so we don't know what i think. development in the future because we under tony coins on so far there will come culture is dead and it took about two years. to come to a kind of a consensus what to do with the with the incoming. migration. strong. from europe gets thinner there could be real pressure cooker these places aren't they as long as they continue to exist international relations professor peter shilton goggin university in france give us your thoughts on this big story tonight pre-shared it. russia's foreign ministers told israel that if it has evidence that iran has broken the twenty fifty nuclear deal it must relate it to the international atomic energy agency so comments come after israel's leader benjamin netanyahu claimed that repeatedly misled the international community over it she read even richmond program could such documents should be immediately passed

on to the international atomic energy agency but according to the comments from experts taking part in the negotiations it's very likely that such documents refer to previous activity which has already been taken into account by the international agencies inspection or if the us will announce its exit from the around the you know the international community will of course lose one of the most important instruments promoting the nuclear nonproliferation regime the source during a dramatic presentation on monday prime minister netanyahu claimed ran lied about never having had nuclear weapons or a program for it he also alleged the continued weapons research after the twenty fifteen deal was struck and that it tried to hide all of the files relating to his work now revealed fifty five thousand pages of documents apparently scenes from iran in a heist by israeli intelligence which he said was proof of to run this dishonesty.

we you know. the project going on was a comprehensive program designed. to work. we're also. very long zuckerberg story project on marketers to use title to struggles to develop what. we remain deeply concerned about iran's dangerous place in the us is really the reason iran's vision to dominate all these things. you know this is with israel in this fight we strongly support israel's right to defend itself. european leaders urged israel to submit all of the data to the un's nuclear watchdog but along with the self they suggested there was nothing new in the presentation that there's no credible evidence that iran has broken the agreement the pact but a history here was stuck struck in twenty fifteen it was broken at the time by the u.s. china britain russia france and germany after nine long years of talks at the time

you may recall it was held a huge diplomatic success in exchange for some sanctions being lifted around agreed to strict limits on its nuclear program and the open up its facilities to international experts the deal though is currently very much in jeopardy now though because the u.s. president trump has been a vocal critic all the way along the line it's aside and whether or not to walk away from it soon many analysts presentation is an attempt to try to convince donald trump that indeed it should be abandoned antiwar activist chris nineham told us he also thinks it paves the way for america to pull out. the only conclusion you can draw from that is that this was likely part of an operation to try and pounce on us to try and give credibility to donald trump's efforts is his is apparent plan to walk out walk away from the from the treaty with iran so it seems it seems a reasonable assumption to make that that is actually what was behind this effort

by benjamin netanyahu the stakes really are very very high here and you know it is one of the few. to deal with iran was one of the few successes of. foreign policy in the region it was one of the things that is actually kind of create at least the hope that some of the problems in the region could be resolved if that's broken we're in very very dangerous territory. a groom whose wedding in yemen last month was hit by what's thought to been a saudi led air strike has been describing the horror of what occurred when that missile struck killing at least twenty family members and friends is among the survivors have been telling their story exclusively to r.t. . at the moment of the bombardment the rocket landed and the whole world turned red and i felt i was turning in the air and many were killed was shrapnel.

there was some victims who were in homes others were injured in the stomach head neck hands or links my cousin and other relatives were injured and. one and then i came to see the wedding i was looking at people dancing and then. i was he's my like the shrapnel from the rocket. we went to the wedding and suddenly during the celebration the strike came we didn't have anything then no weapons no nothing i lost a foot the same happened to my brother my other brother died because of the bombing we tried to flee but could not walk we had to wait until ambulances came in garces a dozen of the wounded are in a critical condition as it stands so far tonight was still good to hear back from the saudi led coalition to our request for an update on the investigation into what happened there the saudi led military operation in yemen was launched against

toothy rebels who control vast territories of the north the saudis have repeatedly insisted though that they do not target civilians the coalition's carried out a number of its own investigations into airstrikes the road to mass casualties as rights groups continue to call on saudi arabia to end the conflict. is a controversial one the iconic boy scouts of america are about to undergo a rebranding of sorts after a hundred eight years and it seems the decision to drop the word boy from its name which will happen early next year is the organization welcomes girls into its ranks isn't the only popular one. i think that. we wanted to land at something that evokes the past but also conveys the inclusive nature of the program going forward we're trying to find the right

way to say we're here for both young men and young women. girl scouts is the premier leadership the phone organization for we are and will remain the first choice for girls and parents. let's be honest the boy scouts as we knew it is now effectively day goes on all supposed to be a part of boy scouts they have their own organization to go scout as a form of boy scouts i say this is a terrible idea boys need to be with other boys at times without the girls being present to be boys the boy scouts raping the dualistic girls losing membership and money feminists and loving the boy scouts move not realizing it may destroy the women run scouts.

