nuclear blast and global struggle to abolish the nuclear weapons altogether will it succeed. governor of japan's hiroshima preferentially. seventy three years off to the world for the devastating effects of nuclear weapons a global nuclear arsenal is growing with warheads ready to what civilization off the planet can humanity afford to rely on fear of mutually assured destruction to keep peace is the drive to get rid of nuclear weapons realistic and all the mysteries of the regime are remembered well enough today. earnings exactly are really great to have you on our program welcome to thank you very much so. a lot so relevant issues to discuss with you. so far your country is the only country that has suffered from the use of the nuclear weapons so it is understandable why

japanese people are so adamant on abolishing nuclear arms. but you say that those advocating nuclear disarmament are realistic. you really think so i mean how realistic because nuclear states including your biggest partner united states opposed that well i say. realistic because. or argument or. you know the goal for abolishment of nuclear weapons is based on the reality of what happens to human beings. it's use when it's actually used so we know the reality of the use of it and sometimes. you know deterrence. strategy and they're all discussed on paper you know there are certain

assumptions there are certain assumptions. this number if we have this number you know two. actions and. you know other too. but. you know mostly it's perception idea based. but no standing. are you talking about those who are actually supporters of the terror threat i mean we didn't have a war for the last seventy years thanks to terrance you don't think that's reason enough to think that that's a good thing you know well deterrence no in this war no having a war or no one having a large number of casualty is not necessarily just because.

u.s. and russia were you know as a country has. nuclear weapons there are so many other factors that. deter the war. well i'm talking about this. you know. nuclear deterrence in deterrence is something that's probably necessary. but i'm talking about nuclear deterrence what is the added value of nuclear deterrence. you know too conventional deterrence in other dictators so all of this fact that it should never ever take place because it's so horrid that no one would ever want to out that ever happen again but done is based on the assumption that there is no mistake there is no misjudgment there is no accident no there are a lot of assumptions that current. you know deterrence is based on. historically

actually it's been proven wrong you know there has been many accidents. many misjudgments almost lead to. nuclear war which is really risky situation so this nuclear powers that the global powers at this point they're all very wary of each other that's why they don't really want to give up their nukes how do you see this technically happening if it were ever to happen like they all should give it up at the same time. well of course the process need to be carefully designed and i don't think it's going to happen tonight that all the night. so what we need. to seriously look into. and of course the situation is very different in

regions deterrence against what you know already did turn against him where. these very important question and you have to. you know dig into details and try to come up with the process in each situation to reduce nuclear weapons in a fun way to eliminate it you've said it yourself. they all have their reasons and yet nuclear weapons are only a manifestation of global political problems that each country has a right to new realistically get rid of the nuclear weapons without addressing those problems because you know they're intertwined together i mean pakistan is afraid of a bigger india and doesn't want to be the next to say israel is surrounded by hostile arab states so unless you address those political problems you can't really talk about getting rid of nukes well no i don't think so. first

you know deterrence is nuclear deterrence is different from deterrence so we're talking about nuclear deterrence and the added value of nuclear deterrence and if you carefully look into each. you know situation. we should be able to find the new equilibrium. you know strategy extract stability is equilibrium in game theory. and there is a multiple. possible multiple equilibrium usually and based on conditions or assumptions. and. if we could find the way to move that you know equilibrium to other position

which is less costly or namely you know equilibrium with a nuclear weapon. much. more economical. probably this risk so what i'm saying is why. not we just say all because we have this conflict. having nuclear weapon is something. that is taken granted taken as granted but this look forwards. whether you know ways to move to leave the room to a new one you know and of course i don't say it's easy. and there are some measures probably. multiple party.

needs to agree upon. but i don't think you've seen possible we just have to make that air force what do you think of the nuclear weapons ban treaty adopted by the united nations can it ever go beyond declaring intent to actually have an actual impact but it's true that nuclear weapons countries must be involved in the process otherwise i mean it's only the nuclear weapon countries that can reduce or. eliminate nuclear weapons so finally they have to be involved and it's you know about the process again you know we involve the nuclear weapon states so you have this in this. global peace plan in motion and i looked at it and i have to say that i admired the idea that. your devotion to it. do you have my doubts about how to promote what you stand

for i mean conferences and rock concerts you know i cover politics a lot of wars a lot and you know peace doesn't come through concerts and conferences so. how do you make sure that you know impact through this program well you should be aware that something speech comes through music concerts too that i agree so you know those activities. you know there's some. targeted public you know like increasing public awareness or some of the d.v.d.'s are targeted more experts. you know like round table talk we have been here a few months. talk among experts and polish policy makers. about what we can do so you know.

