and how's it been in russia's military arsenal since twenty eleven these things have a fifteen year shelf life that can be extended by an extra ten years to the maximum but anything built in eighty six in russia's arsenal would have been destroyed back in twenty eleven they did go on to say that ukraine did have these things in their arsenal the russian ministry of defense also critical of the joint investigative teams findings the fact that a lot of it seem to be based on pictures from social media we want to draw to everyone's attention that the dutch investigators have ignored witness accounts many eyewitnesses saw the tragedy themselves they are not images from social media they are real people who gave their testimonies on record to the european and american media the head of the joint investigation team said that his investigation was entering its final stages however the more information we get from the charity the more questions seem to be thrown up.

investigators concluded the aircraft was hit by a missile from a russian made. the manufacturer's own tests show the missile time used was decommissioned by the russian military years ago. russian investigators claim the missile was fired from a ukrainian held area moscow sent radar data to the netherlands dutch investigators say that information was in a format they couldn't analyze. from. the joint investigation team includes the netherlands belgium australia malaysia and ukraine. the body cooperates with other states but russia's only been allowed limited involvement. was quick to blame russia for the tragedy however the final report does not directly blame russia for the crash.

investigators concluded the book was driven in from russia and returned across the border after the launch that was based on intercepted telephone conversations witness statements photographs and videos posted on social media but the accuracy of such evidence remains questionable. several mainstream media outlets and prominent politicians also didn't hesitate to pin the blame on russia even before the investigation reached any conclusions many reports used questionable evidence from amateur investigators like belling cast who used social networks and open internet sources to try and decipher what happened. the b.b.c. is being accused of bridging its own guidelines and wholly accurate reporting greater manchester police in north west england slammed britain's national

broadcaster after it aired a documentary about the manchester arena terror attack the programme was shown last tuesday on the first anniversary of the bombing and that incident is when a suicide bomber detonated explosives as people were leaving manchester arena after a concert by american pop star ariana grande twenty two people were killed and one hundred thirty nine injured it was the deadliest terror attack in britain since two thousand and five or two is going to your tutor reports. the b.b.c. documentary about the devastating terror attack on the manchester arena has been praised for showing the courageousness of the survivors but the broadcasters inside has left the u.k. police furious greater manchester police chief has issued an open letter condemning what he calls an accurate report to the strongly worded statement has even accused the b.b.c. of reaching its guidelines the programme at least by inference wrongly suggested that officers and stuff why. back on the night of the attack this is untrue and is

no more into the attack on g.n.p. police officers who as the actual footage showed bravely in response to this horrific attack the police did not specify exactly which fragments of the b.b.c. film they believe misrepresented their response on the night of the tragedy however the documentary does contain a lot of interviews with victims who were left frustrated by the police in action here very. very large force of policeman come in but not really any of them will help and they were there to. just secure the premises called police officers with guns pointed towards me had said was that the council to try and save lives was literally going on when you just remember i'm going with i could see was in their decision of course airing criticism isn't an issue as long as manchester police can give their side of the story the catch is they can't do that during an active investigation the b.b.c.

production team were made aware of this but when one just authority saw how the film showed their lack of comments they were far from happy the reference at the end of the programme the g.m.p. refused to cooperate is wholly misleading and was focused only on creating journalistic drama the b.b.c. insists that they did report on the situation on manchester police accurately and say that the caption on the screen only said greater manchester police declined to take part in this film which they say is factually accurate the b.b.c. actually say that it is the chief constables letter that is accurate defending their decision to include those criticisms claiming that they fully adhere to the b.b.c. editorial guidelines this was a responsible accurate and thoughtful documentary which was an important piece of public service broadcasting however as this very public disagreement unfolds according to one former police officer there's good reason. the g.m.p.

is response the treatment that when this is perhaps it may seem harsh but the priority for the put for the place is to try to coax the perpetrator is anybody associated with them i think the reason that the police disengaged from from the conversation the formation of this film was that they sense that it was going to be prejudicial to the general good it's very easy to criticize the wisdom of points but they are actually doing it for the purpose of the public good and to try to keep our syphon arrest people that are doing dangerous horrible when we get things with the battle over whose rights and his wrong likely to continue it's certain that the run between britain's main broadcaster and law enforcement was not the effect a documentary remembering a tragic event intended to have. some liverpool football supporters in kiev for saturday's champions league final have