what do you think about it all for being heralded as long over due inclusive until one side the claims and it's another move to demonize anything there's gender specific the scouts name change certainly so far a discussion here on out. there isn't a great deal of evidence to suggest that only boys want to do traditionally male activities and only girls want to do traditionally female activities there is very very obviously there are a lot of girls dr like climbing trees and there are lots of knowing there is like baking cakes and to try to say to young people you have to only do this what we should of course to do is give them a range of activities on sunday letting them actually encourage them to try new stuff because that's what our it is our what is right our file that's not what this is about and you know if there was an absolute determined effort to destroy whatever was left of this thing called the jones are it's now considered almost like races or inappropriate to do anything to distinguish boys from girls

who are playing it so safe we've got the helmets there was a time when if you were a red blooded american male let's not have alway's lines or have kids you know there's rihanna and cried i read here and there i mean it's fine and there was nothing wrong with it i'm kind of concerned with the idea that it's somehow great to encourage boys to to fight and be super tip super rough and super violent with each other i think but this is two thousand and eighteen and the idea that it's somehow good for young men to be thrown into some sort of boxing ring i think that we should offer young people boys and girls a whole range of activities and there are definitely arguments in favor of allowing them to do some of those activities and violent marriage definitely arguments in favor of allowing them to do at least some of those activities environment what you're seeing is the would sophistication of just boys and girls and how we are just turning their men to just these these i don't know these hominids or these

kids who don't play who don't enjoy doing things like i did like we did being a boy and roughhousing those people think that this is absurd kids are not allowed to be kids. anymore if you look at the kind of science of it where a young people do best it turns out perhaps surprisingly perhaps unsurprisingly that goes seem to thrive better in single sex environments for things like that but boys actually seem to thrive better in mixed environments it seems like having some goals join in maybe takes away some of the sort of culture if you like people are afraid that there are genders and that boys like to do boys stuff and the girls like to do girls stuff it's not accurate mistake it's true. truck you facebook next very much looking to regain it uses trust of course in the wake of that huge data harvesting scandal involving cambridge analytical the social media behavior of so introducing a number of changes them to the platform including

a personalized news filter jacqueline bouvier takes a closer look. facebook is working hard to revamp its public profile in the wake of the privacy scandal and the platforms move to eliminate fake news from your feed is one such example i have your responsibility news is two things make sure people can get trustworthy news and platform and we're doing our job to help build a sense of common ground in society now who's to decide what news organizations are worthy the company's two billion users the social network has already started using the result of the user surveys to determine what news publications will be popping up in your feed and which will be suppressed and the range of an outlet is based on two simple questions have you heard of them and how much do you trust them and that means what's to be believed is based on the opinions of the internet not necessarily facts even flat earth errors and bertha's may have cast their votes. we put that data into the system and insights and is a booster of suppression and we're going to develop intends to that over time we

feel that we have a responsibility to further break down polarization and find common ground some rather wafted goals given that the internet isn't exactly known for bringing out the best in people there's also surely a risk that such a system will only cause people to further dig in their heels not break down polarization hopes a result that was seen with one of facebook's previous attempts at tackling fake news last year the company pulled the plug on its initiative which had third party fact checkers red flagging disputed articles as it didn't have the desired effect i get them a christian church and correcting misinformation has shown that putting a strong image like a red flag next to an article may actually entrenched deeply held beliefs the opposite of fact to what we intended the big issue here is what. they mean is this credible or informative new source is it what fits mark zuckerberg political view is it what it's facebook's political view. in the terms of unbiased independent journalism i don't see a big success at all i don't see anything which puts

a private corporation like facebook who has shown to be not the most trusting of sources of late i don't see anything that putting them in charge of this kind of responsibility could turn out to be successful in a way shape or form for independent journalism so here we are again watching and waiting to see how facebook's latest attempt at social responsibility pans out. well meantime most one of the microscope facebook's also facing criticism over its filtering of news sources that some of us according to a form of censorship one organization which is called the us conservative leaders claims the suppression of right wing news on social media has reached crisis point now they say outlets from both sides of the political spectrum should be respected and given equal waiting online but with recent gains in major elections across the globe we asked new yorkers what they exactly know about the right wing sunday's elections in austria where the latest example of a shift to the right in europe's politics this this shows that the far right wing