we think. the final goal of course is to eliminate nuclear weapons but. who. eliminates it. is actually the leader of the new good working country and the structure that supports the leader. like the bureaucracy in the expert system and also public. as the basic foundation for the system so we are trying to. find a way to reach in each you know how you know how effective each action is and cetera we have to try many things which is you know this is very complicated and very significant issue so it doesn't happen.

again you know. so we're trying to do. whatever we can in a find more effective way. to achieve our goal we're going to take a short break right now when we're back we'll continue talking to governor you jackie will discuss more who is right behind the policy or those who want to stay with us. the new global economic war is unfolding in the realm of education the right to education as being supplanted by the right to access education low it's high

education is becoming just another product that can be bought and sold but it's not just about education anymore it's also about running a business and what you're good at the regime look good it's also the kind of fellow i could name you. want is the place of students in this business model before college i was born now i'm running stream or higher education the new global economic war. join me every thursday on the alec simon show and i'll be speaking to guest of the world of politics sports business i'm show business i'll see you then.

and we're back with governor governor so there are some serious steps towards nuclear going on in your neighboring north korea i wonder what you think about that because it has announced a suspension of nuclear missile ballistic testing shutting down a nuclear test. this is widely seen as a positive step towards nuclear zation do you think kim jong un is actually not going to make any nuclear tests on what well we cannot have a conclusion yet we have to see you know we have to see the options. you know being. betrayed so many times. through the past negotiations. so what's important is. you know it's been one of the word is used. you know

reversible. how. reversible you know how to prove it and you know of course. in the czech it. very important issue but we need to do that. actually been the most korea nuclear so you have an arson of south korea's that are meeting right now in the talks between america and north korea are being set up and all of the partners to korea north korea south korea america japan they're saying that the ultimate goal is to see completely denuclearized north korea a logical question is why would came down and give up. nuclear arsenal i mean why would all of a sudden destroy completely something that is building up for a decade you know world that is exactly why we have to really see the

actions of north korea i think. you know. motivations of course. one extending. the current regime and if he believes. having a nuclear. is more beneficial to extending their regime he may hold on to it and if he believes. giving it up is more beneficial. for extending their regime i think he will so you know we have to prepare an environment that he believes in. you know to show for he knew the more precise in your opinion what should he be getting. in exchange of giving up then

you know what he's saying is security assurance and denuclearization when you know there might be i mean this security assurance there might be more concrete. requests are required meant conditions like having no. u.s. force in peninsula or something. so i don't know they will come out but you know it's. very difficult. to to predict now you know what conditions he would give up the group and at this point we need to see and also. the timing i will discuss the timing because japan's foreign minister says that north korea should abolish nuclear arms by two thousand and twenty. do you think that's

a realistic goal time wise because i mean it took two years of tops to just stop the iranian nuclear program they didn't even have an actual weapon i mean how can this diplomacy with north korea work faster than with iran. you know whether it's realistic or too fast or. too slow you know i hope you feet by twenty twenty that's very welcome. to the extent. it's possible everyone should make every effort to to to achieve that. you know. i would say there's no too early for that so. i don't know if it's achievable or not but at least try so like i mentioned south.

america are going to sit down and talk to north korea as as of now japan has been about it to those talks do you think it should be part of those talks and what can they bring to the table. well. you know. you know a lot of fools in the. entire sitting an entire condition or sitting the entire environment or longer process of you know post agreement to. i don't know a this point. can do but at least you know carefully. you know see a. curious. movement or options and think you know i think. the government position but.

no relieve the pressure on north korea on this we actually see that. for actions it's also quite interesting to see what's going to happen to your country's security because japan has been relying on us for protection for decades and now trump is saying its allies in asia pacific should rely more and more on their own resources their own security and then you know we have personally heard the japanese government saying that slowly japan should be expanding its own japanese military do you think it's time to rethink the security concept of japan well you know i don't think the big picture will change will continue to lie us with the united states and of course it will have close relationship with korea. and other. some of the other.

countries too. but in that balance or some roles could be redefined. well for example. we. would like to see japan to be u.s. nuclear nuclear deterrence not the deterrence as a whole but nuclear deterrence that will give a better position in terms of promoting nuclear. nation or nuclear disarmament. and. for example if you look carefully we recently received a report paper from you need year. research institute.