received less than a warm welcome ukrainian police grabbed and handcuffed a bloodied fan on thursday who had been attacked by masked hooligans in the capital with more details here. what we're seeing is a of course thousands of little four founds who've made their way to kiev in order to watch that champions league final and a number of them were enjoying dinner in the evening last night when they were set upon and actually we can see from some of the tweets of a journalist who was there at the site who describes those attackers as being masked men maybe about twenty of them wearing balaclavas and setting upon these liverpool fans who were just having dinner in a restaurant like a pack of dogs the journalist said that the attack was completely unprovoked those funds just minding their own business ahead of that big game tomorrow evening saying that one of the victims was a fifty year old man who suffered cuts and bruises saying that all of the phones

were in the vicinity of the liverpool fans that is had to run away and we can also hear from some of the eyewitnesses themselves it was terrifying i didn't come here for this i came to watch the football. we were just having dinner they just stormed the place they were throwing glasses and tables it was terrifying we did nothing wrong now during the course of the run of the little fourteen to that final this isn't the first time liverpool fans have been attacked one man was left in a critical condition in hospital when italian fans from roma salted and beat up a number of liverpool fans in liverpool itself when the liverpool fans then went for the return game in rome that was heavy security now this incident hasn't stopped at least one media outlet for blaming russia even though pictures of merge showing the attackers two of the attackers arrested the rest of them fled being hugh craney in t.

shirts belonging to a key football team the paper that's a paper in spain associated to the city of madrid they said it was. of suspected russian origin and many people on twitter quick to correct them and saying that these are well known what wolf belonging to a ukrainian team and so it seems that with the world cup coming up the ante russia campaign or trying to lay the blame where possible on russia just wants to continue . international. it's funny though for the time who by the way will be shown in the recent damilola motorcoach zero zero zero. zero zero.

zero to me really coming from. corn i gotta wonder if you don't i'm not going to work in blood and i'm going out it's going to. be a. story five years ago companies or go public as a way to expand their be a viable corporation you have to meet certain criteria for being a bible corporation and then you're allowed to go public now there are no such criteria so if you're essentially burning through cash and going bankrupt or using

the public marketplace to bail out a losing position. hello welcome to sophie and kill him sophie shevardnadze the chaplain in crisis in spain is back in the spotlight again after local elections and instead. just victory fearing another independence plus what is much reid's next move and what does it all mean for europe i ask spain's former foreign minister may get a statement acting us. reeling from the catalan secession catastrophe madrid is watching over the rest of the province where independence voice is still ringing loud despite a crackdown on separatist leaders with a new kind of government continue on

a course of confrontation can the spanish prime minister afford to restore catalan autonomy and how does the standoff impact on the rest of europe. he lashing latinas thank you very much for being our guest today it's a pleasure well it's a pleasure of mine all right so want to start with castle any happy because it's back in the spotlight again new catalan leader mr toure eyes very pro independence and he offered dialogue to spend his prime minister he wants moderate to return the autonomy to stop direct rule of prominence i mean what are the chances are this is spam it would be oh we're always a spain. i mean we're very. big system in spain but they clearly have had it out of state people don't know what of . the spanish given to the qataris and to all citizens of spain. i mean you mentioned the oldest ok but we didn't. do

a national. i mean you have to talk to respect the spanish prostitution. the spanish law and then to kind of for everybody. but they have to respect their legal system and the. new representative that is being appointed president. of the spawn inclusion on autonomy is not really. to go in the right direction. so we have to see how things evolve and how we can. absolutely necessary but respected the national spanish law so let's go point by point the ruling party saying that if they give catalans back their autonomy that would mean that they will jump right in to the new independence bit not do not go to spawn this. socialist government was formed part of this

government and we give to the cut a lot of nearest star to us for very violence even recognize the qatar nation unfortunately the conservative party the one who is now governing the spain can see that this advanced addressed that there was not a question to shut up and they make an appeal of course to different courts in spain that reject the statute that this socialist government give to the cut out and i think it's one of the options i think at the end of this to give autonomy back to the timing but because i mean we did the spanish what you two should have means and ways to agree understand the needs of certain specific before the cut out and nobody denied that but you have to respect the law so my question is you said it's one of the options to give back the autonomy do you not fear the same thing as the ruling party here is that if the autonomy is given that i've got less it will

push for the referendum one more time and referendum they time their own army now they have looked at me when not given the article one fifty five it's only a certain issue because they are not respected in certain elements of the law but the tanami is that we didn't add up the number of the cut of the question that they were carrying proved to me that what they are asking for but that's of the improving the economy the socialist party or the majority of respondents are in for a while although seed is to be independent they will not. be a cuttle state that's for sure so the question of how we accommodate the nationalities view the national attitude of cattle and we did. much let's say as van show told me for the cutter.