has won its prevailed polls in germany predict that a far right party will interparty limit the term right wing is being used pretty liberally these days we decided to ask americans what does far right or right wing actually mean let's see what kind of answers we get what is far right mean your way but that be like a nazi stream. capitalist news it's probably a more militant version of right wing. media a little more in or. an artistic view on the world's. largest is probably a more extreme viewpoint a far it far right means very far right. what does that mean on the right side very far ok donald trump is far right i think he's trying to come to the sent to because he has to administer it right or he was more far right before he became the president i think he's all over the place to tell you the

truth i don't know that he has an ideology other than donald trump you know not necessarily the he's right of center definitely yes but i mean the fact is he's a former democrat he's not that far right any world leaders that you would consider to be far right. right fundamentalist leaders are far right. and. i think he's right yeah maybe putin but like i don't know you you want i'm not sure. he's considered far right dick durbin may be. prime minister of austria perhaps. i don't know there might be a few others it seems that in politics words can be rather hard to define caleb mop and art see new york former u.s. diplomat jim john crisply there's a multifaceted effort by social media platforms to sideline views that don't fit

with the company's political agenda i think there's a real concern is that the conservative voices are being discriminated against in social media not only facebook but twitter which i use quite a bit and google and the the idea would be to marginalize or stigmatize conservative voices as somehow being beyond the limits of legitimate discussion and we also have practices what they call shadow banding where there are there are ways to downgrade content if it's politically not correct so that it has fewer viewers that they try to deem monetize conservative voices so that they can't actually support their platforms in the way that voices on the left are able to do it which evidently is more acceptable in the circles and that in which the managers of these platforms operate. president mccrone is jetted off to french overseas territory to try and persuade the people of new caledonia to remain

a part of from. there's a push to do my thing that it will be a socialist i'm calling a lot of responsibilities already low who managed by the government of the provinces. new caledonia already have other resources like tourism new caledonia is rich thanks to its culture. if one day there isn't one and can still make. we already thought of every way to live without it's mostly sovereignty transfer the army and security justice sector so we have asked ourselves this question for

a long time in a country of three hundred thousand to fifty thousand habits and do we need to be structured the answer is no conflict. to see the know when it will only be for the first referendum and the be a second referendum on the third one so we have time to convince the believe it's in their future interest to form this country to share their so i did with them it just needs not easy so called go far as possible which is for others to close the curtain traps for. i'll leave you those thoughts new caledonia then that's the way these are shaping up so far this there's a night movie to stay across the latest twenty four seven r.t. dot com kevin owen has him thanks watching want to check out our up as well for the news out and straight to your mobile device.

price precedes news and so if you have fake prices you end up with fake news so here when your manipulation of markets and there if you have interest rates is zero and you can borrow money and zero percent human on the credit line and you can muscle prices around it will decrease fake prices and then if you have a robust report against a crisis on the financial media for instance then the robots are going to report on the fake crisis driven by the fake news created by robots and have a virtual or a not so virtual cycle of fake news and fake prices and then that people interpret that as reality.

welcome to worlds apart us president donald trump has until may twelve decide whether to make good on his threat to the rand deal potentially a pending hears of international diplomacy and setting the ground for yet another conflict how seriously is that threat taken intact and should. be accommodated if peace is at stake while to discuss that i'm now joined by mohamad judge later johnny had of iran's high council for human rights and deputy off international affairs in the just sorry mr larijani it's a great pleasure great honor talking to you thank you very much for your time thank you but let me start with the news of the day and this is

a concern in many corners of the world that the united states is. going to read meat on its obligations under the iran nuclear deal the concerned even more acute following the appointment of the new secretary of state in the united states does it make any difference as far as iran is concerned in who had the state department whether it is john kerry rex tillerson or mike compare for that better. view this right is you have you know this this in the very says it doesn't matter too much the tactics or the articulation different the. impact on the nuclear deal was done and we are accepted that because you wanted to prove the american claim is false rule of not following the weapons at all but we have used capability on the nuclear technology for peaceful purposes but

no it is a perv and the americans want to use our capability nuclear technologies as a pretext to exert pressure most it doesn't matter that we are barred by the private market i think it will definitely be not in the interest of united states of america gets out of this part then the fact is that because it is five plus one parked now the current american president expressed he's dissatisfaction of of the oil a long before he took office and yet in more than a year since his inauguration there's been a lot of bellicose rhetoric but the very little in the way off action in your own calculus why do you think donald trump hasn't walked out of this deal already if he indeed intends to do that well there are two fires number one. don't know trauma's amount of bluffing not the man of reallife actions so we know we are. our custom

