity in the public places while if you know if

you walk into two wrongs the street corners you see the women's games and also boards are rather carrying putting very casual dresses on nobody's following them and pursue them but if there is an organized activity. surely led this time by the britain a number of american a secret services which they want to create a social ophir of all without under the nudity is a pretext while we are very sensitive we will definitely respond to that this is not a private single act when it becomes an organized action led by the external sixer services definitely will it come from the well i'm middle aged.