if you go back to the first question. if we look carefully. at the. situation. nuclear deterrence against north korea is not necessary. you know. that every minute. you know that american nuclear terrorists in a way is a guarantee that no one attacks japan is well now well known though not necessarily because you know for example north korea. their motivation is to. not to be invaded not to be. attacked to destroy the regime. is that you keep interrupting you but i'll forget to ask you this a huge it feels like you don't think the north korea is actually capable of attacking

a neighbor one day on and they are they are capable of attacking neighbor but whether they will do is a different question you don't think they'll do they think they use the nukes just to keep the regime in place that's it. they feel you know really oppressed or you know. there they feel there is an immediate. very imminent danger of being attacked but they know that once they use a nuclear weapons that's basically the end there is jeanne no. because there would be. there would be fight for about and you know there's so much. you don't feel like i just have to go to the question because you didn't quite answer you don't feel like you need american nuclear deterrent because you don't feel like north korea is actually about to attack someone it's more about keeping its regime in tahoe it's not about feeling or you know. it's not about feeling

it's not me saying this but i'm talking about disunity and people paper. from point of view their nuclear deterrence you know what they're deterrent against is a time. from it to destroy the regime and if. the top first you know it's. very certain that their regime will collapse so their real possibility is there a high probability that north korea is going to attack you know from themselves so what we're talking about at this point. and

if you were. again talking about. is to destroy the north korea's nuclear capability you know they need to use so many nuclear weapons if they use nuclear weapons and is very realistic which is going to cause so much radiation issues not only was in those korea south korea china and russia too they're all. in the original question was that japan always enjoyed america's protection because we don't have the military security system in place to protect your country now that trump is saying that you should rely more on your own resources do you think japan needs an actual army and actual security system in place. i don't say we don't have at all we have a conventional defense system to certain extent and we're partnering

with states my view for example you know. nuclear deterrence against north korea we may have. meant we could be out the nuclear deterrent to change. the rules and the balance right. so there could be a new balance in you know the new. thinking of our security. system i just have plus two questions sensitive issue you know ninety's perception. of japan in general so the american president has visited here ashima but do you see a situation where a japanese prime minister for instance visit gene because the chinese are saying you know. so anti-nuclear complain in japan of which you are part of of course is

sort of a way to whitewash japan's role in world war two and not fair because you can't discuss the bombing without the reasons behind the bombing do you do you see a situation where your prime minister would actually visit nineteen like american presidents hiroshima you know maybe possible. you know. and of course depends environment and context if is. in the core of the context. think you'd be difficult for a prime minister to go but the party's out of context you know it may be he may be able to go. all right governor thank you very much for this interview i wish you all the best a lot and have a nice rest of the same question thank you you thank

. i've played for many clubs over the years so i know the game inside i. the ball isn't only about what happens on the pitch put the final school it's about the passion from the fans it's the age of the superman each kill the narrowness and spending that you're getting twenty million on one player. so it's an experience like nothing else on to because i want to share what i think what i know about the beautiful guy a great one more chance for. peace this minute. ministries police forces and city administrations of many countries depend on one

corporation that does what mike was hoping when the board doesn't perform on the rise of god i'm stunned this is not the guns because i'm not with that on into this it's a must assume them proprietary software you don't know the source code isn't that such a security risk when you have a black box operating the public id microsoft dependency puts governments under a cyber threat and not only that. it will. close off instantly since it is still being the source of the only one who will soon be linked to. the suit who will do this. with. the us this is. the host i'm done with the all business stopped and there was a sting of phone calls in front is up and his cards on the fine. doldrum claims he's the master of the deal but when it comes to

a rant it is the art of no deal trump claims he has made america safer a dubious claim closer to the truth has probably attempted force regime change in iran. across europe municipalities are taking their water supply back from private companies who have it to me to peep out of the holes with simple song alone even if i come to a guess will elsewhere though they invite private companies to take over the utilities many by to tell us that all posts are all actual she got she got booked a while on the come up to go buy been vicious camera because to quote them out of pure corporate uproar over one more year round of the left bill brought up locals are ready to stand up for the basic human right of access to water it's about water but it's also over much more than the. it's about the regis tribute.

video. children out of the rubble reported. in the yemeni capital. new deal with iran which in his own words. ordering american and european companies to stop working with tehran. u.s. politicians warn opioid crisis is escalating and we investigate how much of the blame lies with the way licenses for prescriptions are distributed. an activist who was aggressively. speaking out against the confirmation.