with american bluffing for over forty years and this is an extreme one secondly the united reserves wants to extract more concession from iran on the regional issues he is absolutely wrong it doesn't help and it was successful and now the american president doesn't exhibit their very reach for a cabbie larry in describing this deal he simply calls a very bad i wonder what words would iran use in characterizing the two thousand and fourteen agreement you spend a lot of man hours negotiating it did it come out as good or good enough for you while definitely we do not consider this pericope. a magazine more optimal position or deal. but definitely is not than i did the whole logic that we accepted these limitations on own capability and development is to prove to the

world the american or their rest claims an allegation against iran is wrong know that it doesn't prove that they are wrong and the atomic agency in more than ten reports endures to rein in compliance you see that what the american are saying so this is a blasphemy this is corruption and the hypocrisy of the of the american foreign policy but i am i want to say that. you know either this theory should not enter the will if they enter the will they would be the loser they would see that very soon as well as speaking about the potential loss perhaps for all of us president trump specifically mentioned that he and his soon to be secretary of state mike compare tend to see eye to eye on many issues particularly the iranian policy and back in two thousand and fourteen mr peo advocated military action to

fully destroy the iranian nuclear capacity do you see it as a credible threat well our don't think american are in the position to or saw another military engagement in their area already those who have it started before they are unable to manage it to get out but to start an attack when iran may not be very difficult but they won't be the one who will dictate the end of that they will receive a very harsh lesson which may be good for them for the historical. so indulging in a military duty against iran is not an easy thing for united states while they are facing ground failures in the region enough on the song in the persian gulf area another has now president trump employed a similar strategy all threats of blackmail with north korea only to announce last

week that he is willing to sit down a bit the north korean leader do you think the uranium leadership would be open to a similar turn of events a personal meeting with donald trump to renegotiate oprah have simply reinterpret the terms of the standing agreement i think is standing argument should be complied fool by you know this that you know i did this news and also some of the european allies like the britain government are following the hypocritical approach to this this pact. both of them are most complying with. their obligations under the specs the first. secondly we are in no way interested to talk with. the government you know the suit which does not have any credibility in his promises on this signatures so. this is another third important point americans are afraid of the influence of iran in the region.

oh influence is not military influence for this is a moral political influence it cannot be destroyed by bombs it can not be destroyed by military action i think americans should redefine that interest in the region their interest in the region is defined in a very strong and not feasible way mr larijani you just mentioned that you believe teheran has no interest in organizing this presidential meeting between. the leaders of the two countries but i don't know trump is a very particular character he i think he is very easily influenced by his emotions and your neighbors for example israel is making a good the use of that i know that the reigning diplomacy has a very very good tradition of being very very skillful negotiators don't you think that a meeting between mr trump or let's say mr rouhani could be useful not

a new way of renegotiating the terms but simply. trying to establish number four while first of all as you mentioned how diplomacy is basic feature is consistency your not absolute around different issues and time we have a vision and we can follow that vision which is corporation and peace in the vision consistently yes we are capable to negotiate to negotiate hard stuff on hard matters but the point is who is the other side. the other side is a country which does not have any credibility you cannot you cannot put your finger room any promises. they commit to that so we are think there is no need to this there is no fruit to this negotiation now it is well known that

other signatories to the j c b o a including russia are eager to preserve these deal in the in its current form is there anything that they can do to encourage iran to respect it even if the americans under the current leadership walk away while one if americans walk away this pact is there but out is that this you can truce with the very russia and china no a number of other countries definitely we will have our own solution for the problems that we face this cooperation want to stop with the parent or without the pact it will continue but mr larijani i think there are lots of people in moscow who would share your disdain for the way the americans conduct their foreign policy but i think that does know that solve russian or ranee and responsibility to being committed to both regional and hopefully global peace should we give it so easily to the americans to rag the result of you know several years of negotiations should

be allow mr trump to kill this deal no diffidently would. we should prove to mr trump that he will be a loser and they won't gain too much while walking away from this pact we have well known a strategy we have very much calculated the strategy we can come from the situation very powerful and i think the russian policy both in the region and international community especially reserve you the nuclear project is very rational we support the position we have various close collaboration with the government of russia now speaking about the russian regional a policy there is some concern in moscow that the trumpet ministration may choose to try and turn the course of the syrian war by launching yet another unilateral.